Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Article Collections
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Archives
    • Saved Searches
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Subscriptions
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Feedback
    • Reprints
    • Impact Factor
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Article Collections
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Archives
    • Saved Searches
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Subscriptions
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Feedback
    • Reprints
    • Impact Factor
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Follow JASN on Twitter
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow JASN on RSS
  • Community Forum
Pathophysiology of Renal Disease
You have accessRestricted Access

Intranephron Distribution and Regulation of Endothelin-Converting Enzyme-1 in Cyclosporin A-Induced Acute Renal Failure in Rats

YUSHI NAKAYAMA, HIROSHI NONOGUCHI, SHIGERU KIYAMA, MIKA IKEBE, YUKA TASHIMA, KOHEI SHIMADA, KAZUHIKO TANZAWA and KIMIO TOMITA
JASN March 1999, 10 (3) 562-571;
YUSHI NAKAYAMA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI NONOGUCHI
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHIGERU KIYAMA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIKA IKEBE
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUKA TASHIMA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOHEI SHIMADA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUHIKO TANZAWA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KIMIO TOMITA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Abstract

Abstract. Endothelin-1 (ET-1) is thought to play a significant role in acute renal failure induced by cyclosporin A (CsA). The cDNA sequence encoding endothelin-converting enzyme-1 (ECE-1), which produces the active form of ET-1 from big ET-1, was recently reported. To elicit the role of ECE-1 in the glomerular and tubular dysfunction induced by CsA, the effects of CsA on mRNA and protein expression of ECE-1 in rat kidney and on mRNA expression of prepro-ET-1 and ET A- and B-type receptors in glomeruli were studied. ECE-1 mRNA was detected in glomeruli and in whole nephron segments. ECE-1 mRNA expression was downregulated in all nephron segments at 24 h after CsA injection. Protein levels were also downregulated in glomeruli and in the outer and inner medulla. CsA rapidly increased prepro-ET-1 mRNA expression in glomeruli at 30 to 60 min after injection; this rapid increase was followed by an increase in plasma ET-1 levels. These increases were followed by decreased expression of ECE-1, ET A-type receptor, and ET B-type receptor mRNA at 6 h after injection, and serum creatinine levels were increased at 24 h after CsA injection. It is suggested that downregulation of glomerular and tubular ECE-1 expression may be caused by increased ET-1 synthesis in CsA-induced acute renal failure.

Cyclosporin A (CsA) is widely used as an effective immunosuppressive agent to prevent allograft rejection and to treat several autoimmune diseases. However, the therapeutic potential of CsA is limited by a significant complication, i.e., nephrotoxicity. It is now established that CsA-induced renal dysfunction consists of two phases: the acute phase and the chronic phase. The acute phase is functional and reversible, whereas the chronic phase is irreversible (1). However, the precise mechanisms of CsA nephrotoxicity have not yet been clarified. Recent studies indicated that the renal dysfunction of the acute phase was caused mainly by vasoconstriction (2, 3). It was suggested that some vasoconstrictive factors, including the renin-angiotensin system, the sympathetic nervous system, and thromboxane A2, were involved in this phenomenon (1). Studies have also revealed that endothelin-1 (ET-1), which is known to have strong vasoconstrictive effects, plays an important role in CsA-induced acute renal failure (ARF) (4, 5). CsA injections in rats caused increases in plasma ET-1 levels and decreases in GFR (5, 6). Anti-ET-1 antibody and specific ET receptor antagonists ameliorated glomerular dysfunction induced by CsA (5, 7, 8). Furthermore, other reports showed that CsA increased mRNA expression of prepro-ET-1 (ppET-1) and ET B-type receptor (ETBR) in the renal medulla (9) and that CsA increased ET A-type receptor (ETAR) mRNA expression in the rat aorta and mesenteric artery (10). Taken together, these studies suggest that CsA induces ET-1 and that this induced ET-1 produces vasoconstrictive effects through ETAR and/or ETBR in the kidney, resulting in ARF.

ET-1 is produced from big ET-1 by a unique endoproteolytic cleavage, between Trp21 and Val22, by endothelin-converting enzyme-1 (ECE-1) (11). Structural characterization of ECE-1 and its cDNA sequence has been recently performed (12,13,14). Some isoforms and subtypes of ECE were also found. These were identified as ECE-1α, ECE-1β, and ECE-2 (15, 16). Northern blot analysis revealed that ECE-1 mRNA exists in many tissue types, such as lung, adrenal gland, ovary, testis, liver, and kidney (12, 14). It was recently demonstrated that phosphoramidon, an ECE-1 inhibitor, protected rat kidneys from functional and structural deterioration in a model of ARF (17). The protective effect of phosphoramidon was more significant than that of an ETAR antagonist. The aforementioned studies prompted us to investigate the precise localization and regulation of the ECE-1 gene in the kidney, to explore the mechanisms of ARF induced by CsA.

Materials and Methods

Materials

CsA was a kind gift from Sandoz (Tokyo, Japan). Cremophor was a gift from BASF Japan (Tokyo, Japan). The cDNA synthesis kit, the PCR master kit, PCR DIG (digoxigenin) probe synthesis kit and DIG luminescent detection kit were obtained from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany). Vanadyl ribonucleoside complex (VRC) was purchased from Life Technologies BRL (Gaithersburg, MD), collagenase (type 1) from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), and agarose from Sea Kem (Rockland, ME). Nylon membranes were supplied by Funakoshi (Tokyo, Japan). Immobilon-P membranes were obtained from Millipore (Bedford, MA). The enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection reagents were purchased from Amersham (Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom).

