Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Article Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Fellowship
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Impact Factor
    • Reprints
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Article Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Fellowship
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Impact Factor
    • Reprints
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Follow JASN on Twitter
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow JASN on RSS
  • Community Forum
DISEASE OF THE MONTH
You have accessRestricted Access

Light Chain Deposition Disease: A Model of Glomerulosclerosis Defined at the Molecular Level

PIERRE M. RONCO, MARIE-ALEXANDRA ALYANAKIAN, BEATRICE MOUGENOT and PIERRE AUCOUTURIER
JASN July 2001, 12 (7) 1558-1565;
PIERRE M. RONCO
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIE-ALEXANDRA ALYANAKIAN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BEATRICE MOUGENOT
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PIERRE AUCOUTURIER
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Because the renal plasma flow represents 20% of the total plasma flow and the glomerulus is the renal filtering unit continuously exposed to plasma proteins, the glomerulus is a prominent target for deposition of abnormal proteins or proteins with a peculiar affinity for constituents of the capillary wall. Among these proteins, monoclonal Ig or their heavy-chain (HC) or light-chain (LC) subunits are responsible for a wide spectrum of glomerular diseases that can be classified into two categories by electron microscopy (Table 1). The first category is those with organized deposits and includes diseases with fibril formation, mainly amyloidosis, and diseases with microtubule formation, including cryoglobulinemic kidney and immunotactoid glomerulonephritis. Only amyloid deposits stain for Congo red, a tinctorial property related to the β-pleated sheet organization of amyloid fibrils common to all forms of amyloid. The second category of diseases is characterized by nonorganized electron-dense granular deposits. They are localized in basement membranes in most tissues, especially the kidney, and define a disease now called monoclonal Ig deposition disease (MIDD) (1,2), a term that by convention excludes Ig-derived amyloidosis. MIDD differs from amyloidosis by the lack of affinity for Congo red. The distinction between amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis and MIDD also is justified by the different pathophysiology of amyloid that implicates one-dimensional elongation of a pseudocrystalline structure and MIDD that involves nonorganized amorphous precipitation of Ig chains (see Pathogenesis section).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Glomerular diseases with monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition

History

It was known from the late 1950s that nonamyloidotic forms of glomerular disease resembling diabetic glomerulosclerosis could occur in multiple myeloma (3,4). The presence of monoclonal LC in these lesions was recognized in 1973 by Antonovych et al. (5) and confirmed by Randall et al. (6), who published in 1976 the first description of LC deposition disease (LCDD). Although the deposits in AL amyloidosis contain monoclonal LC or LC fragments, the term light-chain deposition disease is used only for the disease that features nonamyloid electron-dense granular deposits as described by Randall et al. (6). Monoclonal HC were found together with LC in the tissue deposits from certain patients (6,7), and the term light- and heavy-chain deposition disease (LHCDD) (1) was proposed. More recently, deposits containing monoclonal HC in the absence of detectable LC were observed in patients who were affected by otherwise typical Randall's disease (heavy-chain deposition disease [HCDD]) (8), and the first series of four patients was reported in 1999 (9).

Pathogenesis

At variance with amyloidosis, lesions in MIDD are related clearly to accumulation of extracellular matrices (ECM). The Ig chains that are responsible for this effect display peculiar structural properties and proneness to precipitate in certain extracellular areas where they most likely stimulate ECM production.

Ig Chain Structure

Ig are made up of two pairs of subunits: two HC and two LC, each of which includes a variable domain implicated in antigen recognition, and a constant region that itself includes one or several domains and that activates a variety of effector systems. Binding to antigen and activating effector cells or complement (i.e., antibody function) is made possible by the association of two HC and two LC. LC may be of κ or λ type, with one constant and one variable domain (termed CL and VL). HC may be of nine isotypes (μ, γ1, γ2, γ3, γ4, α1, α2, δ, and ϵ) that define Ig classes and subclasses: IgM, IgG (including IgG1 to IgG4), IgA (including IgA1 and IgA2), IgD, and IgE. HC include from the -NH2 to the -COOH terminus one variable domain (VH) from a common repertoire for all isotypes and three (for IgG, IgA, and IgD) or four (for IgM and IgE) constant domains, termed CH1 to CH4 (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Domain structure of an IgG. The light- (LC) and heavy-chain domains are shown in gray and white, respectively. VL, light-chain (LC) variable domain; CL, LC constant domain; VH, heavy-chain (HC) variable domain; CH, HC constant domain.

Normal Ig display a striking structural heterogeneity that is borne essentially by the variable domains and is related to the diversity of the antigenic determinants that they are supposed to recognize. These regions of the Ig chains are encoded by numerous gene segments, the rearrangement of which occurs during B-cell differentiation and is mandatory for Ig production. Comparison of VH and VL sequences allowed definition of variability subgroups on the basis of their homologies: HC express six VH subgroups, κ chains express four Vκ subgroups, and λ chains express six Vλ subgroups. The variability of VH and VL is even higher in three small peptidic portions called complementarity determining regions (CDR1, CDR2, and CDR3) that form three loops at one end of the domain that constitutes the antibody binding site.

