Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Article Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Fellowship
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Impact Factor
    • Reprints
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Article Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Fellowship
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Impact Factor
    • Reprints
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Follow JASN on Twitter
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow JASN on RSS
  • Community Forum
Cell and Transport Physiology
You have accessRestricted Access

Regulation of the Proximal Tubular Sodium/Proton Exchanger NHE3 in Rats with Puromycin Aminonucleoside (PAN)-Induced Nephrotic Syndrome

Valérie Besse-Eschmann, Jelena Klisic, Vera Nief, Michel Le Hir, Brigitte Kaissling and Patrice M. Ambühl
JASN September 2002, 13 (9) 2199-2206; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ASN.0000028839.52271.DF
Valérie Besse-Eschmann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jelena Klisic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vera Nief
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michel Le Hir
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brigitte Kaissling
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patrice M. Ambühl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Excessive proteinuria due to loss of glomerular permselectivity in nephrotic syndrome can cause disturbances in renal salt and water handling with edema formation. Apart from oncotic and hydrostatic mechanisms associated with hypoalbuminemia, primary derangements in renal tubular sodium transport may contribute to the pathogenesis of nephrotic edema. Whereas there is evidence for an increase of cortical collecting duct sodium reabsorption in nephrotic rats, it remains controversial whether proximal tubule sodium transport may also be activated in this condition. The regulation of the cortical Na/H exchanger NHE3, the main pathway for Na reabsorption in the proximal tubule (PT), was investigated in rats with puromycin aminonucleoside (PAN)-induced nephrotic syndrome. PAN rats developed reduced GFR, severe proteinuria, and sodium retention within 3 d. After 10 d, immunoblots of brush border vesicles revealed a decreased abundance of NHE3 in nephrotic animals. However, the Na/H antiporter activity in the same vesicle preparations was not significantly altered. Antiporter activity normalized for NHE3 protein was increased by 88% in nephrotic animals (P = 0.025). Immunohistochemistry with the same polyclonal antibody as for immunoblots revealed a decrease of NHE3 abundance in PT. In contrast, immunoreactivity for the monoclonal antibody 2B9, which specifically recognizes the non-megalin-associated, transport-competent pool of NHE3, was higher in PAN-treated rats than in controls. In conclusion, increased sodium reabsorption might be associated with a shift of NHE3 from an inactive pool to an active pool, thus contributing to sodium retention in a state of proteinuria.

The nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a common manifestation of renal disease and is characterized by urinary protein loss due to glomerular damage and renal salt and water retention (1). Under regular conditions, permselectivity of intact glomerular structures ensures retention of most of the serum proteins in the vascular space (2). Even under normal conditions, up to 5 g of protein per day may be filtered by the glomeruli, which are then reabsorbed by the renal tubule (3,4). In glomerular diseases, two pathophysiologically important events occur. First, substantial amounts of protein (mainly albumin) are filtered through the damaged glomeruli and are lost into the urine. Second, increasing quantities of the filtered protein are reabsorbed by the renal tubule (5). Besides being a hallmark of glomerular disease, proteinuria has been shown to be an independent factor that induces and maintains renal damage (6). The current understanding is that protein reabsorption by the proximal tubule triggers inflammation and scarring by induction of several cytokines and growth factors (for example TGFβ) (7). The reabsorption of albumin is achieved predominantly by endocytosis. Several recent studies have suggested an interrelation of transcellular albumin transport by endocytosis and acidification of lysosomes (8,9) through endosomal Na/H exchange (10,11). The nephrotic syndrome (NS) is also accompanied by various degrees of salt and water retention and represents a major clinical problem in the management of patients with nephrosis (12,13). One proposed mechanism is systemic interstitial volume sequestration due to hypoalbuminemia and secondary Na+ retention. In addition, primary salt retention per se may contribute substantially to systemic volume expansion in NS. The nephrotic state has been associated with activation of the Na/K-ATPase in the collecting duct (14,15). The effect of nephrotic syndrome on proximal tubule Na+ transporters has not been explored. The bulk of sodium reabsorption in the proximal tubule is mediated by the apical sodium/proton exchanger NHE3 (16). Given the potential role of proximal tubular sodium/proton exchange in both tubular protein reabsorption and salt retention, we investigated the regulation of the cortical brush border membrane Na/H exchanger NHE3 in rats with nephrotic syndrome induced by puromycin amino nucleoside (PAN).