Monitoring of Serum Creatinine, Plasma ET-1, and Blood CsA Levels

Pathogen-free male Sprague Dawley rats (75 to 100 g body wt), which had free access to tap water and standard rat chow, received CsA (50 or 100 mg/kg) through the tail vein. The control group was given cremophor as the vehicle (same amount as for 100 mg/kg CsA). Serum creatinine and plasma ET-1 concentrations were measured using a creatinine assay kit (Wako, Tokyo, Japan) and RIA, respectively. Blood samples were collected at 0, 1, 6, 24, 72, and 168 h after CsA injections. The antibody for the ET-1 RIA cross-reacted 30% with big ET-1, 26% with ET (16-21), and <0.1% with ET(1-20) and ET(1-15) (18). Blood concentrations of CsA were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassays, using cyclosporine-SP·Dainapack (Dainabot, Tokyo, Japan) and a TDX analyzer (Abbott Diagnostics, North Chicago, IL). Whole blood was collected at 3 min and 1, 3, 6, and 24 h after injection (100 mg/kg CsA) and kept frozen at -30°C until analysis.

Microdissection of Glomeruli and Nephron Segments

Male Sprague Dawley rats received CsA (100 mg/kg) through the tail vein. In some experiments, 25, 50, or 100 mg/kg CsA or vehicle was injected through the tail vein. After induction of anesthesia with sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg), the rat aorta was cannulated and the left kidney was perfused with solutions A and B at 0, 1, 6, 24, and 72 h after CsA administration. The left kidney was rapidly microdissected in a Petri dish filled with solution A1 at 4°C, as described previously (19, 20). The following glomeruli and nephron segments were isolated: superficial glomerulus (s-Glm), juxtamedullary glomerulus (j-Glm), proximal convoluted tubule (PCT), proximal straight tubule (PST), medullary thick ascending limb (MAL), cortical thick ascending limb (CAL), cortical collecting duct (CCD), outer medullary collecting duct (OMCD), and inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD). Three to eight glomeruli or 2-mm-long nephron segments were transferred into a new Petri dish, which was filled with solution A, to wash out VRC. After washing, these segments were transferred into an Eppendorf tube, to which 10 μl of solution A2 was added. The composition of solution A was as follows: 130 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM NaH2PO4, 1 mM MgSO4, 1 mM calcium lactate, 2 mM sodium acetate, 5.5 mM glucose, and 10 mM Hepes; the pH was adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH. Solution B was prepared by adding 1 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (Sigma) and 1 mg/ml collagenase (type 1) to solution A. Solution A1 had the same composition as solution A except that 10 mM VRC was added. Solution A2 was also the same as solution A except that >1 U/μl RNase inhibitor (Boehringer Mannheim) and 1 M DL-dithiothreitol (DTT) (Sigma) were added.

Reverse Transcription Coupled with PCR

Reverse transcription (RT)-PCR was performed using a cDNA synthesis kit and a PCR master kit, as described previously (21, 22). Each sample was centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 30 s, and the supernatant was discarded. A solution (3.5 μl) of 2% Triton X-100 with RNase inhibitor and DTT was added, and samples were incubated for 15 min on ice. After incubation, a RT mixture containing random primers was added and samples were incubated at 42°C for 60 min. RT was stopped by heating the sample to 90°C for 5 min, and samples were stored at 4°C until PCR. Specific primers for ppET-1, ECE-1, ETAR, ETBR, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were designed in different exons.

The ppET-1 sense primer was defined by bases 344 to 363 (5′-TCCTGCTCCTCCTTGATGGA-3′) and the antisense primer by bases 795 to 814 (5′-AAACACCACGGGGCTCTGTA-3′). The cDNA PCR amplification product was predicted to be 471 bp in length (23).

The ECE-1 sense primer was defined by bases 676 to 695 (5′-AATATCACAGGACCCTGGGC-3′) and the antisense primer by bases 1045 to 1064 (5′-AGCTCAGCAGCCGTGACTTT-3′). The cDNA PCR amplification product was predicted to be 384 bp in length (12).

The ETAR sense primer was defined by bases 241 to 260 (5′-TGGCTATTGCCCACAGCAGA-3′) and the antisense primer by bases 687 to 706 (5′-TGCTTCTGGGATGGCCAAGA-3′). The cDNA PCR amplification product was predicted to be 466 bp in length (24).

The ETBR sense primer was defined by bases 264 to 283 (5′-TTGTTGGGGGTATGGGGAGA-3′) and the antisense primer by bases 717 to 736 (5′-AAGGGCACCAGCTTGCACAT-3′). The cDNA PCR amplification product was predicted to be 473 bp in length (25).

The GAPDH sense primer was defined by bases 492 to 511 (5′-TCCCTCAAGATTGTCAGCAA-3′) and the antisense primer by bases 780 to 799 (5′-AGATCCACAACGGATACATT-3′). The cDNA PCR amplification product was predicted to be 308 bp in length (26).

Each primer was used at 0.2 pmol/μl, and the total PCR mixture was adjusted to 100 μl. The annealing temperature for ppET-1, ECE-1, ETAR, ETBR, and GAPDH was 62°C. PCR cycles for ppET-1, ECE-1, ETAR, ETBR, and GAPDH were 28, 28, 30, 28 and 28 cycles, respectively.

Competitive PCR

To quantify ECE-1 mRNA expression, competitive PCR was performed (27). The competitor was synthesized by in vitro overlap-extension PCR, according to the protocol described by Higuchi et al. (28, 29). Inner primers (sense and antisense) were designed on the basis of the ECE-1 cDNA sequence of the PCR product, as shown in Figure 1. The inner antisense primer was designed to anneal to ECE-1 cDNA from base 691 to base 710 and to have a 5′ tail complementary to the annealing site of the inner sense primer. The inner sense primer was designed to anneal to ECE-1 cDNA from base 898 to base 917 and to have a 5′-tail complementary to the annealing site of the inner antisense primer. Two sets of PCR were performed sequentially. Short fragments were produced with the first PCR, using a combination of outer sense and inner antisense primers and a combination of outer antisense and inner sense primers. The sequence of the inner antisense primer was 5′-TTCCCCAGCTGGACCATGTATGGAAGTTGTCCTTGGCCCA-3′, and the first PCR product from the combination of outer sense and inner antisense primers was predicted to be 55 bp (the complementary sequence added to the 5′ tail is underlined). The sequence of the inner sense primer was 5′-TGGGCCAAGGACAACTTCCATACATGGTCCAGCTGGGGAA-3′, and the first PCR product from the combination of outer antisense and inner sense primers was predicted to be 187 bp. After the first PCR, the two PCR products were mixed and the second PCR was performed, using 0.6 pmol/μl levels of the outer sense and outer antisense primers. In this step, short fragments that had an overlapping region were recombined, and a DNA competitor of 202 bp, with a deletion from the ECE-1 cDNA, was produced. The second PCR product (the DNA competitor) was purified by removal of all primers using Centricon 30 cartridges (Amicon, Beverly, MA). RT-competitive PCR was performed by adding appropriate concentrations of the competitor to the PCR mixture. All PCR products are shown in Figure 2. After PCR, ECE-1 mRNA expression was quantified by comparison with that of the competitor, in ethidium bromide-stained gels, using a densitometer (Atto, Tokyo, Japan). The ratio of ECE-1 cDNA to competitor cDNA was corrected for differences in molecular weight. To determine the amount of ECE-1 mRNA, a standard curve was produced by coamplification of the competitor with a series of dilutions of known amounts of ECE-1 cDNA.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

