Epidemiology and Outcomes

Mortality Risk Stratification in Chronic Kidney Disease: One Size for All Ages?

Ann M. O’Hare, Daniel Bertenthal, Kenneth E. Covinsky, C. Seth Landefeld, Saunak Sen, Kala Mehta, Michael A. Steinman, Ann Borzecki and Louise C. Walter
JASN March 2006, 17 (3) 846-853; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2005090986

Abstract

Current National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative staging criteria for chronic kidney disease (CKD) are intended to apply to all age groups. However, it is unclear whether different levels of estimated GFR (eGFR) have the same prognostic significance in older and younger patients. The study cohort was composed of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) patients who were aged 18 to 100 yr and had at least one outpatient serum creatinine measurement between October 1, 2001, and September 30, 2002 (n = 2583,911). Patients with ESRD were excluded. GFR was estimated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation using each patient’s first outpatient creatinine measurement during the study period. The association of eGFR with survival was measured by age group. Twenty percent of cohort patients had an eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, ranging from 3% among 18- to 44-yr-olds to as high as 49% among 85- to 100-yr-olds. Fifty-two percent (n = 266,421) of cohort patients with an eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 had “very” moderate reductions in eGFR into the 50- to 59-ml/min per 1.73 m2 range. The association of eGFR with mortality was weaker in the elderly than in younger age groups: Whereas severe reductions in eGFR were associated with an increased risk for death in all age groups, “very” moderate reductions in eGFR (50 to 59 ml/min per 1.73 m2) were associated with an increased adjusted risk for death only among patients who were younger than 65 yr. Age-related attenuation of the association of eGFR with mortality was also present among women and black patients. In the clinical setting, mortality risk stratification in elderly patients should not be based on the same eGFR cut points as for younger age groups and would benefit from finer categorization of the 30- to 59-ml/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR group.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a common condition that affects >8 million Americans (1). Whereas traditional concerns have focused on the risk for progression to ESRD among patients with CKD, it has recently become clear that the competing risks for death and cardiovascular events are substantial in this population (2–8). To improve detection and management of CKD, the National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) has developed CKD practice guidelines (http://www.kidney.org/professionals/kdoqi/guidelines_bone/index.htm). These guidelines advocate a stepped approach to slowing progression of CKD and reducing CKD-related morbidity and mortality on the basis of each patient’s disease stage (9).

Current guidelines recommend that the same criteria be used to diagnose CKD in older as in younger patients. Thus, all patients, regardless of their age, are considered to have at least moderate CKD when their estimated GFR (eGFR) is <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. However, limited data suggest that GFR decreases as part of normal aging (10) and that decrements in eGFR are exceedingly common in some elderly populations (11). Furthermore, the Cockroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equations may not be accurate in elderly patients; neither was developed in an elderly patient cohort (12,13), and serum creatinine, on which both equations are based, is a poor marker of renal function in older patients. Finally, little is known about the prognostic significance of decreased eGFR in elderly individuals (http://www.kidney.org/professionals/kdoqi/guidelines_ckd/p9_approach.htm).

We examined the prevalence and prognostic significance by age group of different levels of MDRD eGFR on the basis of outpatient serum creatinine measurements in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system, the largest integrated health care provider in the United States. A better understanding of the prognostic importance of decrements in eGFR measurements obtained in the clinical setting could serve as a foundation both for real-world clinical decision making in the elderly and for a better appreciation of the policy implications of applying KDOQI guidelines to a growing elderly population.

Materials and Methods

Patients

A total of 4,436,334 veterans who were aged 18 to 100 yr had at least one outpatient visit to a VA medical center between October 1, 2001, and September 30, 2002. During this time frame, at least one outpatient serum creatinine measurement was available for 2,598,548 of these patients who were cared for at 128 different VA medical centers across the United States. Patients entered this study at the time of their first creatinine measurement during the period under study. For patients with more than one creatinine measurement during the study period, we based our analyses on the first measurement. To focus the study on patients with non–dialysis-dependent CKD, we excluded 14,637 who had reached ESRD or who had undergone at least one episode of dialysis before cohort entry. This left an analytic cohort of 2,583,911 patients.

Data Sources

We used data from the VA, Medicare, and United States Renal Data System data for this study:

  1. The VA Decision Support System Laboratory Results file was used to ascertain serum creatinine and glucose measurements associated with outpatient visits among cohort patients (http://www.virec.research.med.va.gov/References/VirecInsights/Insights-v01n2.pdf).

