Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Article Collections
    • Archives
    • Kidney Week Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Fellowship
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Impact Factor
    • Reprints
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • ASN Publications
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • ASN Publications
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Article Collections
    • Archives
    • Kidney Week Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Fellowship
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Impact Factor
    • Reprints
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Follow JASN on Twitter
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow JASN on RSS
  • Community Forum
EDITORIAL
You have accessRestricted Access

The Art of Counting

KIRSTEN M. MADSEN
JASN May 1999, 10 (5) 1124-1125; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.V1051124
KIRSTEN M. MADSEN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Fifteen years have passed since the publication of an unusual article that was to change the science and methods of stereology forever. The article was titled, “The Unbiased Estimation of Number and Size of Arbitrary Particles Using the Disector.” It was published in the Journal of Microscopy, one of the leading journals in the field of biologic application of stereology (1). It was written by a certain D. C. Sterio, a name that later turned out to be a nom de plume for a now well known stereologist. The article described a new stereologic method or counting tool called the “disector” that could be used to obtain unbiased estimates of the number of objects in a tissue. Since this seminal publication by Sterio in 1984, a relatively small group of investigators has developed and described a large number of new stereologic tools that have revolutionized the world of stereology. These “new” stereologic methods are the focus of the review article by Jens Nyengaard in this issue of the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (2).?

             Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Illustration of systematic, uniformly random sampling of a rat kidney using a slicing device with parallel and equidistantly spaced razor blades. The systematic component is the decision to choose a sampling periodicity of 3. The random sampling component is to look up a random number between 1 and 3; in this case #1. The arrows indicate the slices (1, 4, 7, 10, and 13) that were sampled using this procedure. (Courtesy of Thomas F. Bendtsen and Jens R. Nyengaard).

A considerable number of manuscripts submitted to the Journal include quantitative morphologic data based on counts and measurements of profiles observed in tissue sections or projected images. Quite often these so-called morphometric analyses are based on assumptions and approximations that cannot be verified and therefore may be incorrect. Moreover, many manuscripts have insufficient descriptions of the sampling procedures and statistical analyses in the Methods section, or it is apparent that inappropriate (biased) sampling techniques were used. Because of the availability today of many new and some old stereologic methods and tools that are not based on undeterminable assumptions about size, shape, or orientation of structures, the Editors of the Journal believe that it is time to dispense with the old, often biased, model-based stereology and change the way we count and measure.

The article by Jens Nyengaard in this issue of the Journal describes the application of stereologic methods in the biologic sciences with particular emphasis on kidney research. The review focuses on the newer stereologic methods that are free of assumptions regarding size and shape, but also includes a discussion of important older design-based methods.

Stereologic methods are used to obtain unbiased quantitative estimates of structures from profiles in tissue sections or projections of sections. Because these methods are based on distinct mathematical and statistical principles, careful experimental design and the use of unbiased sampling procedures are essential. Therefore, one section of the article is devoted to the discussion of proper sampling techniques. Another section discusses the new unbiased counting methods and describes the use of the disector to obtain unbiased estimates of numbers of structures from real or optical sections. Because of the importance of obtaining total numbers, volumes, or surface areas as opposed to densities of structures, a special section is devoted to the description of the Cavalieri principle and its use for the estimation of total volume, which can subsequently be used to calculate absolute values from estimated densities. Finally, a special section is devoted to the estimation of error variance with the purpose of identifying the sampling step with the greatest variance. Analysis of error variances should enable the investigator to optimize sampling efficiency and thus, “do more less well,” which would ultimately also result in greater cost effectiveness.

With the review article by Jens Nyengaard in this issue, the Editors of the Journal of the American Society of Nephrology introduce a new policy that will potentially affect all quantitative morphologic studies submitted to the Journal. Beginning with this issue, we request that appropriate stereologic methods be used to quantify structures on tissue sections in all manuscripts submitted to the Journal. In particular, precise descriptions of sampling procedures and statistical analyses will be required. Authors will be expected to be familiar with the new stereologic tools, and unbiased counting rules should be used whenever possible. An example of the use of appropriate stereologic methods, including some of the newer tools such as the disector, can be found in the article by Cobo et al. published in this issue of the Journal (3).

To establish a uniform standard in the Journal, we will attempt to have all papers containing quantitative morphology reviewed by a referee with expertise in stereology. In situations in which it may be difficult or impossible to use unbiased sampling and counting methods, the authors will be requested to provide adequate justification and demonstrate that they are aware of the potential problems and limitations associated with the use of biased sampling and counting procedures.

We would like to point out that other journals, particularly in the field of neuroscience, have established similar policies that emphasize the importance of using unbiased counting methods. It is time to do the same in nephrology.

Footnotes

  • American Society of Nephrology

  • © 1999 American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    Sterio DC: The unbiased estimation of number and size of arbitrary particles using the disector. J Microsc134 : 127-136,1984
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Nyengaard JR: Stereological methods and their application in kidney research. J Am Soc Nephrol 10:x -x, 1999
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    Cobo A, Lopez JM, Carbajo E, Santos F, Alvarez J, Fernandez M, Weruaga A: Growth plate cartilage formation and resorption are differentially depressed in growth retarded uremic rats. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: x-x,1999
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 10 (5)
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 10, Issue 5
1 May 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in JASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Art of Counting
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Art of Counting
KIRSTEN M. MADSEN
JASN May 1999, 10 (5) 1124-1125; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V1051124

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The Art of Counting
KIRSTEN M. MADSEN
JASN May 1999, 10 (5) 1124-1125; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V1051124
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • A View on Cathepsin C as a Target for Therapy in AAV
  • Further Evidence for the Mucosal Origin of Pathogenic IgA in IgA Nephropathy
  • Clonal Hematopoiesis and CKD Progression
Show more Editorial

Cited By...

  • Stereology: a bridge to a better understanding of lung structure and function
  • There is no rationale to still rely on outdated, biased tools for quantitative morphology in pulmonary research
  • Glomerular Number and Function Are Influenced by Spontaneous and Induced Low Birth Weight in Rats
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Annual Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Resources
  • Editorial Fellowship Program
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • JASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About JASN
  • JASN Email Alerts
  • JASN Key Impact Information
  • JASN Podcasts
  • JASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe to ASN Journals

© 2022 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1046-6673 Online ISSN - 1533-3450

Powered by HighWire