. Synthesis of the competitor, according to the procedure described by Higuchi et al. (28,29). Inner primers were designed within the endothelin-converting enzyme-1 (ECE-1) cDNA sequence of the PCR product. Each inner primer (sense and antisense) has sites complementary to ECE-1 cDNA and has a 5′ tail that is complementary to the annealing site of the other inner primer. Two short fragments were produced by the first PCR, using a combination of outer sense and inner antisense primers and a combination of outer antisense and inner sense primers. After the first PCR, the two PCR products were mixed and the second PCR was performed, using outer sense and outer antisense primers. In this step, the 202-bp competitor, which was smaller than ECE-1 cDNA by 187 bp, was produced as shown.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Electrophoresis and ethidium bromide staining of short fragments, the competitor, and ECE-1 cDNA. Lane 1, left short fragment (55 bp); lane 2, right short fragment (187 bp); lane 3, competitor (202 bp); lane 4, ECE-1 cDNA (389 bp); lane 5, competitor (202 bp) plus ECE-1 cDNA (389 bp).

Incubation Study

Twelve to 20 microdissected glomeruli were transferred into Eppendorf tubes filled with solution A containing CsA or vehicle (same amount of cremophor as for CsA). The samples were incubated for 6 h at 37°C and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was discarded, and RT-PCR was performed as described above. Incubation with solution A was considered the control reaction.

Ethidium Bromide Staining

After PCR, 90 μl of the PCR product was transferred into another Eppendorf tube. The PCR product was then precipitated with 4 μl of 5 M NaCl and 200 μl of 100% ethanol. After centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C, the supernatant was discarded and the DNA pellet was resuspended in 8 μl of Tris-acetate/EDTA (TAE) buffer (40 mM Tris, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetate; pH adjusted to 8.3 with acetic acid) and 2 μl of 6× dye solution (0.25% bromphenol blue, 0.25% xylene cyanol FF, and 30% glycerol). A DNA size standard from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) was used as a size marker (50 to 2000 bp). Samples and size marker were electrophoresed in 2% agarose gels in TAE buffer. PCR products were detected by ethidium bromide staining.

Southern Blotting

After ethidium bromide staining, each gel was denatured twice in denaturing solution for 15 min, washed with distilled water, and neutralized twice in neutralizing solution for 15 min. A nylon membrane (Hybond-N+; Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom) was shaken in distilled water for 20 s and in 20× SSC (3 M NaCl, 0.3 M sodium citrate) for 30 to 60 min, until the gel was formed. PCR products were transferred to a nylon membrane in a dish filled with 20× SSC, which was left overnight. After DNA transfer, the membrane was baked in an ultraviolet baking system (M&S Instruments Trading, Vallee, France) and stored at 4°C until Southern hybridization. A nonisotopic DIG-nucleotide detection system was used for Southern hybridization and DNA detection (30). Specific probes for ppET-1, ECE-1, ETAR, ETBR, and GAPDH were produced from each cDNA and the primers, using a PCR DIG probe synthesis kit. Each probe was synthesized according to the instructions accompanying the kit. After prehybridization in Easy Hyb solution (Boehringer Mannheim) for 60 min, the membrane was hybridized with a PCR DIG probe (5 to 25 ng/ml) at 37 to 41°C for 6 to 12 h. Before hybridization, the DIG probe was denatured in boiled water for 10 min and rapidly transferred onto ice. The probe was kept on ice until hybridization. After hybridization, the membrane was washed twice in 2× washing solution (2× SSC, 0.1% SDS) at room temperature and twice in 0.5× washing solution (0.1× SSC, 0.1% SDS) at 68°C. The membrane was then incubated in buffer 1 for 1 min and blocked in buffer 2 for 60 min at room temperature. After blocking, the membrane was hybridized with anti-DIG alkaline phosphatase (AP) in buffer 2 for 30 min. After the membrane was washed in buffer 1 with 0.3% Tween 20, detection of DNA was performed using a DIG luminescence detection kit. The composition of buffers is provided in the DIG luminescence detection kit.

Preparation of Membrane Fractions for Western Blot Analysis

Membrane fractions were prepared from the cortex, the outer medulla, and the inner medulla of rat kidney as described previously (31). Rats were euthanized at 0, 48, and 96 h after CsA injection. Kidneys were rapidly removed and transferred into phosphate-buffered saline on ice. Kidneys were sliced and separated into blocks of cortex, outer medulla, and inner medulla with a razor blade. Each part was minced and homogenized with five strokes at 1000 rpm, using a glass homogenizer, in lysis buffer (0.5 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetate, 5 mM ethylene glycol bis(β-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetate, 2 mM DTT, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 10 μg/ml leupeptin, 5 mM β-glycerophosphate, 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4) at 4°C. The supernatant was collected after centrifugation at 7600 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. Membrane fractions of cortex, outer medulla, and inner medulla were collected by centrifugation of that supernatant at 15,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C. After measurement of protein contents, the membrane fractions were stored at -30°C until use. In some experiments, the kidneys were perfused with solutions A and B, and glomeruli were microdissected. One hundred and fifty glomeruli were collected, transferred into 10 μl of lysis buffer, and stored at -30°C.

Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Western Blot Analysis

Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was performed using the buffers described previously (32). Membrane fractions were mixed with sample buffer (final concentrations of 10% glycerol, 2.3% SDS, 5% β-mercaptoethanol, 65 mM DTT, 0.005% bromphenol blue, and 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8) and running buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS). Samples were denatured for 5 min at 95°C, electrophoresed on polyacrylamide plate gels (4 to 20% gradation; Daiichi Pure Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan), and electrophoretically transferred to membranes (Immobilon-P; Millipore). After being blocked with Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris, 137 mM NaCl, pH 7.6) with polyoxyethylenesorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20) (TBS-T) containing 5% milk and washed with TBS-T, the membranes were incubated overnight with primary antibody to ECE-1 (AEC 27-121; 800× in TBS-T with 5% milk), at 4°C (33). After hybridization, the membranes were washed with TBS-T. Horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-mouse Ig F(ab′)2 fragment (from sheep) was then hybridized for 1 h at room temperature. Membranes were washed again with TBS-T, and specific protein expression was detected using enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting detection reagents. The samples of isolated glomeruli were precipitated with ethanol and resuspended in running buffer and sample buffer. Western blot analysis was then performed as described above.

Statistical Analyses

Results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analyses were performed using the t test, ANOVA, or Kruskal-Wallis analysis, followed by Dunnett or Fisher multiple comparison, as appropriate. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Serum Creatinine Levels

After CsA injection, serum creatinine levels were increased significantly in the 100 mg/kg CsA-treated group at 24 to 72 h but not in the 50 mg/kg CsA-treated group (Figure 3). In the control (vehicle-treated) group, serum creatinine levels did not change. These data revealed that a bolus injection of CsA at 100 mg/kg induced ARF. No remarkable changes in body weight were observed for these groups.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Serum creatinine (S-Cr.) levels after cyclosporin A (CsA) injection (CYA). A high dose of CsA (100 mg/kg) caused increases in serum creatinine levels at 24 to 72 h. •, vehicle; ▴, CsA at 50 mg/kg; ▪, CsA at 100 mg/kg. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 3 to 6). *P < 0.05 versus the vehicle-treated group.

Plasma ET-1 Levels

In the 100 mg/kg CsA-treated group, plasma ET-1 concentrations were significantly increased, from 3.3 ± 0.3 to 7.2 ± 0.2 pg/ml (P < 0.05, n = 3 to 6), at 1 h after CsA injection and returned to basal levels by 24 h (Figure 4). No significant change was observed in the control group.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Plasma ET-1 levels after CsA injection (CYA). CsA induced a rapid increase in plasma ET-1 levels at 1 to 6 h after injection. ▪, vehicle; •, CsA at 100 mg/kg. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 3 to 6). *P < 0.05 versus the vehicle-treated group.

Blood Concentrations of CsA

Blood concentrations of CsA in the 100 mg/kg CsA-treated group were 256 ± 19, 88 ± 6, 30 ± 3, 18 ± 6, and 10 ± 0.9 μM at 3 min, 1 h, 3 h, 6 h, and 24 h, respectively. Data are given as mean ± SEM (n = 3).

Quantification of ECE-1 mRNA by Competitive PCR

For quantification of ECE-1 mRNA, a constant amount of ECE-1 cDNA was coamplified with a series of dilutions of a known concentration of the competitor. There was a linear relationship between the competitor/ECE-1 cDNA ratio and the known concentration of input competitor (Figure 5). To quantify the ECE-1 cDNA in each sample, a series of dilutions of a known concentration of ECE-1 cDNA were coamplified with 3 fg of the competitor. The competitor was added to the PCR mixture at 3 fg/three glomeruli or 2-mm tubule/100 μl of PCR mixture, in a RT-competitive PCR study. As shown in Figures 2 and 5, the competitor was detected to be 202 bp, which was smaller than the ECE-1 cDNA by 187 bp. The ECE-1/competitor cDNA ratio was measured by densitometry, to estimate ECE-1 mRNA expression in the samples. Mean intra- and interassay coefficients of variation for ECE-1 mRNA determinations were 5.1 and 9.5%, respectively.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Coamplification of ECE-1 cDNA with a series of dilutions of the competitor. A constant amount of ECE-1 cDNA was coamplified with various concentrations of the competitor. The competitor concentrations added were 0, 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 3.0, 6.0, and 6.0 fg/PCR tube in lanes 1 to 7 (left to right), respectively. ECE-1 cDNA was not added in lane 7. This graph shows the linear relationship between the competitor/ECE-1 mRNA ratio and the concentration of the competitor.

Effects of CsA on ECE-1 mRNA Expression in Glomeruli

The effects of three doses of CsA on ECE-1 mRNA expression in glomeruli were examined. CsA at 50 and 100 mg/kg caused significant decreases in ECE-1 mRNA expression, whereas 25 mg/kg CsA did not (Figure 6). Because 50 mg/kg CsA did not increase serum creatinine levels (Figure 3), we used 100 mg/kg CsA in the following study.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Effects of CsA (CyA) on ECE-1 mRNA expression in glomeruli. ECE-1 mRNA expression in glomeruli was examined 24 h after CsA injection. CsA at 50 and 100 mg/kg but not 25 mg/kg caused a significant decrease in ECE-1 mRNA expression in glomeruli. *P < 0.05 versus without CsA.