  2. VA administrative databases (the National Patient Care Database and VA Fee Basis files) were used to ascertain demographic and comorbidity information for cohort patients from 1997 onward (http://www.virec.research.med.va.gov/References/VirecInsights/Insights-v01n3.pdf) (14).

  3. The VA Beneficiary Identification and Records Locator Subsystem was used to ascertain date of death (15–17).

  4. The Medicare denominator file was used as the primary source of race data for veterans with Medicare coverage based on its superior reliability to VA data sources (18,19).

  5. We used inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims from 1999 to the time of cohort entry as an additional source of information on comorbid conditions for veterans with Medicare coverage.

  6. We used data from United States Renal Data System, a national ESRD registry, to exclude from the cohort patients who had ESRD.

Primary Predictor

The primary predictor variable for all analyses was eGFR calculated using the abbreviated MDRD formula based on age, gender, race, and serum creatinine level (9). When race data were missing, we made no adjustment for black race. The National Kidney Foundation defines an eGFR of ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 as being “normal” or “mildly reduced.” Moderate CKD is defined as an eGFR of 30 to 59 ml/min per 1.73 m2, severe CKD as an eGFR of 15 to 29 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and renal failure as an eGFR of <15 ml/min per 1.73 m2 or dialysis dependence. In this analysis, we excluded patients with ESRD and used a finer classification of eGFR to distinguish between different levels of moderate CKD (≥60, 50 to 59, 40 to 49, 30 to 39, 15 to 29, and <15 ml/min per 1.73 m2).

Covariates

All analyses were stratified by age group (18 to 44, 45 to 54, 55 to 64, 65 to 74, 75 to 84, and 85+). Multivariate analysis was adjusted for age; race (black versus nonblack); gender; and presence of diabetes, coronary artery disease (defined as a previous diagnosis of coronary artery disease, angina, or myocardial infarction or previous coronary artery bypass graft or angioplasty), congestive heart failure, peripheral arterial disease (defined as a previous diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease or previous lower extremity amputation or revascularization procedure), chronic obstructive lung disease, and cerebrovascular disease (defined as previous stroke or transient ischemic attack). Comorbidities were assigned on the basis of relevant International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic and procedure codes and CPT procedure codes in the VA National Patient Care Database and Fee Basis files from October 1, 1997, to the time of cohort entry and in the inpatient and outpatient Medicare claims from January 1, 1999, through the time of cohort entry. We classified patients with a random serum glucose measurement of ≥200 mg/dl during the 3-mo period before cohort entry as having diabetes.

Outcome

The outcome for this analysis was time from study entry to death. Death data were ascertained through June 17, 2005.

Statistical Analyses

We compared patient characteristics by age group using tests for trend. We calculated annual mortality by age and eGFR category using Poisson regression. We used Cox proportional hazard analysis to measure the association of eGFR with time from study entry to death after stratification for age group. Patients were censored at the end of follow-up. All analyses were adjusted for a fixed effect for center to accommodate between-center differences in creatinine measurement.

To determine the prognostic significance of “stable” eGFR measurements, we repeated the primary analysis among the subgroup of patients who underwent repeat creatinine measurement between 3 and 6 mo after cohort entry and whose eGFR fell in the same range at both time points. We also repeated the primary analyses among women and among black patients. Finally, we used creatinine cut points instead of eGFR measurements to define patients with moderate and severe renal insufficiency. For this analysis, we used cut points of 1.3 and 1.8 mg/dl for women and 1.5 and 2.0 mg/dl for men. We were unable to use the Cockroft-Gault equation because patient weight was not available. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of California, San Francisco, and the Research Committee at the VA San Francisco.

Results

The mean age of the study population was 63.6 ± 14 yr; 5% of cohort patients were women (n = 140,021), 12% were black, 75% were white or other race, and 13% were missing race data. The percentage of female and black patients decreased and the percentage of patients with diagnosed comorbid conditions increased across age groups (Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1.

Cohort patient characteristics by age group

Twenty percent of cohort patients had an eGFR of <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (n = 514,850). Fifty-two percent of these patients had very moderate reductions in eGFR to 50 to 59 ml/min per 1.73 m2 (Figure 1). From the youngest to the oldest age groups, the prevalence of an eGFR of <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 ranged from 3 to 49%. Differences in the prevalence of moderately (rather than severely) reduced eGFR accounted for most of this variability.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Prevalence of low estimated GFR (eGFR) by age group.