Materials and Methods

Materials and Supplies

All chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO) unless stated otherwise.

Animals

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (average 200 g) were injected with either puromycin aminonucleoside (n = 9; PAN 150 mg/kg body weight intraperitoneally) or an identical volume of vehicle (H2O; n = 9). Animals were then placed separately into metabolic cages and allowed free access to distilled water. Control and PAN rats were pair-fed standard rat chow (No 9331 25 W10; Eberle Nafag AG, Gossau SG, Switzerland). Daily 24-h urine collections were performed in all animals. Urinary sodium concentration, as well as serum and urinary creatinine concentrations, were measured with an AVL984 electrode electrolyte analyzer (AVL Medical Instruments, Schaffhausen, Switzerland). Urine protein concentration was determined using the Bradford assay on a Merck Vitalab Eclipse filter photometer. Creatinine clearance was calculated from the urinary creatinine excreted over the last 24 h before sacrifice and the serum creatinine concentration from venous blood taken at sacrifice. Ten days after injection of PAN or vehicle, rats were anesthetized with 0.25 ml/kg Dormitor (Pfizer, Sandwich, Kent, UK) (1 mg/ml medetomidini hydrochloridum) and 0.25 ml/kg Hypnorm (Janssen, New Brunswick, NJ) (0.315 mg/ml fentanyl citrate), and kidneys were excised, weighed, and placed in ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).

Cortical Brush Border Membrane Vesicle Preparation

Renal cortical apical membrane vesicles were prepared by Mg2+ aggregation, as described previously (17). Dissected kidney cortex was homogenized in membrane buffer (300 mM mannitol, 18 mM HEPES, 5 mM EGTA, 100 μg/ml PMSF; pH 7.50) at 4°C with a Brinkmann Polytron (Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY). MgCl2 was added to the homogenate to obtain a final concentration of 15 mM, and the homogenate was pelleted at 4°C by centrifugation at 2500 × g for 30 min (Polytron; Kinematica GmbH, Kriens, Switzerland). Supernatant was transferred, an additional MgCl2 precipitation was performed, and membranes were pelleted from the final supernatant at 48,000 × g at 4°C for 30 min (RC 5c Plus; DuPont Company, Sorvall Products, Wilmington, DE). Enrichment of brush border membrane vesicles was not affected by PAN treatment, as evidenced by comparable ratios of BBM to total cortical homogenate leucine aminopeptidase activities in control and PAN animals (×16 ± 3 versus ×13 ± 2, respectively, P = NS).

Immunoblot

Cortical brush border membrane pellets from the above preparation were resuspended in membrane buffer (see above), and protein content was assessed according to Bradford. Thirty micrograms of protein were diluted 1:5 in 5× sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer (1 mM Tris · HCl, pH 6.8, 1% SDS, 10% glycerol, 1% [vol:vol] 2-mercapttoethanol), boiled for 10 min, size fractionated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 7.5% gels, and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose. After blocking with 5% nonfat milk and 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS for 1 h, blots were probed in the same buffer for 1 h with a polyclonal anti-rat NHE3 antibody directed against amino acids 809 to 822 of the COOH-terminal cytoplasmic domain of rat NHE3 (kindly provided by Dr. Orson W. Moe, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) at a dilution of 1:10,000. Blots were washed in 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS one time for 15 min and two times for 5 min, incubated with a 1:10,000 dilution of peroxidase-labeled sheep anti-rabbit IgG in 5% nonfat milk and 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS for 1 h, washed as above, and then visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Nitro-Block II, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA; CDP-Star detection reagent, Amersham, Piscataway, NJ). NHE3 protein abundance was quantitated by densitometry (BioCapt software version 72.02 s for Windows, Vilbert Lourmat, France; Scion Image Beta 3b 1998, Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD). Signal was measured as an integrated volume with correction for a defined background.