Microlocalization of ECE-1 mRNA along the Nephron

Microdissection and RT-competitive PCR revealed the expression of ECE-1 mRNA along the nephron segments (Figure 7). In control rats, ECE-1 mRNA expression was detected in all tested nephron segments, i.e., superficial glomerulus, juxtamedullary glomerulus, PCT, PST, medullary thick ascending limb, cortical thick ascending limb, cortical collecting duct, OMCD, and IMCD. High levels of expression of ECE-1 mRNA were detected in the superficial glomerulus, juxtamedullary glomerulus, and PST, moderate levels of expression were observed in distal tubules (from the medullary thick ascending limb to the IMCD), and low levels of expression were detected in PCT. At 24 h after injection of 100 mg/kg CsA, ECE-1 mRNA levels were significantly decreased in these nephron segments, except in PCT and OMCD. The largest reduction of ECE-1 mRNA (by 86%) was observed in PST. ECE-1 mRNA expression was decreased by one-half in other segments. GAPDH mRNA did not change significantly in these segments.

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Expression of ECE-1 mRNA along the nephron segments under basal conditions and 24 h after CsA injection. (Top) Typical example of ethidium bromide-stained gel. (Bottom) ECE-1 mRNA expression quantified by reverse transcription (RT)-competitive PCR. s-Glm, superficial glomerulus; j-Glm, juxtamedullary glomerulus; PCT, proximal convoluted tubule; PST, proximal straight tubule; MAL, medullary thick ascending limb; CAL, cortical thick ascending limb; CCD, cortical collecting duct; OMCD, outer medullary collecting duct; IMCD, inner medullary collecting duct. -, control; +, CsA (CYA) injection; ▪, basal condition; □, after CsA injection. Glm, glomerulus. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5). *P < 0.05 versus control.

Time-Course Study

The time course of the effect of CsA injection on ppET-1, ECE-1, ETAR, and ETBR mRNA expression in glomeruli was examined. ppET-1 mRNA levels were increased at 30 to 60 min and returned to control levels after 6 h (Figure 8). ECE-1 and ETAR mRNA levels were decreased at 1 to 24 h and returned to control levels at 72 h. ETBR mRNA levels were decreased at 6 h and recovered to control levels at 72 h. GAPDH mRNA levels did not change during the experimental period. These data showed that the rapid and transient increase in ppET-1 levels was followed by decreases in ECE-1, ETAR, and ETBR mRNA levels.

Figure 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 8.

Time course of mRNA expression of prepro-ET-1 (ppET-1) (A), ECE-1 (B), ET A-type receptor (ETAR) (C), and ET B-type receptor (ETBR) (D) after CsA injection in glomeruli. mRNA expression at each point was normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA expression and was shown as a ratio with the control (zero time) level. ▪, superficial glomeruli; •, juxtamedullary glomeruli. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5 or 6). *P < 0.05 versus zero time.

The time course of ECE-1 mRNA expression after CsA injection was also investigated by RT-competitive PCR. This study showed that ECE-1 mRNA levels were significantly decreased (by 64%) in glomeruli at 6 h after CsA injection (Figure 9).

Figure 9.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 9.

Time course of ECE-1 mRNA expression in glomeruli (Glm) after CsA injection (CYA). ECE-1 mRNA expression was examined using RT-competitive PCR. (Top) Typical example of ethidium bromide-stained gel. (Bottom) Changes in ECE-1 mRNA expression, quantified using a standard curve. ECE-1 mRNA expression in glomeruli showed significant downregulation at 6 to 24 h after CsA injection. Values are mean ± SEM (n = 5). *P < 0.05 versus zero time.

Incubation Study

To reveal the direct effect of CsA on ECE-1 mRNA expression in glomeruli, microdissected glomeruli were incubated with CsA or vehicle for 6 h at 37°C. Because the blood concentration of CsA decreased rapidly after injection (see above), isolated glomeruli were incubated with low concentrations of CsA (0 to 20 μM) or vehicle. ECE-1 mRNA levels were significantly decreased by incubation with 20 μM CsA. GAPDH mRNA levels did not change after incubation with CsA or cremophor (Figure 10).

Figure 10.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 10.

Effects of CsA (CYA) on ECE-1 mRNA expression in glomeruli in vitro. Twelve to 20 glomeruli were incubated with CsA or vehicle (cremophor) for 6 h at 37°C. (Top) Typical example of ethidium bromide-stained gel. Lane 1, control; lane 2, vehicle at 10 μM; lane 3, vehicle at 20 μM; lane 4, CsA at 10 μM; lane 5, CsA at 20 μM. (Bottom) Bar graph showing the ratio of ECE-1 mRNA expression to the control level. ▪, with cremophor (vehicle); □, with CsA; 0, control (with solution A only); 10 and 20, concentrations of CsA or vehicle (μM). Values are mean ± SEM (n = 3). *P < 0.05 versus vehicle.

Western Blot Analysis

A specific monoclonal antibody against ECE-1 was used to demonstrate ECE-1 protein expression. As shown in Figure 11A, ECE-1 protein was expressed in the renal cortex, the outer medulla, and the inner medulla under basal conditions. The ECE-1 protein levels in the cortex did not change after CsA injection but those in the outer and inner medulla were decreased at 48 and 96 h after the injection. Although ECE-1 protein levels did not change in the cortex, levels were markedly decreased in isolated glomeruli at 48 and 96 h after CsA injection (Figure 11B).

Figure 11.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 11.

(A) ECE-1 protein expression in the cortex (CX), the outer medulla (OM), and the inner medulla (IM) after CsA injection. Membrane fraction protein (33 μg) was loaded in each lane for sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western blot analysis. (Top) Typical example of ethidium bromide-stained gel. (Bottom) Results from four experiments. (B) ECE-1 protein expression in glomeruli. One hundred-fifty isolated glomeruli were used for each lane. (Top) Typical example of ethidium bromidestained gel. (Bottom) Results from three experiments. *P < 0.05 versus time 0.

