Abstract
Abstract. Tested was the hypothesis that high-dose omega (ω)-3 fatty acids will be more effective than low-dose ω-3 fatty acids in preserving renal function in patients with severe IgA nephropathy in a randomized, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial. Patients were assigned to receive either high-dose fatty acids (EPA 3.76 g and DHA 2.94 g) or low-dose fatty acids (EPA 1.88 g and DHA 1.47 g), both given daily in a highly purified ethyl ester concentrate (Omacor). Patients were treated for a minimum of 2 yr in the absence of a treatment failure or until study closure (January 2000). Seventy-three patients were enrolled in the trial with two ranges of elevated serum creatinine (SC): 63 patients (86%) with a range of 1.5 to 2.9 mg/dl and 10 patients (14%) with a range of 3.0 to 4.9 mg/dl. The primary end point, within-patient rates of change in SC (2-yr minimum), showed an annualized median increase in SC of 0.08 mg/dl per yr in the low-dose group and 0.10 mg/dl per yr in the high-dose group (P = 0.51). Patients in the lower entry SC range had lower SC slopes (P = 0.02) and less end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (P < 0.001) compared with those in the higher entry SC range. No patient died, and 18 patients developed ESRD: 10 in the low-dose group and 8 in the high-dose group (P = 0.56). SC slopes were significantly lower, and survival free of ESRD was significantly higher (both, P = 0.04) in the 63 Omacor-treated patients compared with the 22 placebo-treated patients from our previously reported clinical trial in which both groups had a similar level of renal impairment. Patient compliance was excellent, and no serious adverse events were noted. Low-dose and high-dose ω-3 fatty acids were similar in slowing the rate of renal function loss in high-risk patients with IgA nephropathy, particularly those with moderately advanced disease.
We previously reported that omega (ν)-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids significantly reduced renal disease progression in patients with idiopathic IgA nephropathy in a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized, 2-yr clinical trial (1). In a follow-up observational study extending beyond the 2-yr trial, long-term treatment with ω-3 fatty acids retarded renal progression consistent with the findings in the 2-yr trial (2). Both the primary end point—an increase in serum creatinine of 50% or more—and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were substantially lower in the fatty acid-treated group in observations extending 6.4 yr from randomization to last follow-up. Despite these encouraging results, in large cohort studies of patients with IgA nephropathy as many as 30 to 50% develop ESRD over a 20-yr period after diagnosis (3,4,5). More progressive disease relates to higher prevalence rates of well-recognized clinical markers of disease progression in patients with hypertension, reduced renal function and abnormal proteinuria at diagnosis, and high glomerular histopathologic scores in their renal biopsy specimens (5). In 1995, in a new study, we proposed the hypothesis that high-dose ω-3 fatty acids will be more effective than low-dose ω-3 fatty acids in preserving renal function in patients with IgA nephropathy who are at high risk for developing progressive renal disease. We designed a prospective, randomized, comparative two-dose study of ω-3 fatty acids using a highly purified ethyl ester concentrate of ω-3 fatty acids, and we report here the effects of treatment on the renal outcome of patients with severe IgA nephropathy who participated in the trial.
Materials and Methods
Study Design
The study was a randomized, open-label, parallel-group comparison of treatment for 2 yr with high-dose and low-dose ω-3 fatty acids. As this was an open-label study, patients who completed a minimum of 2 yr of treatment (in the absence of failure) were continued on their same regimens, either low dose or high dose, until study closure (January 2000). The quantities of ω-3 fatty acids we chose for the low-dose group approximated the amounts of C20:5ω3 (EPA) and C22:6ω3 (DHA) that were given to patients in the clinical trial (1) and extended observational study (2). In these earlier studies, patients were given 1.68 to 1.87 g/d EPA and 0.97 to 1.36 g/d DHA. In the present study, patients in the low-dose group received 1.88 g/d EPA and 1.47 g/d DHA; in the high-dose group, patients received 2× this amount. We did not consider it justifiable to have a placebo-control group because the primary renal end point occurred in only 6% of ω-3 fatty acid—treated patients compared with 33% in the placebo group in our previously reported clinical trial (1). The trial was performed in 14 centers of the Mayo Nephrology Collaborative Group (see the Appendix). The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards at each site, and all patients gave written, informed consent.