A mean of 3.17 ± 0.62 yr per person and a total of 8,218,817 yr of follow-up were available for study. A total of 218,246 deaths occurred during this period. Death rates increased both with increasing age and with falling eGFR (Figure 2). Baseline mortality rates among elderly patients with eGFR levels of ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 were much higher than for younger patients. Among elderly patients with eGFR levels in the 40- to 59-ml/min per 1.73 m2 range, mortality rates were only slightly higher than for the group with an eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. However, for all age groups, mortality rates increased dramatically at eGFR levels <40 ml/min per 1.73 m2, with the highest rates occurring in the oldest age groups.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Annual mortality by age group and eGFR.

In unadjusted analysis, risk for death was increased at all levels of eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 regardless of age (Table 2). However, the association of eGFR with mortality was weaker among older than among younger patients. For example, reductions in eGFR to 50 to 59 ml/min per 1.73 m2 were associated with an 80% increase in unadjusted risk for death among the youngest age group but with only a 6% increase among those aged 85 to 100. After adjustment for demographic characteristics, comorbid conditions, and VA medical center, patients who were aged 65 and older and had an eGFR of 50 to 59 ml/min per 1.73 m2 did not have an increased risk for death compared with those with an eGFR above this level. However, an eGFR of 50 to 59 ml/min per 1.73 m2 was still associated with an increased risk for death among all age groups under 65 yr.

View this table:
Table 2.

Risk for death by eGFR after stratification by age groupa

Subgroup Analyses

Results of subgroup analysis among women and among black patients yielded similar results. In sensitivity analysis using serum creatinine cut points, 11% of patients had an elevated creatinine (≥1.3 mg/dl for women and ≥1.5 mg/dl for men). This ranged from 2 to 30% from the youngest to the oldest age groups. The risk for death associated with elevated creatinine was also attenuated with advancing age. For women with creatinine values in the 1.3- to 1.7-mg/dl range and men with values in the 1.5- to 1.9-mg/dl range, the adjusted risk for death was 1.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37 to 1.96) in the youngest and 1.14 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.19) in the oldest age groups. For women with creatinine values ≥1.8 mg/dl and men with values ≥2.0 mg/dl, the adjusted risk for death ranged from 4.27 (95% CI 3.53 to 5.17) in the youngest to 1.67 (95% CI 1.59 to 1.75) in the oldest age groups.

Thirty percent (n = 777,092) of cohort patients underwent at least one repeat creatinine measurement between 3 and 6 mo after cohort entry. The percentage of patients who underwent repeat creatinine measurements varied by age group (19% of 18- to 44-yr-olds, 29% of 45- to 54-yr-olds, 32% of 55- to 64-yr-olds, 32% of 65- to 74-yr-olds, 32% 75- to 84-yr-olds, and 30% of 85- to 100-yr-olds). At the time of follow-up creatinine measurement, 627,056 (81%) patients were in the same eGFR category as they were at baseline, 64,102 (8%) had moved to a higher eGFR category, and 85,936 (11%) had moved to a lower eGFR category. Among the 627,054 patients who were in the same eGFR category at the time of their second creatinine measurement, an eGFR measurement in the 50- to 59-ml/min per 1.73 m2 range was not associated with a statistically significantly increased adjusted mortality risk in any age group (Table 3). Indeed, patients who were aged 65 to 84 yr and had an eGFR in this range had a lower adjusted mortality risk than those in their age group with an eGFR ≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Among patients with a stable eGFR of 40 to 49 ml/min per 1.73 m2, those who were 75 yr or older did not have a higher risk for death than the referent group. With the exception of the small group with an eGFR <15 ml/min per 1.73 m2, relative risk for death generally decreased with advancing age.

View this table:
Table 3.