At variance with normal polyclonal Ig, monoclonal Ig are secreted by a single clone of differentiated B cells that expands excessively, either in a tumoral context (myeloma, Waldenström's disease, etc.) or without patent hematologic malignancy (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance). A monoclonal Ig may be secreted as free LC (or rarely, HC) that displays structural anomalies causing tissue deposition.

Abnormal Structures of LC Variable Domains

In LCDD, isotype restriction is significant; κ chains occur in approximately 80% of cases. This contrasts with the increased λ to κ ratio seen in amyloidosis. Data on N-terminal sequences of the LC from six consecutive patients with LCDD suggested an overrepresentation of the rare VκIV variability subgroup (10). This subgroup features a longer CDR1 loop that contains some hydrophobic residues. The role of LC variable region (VL) in LC deposition is suggested by the fact that amino acid changes in VL were sufficient to promote tissue deposition in mice that expressed a human LCDD VκIV chain (11).

The primary structures of a few additional LCDD precursors were analyzed at the cDNA (12,13) and protein levels (14). As in AL amyloidosis, no common structural motif emerged from these studies. The most remarkable observations were unusual hydrophobic residues at positions where they either could be exposed to the solvent or strongly modify the conformation, especially in the CDR (13,14). In particular, molecular modeling experiments performed on VκI and VκIV LC underline the presence of leucine, isoleucine, or tyrosine at positions 27 and/or 31 in all known cases of LCDD. Other nonpolar groups may be exposed on CDR regions, which suggests that hydrophobic interactions are important either in the amorphous precipitation of LC or in the mechanisms that lead to overproduction of ECM components (15). Of note, in contrast to LCDD LC, those involved in AL amyloidosis often present particular acidic residues in CDR and might form fibrils through electrostatic interactions.

When pathogenic LC could not be detected in the serum and urine, which occurred in 15 to 30% of patients, they seemed to be N-glycosylated in all tested cases (10,16). In vitro biosynthetic labeling experiments on short-term cultures showed that LC that were absent in the urine actually were secreted by the bone marrow plasma cells (1,17,18). Thus, together with the presence of hydrophobic residues, glycosylation might increase the LC propensity to precipitate in tissues and displace the equilibrium from soluble toward deposited amorphous forms.

Truncated HC

Twenty-two cases of HCDD have been reported (19 and reviewed in reference 20). In all patients, a monotypic HC without LC was detected in the deposits. A deletion of the CH1 domain was found in the deposited or circulating HC in the 10 patients with γ HCDD where it was searched for. It also was suggested in a patient with α HCDD (21). Deletions of the CH1, hinge, and CH2 domains were found in one case (8).

The loss of the CH1 domain suggests that secretion of the free, abnormal HC is required for tissue deposition. Normal HC associate posttranslationally with Ig binding protein (BIP) in the endoplasmic reticulum. The LC later assemble with HC, and the complex is transferred to the Golgi apparatus for further processing and secretion. Because the binding site of BIP is located in the CH1 domain, when a mutant HC lacks the CH1 domain, it fails to associate with BIP and thus may be secreted as a free subunit in the circulation. However, CH1 deletion seems necessary but not sufficient for deposition, and it is likely that the VH also contributes to tissue deposition, ultrastructural aspects of the deposits, and ECM accumulation. Indeed, in HC disease, a lymphoproliferative disorder with free HC secretion without corresponding tissue deposition, the variable regions are found to be deleted partially or entirely, together with the CH1 domain. In HCDD, the variable regions are present without major structural alteration, although in the two cases in which they were sequenced (8,22), they contained unusual amino acid substitutions that might change the physicochemical properties (e.g., charge, hydrophobicity). In addition, the structure of an HCDD HC (8) was strikingly similar to that reported in a case of amyloid HC amyloidosis (23), from which it differed essentially at the V domain level. It is worth noting that in most cases of HCDD, the circulating HC is associated with a λ-type LC. This bias may reflect a preferential association of the VH with λ VL domains.

Deposition Does Not Mean Pathogenicity

The finding by Solomon et al. (24) of unexpectedly frequent (14 of 40) deposition of human monoclonal LC along basement membranes in a mouse experimental model raises the question of the relationship between tissue precipitation and pathogenic effects. Human LC that were found deposited along basement membranes in mice were predominantly of the λ type (9 of 14), contrasting with the striking predominance of κ chains in MIDD (24). In addition, LC deposition similar in aspect to LCDD by immunofluorescence but with no or only scanty granular electron-dense deposits in the tubular basement membrane may occur in the absence of glomerular lesions and tubular basement membrane thickening (19,25). One patient (Aucouturier P, Droz D, personal data) had an important LC secretion and typical basement membrane deposits by immunofluorescence in the kidney, without histologic alteration, and with normal renal functions 2 yr after kidney biopsy. Thus, the propensity of a given LC to form deposits does not necessarily mean that it is pathogenic, and immunofluorescence staining should not be considered a sufficient criterion for pathologic diagnosis of MIDD. As shown by characteristic pathologic changes and experimental evidence, MIDD lesions are associated with local fibrosis.