Patient Selection and Treatment
Patients aged 18 yr and older with a baseline serum creatinine of 1.5 to 4.9 mg/dl were eligible for the study if they had renal biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy. The diagnosis of IgA nephropathy was based on histologic assessment of renal biopsy tissue performed by one investigator (J.P.G.) and was confirmed by immunofluorescence studies showing predominant or co-dominant mesangial deposition of IgA (5,6). Histopathologic assessment of renal injury was done by a semiquantitative scoring system, as described previously (5). In a previous study of 148 patients with IgA nephropathy, total glomerular score, derived from extent of mesangial cell proliferation, matrix increase, capillary loop narrowing or disruption, glomerular sclerosis, cellular crescents, and fibrous adhesions, was an independent predictor of adverse outcome (5). Therefore, total glomerular score at time of renal biopsy was assessed in this study.
At study entry, patients were randomized within strata determined by (1) two ranges of elevated serum creatinine concentrations (1.5 to 2.9 mg/dl and 3.0 to 4.9 mg/dl), (2) previous treatment with ω-3 fatty acids, and (3) previous treatment with corticosteroids. One patient who had a central laboratory baseline serum creatinine of 1.4 mg/dl was randomized to low-dose Omacor (Pronova Biocare, Oslo, Norway). This patient's initial serum creatinine was 1.5 mg/dl measured 1 mo before in her local laboratory. We elected to include the patient in all analyses (in the 1.5 to 2.9 serum creatinine group). Omacor soft gelatin capsules, the study medicine used in this study, contain 1 g of a long-chain polyunsaturated ω-3 fatty acid ethyl ester concentrate including 4 mg of α-tocopherol, which is added as an antioxidant. The concentrate is produced from high-quality fish oil and contains 47% EPA, 37% DHA, and 5 to 10% of other ω-3 fatty acids. In the manufacturing process, impurities, cholesterol, vitamins A and D, and potentially toxic compounds such as heavy metals, dioxins, and pesticides are removed below detection limits (7). The patients were randomly assigned to receive either Omacor 8 g/d given as eight 1-g soft gelatin capsules containing 3.76 g of EPA and 2.94 g of DHA for a total of 6.7 g of ω-3 fatty acids—the high-dose group—or Omacor 4 g/d given as four 1-g soft gelatin capsules containing 1.88 g of EPA and 1.47 g of DHA for a total of 3.35 g of ω-3 fatty acids—the low-dose group. Dosing instruction was eight capsules or four capsules once a day ingested with a meal. Patients with hypertension were treated with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril (Vasotec; Merck Sharp & Dohme Laboratories, West Point, PA). When the target BP of 140/85 mmHg was not achieved, other antihypertensive drugs were added at the physician's discretion. Mild dietary sodium restriction limited to 90 mmol/d was advised.
Patient Monitoring
At study entry, complete medical histories were taken and physical examinations were performed for all patients. Initial clinical and laboratory results were sent to the coordinating center. Follow-up patient examinations and measurements of serum creatinine; total, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; triglycerides; and 24-h urine total protein were scheduled after 1.5, 6, 12, 18, and 24 mo of treatment. Patients who remained at risk for a renal failure event after 24 mo of treatment were continued on the same dose regimens to which they were originally assigned, and they had scheduled visits and the above named laboratory tests performed at 6-mo intervals until study closure (January 2000). Also, first morning urinalysis, hemoglobin, hematocrit, peripheral blood leukocytes, platelets, and serum potassium were collected and analyzed at the local center at each scheduled visit. All clinical and laboratory results were recorded on case report forms, forwarded to the coordinating center, and entered for data processing. To reduce variability, we analyzed each sample for serum creatinine and lipids and 24-h urine total protein at the Mayo Medical Laboratories (Rochester, MN) using standard methods. Patient compliance was ascertained by measuring the plasma phospholipid fatty acids—EPA, DHA, and C20:4ω6 (AA)—at 6 wk and 6 mo versus baseline within and between the two Omacor-supplemented groups. The EPA/AA ratio, a particularly sensitive indicator of compliance, was also calculated. The fatty acid composition including ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acids of plasma phospholipid was measured by capillary gas-liquid chromatography (8,9).