Na+/H+ Antiporter Assay

Na+-H+ antiporter activity was determined by the acridine orange method as described by Moe et al. (18). Cortical brush border membrane vesicles were used as prepared for western blotting, with the exception that after the final precipitation step at 48,000 × g, the pellet was resuspended in 140 mM NMDG gluconate and 5 mM MES at pH 5.5. The acid-loaded vesicles were then added to a solution containing 120 mM NMDG-gluconate, 20 mM HEPES at pH 7.50, and 6 μM acridine orange (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Fluorescence signal was followed in a spectrofluorometer (λex = 493 nm, λex = 530 nm; Shimadzu 5000, Japan). The proton gradient-driven trapping of acridine orange in the vesicles provoked fluorescence quenching. Na+/H+ antiporter activity was then assayed as the rate of increase in fluorescence (acridine orange efflux) occurring in response to Na+ addition to the extravesicular space. Specific activity of the Na+/H+ antiporter was expressed as the slope of the initial Na+-dependent fluorescence increase divided by the initial quench.

Tissue Preparation for Light Microscopy and Immunohistochemistry

An additional set of animals (n = 3 for both PAN and control) undergoing identical treatment as described above (except for the following modifications) was analyzed by light microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Nine days after injection of PAN or vehicle, rats were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of thiopental (0.5 mg/kg Pentothal; Abbott, Abbott Park, IL), and kidneys were fixed by vascular perfusion via the abdominal aorta as described previously (19). The fixative consisted of 3% paraformaldehyde and 0.05% picric acid in 0.06 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4; containing 3 mM MgCl2 and adjusted to 300 mOsm with sucrose) and 10% hydroxyethyl starch (HAES, Fresenius, Switzerland). After fixation, the left renal artery was clamped and the fixative in the right kidney was washed out by perfusion with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. Both kidneys were then removed.

For light microscopy, the left unwashed kidney was cut in coronal slices and immersed for at least 24 h in the 3% paraformaldehyde solution, to which 0.1% glutardialdehyde (Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs, Switzerland) was added. Thereafter, the tissue was postfixed in 1% OsO4 and embedded in epoxy resin. Then, 1-μm-thick sections were cut from the epoxy resin-embedded tissue and stained with azure II-methylene blue. Coverslips were applied with DPX mounting medium (Agar Scientific, Stansted, Essex, UK).

For immunofluorescence, coronal slices of the right kidney were mounted on cork disks, frozen in liquid propane cooled by liquid N2 and stored at −80°C until use. Four-micrometer-thick cryosections were placed on chromalum/gelatin-coated slides. Sections were pretreated with 1% SDS in PBS for 4 min. After rinsing with PBS, they were covered with 10% normal goat serum in PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (PBS/BSA) for 10 min. Sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C with a mouse anti-rabbit NHE3 monoclonal antibody directed against a Maltose Binding Protein fusion protein containing C-terminal 131 amino acids of rabbit NHE3 (clone 2B9; Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) diluted 1:50, with a polyclonal anti-rat NHE3 antibody (see Immunoblot section) diluted 1:500 in PBS/BSA or with a polyclonal anti-ecto-5′-nucleotidase antibody (19) 1:5000 for staining the brush border (without SDS-pretreatment in this case). Sections were then rinsed three times with PBS and covered for 1 h at room temperature with FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG and IgM (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) diluted 1:50 and Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson) diluted 1:1000 in PBS/BSA together with normal rat serum 1:100. Finally, the sections were rinsed with PBS, coverslips were applied with DAKO-Glycergel (Dakopatts, Glostrup, Denmark) containing 2,5% 1,4-diazabicyclo-(2.2.2)-octane (DABCO; Sigma) as a fading retardant, and the sections were examined by epifluorescence microscopy. The same protocol was followed for double-labeling, but the two primary antibodies as well as the two second antibodies were mixed.

Results

Renal Sodium and Protein Excretion; Creatinine Clearance

As shown in Figure 1, PAN-treated rats developed severe proteinuria on day 4 and beyond, whereas renal protein excretion was minimal in control animals. Similarly, PAN rats showed a significant decrease in urinary sodium excretion compared with control animals within 3 d after administration of the drug (Figure 2). A new steady state in sodium balance was achieved on day 9 in PAN animals, with a urinary sodium excretion no longer statistically different from rats not treated with puromycin. Most of the PAN rats also exhibited ascites on the day of sacrifice. Taken together, administration of puromycin resulted in the clinical equivalent of nephrotic syndrome with proteinuria as well as salt and volume retention. Creatinine clearance was significantly lower in nephrotic versus control rats (0.67 ± 0.09 versus 1.65 ± 0.15 ml/min, respectively; P = 0.0074).