LC-Induced Mesangial Fibrosis

Results of an in vitro study (26) suggest that pathogenic Ig chains may stimulate mesangial cells to secrete ECM components through growth factors, in particular transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β). LC-induced overproduction of collagen IV, laminin, fibronectin, and tenascin was shown to be maximal at 72 h of incubation with mesangial cells (27). Accumulation may be increased by a concomitant inhibition of collagenase IV, which also is mediated by TGF-β. None of these effects was found with amyloid LC (27). One way to prevent the LC-induced fibrosis is to study the detailed mechanism of putative ligand-receptor interactions that may govern the ability of a given LC to stimulate the ECM synthesis. Other possibilities are to prevent the secretion of TGF-β or to interfere with the TGF-β signaling pathway.

Renal Pathology

Light Microscopy

Despite clinical manifestations that feature impairment of glomerular function in most cases, MIDD should not be considered a purely glomerular disease. In fact, tubular lesions may be more conspicuous than the glomerular damage. Tubular lesions are characterized by the deposition of a refractile, eosinophilic, periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-positive, ribbon-like material along the tubular basement membrane (Figure 2A). The deposits predominate around the distal tubules, the loops of Henle, and, in some instances, the collecting ducts whose epithelium is flattened and atrophied. Typical myeloma casts are only occasionally seen in pure forms of MIDD (see below for association with myeloma cast nephropathy). In advanced stages, a marked interstitial fibrosis including refractile deposits frequently is associated with tubular lesions.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Light microscopy of an LC nephropathy with predominant tubulointerstitial lesions. (A) Thickening of tubular basement membranes and diffuse interstitial fibrosis. (B) Strongly periodic acid-Schiff (PAS)-positive deposits delineating the spaces between myocytes in an interlobular artery. Magnifications: ×125 in A (PAS); ×312 in B (PAS).

Glomerular lesions are much more heterogeneous (28,29). Nodular glomerulosclerosis (NGS) is the most characteristic; it is found in 60 (30) to 100% (19) of patients with LCDD. Expansion of the mesangial ECM was observed in all cases of HCDD, with NGS in almost all of them. Mesangial nodules are composed of PAS-positive membrane-like material and often are accompanied by mild mesangial hypercellularity. The capillary loops stretch at the periphery of florid nodules and may undergo aneurysmal dilation. Bowman's capsule may contain a material that is identical to that present in the center of the nodules. These lesions resemble nodular diabetic glomerulosclerosis, but some characteristics are distinctive: the distribution of the nodules is fairly regular in a given glomerulus, the nodules are poorly argyrophilic, and exudative lesions as “fibrin caps” and extensive hyalinosis of the efferent arterioles are not observed. In occasional cases with prominent endocapillary cellularity and mesangial interposition, the glomerular features mimic lobular glomerulonephritis. Milder forms of LCDD simply show an increase in mesangial matrix and sometimes in mesangial cells and a modest thickening of the basement membranes that are abnormally bright and rigid. Glomerular lesions may not even be detected by light microscopy but require ultrastructural examination. These lesions may represent early stages of glomerular disease or be induced by LC with a weak pathogenic potential. Their diagnosis would be unrecognized without the immunostaining results. Arteries, arterioles, and peritubular capillaries all may contain PAS-positive deposits in close contact with their basement membranes (Figure 2B). Deposits do not show the staining characteristics of amyloid, but they may be associated with Congo red—positive amyloid deposits in approximately 10% of patients (19).

Immunofluorescence Microscopy

A key step in the diagnosis of the various forms of MIDD is immunofluorescence examination of the kidney. All biopsy specimens show evidence of monotypic LC (mostly κ) and/or HC fixation along tubular basement membranes. This criterion is requested for the diagnosis of MIDD.

The tubular deposits stain strongly and predominate along the loops of Henle and the distal tubules, but they also often are detected along the proximal tubules. In contrast, the pattern of glomerular immunofluorescence displays marked heterogeneity. In patients with NGS, deposits of monotypic Ig chains usually are found along the peripheral glomerular basement membranes and, to a lesser extent, in the nodules themselves. The staining in glomeruli typically is weaker than that observed along the tubular basement membranes. This may not be a function of the actual amount of deposited material, because several cases in which glomerular immunofluorescence was negative despite the presence of large amounts of granular glomerular deposits by electron microscopy have been reported (31). Local modifications of deposited LC thus might change their antigenicity (18). In patients without nodular lesion (Figure 3A), glomerular staining occurs mainly along the basement membrane, but it may involve the mesangium in some cases. A linear staining usually decorates Bowman's capsule. Deposits frequently are found in vascular walls and interstitium.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

(A) Immunofluorescence of renal biopsy specimen from a κ LC nephropathy without nodular glomerulosclerosis. Bright staining is shown along tubular basement membranes, and heavy deposits are shown in an arteriolar wall. Glomerular staining involves Bowman's capsule and capillary basement membranes as well as mildly increased mesangium. (B) In a patient who presented with overt myeloma and acute renal failure, direct immunofluorescence of renal biopsy specimen with the use of anti-κ antibody showed numerous myeloma casts and staining of most of the tubular basement membrances. (C) In the same patient, examination of a post mortem liver biopsy revealed κ deposits along sinusoids. (D) Renal biopsy from a patient with HC deposition disease. Direct immunofluorescence with fluorescein-conjugated anti-γ antibody shows bright staining of mesangial nodular areas and peripheral capillary walls but, in this case, no staining along basement membranes of the surrounding tubules. Magnification, ×312.