Study End Points
The primary end point of the study was the estimated annual within-patient slope in serum creatinine, a determinant of change in renal function, over the entire time in study for each patient (2-yr minimum). Secondary end points were time to ESRD (defined as chronic, repetitive dialysis or receiving a renal transplant) and time to treatment failure, defined as the first occurrence of any of the following: (1) the development of ESRD, (2) a serious side effect leading to the inability to continue study medicines and death from any cause, and (3) refusal to continue participation (noncompliance). For noncompliant patients, we attempted to obtain follow-up information on subsequent renal failure and vital status following the intent-to-treat principle. Other variables monitored included changes in BP and 24-h urine total protein and changes in serum lipid profiles, peripheral blood counts, and serum potassium for safety.
Statistical Analyses
Univariate baseline comparisons between the two dose groups were done using the rank-sum (continuous data) or χ2 (nominal data). Continuous factors were summarized using means and SD. Distributions that were particularly skewed or that had severe outliers (urine protein, triglycerides, serum creatinine slopes) were summarized using medians and the estimated interquartile range (25th, 75th percentiles). For patients who developed ESRD, only laboratory values taken before starting dialysis or receiving a renal transplant are included in the analyses.
The primary end point for the study was rate of change in serum creatinine. Changes in serum creatinine over time were estimated in two ways. First, simple linear regression analysis (Y = serum creatinine, X = years since start of Omacor) was used to estimate annualized rates of change (slopes) in serum creatinine and reciprocal serum creatinine for each patient. Although reciprocal serum creatinine values were more linear over time than direct values, both measurements are presented as the interpretation of the direct changes is more familiar to readers. The rank-sum test was then used to compare dose groups with respect to serum creatinine slopes. Analyses followed intent-to-treat principles, with every attempt made to include all randomized patients in the analysis. However, one patient, randomized to high-dose Omacor, left the study before beginning treatment and was excluded from this analysis as only a single baseline serum creatinine reading was available.
Second, generalized estimating equations were used to assess the average change over time in serum creatinine readings taken from low-dose versus high-dose Omacor-treated patients (10). In contrast to the first approach, this method eliminates the need first to estimate within patient slopes, while taking into account not only the repeated nature of the data but also the variable number of readings per patient. Furthermore, all patients contributed to the analysis. The dependent variable was serum creatinine (and also reciprocal serum creatinine). Predictor variables were Omacor dose group, time since start of therapy, and dose by time interaction. As readings within patients tend to be correlated, patient was used as a clustering factor. Both an autoregressive reading (correlations between readings within a patient assumed to decrease with time) and an exchangeable reading (correlations between readings within a patient assumed constant across time) were used.
Secondary end points included time from start of therapy to development of ESRD and time to either development of ESRD or discontinuation of treatment as a result of an adverse event or noncompliance (refusal to continue). The cumulative percentage of patients who were free of these events was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Dose groups were compared using the log-rank test. All randomized patients were included in these comparisons. The one patient who dropped out before beginning therapy was censored with 0 follow-up for the ESRD end point and counted as an event with 0 follow-up for the ESRD or discontinuation of treatment end point.
Within-dose group 1-yr and 2-yr changes in BP, urine protein, serum lipids, peripheral blood counts, and serum potassium were tested using the sign-rank test. All tests were two-sided with α-level 0.05.