Discussion

In this study, we demonstrated the microlocalization of ECE-1 mRNA along the nephron segments. ECE-1 mRNA was detected in glomeruli and whole nephron segments. Administration of 100 mg/kg CsA caused a significant decrease in ECE-1 mRNA expression in all nephron segments except the PCT and OMCD after 24 h. The time-course study in glomeruli revealed that CsA decreased ECE-1 mRNA expression at 1 to 24 h and expression returned to control levels by 72 h after the injection. In glomeruli, CsA caused a rapid increase in ppET-1 mRNA expression at 30 to 60 min, and an increase in plasma ET-1 concentrations ensued 1 to 6 h after CsA administration. The levels of ECE-1, ETAR, and ETBR mRNA then decreased. Although plasma ET-1 concentrations returned to control levels 24 h after CsA injection, the increase in serum creatinine levels that occurred at 24 h lasted until 72 h after the injection. These data showed that 100 mg/kg CsA caused rapid increases in ppET-1 mRNA, plasma ET-1, and serum creatinine levels, which were followed by decreases in ECE-1, ETAR, and ETBR mRNA expression.

We previously reported substantial synthesis of ET-1 and ppET-1 mRNA expression in rat glomeruli and IMCD (34). The data presented here showed that ECE-1 mRNA was detected not only in glomeruli and IMCD but also in other proximal and distal nephron segments. Quantitative PCR revealed that ECE-1 mRNA expression was more abundant in glomeruli and PST than in the other nephron segments. Therefore, the localization of ECE-1 mRNA expression in nephron segments is slightly different from that of ET-1 synthesis, suggesting the possibility that cell surface ECE-1 may also produce ET-1, using exogenous big ET-1. There is also the possibility that there is a small amount of ET-1 synthesis, which could not be detected in the previous study, in nephron segments other than glomeruli and IMCD.

It is known that CsA causes increases in circulating plasma ET-1 levels and renal dysfunction (1,3,5,35,36). It was also reported that ET-1 plays an important role in several models of acute renal dysfunction (5,6,7,8,37,38,39,40). However, those reports documented only early hemodynamic changes, and it is questionable whether such changes caused sustained renal failure. In this study, 100 mg/kg but not 50 mg/kg CsA increased serum creatinine levels at 24 h after the injection, although both 50 and 100 mg/kg CsA caused significant decreases in ECE-1 mRNA expression in glomeruli. Therefore, we used 100 mg/kg CsA to investigate ARF caused by CsA in this study. CsA at 100 mg/kg caused an increase in circulating plasma ET-1 levels at 1 to 6 h after the administration. Subsequently, serum creatinine levels were increased at 24 h and remained at high levels throughout the experimental period. Therefore, an increase in ET-1 synthesis is thought to be crucial for the production of acute renal dysfunction by CsA in our model, as also noted in other reports.

CsA has also been shown to regulate ligand and receptor genes. CsA selectively increased ppET-1 and ETBR mRNA expression in the renal medulla (9). CsA administered for 4 wk increased ETAR mRNA expression in the rat aorta and mesenteric artery (10). In our study, ppET-1 mRNA was significantly increased, whereas both ETAR and ETBR mRNA expression in glomeruli was decreased after CsA injection. The increase in plasma ET-1 levels was preceded by the increase in ppET-1 mRNA levels in glomeruli, whereas ECE-1 mRNA and protein expression in glomeruli and nephron segments was downregulated by CsA injection. Therefore, the increase in plasma ET-1 levels seems to be caused by activation of the ppET-1 gene but not by the ECE-1 gene or protein. It is not clear whether this upregulation of ppET-1 mRNA was induced by CsA itself or other factors, such as hypoxia caused by vasoconstriction (41).

Our data suggest either that the increase in ET-1 synthesis induced by CsA caused the vasoconstriction or that CsA itself caused the vasoconstriction, which subsequently increased ET-1 synthesis. Therefore, to determine whether vasoconstriction is necessary for the downregulation of ECE-1, the effect of CsA on ECE-1 mRNA expression was investigated using in vitro incubations of isolated glomeruli. Incubation of glomeruli with 20 μM CsA significantly decreased ECE-1 mRNA expression in the absence of vasoconstriction. It is of great interest that ECE-1 mRNA and protein levels were decreased 6 to 24 h and 48 to 96 h after CsA injection, respectively, although ppET-1 mRNA expression in glomeruli and plasma ET-1 levels were rapidly increased. Naomi et al. (42) reported that ET-1 reduced ECE-1 mRNA and protein expression through ETBR in pulmonary endothelial cells. Taken together, these data suggest that CsA reduced ECE-1 mRNA expression probably through the induction of ET-1 by some direct or indirect mechanisms other than vasoconstriction. ET-1 is known to cause autoinduction via ETBR in mesangial and endothelial cells (43,44,45), leading to prolonged deterioration of renal function produced by increased levels of ET-1 itself. In our study, ECE-1, ETAR, and ETBR mRNA expression was downregulated after increases in ppET-1 expression and plasma ET-1 levels. Without downregulation of ECE-1 expression, autoinduction of ET-1 and further deterioration of renal function might have occurred.

In summary, microdissection coupled with RT-competitive PCR revealed the microlocalization of ECE-1 mRNA in rat nephron segments, including glomeruli, proximal tubules, medullary and cortical thick ascending limbs, cortical collecting ducts, OMCD, and IMCD. An early increase in ppET-1 mRNA expression in glomeruli after CsA injection was followed by an increase in plasma ET-1 levels and then by an increase in serum creatinine levels. ECE-1, ETAR, and ETBR mRNA and ECE-1 protein levels were downregulated in glomeruli after injection of CsA. ECE-1 mRNA expression was also downregulated in all nephron segments except PCT and OMCD. These data suggest that downregulation of glomerular and tubular ECE-1 expression may be caused by increased ET-1 synthesis, rather than vasoconstriction, in CsA-induced ARF.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture in Japan (09470238, 09557091, 08671290, 08671291, and 07457242) and Grants-in-Aid for the Development of Scientific Research (B1, 05557053, and 05557054), and Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research. We thank Sandoz for providing CsA and BASF Japan for providing cremophor. We also thank Miss S. Chaen for measuring blood concentrations of CsA.

Footnotes

  • American Society of Nephrology

  • This work was presented in part at the 28th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Nephrology, San Diego, CA, November 1995, and has been published in abstract form (J Am Soc Nephrol 6: 1001a, 1995).

