Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Article Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Fellowship
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Impact Factor
    • Reprints
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Article Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Fellowship
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Impact Factor
    • Reprints
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Follow JASN on Twitter
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow JASN on RSS
  • Community Forum
UP FRONT MATTERSEditorials
You have accessRestricted Access

Variations in Mortality among Hospitalizations for Acute Kidney Injury

William M. McClellan
JASN May 2010, 21 (5) 728-731; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2010030300
William M. McClellan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Health insurance, setting of care, geography, and primary disease all affect mortality among various populations in the United States.1,2 If medical care for these different populations were truly comparable, then we might expect similar mortality outcomes and attribute differences to random variation. Unfortunately, population-to-population variations in mortality are frequently observed and persist even after controlling for individual patient characteristics. This suggests potentially remediable differences in the content, organization, and delivery of health care may be important in shaping true variation.3–6 Such modifiable differences in health care–related mortality, if they exist, warrant special attention as clinical and public health problems.

This conceptual framework should be familiar to nephrologists. The national ESRD surveillance system, comprising the ESRD Networks and the US Renal Data System, consistently reports the likelihood of receiving a kidney transplant, mortality in hemodialysis patients, or incident ESRD differ in a nonrandom manner among patient groups, among geographic areas, and over time.7 Variations in patient care associated with these outcomes are reported as well,8 and interventions during the past 15 years to reduce variations in providing hemodialysis have substantially reduced mortality among patients with ESRD.9–11

An important question is the extent to which this conceptual framework extends to other aspects of clinical nephrology. One area in which new ideas are being piloted is in pre-ESRD care for stage 4 chronic kidney disease (CKD). The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently piloted surveillance and quality improvement activities to test the applicability of reducing variations in care in earlier stages of CKD among primary care physicians.12 If surveillance data can be used to direct targeted interventions to improve the care of patients with earlier stages of CKD, then nephrologists may be able to translate evidence-based clinical practice guidelines into better outcomes for kidney disease.

Another potential application of this conceptual framework comes from an important report in this issue of JASN. James et al.13 examine the mortality of patients who were treated in hospitals for acute kidney injury (AKI) regarding variations in time and place. They use an annual sample of hospitalizations, the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, designed in part to track and analyze national trends in health care quality and outcomes, to address two simple questions: Does mortality among patients who are hospitalized for AKI vary between weekday and weekend admissions, and does mortality risk for AKI vary by hospital size? They found patients who were admitted with a diagnosis of primary AKI on weekends experienced 7% greater mortality. This increased weekend risk was substantially greater in smaller (17% increase) compared with larger (7%) hospitals, a 45% relative risk differential.

A frequent concern about reported variations in mortality rates such as those reported by James et al.13 is that selection of study participants; errors in measuring either the outcome or group membership' and failure to account for disease severity, comorbidities, and other patient attributes may bias observed results. The authors' treatment of these issues is instructive and provides unexpected insight into hospital admissions for AKI.

They used a nationally representative sample of admissions to US hospitals, readily available to researchers, to reduce selection bias and increase the applicability of their results to the practicing nephrologist. In-hospital mortality was recorded in the same data source, reducing the likelihood that patients who met their AKI diagnosis in either high- or low-mortality hospitals were systematically excluded from the analyses. The authors used a validated, claims-based algorithm to ensure that each case of AKI was based on comparable documentation. Admissions were categorized as being for either primary and secondary AKI on the basis of the discharge diagnosis listed as the main cause for hospitalization. James et al.13 also reduced heterogeneity among the populations being compared across time and place by focusing their analyses on the remaining 22% of patients with primary AKI.