Results
Between October 1995 and January 1998, 103 patients with IgA nephropathy were screened for study. Seventy-three patients met the clinical criteria for eligibility and were willing to enter the study. Except for one center that recruited 33 patients, the remaining 13 centers all had 7 or fewer patients each, precluding the analysis of an effect of study center. In the prerandomization strata, 32 patients who were allocated to the low-dose Omacor group and 31 patients who were allocated to the high-dose Omacor group had baseline serum creatinines of 1.5 to 2.9 mg/dl, whereas 5 patients who were assigned to each treatment group had baseline serum creatinines of 3.0 to 4.9 mg/dl. Twenty-one patients in the low-dose group and 22 in the high-dose group had previous treatment with ω-3 fatty acids, and 4 patients and 5 patients, respectively, had previous treatment with corticosteroids. Thirty-seven patients were assigned to receive low-dose Omacor, and 36 were assigned to receive high-dose Omacor. The clinical and laboratory characteristics of the patients in the two treatment groups were similar (Table 1), as were preceding illnesses, including upper respiratory infections, episodic macroscopic hematuria, fever, and flu-like illnesses. There was no difference in glomerular histopathologic score of patients (Table 1), indicating that the extent of histopathologic injury was similar in the two groups.
Characteristics of the patients in the low-dose and high-dose Omacor treatment groups at baselinea
In the follow-up of the 73 patients who entered the trial, there were no deaths and 18 developed ESRD. Of the remaining 55 patients, 42 stayed on treatment through July 1, 1999 (the earliest possible date for completing the final study visit), whereas 13 patients left the study early because of refusal to continue participation (8 patients), moving away from a study center (2 patients), lack of follow-up (1 patient), or sustaining an adverse event (2 patients). Of the two patients who withdrew from the study early because of an adverse event, one patient had gastrointestinal intolerance (indigestion) after the patient had taken Omacor 8 g/d for 18 mo. The symptom resolved promptly after the drug was stopped. The second patient, with a history of Barrett's esophagus, discontinued medication (4 g/d) approximately 6 wk after study entry as a result of an exacerbation of reflux esophagitis.
Outcome: Annual within-Patient Slopes in Serum Creatinine
Based on within-patient serum creatinine profiles (Figure 1), we estimated within-patient annualized rates of change (slopes) for serum creatinine. These slopes are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 2. Although both groups demonstrated slopes that were significantly different from 0 (4 g, P = 0.008; 8 g, P = 0.001 [sign-rank test]), no significant differences were noted between the two Omacor dose groups (P = 0.51 [rank-sum test]). Additional analyses based on slopes derived from reciprocal serum creatinine profiles also showed no significant differences between Omacor dose groups (P = 0.58). Further analyses based on generalized estimating equations (see the Materials and Methods section) also found no significant evidence of an Omacor dose effect on follow-up serum creatinine levels (all P values >0.20). For example, the mean slope in reciprocal serum creatinine was estimated to be -0.03 dl/mg per yr for the low-dose group compared with -0.02 dl/mg per yr for the high-dose group (P = 0.58). Annualized median change in serum creatinine was not different in previously ω-3 fatty acid—treated (0.107 mg/dl per yr) versus non-previously ω-3 fatty acid—treated patients (0.064 mg/dl per yr; P = 0.36 [rank-sum test]) or in reciprocal serum creatinine slopes comparing previously ω-3 fatty acid—treated (-0.026 dl/mg per yr) with non-previously ω-fatty acid—treated (-0.020 dl/mg per yr) patients (P = 0.71 [rank-sum test]).
Serum creatinine profiles in patients who had IgA nephropathy and who were treated with low-dose (A) and high-dose (B) Omacor. The serum creatinines are plotted and connected for each patient and include all readings before renal failure (if present).