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1. 24-h urinary protein excretion. Protein excretion was determined from 24-h urine collections of control and puromycin aminonucleoside (PAN)-treated rats. Experimental rats developed severe proteinuria 4 d after administration of PAN, which persisted throughout the whole study period. Note the logarithmical scale of the y-axis. *P < 0.001.

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 2. 24-h urinary sodium excretion. Sodium excretion was determined from 24-h urine collections of control and PAN-treated rats. Whereas control rats were in sodium balance, as revealed by constant natriuresis over the whole study period, PAN rats retained sodium from day 3 through 8, as evidenced by almost undetectable sodium excretion during this period. However, natriuresis in PAN animals returned back to control levels at day 9. *P < 0.001.

Light Microscopy

The overview of control kidneys (Figure 3a) shows intact cortex and outer stripe of medulla with open tubules. In contrast, the kidneys of rats treated with PAN exhibit an irregular pattern with many partially collapsed tubules (Figure 3b). Moreover, many dilated proximal tubules, especially in the medullary rays, can be detected. At higher magnification, the proximal tubules of control rats (Figure 4a) manifest with an intact brush border. In PAN rats (Figure 4b), a widespread shortening of the brush border takes place in proximal tubules. The brush border also undergoes focal destruction, especially in S2 segments. The proximal tubular cells display some variability in size, with many cells being smaller than in control animals, but some cells also with an increase in size.

Figure3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 3. Light microscopic overview of cortex. 1-μm-thick epon sections. (a) control kidney; (b) PAN-treated animal showing some collapsed tubules, whereas many tubules are dilated in the cortical medullary rays.

Figure4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 4. Light microscopic view of S2-segment of proximal tubule. 1-μm-thick epon sections. The profiles are from the sections shown in Figure 1. (a) control; (b) PAN-treated rat with partial disruption of the apical brush border membrane.

Immunofluorescence

Two different antibodies were used for detection of NHE3 in this study. With the monoclonal antibody 2B9, immunoreactivity was homogeneously increased in PAN-treated animals (Figure 5). In contrast, with the polyclonal antibody there was an overall decrease in PAN-treated animals. The levels of immunofluorescence were similar to controls in some tubules, whereas they were very low in other tubules (Figure 6). The decrease of immunoreactivity with the polyclonal antibody may be related to the structural alteration of the brush border described above. Indeed, the immunoreactivity for two unrelated proteins of the luminal membrane, ecto-5′-nucleotidase and NaPi-IIa, decreased also (not shown).

Figure5
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 5. NHE3 immunoreactivity with the monoclonal antibody 2B9 in the cortex. Cryosections were labeled with the 2B9 monoclonal antibody. In comparison with control animals (a), the immunofluorescence signal of the monoclonal antibody was increased in treated animals (b). A, arcuate artery.

Figure6
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 6. NHE3 immunoreactivity with the polyclonal antibody in the cortex. Cryosections were labeled with a polyclonal antibody against NHE3. In comparison with control animals (a), the immunofluorescence signal obtained with the polyclonal antibody was decreased in treated animals (b). A, arcuate artery.

In both control and PAN-treated animals, the intracellular distribution of NHE3 immunoreactivity was strikingly different with the two antibodies (Figure 7). NHE3 is mainly localized at the base of the brush border in the so-called intermicrovillar compartment (20–22), which the polyclonal antibody labeled almost exclusively in the present study (Figure 7). In contrast, strong labeling was detected with antibody 2B9 up to the tip of the microvilli, as described previously (20). With 2B9 the intracellular distribution pattern of immunoreactivity was somewhat altered by PAN treatment. Whereas in control animals the intermicrovillar compartment showed a distinctly higher immunofluorescence than the brush border, there was little difference between the two compartments in PAN-treated animals (Figure 7). Although the overall immunoreactivity with 2B9 was stronger in treated animals, its pattern often appeared irregular within tubular profiles at high magnification. This probably reflects the focal damage in the brush border, which has been observed also by light microscopy (see above). Indeed, the same irregular pattern was seen when adjacent sections were double-labeled with 2B9 and with an antibody against the brush border enzyme ecto-5′-nucleotidase (Figure 8).