In patients with HCDD, immunofluorescence with anti-LC polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies is negative despite typical NGS. Monotypic deposits of γ, α, or μ HC may be identified. All γ subclasses may be observed. Analysis of the kidney biopsy with monoclonal antibodies specific for the constant domains of the γ HC allowed identification of a deletion of the CH1 domain in all tested cases. In most cases of HCDD, except those with deposits of γ4 that does not activate complement, complement components could be demonstrated in a granular or pseudolinear pattern.

The accessory proteins (serum amyloid P component, apolipoprotein E, and ubiquitin) that are associated with AL amyloidosis and other amyloidoses are not present in LCDD deposits.

The composition of glomerular matrix proteins has been examined comparatively in NGS associated with LCDD and diabetes mellitus (32). Nodules are made of normal ECM constituents (collagen type IV, laminin, fibronectin) that are produced in excess and stain weakly for the small proteoglycans, decorin and biglycan (33). In a series of 36 patients with LC-related renal diseases including AL amyloidosis, cast nephropathy, fibrillary glomerulopathy, and LCDD, TGF-β was detected only in glomeruli of the 3 patients with LCDD and nodular glomerular lesions (34). In the control series, it was found essentially in nodular diabetic glomerulosclerosis, which may suggest that distinct initial insults to the glomerular mesangium may trigger similar fibrogenetic pathways.

Electron Microscopy

The most characteristic ultrastructural feature is the presence of finely to coarsely granular electron-dense deposits along the outer (interstitial) aspect of the tubular basement membranes. In the glomerulus, they predominate in a subendothelial position along the glomerular basement membrane and are located mainly along and in the lamina rara interna. They also can be found in mesangial nodules, Bowman's capsule, and the wall of small arteries between the myocytes. Nonamyloid fibrils have been reported in a few patients with LCDD or HCDD.

Association with Myeloma Cast Nephropathy

The association of monoclonal LC deposits, mostly along renal tubule membranes, with typical myeloma cast nephropathy is more frequent than reported initially (see Figure 3, B and C). It was found in 23 of 72 (32%) patients with nonamyloid monoclonal LC deposits in a French series (30) and in 11 of 34 (32%) patients with MIDD in a recent North American study (19). NGS is, however, infrequent (<10%), and some ribbon-like tubular basement membranes are seen in fewer than half of the patients (30). In addition, one third of the patients do not have granular-dense deposits by electron microscopy. The lack of ECM accumulation in most of these patients who present with acute renal failure in the setting of a true myeloma may be due to insufficient time for the development of fibrosis or to a weaker sclerogenic effect of the LC, if any. As discussed previously, the presence of LC deposits along the tubular basement membrane is not sufficient to make a diagnosis of MIDD.

Clinical Features of LCDD

The main clinical features of MIDD are renal and cardiac manifestations, as in AL amyloidosis. Data collected from the largest series as yet published (1,19,29,35,36,37) show an unexpectedly wide range of affected ages (35 to 80 yr) with a male gender preponderance. Mean age tends to be higher in patients with LCDD and myeloma cast nephropathy (67 yr) (19) than in those with pure MIDD (51 to 58 yr).

Renal Disease

Renal involvement is a constant feature of MIDD, and proteinuria (composed mostly of albumin) and renal failure often dominate the clinical presentation. In 23 to 53% of the patients, albuminuria is associated with nephrotic syndrome. However, in approximately 25% of them, it is less than 1 g/d, and these patients exhibit mainly a tubulointerstitial syndrome (Figure 2A). Albuminuria is not correlated with the existence of NGS, at least initially, and may occur in the absence of significant glomerular lesions by light microscopy. Hematuria is more frequent (29 to 67%) than one would expect for a nephropathy in which cell proliferation usually is modest, with a few exceptions. The prevalence of hypertension is variable but must be interpreted according to medical history.

The high prevalence (>90%), early appearance, and severity of renal failure are other salient features of MIDD. In most cases, renal function declines rapidly, which is a main reason for referral.

Renal features of the 22 patients with HCDD basically are similar to those seen in LCDD and LHCDD (see below).

Extrarenal Manifestations

MIDD is a systemic disease, but visceral LC deposits may be totally asymptomatic and found only at autopsy. Liver and cardiac involvements are the most common (29).

Liver deposits were constant in patients whose liver was examined (38) (Figure 3C). They are discrete, confined to sinusoids and basement membranes of biliary ductules without associated parenchymal lesions, or massive with marked dilation and multiple ruptures of sinusoids resembling peliosis. Hepatomegaly with mild alterations of liver function tests are the most usual symptoms, but several patients develop hepatic insufficiency and portal hypertension, and some of them die of hepatic failure (29).