Results of low-dose versus high-dose Omacor regarding primary and secondary end pointsa
Annualized rate of change in renal function in patients who had IgA nephropathy and who were treated with low-dose and high-dose Omacor. The annual rates of change (slopes) for serum creatinine were computed for each patient by linear regression analysis using all results before renal failure (if present). The annualized median change in serum creatinine was 0.08 mg/dl per yr in the low-dose group and 0.10 mg/dl per yr in the high-dose group (P = 0.51). +, median.
It is apparent that the majority of patients who had baseline serum creatinines of 1.5 to 2.9 mg/dl at study entry (n = 63) had stable renal function in both the low-dose and high-dose Omacor groups (Figure 1). Patients with initial serum creatinine levels of 1.5 to 2.9 mg/dl had significantly lower rates of deterioration in renal function (median creatinine slope = 0.08 versus 1.3 mg/dl per yr [P = 0.019]; median reciprocal creatinine slope = -0.02 versus -0.07 [P = 0.062]) and less ESRD (13 versus 85% at 3 yr; P < 0.001 [log-rank test]) when compared with those with initial serum creatinines of 3.0 to 4.9 mg/dl. Large serum creatinine slopes (>0.5 mg/dl per yr) were observed in 14 of 62 patients (23%) with baseline serum creatinines of 1.5 to 2.9 mg/dl compared with 7 of 10 (70%) patients with baseline serum creatinines of 3.0 to 4.9 mg/dl and in 17 of 18 patients who subsequently developed ESRD. Although we recognize that serum creatinine slopes >0.5 mg/dl per yr are nonlinear for expressing changes in GFR, such large slopes have clinical interpretation and correlate with the development of ESRD.
Renal Failure Events
Survival free of ESRD was similar in the two treatment groups (Table 2, Figure 3), and survival without sustaining any event—ESRD, an adverse event leading to discontinuation of treatment, or refusal to continue therapy—was also similar in the low-dose and high-dose Omacor treatment groups (Table 2).
Cumulative percentage of patients who had IgA nephropathy and who were treated with low-dose and high-dose Omacor and did not have renal failure during the treatment period. In the low-dose group, 73% of the patients (SEM = 8.4%) were free of renal failure at 3 yr compared with 76% (7.6) in the high-dose group (P = 0.56). Numbers of patients who were at risk at 3 yr were 12 in the low-dose group and 15 in the high-dose group.
Changes in BP, Proteinuria, Serum Lipids, Peripheral Blood Counts, and Potassium
There were no significant within-dose group time trends in BP, proteinuria, serum lipids, peripheral blood counts, and potassium, with the exception that BP and serum triglycerides were lower in the low-dose Omacor group at 12 mo compared with baseline, and high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were lower in the high-dose Omacor group at 12 mo compared with baseline (Table 3). Although there was a decline in urine protein excretion over time in the low-dose group compared with no change in the high-dose group, the median annual slopes in proteinuria were not significantly different between treatment groups (P = 0.17 [rank-sum test]).
Time trends in BP, urine protein, lipids, and CBC by Omacor dosea
Compliance with Treatment
As a measure of compliance, in 56 patients who were not taking ω-3 fatty acids at study entry, plasma phospholipid fatty acid changes from pretreatment were significant for all studied fatty acids (Table 4). There were significant increases in EPA and DHA and significant reductions in AA levels at 6 wk and 6 mo after supplementation (P < 0.01 for all values [paired t test]). With the exception of AA, fatty acid changes from baseline were, in general, higher for the high-dose compared with the low-dose group (Table 4). EPA/AA ratios were also significantly increased in both treatment groups and were higher at both 6 wk (P = 0.007, two-tailed P value from rank-sum test) and 6 mo (P = 0.002) in the high-dose group (Table 4).