Figure7
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 7. NHE3 immunoreactivity with monoclonal and polyclonal antibody at high magnification. Cryosections were double-labeled with monoclonal and polyclonal anti-NHE3 antibodies. Two cross-sections of S1 segments of the proximal tubule in a control (panels a through c) and a treated rat (panels d through f) are shown. The two cryosections were processed together. In panels a and d, the immunofluorescence signal for monoclonal anti-NHE3 is shown; in panels b and e, the immunofluorescence signal for polyclonal anti-NHE3 antibody is shown. In panels c and f, the data from both channels are superimposed, with the signal obtained with monoclonal antibody shown in red and polyclonal antibody shown in green. With the monoclonal antibody 2B9, the intermicrovillar membrane compartment was distinctly visible in controls only. The immunoreactivity in the brush border appeared slightly higher in the tubules of PAN-treated rats. With the polyclonal antibody, immunoreactivity was mostly restricted to the intermicrovillar compartment and was markedly lower in the tubules of treated animals.

Figure8
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 8. Colocalization of immunoreactivities with the anti-NHE3 monoclonal antibody and the brush border enzyme ecto-5′-nucleotidase. A profile of proximal tubule in a treated animal is shown. The cryostat section was double-labeled with a polyclonal antibody against the ecto-5′-nucleotidase (panel a; green in panel c) and with 2B9 (panel b; red in panel c). The damaged brush border shows short and discontinuous microvilli. The immunoreactivities with the two antibodies are congruent.

Na/H Exchange Activity and NHE3 Protein Abundance of Renal Cortical Brush Border Membrane Vesicles

Na/H exchange activity in cortical brush border membrane (BBM) vesicles was not significantly different between PAN and control rats (Figure 9A). However, NHE3 immunoblot showed that NHE3 protein abundance (per unit of total BBM vesicle protein) was decreased by 38% in animals that had been treated with puromycin (P = 0.003; Figure 9, B and C). This can be explained mainly by the partial disruption of the cortical brush border from PAN toxicity. To estimate specific Na/H exchange activity of intact tubules, activity measurements were normalized to cortical brush border NHE3 protein abundance, as Na/H exchange activity and NHE3 protein abundance were always determined from the same brush border vesicle preparation. Specific Na/H exchange activity was significantly increased in PAN rats by 88% versus control animals (P = 0.032; Figure 9D). As an internal control, Western immunoblot experiments were performed using an antibody directed against the rat sodium/phosphate cotransporter NaPi-2 (kindly provided by Dr. Jürg Biber, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich-Irchel, Zurich, Switzerland). Unlike for NHE3, no relevant changes in NaPi-2 cortical BBM protein abundance could be detected between control and PAN treated animals (data not shown).

Figure9
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 9. Proximal tubular Na/H antiporter activity and NHE3 protein abundance. Panel A depicts results of Na/H antiporter activity as determined from changes in intravesicular pH of cortical brush border membrane vesicles by acridine orange. No apparent difference exists in unadjusted measurements between control (white bar) and PAN-treated animals (black bar) regarding Na/H exchange activity. (B) Typical Western immunoblot from the same vesicle preparations as used for activity measurements showing substantially reduced NHE3 protein abundance in PAN rats compared with controls. (C) Quantification of NHE3 protein abundance in control and PAN-treated animals as determined by densitometry from Western immunoblot chemifluorescence signals. (D) Proximal tubular brush border Na/H exchange activity normalized for the amount of NHE3 protein abundance depicted in panels B and C. The adjusted Na/H exchange activity was increased by 88% in nephrotic rats (PAN) versus normal controls.