These steps substantially reduce but do not preclude the possibility that measurement bias may occur absent standard diagnostic criteria for AKI.14 Hospital-to-hospital variations in AKI documentation might have been further reduced, however, if more precise diagnostic criteria were available. In particular, identifying the type of injury that led to AKI,15 which is highly uneven and influences mortality, might have affected the data on day of the week or hospital size, and this issue might contribute to some of the mortality differences; however, information about the cause of injury is not reflected by the current International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes for acute renal failure (584.5, 584.6, 584.7, 584.8, and 584.9), which depend instead on the presumed location of injury, tubular necrosis, renal cortical necrosis, medullary (papillary) necrosis, other specified pathologic lesion in kidney, and unspecified causes.16

The reported mortality comparisons might also have been biased if differences in the severity of AKI and other patient attributes associated with increased risk for death varied during the week or among hospitals. They account for this possibility by controlling for age, gender, race, and comorbid conditions. Ideally, had the relevant information been available in the database, risk stratification criteria for AKI such as the recently published Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, ESRD (RIFLE) criteria that is based on changes in urine output and serum creatinine could have further controlled for differences in the severity of renal injury.17–19 This issue is important, because it is evident that even minor AKI confers increased risk for both short- and long-term mortality.20–23

What then are we to make of the conclusion of this well-designed study that weekend admissions characterized by either primary or secondary AKI associate with increased risk for death that is greater in small compared with large hospitals? These data do need replication, as is true of any single report, and as noted by the authors' further explanatory studies. Notably, these results raise the important question of identifying potentially modifiable risk factors that contribute to mortality differences.

James et al.13 suggest a reasonable hypothesis that increased weekend mortality reflects delayed recognition and treatment among patients with AKI as a result of the limited resources, particularly timely initiation of nephrology consultation and hemodialysis. These two possibilities warrant close scrutiny and comment. That delayed hemodialysis may contribute to variations in AKI-related mortality reflects the assumption that renal replacement therapy plays a substantial role in the care of patients who are admitted with AKI.

The data in this study, which reveal an unexpected picture of hospitalizations for AKI, suggest otherwise. The frequencies of hemodialysis care on the weekend (8.4%) and weekday (8.9%) were unexpectedly low and nearly the same. Although we are not provided dialysis rates individually for primary and secondary AKI, it is evident that for the overwhelming majority of these patients, someone determined that dialysis was not necessary. The overall low dialysis rates for both weekend and weekday AKI admissions suggest that although delayed initiation of renal replacement therapy may contribute to the increased weekend mortality, it may not be the sole or even major explanatory factor.

What of the second possibility, that failure of timely nephrology referral contributes to increased weekend mortality? As discussed by the authors,13 the impact of “nephrology consultation and the provision (and timing of) renal replacement therapy” on patient mortality is not currently supported by evidence—the notion being “hypothetical” in their words. Furthermore, a contrarian might argue if ≥90% of patients who are admitted with AKI do not require hemodialysis, then what added benefit is derived from a nephrology consultation?

The process similar to that used in ESRD to improve hemodialysis care may be relevant in addressing the nondialytic contribution of nephrology care for AKI. The methods for producing evidence-based practice guidelines for nephrology care in AKI is well advanced,24 and the clinical practice guidelines similar to those used in ESRD are being published (http://www.renal.org/Clinical/GuidelinesSection/AcuteKidneyInjury.aspx). Although the current guidelines appropriately focus mainly on dialysis therapy in AKI, current AKI guidelines do suggest nondialytic contributions to the care of patients who are admitted to the hospital for AKI.25 Attributes of this care include timely nephrology consultation, appropriate assignment of cause and severity and need for dialysis, nondialytic management of volume, attention to antisepsis measures, metabolic control, adjustment of drug dosing, and modification of nutritional support. An international Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) working group is currently developing international AKI guidelines that address nondialytic nephrology care in more detail.26

If an evidence database supporting the role of these or other variations in nephrology care for patients with AKI can be developed27 and translated into quality indicators,28 similar to those for hemodialysis practice, then it would be possible to draw inferences about their contribution to weekday-to-weekend and hospital-to-hospital variability in mortality of patients with AKI. In turn, this information could be used to address variations in care.29

Disclosures

None.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.jasn.org.

  • See related article, “Weekend Hospital Admission, Acute Kidney Injury, and Mortality,” on pages 845–851.