Fatty acid composition of plasma phospholipid in low-dose and high-dose Omacor-treated patients with IgA nephropathy who were not taking omega-3 fatty acids at study entrya
Adverse Events
A total of nine patients (five at 4 g/d, four at 8 g/d) had adverse events, including the two aforementioned patients who withdrew early as a result of adverse events. Of the remaining seven patients, one patient (4 g/d) had episodes of cryptogenic gastrointestinal bleeding before, during, and after study participation. Omacor was discontinued in this patient 2 yr after study enrollment during an episode of gastrointestinal bleeding 1 mo before the patient was started on maintenance hemodialysis for ESRD. Another patient (4 g/d) discontinued therapy after development of rectal bleeding from hemorrhoids 48 mo after study entry. This patient had advanced renal failure at the time. Other single adverse events noted during the course of study participation included one episode of diverticulitis (4 g/d), an episode of pneumonitis and possible pancreatitis (8 g/d), development of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation (8 g/d), hyperkalemia (4 g/d) that resolved after discontinuing angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy, and development of hemiparesis as a result of ischemic cerebrovascular disease (8 g/d). None of these events was thought to be related directly to study medication.
Discussion
In this multicenter, randomized, 2-yr, comparative two-dose trial, both low-dose and high-dose ω-3 fatty acids, given daily as a highly purified ethyl ester concentrate of EPA and DHA (Omacor), were equally effective in slowing the rate of loss of renal function in patients who were at high risk for renal progression, all having impaired renal function at the start of treatment. Changes in renal function (serum creatinine) were only 0.08 mg/dl per yr in the low-dose group and 0.10 mg/dl per yr in the high-dose group.
Patients who had the most stable renal course in both the low-dose and high-dose groups were those who had less impaired renal function upon entering the study with a baseline serum creatinine that ranged from 1.5 to 2.9 mg/dl. Sixty-three of the 73 patients (86%) who were enrolled in the trial fell into this category. Patients in this lower entry serum creatinine range had significantly lower serum creatinine slopes and less ESRD when compared with those in the higher entry serum creatinine range. Furthermore, large serum creatinine slopes—<0.5 mg/dl per yr, a widely recognized clinical change in renal function—were observed in 14 of 62 patients (23%) with lower baseline serum creatinine levels compared with 7 of 10 patients (70%) with higher baseline serum creatinines and in 17 of 18 patients who subsequently developed ESRD. This is not a surprising finding because most patients in the late stages of IgA nephropathy develop progressive renal failure despite various therapies that have been tried (11,12).
Survival free of ESRD was also similar in the low-dose and high-dose Omacor treatment groups. An event-free survival rate from ESRD was 75% at 3 yr, representing a favorable outcome in view of the high-risk profile in the cohort of patients in this trial. To expand on this point, we compared both the primary endpoint—changes in renal function by annualized rates of change in serum creatinine—and survival free of ESRD in patients in the present study with patients in a placebo-control group in our previously reported clinical trial (1). Time to ESRD was defined in both study groups as time from start of therapy to the start of chronic, repetitive dialysis or receiving a renal transplant, whichever occurred first. To make the analysis comparable between the two groups, we compared outcomes in the 63 patients in the current trial with 22 patients in the placebo-treated group whose baseline serum creatinine concentrations were in the 1.4 to 2.9 mg/dl range (Table 5). Changes in serum creatinine slopes were significantly lower, and survival free of ESRD was significantly higher in the Omacor-treated patients from the present study compared with the placebo-treated patients from our previous study (1). Although this is not a comparison between patients who were contemporaneously randomized to treatment, it does examine the effects of treatment for patients with similar degrees of renal impairment (median serum creatinine is 1.8 mg/dl for both groups).
Comparison of renal end points in Omacor- and placebo-treated patients who had pretreatment serum creatinine levels ranging from 1.4- to 2.9 mg/dl
That the patients in the present study were at high risk for developing progressive renal disease is evidenced not only by the aforementioned impaired pretreatment renal function that was part of the study design but also by the observations that 92% were hypertensive and that urinary protein excretion was in excess of 1.5 g/24 h at study entry. These clinical variables are important predictors of poor outcome in IgA nephropathy (5,13,14,15,16,17). In addition, total glomerular histopathologic score, a semiquantitative index of renal injury and an independent predictor of renal failure (5), was increased in the renal biopsy specimens of 50% of the patients. In a previous study of 148 patients with IgA nephropathy, we found that total glomerular histopathologic scores greater than 5 were associated with adverse outcome (5).