Adjusted risk for death by age and eGFR among cohort members with stable repeat creatinine measurementsa

Discussion

Guidelines for the care of patients with CKD advocate a stepped approach toward slowing progression of CKD and reducing CKD-related morbidity and mortality on the basis of each patient’s stage of CKD (9). Estimated level of GFR (calculated using either the Cockroft-Gault or MDRD equation) is a key determinant of CKD stage. Although little is known about the accuracy of these equations or the health effects of a low GFR in elderly individuals, current staging criteria for CKD do not differ by age group (http://www.kidney.org/professionals/kdoqi/guidelines_ckd/p9_approach.htm). The findings reported here of a high prevalence of decreased eGFR in elderly patients and substantial variation across age groups in the prognostic significance of low eGFR suggest that mortality risk stratification should not be based on the same eGFR cut points in the elderly as in younger age groups.

When we used the MDRD equation to estimate GFR in a large national cohort with outpatient serum creatinine measurements, we found that the percentage of patients with moderate reductions in eGFR increased dramatically with advancing age. At the same time, the associations between eGFR and absolute and relative mortality risk varied considerably between age groups: At all levels of renal function, most deaths occurred in elderly patients, but the relative risk for death associated with each level of renal function decreased markedly with age. In fact, very moderate reductions in eGFR (50 to 59 ml/min per 1.73 m2) were not associated with an increased relative or absolute risk for death in patients who were older than 65 yr. At lower levels of eGFR, the presence of a decrement in eGFR explained a smaller percentage but larger absolute number of deaths in older compared with younger age groups. Among the one third of cohort patients with stable repeat creatinine measurements within 3 to 6 mo of cohort entry, an eGFR of 50 to 59 ml/min per 1.73 m2 was not associated with increased adjusted mortality risk in any age group, and an eGFR of 40 to 49 ml/min per 1.73 m2 was not associated with increased relative or absolute adjusted mortality risk among patients who were 75 yr or older. These findings suggest the potential value both of dividing the moderately decreased eGFR group into finer categories and of repeating creatinine measurements 3 to 6 mo later to distinguish the large number of patients with moderate reductions in eGFR with no increase in mortality risk from those with some increase in risk.

Patients with “very” moderate decrements in eGFR (in whom mortality risk was not increased compared with the referent) account for a large proportion of the elderly population with CKD. Thirty-nine percent of cohort members with moderate CKD and 49% of elderly (≥65 yr) cohort members with moderate CKD had an eGFR of 50 to 59 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The absence of an association of “very” moderate reductions in eGFR with mortality at older ages could occur as a result of inaccuracy of the MDRD equation in elderly patients. This equation was not developed in an elderly cohort (13), and creatinine may be a poor indicator of renal function in elderly individuals. Alternatively, age-related differences in the relative risk for death at each level of eGFR may represent true variation across age groups in the impact of low eGFR on mortality.

Most previous studies that examined the association of CKD with mortality adjusted for age but did not examine how risk for death attributable to CKD varies as a function of age (2–8). However, the results of population-based studies of advanced CKD in the United Kingdom indicate that the relative risk for mortality associated with CKD may be lower in older patients (20,21). Consistent with this, age has been shown to have an impact on associations between several other common conditions and mortality. For example, higher BP is associated with better rather than worse survival in patients who are 80 yr and older, whereas the reverse is true for younger patients (22–27). A similar phenomenon seems to exist for subclinical hypothyroidism, for which patients who are 80 yr or older and have mildly elevated levels of thyrotropin seem to have a lower risk for death than those with levels in the normal range (28). The lower relative risk for death attributable to CKD at older ages most likely reflects the higher background mortality risk and higher prevalence of other comorbidities at older ages, lessening the potential for a single comorbidity such as CKD to have an impact on mortality. The presence of a survival advantage among elderly patients with prevalent CKD (over those without CKD) may also be a consideration.

The prevalence of CKD in this cohort was much higher than expected on the basis of population estimates for older individuals in the general population (1,29). This is probably accounted for in large part by the characteristics of our study population (veteran health care users versus a representative sample of the civilian population). The higher-than-expected prevalence of CKD in our cohort may also have occurred as a result of differences in creatinine calibration between the MDRD reference laboratory and the various laboratories at which creatinine measurements were obtained for cohort patients (30,31). Although it is recommended that individual clinical laboratories calibrate creatinine measurements to the MDRD laboratory (9), this is not practiced routinely in the clinical setting. Our findings argue for caution in applying the MDRD equation to clinical populations of elderly patients, particularly when (as is most commonly the case) creatinine measurements are not calibrated to the MDRD laboratory.