  • Copyright © 2010 by the American Society of Nephrology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    1. Keenan PS,
    2. Cleary PD,
    3. O'Malley AJ,
    4. Landon BE,
    5. Zaborski L,
    6. Zaslavsky AM
    : Geographic area variations in the Medicare health plan era. Med Care 48: 260–266, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Fisher ES,
    2. Wennberg JE
    : Health care quality, geographic variations, and the challenge of supply-sensitive care. Perspect Biol Med 46: 69–79, 2003
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Wennberg JE
    : Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: Implications for academic medical centres. BMJ 325: 961–964, 2002
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Mitchell PH,
    2. Shortell SM
    : Adverse outcomes and variations in organization of care delivery. Med Care 35: NS19–NS32, 1997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Norris K,
    2. Nissenson AR
    : Race, gender, and socioeconomic disparities in CKD in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 19: 1261–1270, 2008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Ruggenenti P,
    2. Perticucci E,
    3. Cravedi P,
    4. Gambara V,
    5. Costantini M,
    6. Sharma SK,
    7. Perna A,
    8. Remuzzi G
    : Role of remission clinics in the longitudinal treatment of CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol 19: 1213–1224, 2008
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    2006 Renal Data System: Excerpts from the USRDS 2006 Annual Data Report. Am J Kidney Dis 49[Suppl 1]: S1–S296, 2006
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Lacson E Jr.,
    2. Wang W,
    3. Lazarus JM,
    4. Hakim RM
    : Hemodialysis facility-based quality-of-care indicators and facility-specific patient outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis 54: 490–497, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Wolfe RA,
    2. Hulbert-Shearon TE,
    3. Ashby VB,
    4. Mahadevan S,
    5. Port FK
    : Improvements in dialysis patient mortality are associated with improvements in urea reduction ratio and hematocrit, 1999 to 2002. Am J Kidney Dis 45: 127–135, 2005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    1. Sehgal AR
    : Impact of quality improvement efforts on race and sex disparities in hemodialysis. JAMA 289: 996–1000, 2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. 11.↵
    1. Sehgal AR,
    2. Leon JB,
    3. Siminoff LA,
    4. Singer ME,
    5. Bunosky LM,
    6. Cebul RD
    : Improving the quality of hemodialysis treatment: A community-based randomized controlled trial to overcome patient-specific barriers. JAMA 287: 1961–1967, 2002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    1. McClellan WM,
    2. Casey MT,
    3. Hughley J,
    4. Freund E
    : Population-based interventions to reduce socioeconomic disparities in chronic kidney disease. Semin Nephrol 30: 33–41, 2010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    1. James MT,
    2. Wald R,
    3. Bell CM,
    4. Tonelli M,
    5. Hemmelgarn BR,
    6. Waikar SS,
    7. Chertow GM
    : Weekend hospital admission, acute kidney injury, and mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 21: 845–851, 2010
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. 14.↵
    1. Waikar SS,
    2. Liu KD,
    3. Chertow GM
    : Diagnosis, epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3: 844–861, 2008
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. 15.↵
    1. Ali T,
    2. Khan I,
    3. Simpson W,
    4. Prescott G,
    5. Townend J,
    6. Smith W,
    7. MacLeod A
    : Incidence and outcomes in acute kidney injury: A comprehensive population-based study. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 1292–1298, 2007
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    1. Waikar SS,
    2. Wald R,
    3. Chertow GM,
    4. Curhan GC,
    5. Winkelmayer WC,
    6. Liangos O,
    7. Sosa MA,
    8. Jaber BL
    : Validity of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes for acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 1688–1694, 2006
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. 17.↵
    1. Bellomo R,
    2. Ronco C,
    3. Kellum JA,
    4. Mehta RL,
    5. Palevsky P
    Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup: Acute renal failure: Definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs—The Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 8: R204–R212, 2004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Mehta RL,
    2. Kellum JA,
    3. Shah SV,
    4. Molitoris BA,
    5. Ronco C,
    6. Warnock DG,
    7. Levin A
    Acute Kidney Injury Network: Acute Kidney Injury Network: Report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care 11: R31, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Ricci Z,
    2. Cruz D,
    3. Ronco C