Cardiac manifestations have been noted in as many as 80% of the reported cases of LCDD, but they must be interpreted with caution because of other age-dependent potential causes of heart disease. Arrhythmias, conduction disturbances, and congestive heart failure are seen. Echocardiography and catheterization may reveal diastolic dysfunction and a reduction in myocardial compliance similar to that seen in cardiac amyloid. As in the kidney and the liver, immunofluorescence showed monotypic LC deposits in the vascular walls and perivascular areas of the heart in all autopsy cases (16).

Deposits also may occur along the nerve fibers and in the choroid plexus, as well as in the lymph nodes, bone marrow, spleen, pancreas, thyroid gland, submandibular glands, adrenal glands, gastrointestinal tract, abdominal vessels, lungs, and skin. They may be responsible for peripheral neuropathy (20% of the reported cases), gastrointestinal disturbances, pulmonary nodules, amyloid-like arthropathy, and sicca syndrome.

Hematologic Disease

The most common underlying disease in MIDD is myeloma, which accounts for 40 to 50% of pure MIDD (1,19,35,36,37) and >90% of LC deposits associated with myeloma cast nephropathy. MIDD and AL amyloidosis are found at postmortem examination in 5 and 10% of myeloma patients, respectively (39). MIDD, like AL amyloidosis, often is the presenting disease that leads to the discovery of myeloma at an early stage. In some patients who first presented with “common” myeloma and with normal-sized monoclonal Ig without kidney disease, LCDD occurred when the disease relapsed after chemotherapy, together with Ig structural abnormalities (7,16). Because melphalan was shown to induce Ig gene mutations, the disease in these patients might result from the emergence of a variant clone induced by the alkylating agent. Apart from myeloma, MIDD may complicate Waldenström's macroglobulinemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia in rare cases (17). It often occurs in the absence of a detectable malignant process, even after prolonged (>10 yr) follow-up. In such “primary” forms, a monoclonal bone marrow plasma cell population can be documented easily by immunofluorescence examination.

Diagnostic Investigation

The diagnosis of MIDD must be suspected in any patient who has nephrotic syndrome or rapidly progressive tubulointerstitial nephritis or who has echocardiographic findings that indicate diastolic dysfunction and a monoclonal Ig component in the serum and/or the urine. The same combination also is seen in AL amyloidosis, but the latter more often is associated with the λ LC isotype. Because sensitive techniques, including immunofixation, fail to identify a monoclonal Ig component in 15 to 30% of patients, renal biopsy plays an essential role in the diagnosis of MIDD and of the associated dysproteinemia.

The definitive diagnosis is made by the immunohistologic analysis of tissue from an affected organ, in most cases the kidney, with the use of a panel of Ig chain—specific antibodies, including anti-κ and anti-λ LC antibodies to stain the noncongophilic deposits. When the biopsy stains for a single HC isotype and does not stain for LC isotypes, the diagnosis of HCDD should be suspected (see below).

The diagnosis of plasma cell dyscrasia relies on bone marrow aspiration and bone marrow biopsy with cell morphologic evaluation and, if necessary, immunophenotyping with anti-κ and anti-λ antisera to demonstrate monoclonality. Diagnostic criteria for a multiple myeloma are present in no more than 50% of the patients with LCDD.

Variants of LCDD: LHCDD and HCDD

A monotypic HC is associated with the monotypic LC in approximately 10% of patients with LCDD. Whether HC and LC precipitate as independent subunits or as a whole Ig molecule remains to be established. In one case, we found different patterns of kidney deposition of the HC and LC (Rose C, unpublished observation). Anomalies of the HC structure suggesting deletion were demonstrated in LHCDD (7). Clinical presentation and pathologic data in patients with LHCDD are similar to those in LCDD.

The first patients with HCDD were reported in 1993 (8). Twenty-two cases have been described so far (19 and reviewed in reference 20). The clinical and pathologic features of HCDD basically are the same as in LCDD, although several differences can be noted. First, lesions of NGS are constant in patients with HCDD, whereas only a faint staining of tubular basement membranes was seen in some patients (Figure 3D). Second, extrarenal deposits are less frequent in these patients than in those with LCDD. They have been reported in heart, in synovial tissue, in skin, in striated muscles, in pancreas, around thyroid follicles, and in Disse spaces of the liver (8 and reviewed in reference 20). Third, signs of complement activation with renal complement deposition are present in most patients with γ1 or γ3 HCDD (19).

In some patients with HCDD, a monoclonal component cannot be detected in serum and urine (8). In other patients, a monoclonal IgG1λ can be found in serum, but no deletion is found in the HC (9). Identification of the nephritogenic deleted HC that circulates in low amounts then requires serum fractionation followed by Western blotting (9) (Figure 4). This finding suggests that serum fractionation also should be performed in patients with LCDD in whom usual immunochemical methods have failed to detect a circulating monoclonal component.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Immunoblotting study after agarose nondenaturing electrophoresis of a 5S Sephadex-G200 fraction from the serum of patients A and B. Blots were revealed with monoclonal antibodies of Ig domain specificities as indicated. Note that both fractions contained a monoclonal IgG1λ exhibiting normal reactivity with anti-γ constant domain antibodies (including the two anti-γCH1 tested) and an isolated γ chain of IgG1 subclass (reactivity with NL16) lacking CH1 domain epitopes (arrow). The fraction from the serum of patient A also included a free λ LC (from Moulin et al., J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 526, 1999; reprinted with permission of the publisher).