Our analysis has the following limitations. (1) We address only mortality risk. Further studies are needed to evaluate other important disease-related outcomes such as progression of renal disease, cardiovascular or other morbid events, and patient quality of life. (2) Although our results probably reflect (at least in part) the inaccuracy of the MDRD equation among elderly patients and in the setting of uncalibrated creatinine measurements, we cannot confirm these possibilities because creatinine measurements that are calibrated to the MDRD laboratory and directly measured GFR are not routinely obtained in the clinical setting. (3) The results of subgroup analysis among patients with repeat creatinine measurements must be interpreted with caution because only one third of the original cohort underwent repeat creatinine measurements within the prespecified time frame, and this sample included relatively few younger patients with CKD. As a result of these limitations, comparison of the prognostic value of a single creatinine measurement versus two creatinine measurements drawn 3 to 6 mo apart must be interpreted with some caution. (4) Our study is limited by the use of administrative data to define comorbid conditions, which provided us with limited ability to adjust for the severity of comorbid conditions in our analysis. However, inadequate adjustment for severity of comorbid conditions is unlikely to have biased our results toward the null hypothesis. (5) Although the large size and older age structure of this cohort afforded us a unique opportunity to examine in detail the complex association of CKD with mortality across age groups, use of a veteran population that is predominantly male and white may raise concern that our results are not generalizable to other populations. However, our findings were reproduced in subgroup analysis among women and black patients. Therefore, there is no reason to expect that our major finding of an age-related attenuation in the association of eGFR with mortality would be different in other populations.

Conclusion

In a real-world clinical setting, the MDRD equation identified large numbers of patients who met KDOQI criteria for moderate CKD. Most of these patients were elderly, and many had “very” moderate reductions in eGFR that were not associated with an increased relative or absolute risk for death. These findings suggest that in the clinical setting, mortality risk stratification in elderly patients should not be based on the same eGFR cut points as for younger age groups and would benefit both from finer categorization of the 30- to 59-ml/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR group and from use of serial creatinine measurements.

Acknowledgments

A.M.O., M.A.S., and L.C.W. are supported by Research Career Development Awards from the Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service. D.B. and S.S. are supported by the VA San Francisco Health Services Research and Development Program Research Enhancement Award Program. C.S.L. is supported by the VA National Quality Scholar Program and an National Institute on Aging Academic Leadership Award (AG000912). C.S.L. and K.E.C. are supported by a grant from the John A. Hartford Foundation, Inc (2003-0244). These funding sources had no involvement in the design or execution of this study.

We thank Dr. David H. Lovett for insightful comments on a draft of this manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.jasn.org.