    : The RIFLE criteria and mortality in acute kidney injury: A systematic review. Kidney Int 73: 538–546, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Coca SG,
    2. Peixoto AJ,
    3. Garg AX,
    4. Krumholz HM,
    5. Parikh CR
    : The prognostic importance of a small acute decrement in kidney function in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 50: 712–720, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    1. Goldberg A,
    2. Kogan E,
    3. Hammerman H,
    4. Markiewicz W,
    5. Aronson D
    : The impact of transient and persistent acute kidney injury on long-term outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. Kidney Int 76: 900–906, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    1. Ishani A,
    2. Xue JL,
    3. Himmelfarb J,
    4. Eggers PW,
    5. Kimmel PL,
    6. Molitoris BA,
    7. Collins AJ
    : Acute kidney injury increases risk of ESRD among elderly. J Am Soc Nephrol 20: 223–228, 2009
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Lafrance J-P,
    2. Miller DR
    : Acute kidney injury associates with increased long-term mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 21: 345–352, 2010
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.↵
    1. Kellum JA,
    2. Bellomo R,
    3. Ronco C
    : Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI): Methodology. Int J Artif Organs 31: 90–93, 2008
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Vanbelleghem H,
    2. Vanholder R,
    3. Levin NW,
    4. Becker G,
    5. Craig JC,
    6. Ito S,
    7. Lau J,
    8. Locatelli F,
    9. Zoccali C,
    10. Solez K,
    11. Hales M,
    12. Lameire N,
    13. Eknoyan G
    : The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes website: Comparison of guidelines as a tool for harmonization. Kidney Int 71: 1054–1061, 2007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. 26.↵
    1. Eckardt KU,
    2. Kasiske BL
    : Kidney disease: Improving global outcomes. Nat Rev Nephrol 5: 650–657, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Steinberg EP,
    2. Eknoyan G,
    3. Levin NW,
    4. Eschbach JW,
    5. Golper TA,
    6. Owen WF,
    7. Schwab S
    : Methods used to evaluate the quality of evidence underlying the National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative clinical practice guidelines: Description, findings, and implications. Am J Kidney Dis 36: 1–11, 2000
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    1. Sugarman JR,
    2. Frederick PR,
    3. Frankenfield DL,
    4. Owen WF Jr.,
    5. McClellan WM
    : Developing clinical performance measures based on the Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative clinical practice guidelines: Process, outcomes, and implications. Am J Kidney Dis 42: 806–812, 2003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Goldman RS
    : Continuous quality improvement in ESRD: The role of networks, the United States Renal Data System, and facility-specific reports. Am J Kidney Dis 32[Suppl 4]: S182–S189, 1998
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 21 (5)
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 21, Issue 5
1 May 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in JASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Variations in Mortality among Hospitalizations for Acute Kidney Injury
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Variations in Mortality among Hospitalizations for Acute Kidney Injury
William M. McClellan
JASN May 2010, 21 (5) 728-731; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2010030300

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Variations in Mortality among Hospitalizations for Acute Kidney Injury
William M. McClellan
JASN May 2010, 21 (5) 728-731; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2010030300
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

UP FRONT MATTERS

  • QALYs, DALYs and Now PALYs: Strengthening the Argument for Prevention of CKD
  • Management of Obesity in Adults with CKD
  • Me Or Your Own Eyes: RNA-Seq and the Kidney
Show more UP FRONT MATTERS

Editorials

  • Race and the Estimation of GFR: Getting it Right
  • Monkeying about with Nephron Formation
  • Kidney Transplant Rejection Clusters and Graft Outcomes: Revisiting Banff in the Era of “Big Data”
Show more Editorials

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • Weekend Hospital Admission, Acute Kidney Injury, and Mortality
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Annual Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Resources
  • Editorial Fellowship Program
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • JASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About JASN
  • JASN Email Alerts
  • JASN Key Impact Information
  • JASN Podcasts
  • JASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe to ASN Journals

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1046-6673 Online ISSN - 1533-3450

Powered by HighWire