Outcome and Treatment

The outcome of MIDD remains uncertain, mainly because extrarenal deposits of LC can be totally asymptomatic or cause severe organ damage that leads to death. Survival from onset of symptoms varies from 1 mo to 10 yr, whereas by comparison, the prognosis of a related disease, AL amyloidosis, is much more homogeneous with a median survival time of 18 mo under chemotherapy (40). Although renal prognosis is poor, patient survival can be considerable with 70 and 37% 5-yr patient survival and renal survival, respectively (36). The only predictor of renal patient survival seems to be the initial serum creatinine at the time of biopsy, whereas the presence of multiple myeloma does not seem to influence renal or patient survival (19). Outcomes in terms of renal and patient survival are significantly better in patients with pure MIDD, compared with those who present with myeloma cast nephropathy (19).

As in AL amyloidosis, treatment should be aimed at reducing Ig production. Chemotherapy is logical in patients with MIDD and myeloma. It is controversial in the absence of overt malignancy given the uncertain outcome of LCDD and the absence of reliable follow-up criteria, especially in patients without detectable M component. However, it has become general practice to treat patients with steroids plus melphalan or a cytotoxic agent, irrespective of the accompanying hematologic disease.

Whether appropriate treatment can result in sustained remission has long remained unclear. Clearance of the LC deposits has been demonstrated unequivocally in some patients after intensive chemotherapy with syngeneic bone marrow transplantation or blood stem cell autografting (41,42). Disapperance of nodular mesangial lesions and LC deposits also was reported after long-term chemotherapy (43). These observations are of paramount importance: they demonstrate that fibrotic nodular glomerular lesions are reversible, and they argue for intensive chemotherapy in patients with severe visceral involvement.

Kidney transplantation has been performed in a few patients with MIDD and end-stage renal failure. Recurrence of the disease usually is observed. Therefore, intensive chemotherapy should be performed before kidney transplantation.

In conclusion, MIDD is a rare systemic disease that is characterized by severe renal failure as a result of the deposition of a monotypic LC and/or HC of Ig. Glomerular lesions are so similar to diabetic nephropathy that MIDD may serve as a model for the understanding of this plague of the third millennium. MIDD indeed is the only sclerotic glomerular disease in which the offending molecule is defined perfectly. As in AL amyloidosis, controlled trials are required to define the best chemotherapy combination according to clinical presentation and severity of renal failure.

Acknowledgments

We thank Catherine Bazaud for excellent secretarial assistance. This work was supported by a grant from the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique (AOM 96058).