References

  1. ↵
    Coresh J, Astor BC, Greene T, Eknoyan G, Levey AS: Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis 41 : 1 –12, 2003
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    Fried LF, Shlipak MG, Crump C, Bleyer AJ, Gottdiener JS, Kronmal RA, Kuller LH, Newman AB: Renal insufficiency as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in elderly individuals. J Am Coll Cardiol 41 : 1364 –1372, 2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY: Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 351 : 1296 –1305, 2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. Henry RM, Kostense PJ, Bos G, Dekker JM, Nijpels G, Heine RJ, Bouter LM, Stehouwer CD: Mild renal insufficiency is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality: The Hoorn Study. Kidney Int 62 : 1402 –1407, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. Manjunath G, Tighiouart H, Coresh J, Macleod B, Salem DN, Griffith JL, Levey AS, Sarnak MJ: Level of kidney function as a risk factor for cardiovascular outcomes in the elderly. Kidney Int 63 : 1121 –1129, 2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. Mann JF, Gerstein HC, Pogue J, Bosch J, Yusuf S: Renal insufficiency as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes and the impact of ramipril: The HOPE randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 134 : 629 –636, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. Muntner P, He J, Hamm L, Loria C, Whelton PK: Renal insufficiency and subsequent death resulting from cardiovascular disease in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 13 : 745 –753, 2002
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Shlipak MG, Simon JA, Grady D, Lin F, Wenger NK, Furberg CD: Renal insufficiency and cardiovascular events in postmenopausal women with coronary heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 38 : 705 –711, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, Kausz AT, Levin A, Steffes MW, Hogg RJ, Perrone RD, Lau J, Eknoyan G, National Kidney Foundation: National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification. Ann Intern Med 139 : 137 –147, 2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Lindeman RD, Tobin J, Shock NW: Longitudinal studies on the rate of decline in renal function with age. J Am Geriatr Soc 33 : 278 –285, 1985
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Garg AX, Papaioannou A, Ferko N, Campbell G, Clarke JA, Ray JG: Estimating the prevalence of renal insufficiency in seniors requiring long-term care. Kidney Int 65 : 649 –653, 2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Cockroft DW, Gault MH: Prediction of creatinine clearance from serum creatinine. Nephron 16 : 31 –41, 1976
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D: A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: A new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 130 : 461 –470, 1999
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Murphy PA, Cowper DC, Seppala G, Stroupe KT, Hynes DM: Veterans Health Administration inpatient and outpatient care data: An overview. Eff Clin Pract 5 : E4 , 2002
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Fisher SG, Weber L, Goldberg J, Davis F: Mortality ascertainment in the veteran population: Alternatives to the National Death Index. Am J Epidemiol 141 : 242 –250, 1995
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. Page WF, Braun MM, Caporaso NE: Ascertainment of mortality in the US veteran population: World War II veteran twins. Mil Med 160 : 351 –355, 1995
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    Cowper DC, Kubal JD, Maynard C, Hynes DM: A primer and comparative review of major US mortality databases. Ann Epidemiol 12 : 462 –468, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Arday SL, Arday DR, Monroe S, Zhang J: HCFA’s racial and ethnic data: Current accuracy and recent improvements. Health Care Financ Rev 21 : 107 –116, 2000
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Kressin NR, Chang BH, Hendricks A, Kazis LE: Agreement between administrative data and patients’ self-reports of race/ethnicity. Am J Public Health 93 : 1734 –1739, 2003
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    John R, Webb M, Young A, Stevens PE: Unreferred chronic kidney disease: A longitudinal study. Am J Kidney Dis 43 : 825 –835, 2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Drey N, Roderick P, Mullee M, Rogerson M: A population-based study of the incidence and outcomes of diagnosed chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 42 : 677 –684, 2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Goodwin JS: Embracing complexity: A consideration of hypertension in the very old. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58 : 653 –658, 2003
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. Boshuizen HC, Izaks GJ, van Buuren S, Ligthart GJ: Blood pressure and mortality in elderly people aged 85 and older: Community based study. BMJ 316 : 1780 –1784, 1998
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. Hakala SM, Tilvis RS, Strandberg TE: Blood pressure and mortality in an older population. A 5-year follow-up of the Helsinki Ageing Study. Eur Heart J 18 : 1019 –1023, 1997
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. Mattila K, Haavisto M, Rajala S, Heikinheimo R: Blood pressure and five year survival in the very old. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 296 : 887 –889, 1998
    OpenUrl
  26. Rajala S, Haavisto M, Heikinheimo R, Mattila K: Blood pressure and mortality in the very old. Lancet 2 : 520 –521, 1983
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    Satish S, Freeman DH Jr, Ray L, Goodwin JS: The relationship between blood pressure and mortality in the oldest old. J Am Geriatr Soc 49 : 367 –374, 2001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Gussekloo J, van Exel E, de Craen AJ, Meinders AE, Frolich M, Westendorp RG: Thyroid status, disability and cognitive function, and survival in old age. JAMA 292 : 2591 –2599, 2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Coresh J, Byrd-Holt D, Astor BC, Briggs JP, Eggers PW, Lacher DA Hostetter TH: Chronic kidney disease awareness, prevalence, and trends among US adults, 1999 to 2000. J Am Soc Nephrol 16 : 180 –188, 2005
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Coresh J, Eknoyan G, Levey AS: Estimating the prevalence of low glomerular filtration rate requires attention to the creatinine assay calibration. J Am Soc Nephrol 13 : 2811 –2812, 2002
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Coresh J, Astor BC, McQuillan G, Kusek J, Greene T, Van Lente F, Levey AS: Calibration and random variation of the serum creatinine assay as critical elements of using equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Am J Kidney Dis 39 : 920 –929, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Request Permissions
Mortality Risk Stratification in Chronic Kidney Disease: One Size for All Ages?
Ann M. O’Hare, Daniel Bertenthal, Kenneth E. Covinsky, C. Seth Landefeld, Saunak Sen, Kala Mehta, Michael A. Steinman, Ann Borzecki, Louise C. Walter
JASN Mar 2006, 17 (3) 846-853; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2005090986
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

More in this TOC Section

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.