  • © 1999 American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    Myers BD: Cyclosporine nephrotoxicity. Kidney Int30 : 964-974,1986
  2. ↵
    Murray BM, Paller MS, Ferris TF: Effect of cyclosporine administration on renal hemodynamics in conscious rats. Kidney Int 28: 767-774,1985
  3. ↵
    Sullivan BA, Hak LJ, Finn WF: Cyclosporine nephrotoxicity: Studies in laboratory animals. Transplant Proc17 : 145-154,1985
  4. ↵
    Yanagisawa M, Kurihara H, Kimura S, Tomobe Y, Kobayashi M, Mitsui Y, Yazaki Y, Goto K, Masaki T: A novel potent vasoconstrictor peptide produced by vascular endothelial cells. Nature (Lond)332 : 411-415,1988
  5. ↵
    Kon V, Sugiura M, Inagami T, Harvie BR, Ichikawa I, Hoover RL: Role of endothelin in cyclosporine-induced glomerular dysfunction. Kidney Int 37: 1487-1491,1990
  6. ↵
    Kon V, Badr KF: Biological actions and pathophysiologic significance of endothelin in the kidney. Kidney Int40 : 1-12,1991
  7. ↵
    Kivlighn SD, Gabel RA, Siegl PKS: Effects of BQ-123 on renal function and acute cyclosporine-induced renal dysfunction. Kidney Int 45: 131-136,1994
  8. ↵
    Fogo A, Hellings SE, Inagami T, Kon V: Endothelin receptor antagonism is protective in in vivo acute cyclosporine toxicity.Kidney Int 42:770 -774, 1992
  9. ↵
    Iwasaki S, Homma T, Kon V: Site specific regulation in the kidney of endothelin and its receptor subtypes by cyclosporine. Kidney Int 45: 592-597,1994
  10. ↵
    Takeda Y, Miyamori I, Wu P, Yoneda T, Furukawa K, Takeda R: Effects of an endothelin receptor antagonist in rats with cyclosporine-induced hypertension. Hypertension (Dallas) 26:932 -936, 1995
  11. ↵
    Opgenorth TJ, Wu-Wong JR, Shiosaki K: Endothelin-converting enzymes. FASEB J 6:2653 -2659, 1992
  12. ↵
    Shimada K, Takahashi M, Tanzawa K: Cloning and functional expression of endothelin-converting enzyme from rat endothelial cells.J Biol Chem 269:18275 -18278, 1994
  13. ↵
    Shimada K, Matsushita Y, Wakabayashi K, Takahashi M, Matsubara A, Iijima Y, Tanzawa K: Cloning and functional expression of human endothelin-converting enzyme cDNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun207 : 807-812,1995
  14. ↵
    Xu D, Emoto N, Giaid A, Slaughter C, Kaw S, de Wit D, Yanagisawa M: ECE-1: A membrane-bound metalloprotease that catalyzes the proteolytic activation of big endothelin-1. Cell 78:473 -485, 1994
  15. ↵
    Shimada K, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Tanzawa K: Identification and characterization of two isoforms of an endothelin-converting enzyme-1.FEBS Lett 371:140 -144, 1995
  16. ↵
    Emoto N, Yanagisawa M: Endothelin-converting enzyme-2 is a membrane-bound, phosphoramidon-sensitive metalloprotease with acidic pH optimum. J Biol Chem 270:15262 -15268, 1995
  17. ↵
    Bird JE, Webb ML, Wasserman AJ, Liu EC, Giancarli MR, Durham SK: Comparison of novel ETA receptor antagonist and phosphoramidon in renal ischemia. Pharmacology 50:9 -23, 1995
  18. ↵
    Ando K, Hirata Y, Shichiri M, Emori T, Marumo F: Presence of immunoreactive endothelin in human plasma. FEBS Lett245 : 164-166,1989
  19. ↵
    Nonoguchi H, Knepper MA, Manganiello VC: Effects of atrial natriuretic factor on cyclic guanosine monophosphate and cyclic adenosine monophosphate accumulation in microdissected nephron segments from rats.J Clin Invest 79:500 -507, 1987
  20. ↵
    Ujiie K, Nonoguchi H, Tomita K, Marumo F: Effects of ANF on cGMP synthesis in inner medullary collecting duct subsegments of rats. Am J Physiol 259:F535 -F538, 1990
  21. ↵
    Terada Y, Moriyama T, Martin BM, Knepper MA, Garcia-Perez A: RT-PCR micro-localization of mRNA for guanylyl cyclase-coupled ANF receptor in rat kidney. Am J Physiol 261:F1080 -F1087, 1991
  22. ↵
    Disashi T, Nonoguchi H, Iwaoka T, Naomi S, Nakayama Y, Shimada K, Tanzawa K, Tomita K: Endothelin converting enzyme-1 gene expression in the kidney of spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension (Dallas) 30:1591 -1597, 1997
  23. ↵
    Sasaki T, Yanagisawa M, Inoue A, Ryan US, Kimura S, Mitsui Y, Goto K, Masaki T: cDNA cloning, sequence analysis and tissue distribution of rat preproendothelin-1 mRNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun175 : 44-47,1991
  24. ↵
    Lin HY, Kaji EH, Winkel GK, Ives HE, Lodish HF: Cloning and functional expression of a vascular smooth muscle endothelin-1 receptor.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:3185 -3189, 1991
  25. ↵
    Sakurai T, Yanagisawa M, Takuwa Y, Miyazaki H, Kimura S, Goto K, Masaki T: Cloning of a cDNA encoding a non-isopeptide-selective subtype of the endothelin receptor. Nature (Lond) 348:732 -735, 1990
  26. ↵
    Fort P, Marty L, Picchaczyk M, Sabrouly SE, Dani C, Jeanteur P, Blanchard JM: Various rat adult tissues express only one major mRNA species from the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase multigene family.Nucleic Acids Res 13:1431 -1442, 1985
  27. ↵
    Gilliland G, Perrin S, Blanchard K, Bunn HF: Analysis of cytokine mRNA and DNA: Detection and quantitation by competitive polymerase chain reaction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:2725 -2729, 1990
  28. ↵
    Higuchi R, Barbara K, Randall SK: A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: Study of protein and DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res16 : 7351-7367,1988