Footnotes

  • Eberhard Ritz, Feature Editor

  • © 2001 American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    Buxbaum JN, Chuba JV, Hellman GC, Solomon A, Gallo GR: Monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease: Light chain and light and heavy chain deposition diseases and their relation to light chain amyloidosis. Clinical features, immunopathology, and molecular analysis. Ann Intern Med 112: 455-464,1990
  2. ↵
    Preud'homme JL, Aucouturier P, Touchard G, Striker L, Khamlichi AA, Rocca A, Denoroy L, Cogne M: Monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (Randall type). Relationship with structural abnormalities of immunoglobulin chains. Kidney Int 46:965 -972, 1994
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Kobernick SD, Whiteside JH: Renal glomeruli in multiple myeloma. Lab Invest 6:478 -485, 1957
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    Sanchez LM, Domz CA: Renal patterns in myeloma. Ann Intern Med 52:44 -54, 1960
  5. ↵
    Antonovych TT, Lin RC, Parrish E, Mostofi K: Light chain deposits in multiple myeloma [Abstract]. Lab Invest30 : 370A,1974
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    Randall RE, Williamson WC Jr, Mullinax F, Tung MY, Still WJ: Manifestations of systemic light chain deposition. Am J Med 60: 293-299,1976
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Preud'homme JL, Morel-Maroger L, Brouet JC, Mihaesco E, Mery JP, Seligmann M: Synthesis of abnormal heavy and light chains in multiple myeloma with visceral deposition of monoclonal immunoglobulin. Clin Exp Immunol 42:545 -553, 1980
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    Aucouturier P, Khamlichi AA, Touchard G, Justrabo E, Cogne M, Chauffert B, Martin F, Preud'homme JL: Brief report: Heavychain deposition disease. N Engl J Med 329:1389 -1393, 1993
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Moulin B, Deret S, Mariette X, Kourilsky O, Imai H, Dupouet L, Marcellin L, Kolb I, Aucouturier P, Brouet JC, Ronco PM, Mougenot B: Nodular glomerulosclerosis with deposition of monoclonal immunoglobulin heavy chains lacking CH1. J Am Soc Nephrol10 : 519-528,1999
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Denoroy L, Déret S, Aucouturier P: Overrepresentation of the VκIV subgroup in light chain deposition disease. Immunol Lett42 : 63-66,1994
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Khamlichi AA, Rocca A, Touchard G, Aucouturier P, Preud'homme JL, Cogne M: Role of light chain variable region in myeloma with light chain deposition disease: Evidence from an experimental model. Blood 86:3655 -3659, 1995
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Khamlichi AA, Aucouturier P, Silvain C, Bauwens M, Touchard G, Preud'homme JL, Nau F, Cogne M: Primary structure of a monoclonal κ chain in myeloma with light chain deposition disease. Clin Exp Immunol 87:122 -126, 1992
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    Rocca A, Khamlichi AA, Aucouturier P, Noel LH, Denoroy L, Preud'homme JL, Cogne M: Primary structure of a variable region of the Vκ1 subgroup (ISE) in light chain deposition disease. Clin Exp Immunol 91:506 -509, 1993
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    Bellotti V, Stoppini M, Merlini G, Zapponi MC, Meloni ML, Banfi G, Ferri G: Amino acid sequence of k Sci, the Bence Jones protein isolated from a patient with light chain deposition disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1097:177 -182, 1991
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Deret S, Chomilier J, Huang DB, Preud'homme JL, Stevens FJ, Aucouturier P: Molecular modeling of immunoglobulin light chains implicates hydrophobic residues in non-amyloid light chain deposition disease. Protein Eng 10:1191 -1197, 1997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Ganeval D, Noël LH, Preud'homme JL, Droz D, Grünfeld JP: Light-chain deposition disease: Its relation with AL-type amyloidosis. Kidney Int 26: 1-9,1984
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Preud'homme JL, Morel-Maroger L, Brouet JC, Cerf M, Mignon F, Guglielmi P, Seligmann M: Synthesis of abnormal immunoglobulins in lymphoplasmacytic disorders with visceral light chain deposition. Am J Med 69:703 -710, 1980
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Cogné M, Preud'homme JL, Bauwens M, Touchard G, Aucouturier P: Structure of a monoclonal kappa chain of the VκIV subgroup in the kidney and plasma cells in light chain deposition disease. J Clin Invest87 : 2186-2190,1991
  19. ↵
    Lin J, Markowitz GS, Valeri AM, Kambham N, Sherman WH, Appel GB, D'Agati VD: Renal monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease: The disease spectrum. J Am Soc Nephrol, 12:1482 -1492, 2001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Ronco PM, Aucouturier P, Mougenot B: Monoclonal gammopathies: Multiple myeloma, amyloidosis, and related disorders. In: Diseases of the Kidney, 7th Ed., edited by Schrier RM, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, in press
  21. ↵
    Cheng IK, Ho SK, Chan DT, Ng WK, Chan KW: Crescentic nodular glomerulosclerosis secondary to truncated immunoglobulin alpha heavy chain deposition. Am J Kidney Dis 28:283 -288, 1996
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Khamlichi AA, Aucouturier P, Preud'homme JL, Cogné M: Structure of abnormal heavy chains in human heavy-chain-deposition disease. Eur J Biochem229 : 54-60,1995
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Eulitz M, Weiss DT, Solomon A: Immunoglobulin heavy-chain-associated amyloidosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:6542 -6546, 1990
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Solomon A, Weiss DT, Kattine AA: Nephrotoxic potential of Bence Jones proteins. N Engl J Med324 : 1845-1851,1991
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Gallo G, Buxbaum J: Monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease: Immunopathologic aspects of renal involvement. In: The Kidney in Plasma Cell Dyscrasias, edited by Minetti L, D'Amico G, Ponticelli C, Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1988, pp171 -181
  26. ↵
    Zhu L, Herrera GA, Murphy-Ullrich JE, Huang ZQ, Sanders PW: Pathogenesis of glomerulosclerosis in light chain deposition disease. Role for transforming growth factor-β. Am J Pathol147 : 375-385,1995
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Herrera GA, Russell WJ, Isaac J, Turbat-Herrera EA, Tagouri YM, Sanders PW, Picken MM, Dempsey S: Glomerulopathic light chain-mesangial cell interactions modulate in vitro extra-cellular matrix remodeling and reproduce mesangiopathic findings documented in vivo. Ultrastruct Pathol 23:107 -126, 1999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Sanders PW, Herrera GA, Kirk KA, Old CW, Galla JH: Spectrum of glomerular and tubulointerstitial renal lesions associated with monotypical immunoglobulin light chain deposition. Lab Invest64 : 527-537,1991
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    Ganeval D: Visceral deposition of monoclonal light chains and immunoglobulins: A study of renal and immunopathologic abnormalities. Adv Nephrol Necker Hosp 11:25 , 1982
  30. ↵
    Lomé C, Beaufils H, Mougenot B, Noël LH, Droz D: Non-amyloid monoclonal immunoglobulin light-chain (LC) deposits in renal extracellular matrix [Abstract]. J Am Soc Nephrol 8:539A , 1997
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    Pirani CL, Silva F, D'Agati V, Chander P, Striker L: Renal lesions in plasma cell dyscrasias: Ultrastructural observations. Am J Kidney Dis 10:208 -221, 1987
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    Bruneval P, Foidart JM, Nochy D, Camilleri JP, Bariety J: Glomerular matrix proteins in nodular glomerulosclerosis in association with light chain deposition disease and diabetes mellitus. Hum Pathol 16:477 -484, 1985
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Stokes MB, Holler S, Cui Y, Hudkins KL, Eitner F, Fogo A, Alpers CE: Expression of decorin, biglycan, and collagen type I in human renal fibrosing disease. Kidney Int57 : 487-498,2000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Herrera GA, Shultz JJ, Soong SJ, Sanders PW: Growth factors in monoclonal light-chain-related renal diseases. Hum Pathol 25:883 -892, 1994
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Tubbs RR, Gephardt GN, McMahon JT, Hall PM, Valenzuela R, Vidt DG: Light chain nephropathy. Am J Med71 : 263-269,1981
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Heilman RL, Velosa JA, Holley KE, Offord KP, Kyle RA: Longterm follow-up and response to chemotherapy in patients with light-chain deposition disease. Am J Kidney Dis 20:34 -41, 1992
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    Pozzi C, Fogazzi GB, Banfi G, Strom EH, Ponticelli C, Locatelli F: Renal disease and patient survival in light chain deposition disease. Clin Nephrol 43:281 -287, 1995
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    Droz D, Noel LH, Carnot F, Degos F, Ganeval D, Grunfeld JP: Liver involvement in nonamyloid light chain deposits disease. Lab Invest 50:683 -689, 1984
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    Ivanyi B: Frequency of light chain deposition nephropathy relative to renal amyloidosis and Bence Jones cast nephropathy in a necropsy study of patients with myeloma. Arch Pathol Lab Med114 : 986-987,1990
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    Kyle RA: A trial of three regimens for primary amyloidosis: Colchicine alone, melphalan and prednisone, and melphalan, prednisone, and colchicine. N Engl J Med 336:1202 -1207, 1997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Barjon P: Traitement de la maladie par dépôts de chaînes légères par greffe de moelle. Nephrologie13 : 24,1992
  42. ↵
    Mariette X, Clauvel JP, Brouet JC: Intensive therapy in AL amyloidosis and light-chain deposition disease. Ann Intern Med 123: 553,1995
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    Komatsuda A, Wakui H, Ohtani H, Kodama T, Miki K, Imai H, Miura A: Disapperance of nodular mesangial lesions in a patient with light chain nephropathy after long-term chemotherapy. Am J Kidney Dis 35: 9E,2000
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 12 (7)
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 12, Issue 7
1 Jul 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in JASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Light Chain Deposition Disease: A Model of Glomerulosclerosis Defined at the Molecular Level
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Light Chain Deposition Disease: A Model of Glomerulosclerosis Defined at the Molecular Level
PIERRE M. RONCO, MARIE-ALEXANDRA ALYANAKIAN, BEATRICE MOUGENOT, PIERRE AUCOUTURIER
JASN Jul 2001, 12 (7) 1558-1565;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Light Chain Deposition Disease: A Model of Glomerulosclerosis Defined at the Molecular Level
PIERRE M. RONCO, MARIE-ALEXANDRA ALYANAKIAN, BEATRICE MOUGENOT, PIERRE AUCOUTURIER
JASN Jul 2001, 12 (7) 1558-1565;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • History
    • Pathogenesis
    • Renal Pathology
    • Clinical Features of LCDD
    • Diagnostic Investigation
    • Variants of LCDD: LHCDD and HCDD
    • Outcome and Treatment
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Exercise in the End-Stage Renal Disease Population
  • Nephronophthisis-Associated Ciliopathies
  • Lipoprotein Metabolism and Lipid Management in Chronic Kidney Disease
Show more Disease of the Month