Discussion

It is still a matter of debate whether nephrosis is a state of underfill due to hypoalbuminemia or the result of primary renal salt and water retention from an activated renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Although our study was not designed to resolve this question, the findings point to a novel mechanism for primary renal sodium retention in a model of nephrosis in the rat. PAN in a dose of 150 mg/kg body wt resulted in salt retention within 3 d of administration (Figure 1), preceding overt proteinuria by 1 d (Figure 2). Besides a clear reduction in urinary sodium excretion, PAN rats also exhibited volume retention as evidenced by the development of ascites. Current evidence suggests that the collecting duct is one of the primary sites of salt retention in nephrotic syndrome (23–25). The Na/K-ATPase seems to be the major regulator of sodium reabsorption in this tubular segment in rats with proteinuria (14, 15). However, other studies have also shown increased sodium reabsorption to occur in the proximal tubule (26). Varying levels of intravascular volume status and GFR at time of study may account for the diverse findings with regard to the principal site of sodium reabsorption in nephrotic subjects. As the bulk of sodium absorption occurs in the proximal tubule, it seems reasonable to postulate that this segment contributes at least in part to salt and volume retention in the nephrotic syndrome.

The combined functional and immunohistochemical data of our study point toward an increase in activity of the Na/H exchanger in proximal tubules in PAN-induced nephrotic syndrome. Na/H exchange activity normalized to NHE3 antigen was increased by 88% in nephrotic versus control rats. As other BBM proteins, like the cortical sodium/phosphate cotransporter NaPi-2 and the ecto-5′-nucleotidase, are not affected in PAN-treated animals, we postulate a specific effect of proteinuria on proximal tubular NHE3. Furthermore, our immunohistochemical data along with recent studies by Biemesderfer et al. (20) provide the basis for a possible explanation how NHE3 activity may be regulated in the nephrotic syndrome. They demonstrated that NHE3 occurs in two different pools. The majority of NHE3 is found as a 21 S, megalin-associated, inactive form in the intermicrovillar microdomain at the base of the apical plasma membrane, whereas the remainder is present mainly in a 9.6 S active form present in brush border microvilli unrelated to megalin. There are two separate lines of evidence in the present study that suggest that the relative distribution of NHE3 is shifted toward the megalin-free, active pool in nephrotic animals. First, in BBM vesicles, the Na/H exchange activity per unit of NHE3 protein increased in PAN-treated rats. Second, in tissue sections, the abundance of NHE3 detected with the polyclonal antibody decreased, whereas increased immunoreactivity could be noted with the monoclonal antibody 2B9, which is specific for the megalin-free, active form of NHE3. Megalin is a receptor for filtered proteins; increased protein filtration might therefore represent the link between PAN treatment and the postulated dissociation of NHE3 from the complexes with megalin. To substantiate this proposed link between proteinuria and activation of the Na/H exchanger, it will be necessary to examine further models of proteinuria. However, regulation of NHE3 activity in opossum kidney (OKP) cells via trafficking of NHE3 protein between the microvillar plasma membrane and a subapical compartment has been shown previously by various stimuli such as acid (22), osmolarity (27), endothelin-1 (28), parathyroid hormone (29), and dopamine (30). Finally, in a preliminary report, we have demonstrated that albumin increases Na/H exchange activity and apical cell surface NHE3 antigen in OKP cells (31).

The immediate signal for Na/H exchanger stimulation could be activation of the renin-angiotensin system. Indeed, 10−11 M angiotensin II activates Na/H exchange as shown in cultured proximal tubule cells. However, the literature on changes in local and systemic angiotensin II concentrations in PAN nephrosis is controversial. Whereas some investigators found increased angiotensin II levels in nephrotic animals, others did not observe such changes. PAN-treated rats had a decreased whole-animal GFR, as revealed by the significantly lower creatinine clearance compared to control animals. Given the reduced total kidney GFR, the “normal” total cortical BBM NHE3 activity suggests a heightened level of proximal tubule reabsorption reflecting a reset level of glomerulotubular balance. The second implication of our findings relates to proteinuria. Albumin enhances Na/H exchange activity in OKP cells, as shown in a preliminary report (31). NHE3 participates in tubular albumin uptake (10,11); the increase in NHE3-specific activity may therefore be in response to the increased albumin load presented to the proximal tubule.

In conclusion, in a model of nephrotic syndrome, the abundance of NHE3, its specific activity, and its subcellular localization were altered, suggesting a novel mechanism of control of Na/H exchange in the proximal tubule in vivo.

Acknowledgments

PMA was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation (31–54957.98) and the Hermann Klaus Foundation. JK was supported by the Novartis Science Foundation.