  29. ↵
    Higuchi R: Recombinant PCR. In: PCR Protocols, edited by Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, San Diego, Academic Press, 1990, pp 177-183
  30. ↵
    Engler-Blum G, Meier M, Frank J, Muller GA: Reduction of background problems in nonradioactive Northern and Southern blot analyses enables higher sensitivity than 32P-based hybridizations. Anal Biochem 210: 235-244,1993
  31. ↵
    Nonoguchi H, Owada A, Kobayashi N, Takayama M, Terada Y, Koike J, Ujiie K, Marumo F, Sakai T, Tomita K: Immunohisto-chemical localization of V2 vasopressin receptor along the nephron and functional role of luminal V2 receptor in terminal inner medullary collecting ducts. J Clin Invest 96: 1768-1778,1995
  32. ↵
    Laemmli UK: Cleavage of structural protein during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature (Lond)227 : 680-685,1970
  33. ↵
    Takahashi M, Fukuda K, Shimada K, Barnes K, Turner AJ, Ikeda M, Koike H, Yamamoto Y, Tanzawa K: Localization of rat endothelin-converting enzyme to vascular endothelial cells and some secretory cells. Biochem J 311: 657-665,1995
  34. ↵
    Ujiie K, Terada Y, Nonoguchi H, Shinohara M, Tomita K, Marumo F: Messenger RNA expression and synthesis of endothelin-1 along rat nephron segments. J Clin Invest 90:1043 -1048, 1992
  35. ↵
    Whiting PH, Thomson AW, Blair JT, Simpson JG: Experimental cyclosporine A nephrotoxicity. Br J Exp Pathol63 : 88-94,1982
  36. ↵
    Thomson AW, Whiting PH, Cameron ID, Lessels SE, Simpson JG: A toxicological study in rats receiving immunotherapeutic doses of cyclosporine A. Transplantation 31:121 -124, 1981
  37. ↵
    Firth JD, Ratcliffe PJ, Raine AEG, Ledingham JGG: Endothelin: An important factor in acute renal failure? Lancet19 : 1179-1181,1988
  38. ↵
    Tomita K, Ujiie K, Nakanishi T, Tamura S, Matsuda O, Ando K, Shichiri M, Hirata Y, Marumo F: Plasma endothelin levels in patients with acute renal failure [Abstract]. N Engl J Med321 : 1127,1989
  39. ↵
    Kon V, Yoshioka T, Fogo A, Ichikawa I: Glomerular actions of endothelin in vivo. J Clin Invest83 : 1762-1767,1989
  40. ↵
    Perico N, Dadan J, Remuzzi G: Endothelin mediates the renal vasoconstriction induced by cyclosporine in the rat. J Am Soc Nephrol 1: 76-83,1990
  41. ↵
    Kourembanas S, Marsden PA, McQuillan LP, Faller DV: Hypoxia induces endothelin gene expression and secretion in cultured human endothelium.J Clin Invest 88:1054 -1057, 1991
  42. ↵
    Naomi S, Iwaoka T, Disashi T, Inoue J, Kanesaka Y, Tokunaga H, Tomita K: Endothelin-1 inhibits endothelin-converting enzyme-1 expression in cultured rat pulmonary endothelial cells. Circulation97 : 234-236,1998
  43. ↵
    Iwasaki S, Homma T, Matsuda Y, Kon V: Endothelin receptor subtype B mediates autoinduction of endothelin-1 in rat mesangial cells. J Biol Chem 270: 6997-7003,1995
  44. ↵
    Saito S, Hirata Y, Imai T, Marumo F: Autocrine regulation of the endothelin-1 gene in rat endothelial cells. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 26[Suppl 3]:S84 -S87, 1995
  45. ↵
    Saijonmaa O, Naiman T, Fyhrquist F: Endothelin-1 stimulates its own synthesis in human endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 188: 286-291,1992
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 10 (3)
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 10, Issue 3
1 Mar 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in JASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Intranephron Distribution and Regulation of Endothelin-Converting Enzyme-1 in Cyclosporin A-Induced Acute Renal Failure in Rats
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Intranephron Distribution and Regulation of Endothelin-Converting Enzyme-1 in Cyclosporin A-Induced Acute Renal Failure in Rats
YUSHI NAKAYAMA, HIROSHI NONOGUCHI, SHIGERU KIYAMA, MIKA IKEBE, YUKA TASHIMA, KOHEI SHIMADA, KAZUHIKO TANZAWA, KIMIO TOMITA
JASN Mar 1999, 10 (3) 562-571;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Intranephron Distribution and Regulation of Endothelin-Converting Enzyme-1 in Cyclosporin A-Induced Acute Renal Failure in Rats
YUSHI NAKAYAMA, HIROSHI NONOGUCHI, SHIGERU KIYAMA, MIKA IKEBE, YUKA TASHIMA, KOHEI SHIMADA, KAZUHIKO TANZAWA, KIMIO TOMITA
JASN Mar 1999, 10 (3) 562-571;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Reversal of Glomerulosclerosis after High-Dose Enalapril Treatment in Subtotally Nephrectomized Rats
  • Expression of Podocyte-Associated Molecules in Acquired Human Kidney Diseases
  • Protease-Activated Receptor-2 Expression in IgA Nephropathy: A Potential Role in the Pathogenesis of Interstitial Fibrosis
Show more Pathophysiology of Renal Disease

Cited By...

  • Activation of Epithelial Sodium Channels by Prostasin in Xenopus Oocytes
  • Upregulation of the Secretory-Type Na+/K+/2Cl--Cotransporter in the Kidney by Metabolic Acidosis and Dehydration in Rats
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Annual Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Resources
  • Editorial Fellowship Program
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • JASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About JASN
  • JASN Email Alerts
  • JASN Key Impact Information
  • JASN Podcasts
  • JASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1046-6673 Online ISSN - 1533-3450

Powered by HighWire