Cited By...

  • Late Recurrence of Light Chain Deposition Disease after Kidney Transplantation Treated with Bortezomib: A Case Report
  • Kidney Disease and Multiple Myeloma
  • Formation of assemblies on cell membranes by secreted proteins: molecular studies of free {lambda} light chain aggregates found on the surface of myeloma cells
  • Retinal pigment epithelial detachments and tears, and progressive retinal degeneration in light chain deposition disease
  • Onco-Nephrology: Glomerular Diseases with Cancer
  • Renal Monoclonal Immunoglobulin Deposition Disease: A Report of 64 Patients from a Single Institution
  • Kidney disease associated with plasma cell dyscrasias
  • Urinary Protein Profiles in a Rat Model for Diabetic Complications
  • Treatment of light chain deposition disease with bortezomib and dexamethasone
  • A Case of Atypical Light Chain Deposition Disease--Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Light chain deposition disease involving the airways: diagnosis by fibreoptic bronchoscopy
  • Distinguishing diabetic nephropathy from other causes of glomerulosclerosis: an update
  • Immunoglobulin Light (Heavy)-Chain Deposition Disease: From Molecular Medicine to Pathophysiology-Driven Therapy
  • Multiple Myeloma
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Annual Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Resources
  • Editorial Fellowship Program
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • JASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About JASN
  • JASN Email Alerts
  • JASN Key Impact Information
  • JASN Podcasts
  • JASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe to ASN Journals

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1046-6673 Online ISSN - 1533-3450

Powered by HighWire