  • © 2002 American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    Orth SR, Ritz E: The nephrotic syndrome. N Engl J Med 338: 1202–1211, 1998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Brenner BM, Hostetter TH, Humes HD: Glomerular permselectivity: Barrier function based on discrimination of molecular size and charge. Am J Physiol 234: F455–F460, 1978
  3. ↵
    Straus W: Change in droplet fraction from rat kidney after intraperitoneal injection of egg-white. J Biophys Biochem Cytol 3: 933–947, 1957
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Maack T: Renal filtration, transport, and metabolism of proteins. In: The Kidney, edited by Seldin DW, Giebisch G, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2235–2267, 2000
  5. ↵
    Blantz RC, Wilson CB, Gabbai FB: Pathophysiology of acute glomerular injury. In: Immunologic Renal Disease, edited by Neilson EG, Couser WG, Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997: 237–250
  6. ↵
    Remuzzi G, Bertani T: Pathophysiology of progressive nephropathies. N Engl J Med 339: 1448–1456, 1998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Brunskill NJ: Molecular interactions between albumin and proximal tubular cells. Exp Nephrol 6: 491–495, 1998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Mukherjee S, Ghosh RN, Maxfield FR Endocytosis. Physiol Rev 77: 759–803, 1997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Schmid S, Fuchs R, Kielian M, Helenius A, Mellman I: Acidification of endosome subpopulations in wild-type Chinese hamster ovary cells and temperature-sensitive acidification-defective mutants. J Cell Biol 108: 1291–1300, 1989
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Gekle M, Mildenberger S, Freudinger R, Silbernagl S: Long-term protein exposure reduces albumin binding and uptake in proximal tubule-derived opossum kidney cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 9: 960–968, 1998
    OpenUrlAbstract
  11. ↵
    Gekle M, Drumm K, Mildenberger S, Freudinger R, Gassner B, Silbernagl S: Inhibition of Na+-H+ exchange impairs receptor-mediated albumin endocytosis in renal proximal tubule-derived epithelial cells from opossum. J Physiol Lond 520: 709–721, 1999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Palmer BF, Alpern RJ: Pathogenesis of edema formation in the nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int Suppl 59: S21–S27, 1997
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    Vande Walle JG, Donckerwolcke RA: Pathogenesis of edema formation in the nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 16: 283–293, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Deschenes G, Wittner M, Stefano A, Jounier S, Doucet A: Collecting duct is a site of sodium retention in PAN nephrosis: A rationale for amiloride therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 598–601, 2001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Zolty E, Ibnou-Zekri N, Izui S, Feraille E, Favre H Glomerulonephritis and sodium retention: enhancement of Na+/K+-ATPase activity in the collecting duct is shared by rats with puromycin induced nephrotic syndrome and mice with spontaneous lupus-like glomerulonephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 14: 2192–2195, 1999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Aronson PS: Role of ion exchangers in mediating NaCl in the proximal tubule. Kidney Int 49: 1665–1670, 1996
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Levi M, McDonald LA, Preisig PA, Alpern RJ Chronic K depletion stimulates rat renal brush-border membrane Na-citrate cotransporter. Am J Physiol 261: F767–F773, 1991
  18. ↵
    Moe OW, Tejedor A, Levi M, Seldin DW, Preisig PA, Alpern RJ: Dietary NaCl modulates Na(+)-H+ antiporter activity in renal cortical apical membrane vesicles. Am J Physiol 260: F130–F137, 1991
  19. ↵
    Dawson TP, Gandhi R, Le Hir M, Kaissling B Ecto-5′-nucleotidase: localization in rat kidney by light microscopic histochemical and immunohistochemical methods. J Histochem Cytochem 37: 39–47, 1989
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Biemesderfer D, DeGray B, Aronson PS Active (9.6 s) and inactive (21 s) oligomers of NHE3 in microdomains of the renal brush border. J Biol Chem 276: 10161–10167, 2001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. Kwon TH, Frokiaer J, Fernandez-Llama P, Maunsbach AB, Knepper MA, Nielsen S: Altered expression of Na transporters NHE-3. NaPi-II, Na-K-ATPase, BSC- 1 and TSC in CRF rat kidneys. Am J Physiol 277: F257–F270, 1999
  22. ↵
    Ambühl PM, Amemiya M, Danczkay M, Lötscher M, Kaissling B, Moe OW, et al: Chronic metabolic acidosis increases NHE3 protein abundance in rat kidney. Am J Physiol 271: F917–F925, 1996
  23. ↵
    Bernard DB, Alexander EA, Couser WG, Levinsky NG: Renal sodium retention during volume expansion in experimental nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int 14: 478–485, 1978
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. Bohrer MP, Baylis C, Robertson CR, Brenner BM, Troy JL, Willis WT: Mechanisms of the puromycin-induced defects in the transglomerular passage of water and macromolecules. J Clin Invest 60: 152–161, 1977
  25. ↵
    Ichikawa I, Rennke HG, Hoyer JR, Badr KF, Schor N, Troy JL, et al: Role for intrarenal mechanisms in the impaired salt excretion of experimental nephrotic syndrome. J Clin Invest 71: 91–103, 1983
  26. ↵
    Allon M, Pasque CB, Rodriguez M: Sodium and water excretion in nephrotic patients: effects of changes in renal haemodynamics. Clin Sci (Colch) 79: 123–129, 1990
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Ambühl P, Amemiya M, Preisig PA, Moe OW, Alpern RJ: Chronic hyperosmolality increases NHE3 activity in OKP cells. J Clin Invest 101: 170–177, 1998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Peng Y, Amemiya M, Yang X, Fan L, Moe OW, Yin H, et al. ET(B) receptor activation causes exocytic insertion of NHE3 in OKP cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F34–F42, 2001
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    Collazo R, Fan L, Hu MC, Zhao H, Wiederkehr MR, Moe OW: Acute regulation of Na+/H+ exchanger NHE3 by parathyroid hormone via NHE3 phosphorylation and dynamin-dependent endocytosis. J Biol Chem 275: 31601–31608, 2000
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Hu MC, Fan L, Crowder LA, Karim-Jimenez Z, Murer H, Moe OW: Dopamine acutely stimulates Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE3) endocytosis via clathrin-coated vesicles: Dependence on protein kinase A-mediated NHE3 phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 276: 26906–26915, 2001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Nief V, Reyes L, Klisic J, Ambühl PM: Albumin enhances Na/H exchange in OKP cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 21, 2001
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 13 (9)
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 13, Issue 9
1 Sep 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in JASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Regulation of the Proximal Tubular Sodium/Proton Exchanger NHE3 in Rats with Puromycin Aminonucleoside (PAN)-Induced Nephrotic Syndrome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Regulation of the Proximal Tubular Sodium/Proton Exchanger NHE3 in Rats with Puromycin Aminonucleoside (PAN)-Induced Nephrotic Syndrome
Valérie Besse-Eschmann, Jelena Klisic, Vera Nief, Michel Le Hir, Brigitte Kaissling, Patrice M. Ambühl
JASN Sep 2002, 13 (9) 2199-2206; DOI: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000028839.52271.DF