Patient compliance was excellent as ascertained by the expected enhancement of plasma phospholipid EPA and DHA and suppression of AA after Omacor supplementation (1,18). EPA and DHA levels on treatment were higher in the high-dose group compared with the low-dose group. Yet, as already shown, treatment with high-dose ω-3 fatty acids had no added beneficial effect on preserving renal function.
Omacor was well tolerated as only two patients discontinued treatment as a result of gastrointestinal intolerance. There were no unfavorable effects on serum lipid profiles, hematocrits, peripheral blood leukocytes, or platelets.
Because treatment with high-dose ω-3 fatty acids provided no added benefit, we believe that it is appropriate to recommend low-dose ω-3 fatty acids in the treatment of high-risk patients with IgA nephropathy, including those with moderately advanced renal disease, for example, for those patients whose serum creatinines were in the lower entry range of 1.5 to 2.9 mg/dl. We previously determined that this lower dose of ω-3 fatty acids, composed of 1.9 g of EPA and of 1.4 g DHA, efficiently enhanced the EPA and DHA and total ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids of plasma phospholipids (18) and can be recommended on the strength of the present findings. For convenience, the ethyl ester ω-3 fatty acid concentrate Omacor, which provides a concentrated preparation of EPA and DHA and was used in this trial, allowed patients who were in the low-dose group to consume only four soft gelatin capsules daily. This compares with 12 capsules daily necessary to take in 1.9 g of EPA and 1.4 g of DHA contained in the over-the-counter products that generally are 30% concentrates of ω-3 fatty acids. As no other comparative-dose studies have been performed using ω-3 fatty acids, we do not know whether a lower dose of ω-3 fatty acids might be effective in slowing renal progression for high-risk patients with IgA nephropathy.
Appendix: The Mayo Nephrology Collaborative Group
Clinical Coordinating Center: T. Larson, D. Spencer, J. Grande, and J. Donadio; Section of Biostatistics: E. Bergstralh and D. Rademacher; Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN): J. Gloor, J. McCarthy, J. Mitchell, T. Schwab, and V. Torres; Mayo Clinic (Scottsdale, AZ): R. Heilman and D. Wochos; Duluth Clinic, Ltd. (Duluth, MN): R. Hellman and T. Russ; Marshfield Clinic (Marshfield, WI): R. Dart; Consultative Nephrology (Lincoln, NE): S. Youngberg; McFarland Clinic (Ames, IA): J. Graves; Arms, Dodge, Robinson, Wilber & Crouch, Inc. (Kansas City, MO): J. Mertz; Columbia Nephrology Association (Columbia, SC): W. Edwards; Nephrology and Hypertension (Columbia, MO): M. Vaporean and W. Winkelmeyer; West Michigan Nephrology, P.C. (Muskegon, MI): G. Downer; Renal Associates, P.A. (San Antonio, TX): M. Isbell; Nephrology Associates of Syracuse, P.C. (Syracuse, NY): R. Scheer; Lynchburg Nephrology (Lynchburg, VA): J. Nielsen; Gunderson Clinic (LaCrosse, WI): J. Singer.
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Dorothy Spencer for her assistance as Clinical Coordinator at the Clinical Coordinating Center (Rochester, MN); Diana Rademacher for her assistance with statistical analyses; Cherish Grabau for secretarial support; and Dr. Bruce Holub, Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Guelph (Guelph, Ontario, Canada), for the measurement of plasma phospholipids. This work was supported by research grants from Pronova Biocare a.s. (Oslo, Norway) and Mayo Foundation (Rochester, MN).
Footnotes
↵ 1 The investigators of the Mayo Nephrology Collaborative Group are listed in the appendix.
- © 2001 American Society of Nephrology