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Regulation of the Proximal Tubular Sodium/Proton Exchanger NHE3 in Rats with Puromycin Aminonucleoside (PAN)-Induced Nephrotic Syndrome
Valérie Besse-Eschmann, Jelena Klisic, Vera Nief, Michel Le Hir, Brigitte Kaissling, Patrice M. Ambühl
JASN Sep 2002, 13 (9) 2199-2206; DOI: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000028839.52271.DF
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Acute Regulation of the Epithelial Na+ Channel by Phosphatidylinositide 3-OH Kinase Signaling in Native Collecting Duct Principal Cells
  • Role for TGF-β in Cyclosporine-Induced Modulation of Renal Epithelial Barrier Function
  • Increased Renal Responsiveness to Vasopressin and Enhanced V2 Receptor Signaling in RGS2−/− Mice
Show more Cell and Transport Physiology

Cited By...

  • Edema in the Nephrotic Syndrome: New Aspect of an Old Enigma
  • Albumin Regulates the Na+/H+ Exchanger 3 in OKP Cells
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Annual Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Resources
  • Editorial Fellowship Program
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • JASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About JASN
  • JASN Email Alerts
  • JASN Key Impact Information
  • JASN Podcasts
  • JASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe to ASN Journals

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1046-6673 Online ISSN - 1533-3450

Powered by HighWire