Clinical Research

Biomarkers Predict Progression of Acute Kidney Injury after Cardiac Surgery

Jay L. Koyner, Amit X. Garg, Steven G. Coca, Kyaw Sint, Heather Thiessen-Philbrook, Uptal D. Patel, Michael G. Shlipak, Chirag R. Parikh and for the TRIBE-AKI Consortium
JASN May 2012, 23 (5) 905-914; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2011090907

This article has a correction. Please see:

Abstract

Being able to predict whether AKI will progress could improve monitoring and care, guide patient counseling, and assist with enrollment into trials of AKI treatment. Using samples from the Translational Research Investigating Biomarker Endpoints in AKI study (TRIBE-AKI), we evaluated whether kidney injury biomarkers measured at the time of first clinical diagnosis of early AKI after cardiac surgery can forecast AKI severity. Biomarkers included urinary IL-18, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR), and urinary and plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL); each measurement was on the day of AKI diagnosis in 380 patients who developed at least AKI Network (AKIN) stage 1 AKI. The primary end point (progression of AKI defined by worsening AKIN stage) occurred in 45 (11.8%) patients. Using multivariable logistic regression, we determined the risk of AKI progression. After adjustment for clinical predictors, compared with biomarker values in the lowest two quintiles, the highest quintiles of three biomarkers remained associated with AKI progression: IL-18 (odds ratio=3.0, 95% confidence interval=1.3–7.3), ACR (odds ratio=3.4, 95% confidence interval=1.3–9.1), and plasma NGAL (odds ratio=7.7, 95% confidence interval=2.6–22.5). Each biomarker improved risk classification compared with the clinical model alone, with plasma NGAL performing the best (category-free net reclassification improvement of 0.69, P<0.0001). In conclusion, biomarkers measured on the day of AKI diagnosis improve risk stratification and identify patients at higher risk for progression of AKI and worse patient outcomes.

AKI is a common and serious complication of cardiac surgery that has been shown to correlate with all manner of adverse patient outcomes.1,2 Recently, standardized clinical definitions of AKI have been implemented through the validation of the Risk Injury Failure Loss End Stage (RIFLE) and Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria.3,4 These definitions have aided in ascertainment of the true incidence of AKI after cardiac surgery and shown that AKI, regardless of severity or stage, is associated with longer length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, increased cost of hospitalization, and increased patient mortality.5,6

In recent years, several studies have shown that novel biomarkers can detect acute tubular injury earlier than serum creatinine in the setting of AKI.7–11 Despite attempts to select patients at high risk for severe AKI, the majority of patients in these prospective studies do not develop clinical AKI. Additionally, most of those patients who develop AKI experience a milder form of AKI (e.g., AKIN stage 1 or RIFLE R) with transient bumps in serum creatinine and do not progress to more severe AKI stages (AKIN stage 2 or 3 or RIFLE F) or require acute dialysis.

Although several risk stratification scoring systems have been constructed to predict who will develop AKI before surgery, few tools exist for assessing the risk for progression of AKI when early AKI is evident in the postoperative setting. Diagnostic mainstays such as the fractional excretion of sodium and urea have been repeatedly shown to be suboptimal in a variety of clinical settings, including cardiac surgery.10,12–15 Similarly, in the specific setting of cardiac surgery, the use of urinalysis with microscopy has not been found to be effective.16 Currently, there are no clinical tools available at the time of early clinical AKI diagnosis (e.g., ≥50% or ≥0.3 mg/dl increase in serum creatinine) to predict the patients who will progress to more severe AKI after cardiac surgery.

Assessment of biomarkers of structural renal tubular injury (e.g., neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin [NGAL] and IL-18) at the time of creatinine-based diagnosis of AKI may offer prognostic information that may improve monitoring and care, guide patient counseling, and assist in the identification of patients for trials of AKI treatment. We have recently shown that urine IL-18 and plasma NGAL peak within 6 hours of adult cardiac surgery and forecast the future development of AKI in the early postoperative period.17 Additionally, at this early time point, these biomarkers were associated with longer length of in-hospital and ICU stay and higher risk of dialysis or death. The current study serves to expand on these data by investigating the role of biomarkers at the time of creatinine-based AKI diagnosis.

We used blood and urine from the Translational Research Investigating Biomarker Endpoints in AKI (TRIBE AKI) study, a large prospective, multicenter international cohort of adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery, to evaluate the prognostic utility of traditional and novel plasma and urinary biomarkers measured on the morning that creatinine-based AKI was detected. The four biomarkers that we examined were urinary IL-18, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR), and plasma and urine NGAL.

Results

Among 1219 adults who underwent cardiac surgery, 426 (34.9%) patients developed AKI after cardiac surgery4; 380 of 426 (89.2%) had biomarkers measured from the blood and urine collected on the first day of AKI diagnosis. Among the patients with AKI, 45 patients (11.8% of AKI cases) progressed to a higher severity AKI during their postoperative hospital stay; 15 (33.3%) of these 45 progressors received acute dialysis. Three hundred twenty-nine patients (86.5% of those patients with AKI) persisted in stage 1 AKI, and six patients (1.6%) were diagnosed and persisted in stage 2 AKI; 23 individuals (6.1%) progressed from stage 1 to stage 2, 17 individuals (4.5%) progressed from stage 1 to stage 3, and 5 individuals (1.3%) progressed from stage 2 to stage 3. Figure 1 displays the postoperative days when AKI was first diagnosed for both progressors and nonprogressors; 66% of patients developed AKI within the first 2 postoperative days, and 93.4% of patients developed AKI by day 3.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Timing of AKI after cardiac surgery. The graph displays when those patients with and without AKI progression were first diagnosed with AKI after cardiac surgery; 66% of patients developed AKI within the first 2 postoperative days.

Table 1 describes the pre- and intraoperative clinical characteristics of patients with AKI that progressed compared with those patients with AKI that did not progress. AKI progressors had more nonelective surgeries, higher use of intraoperative, intra-aortic balloon pumps, and significantly longer cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp times. There was no statistical difference in Thakar or Mehta preoperative AKI risk assessment scores between those patients with and without AKI progression.18,19

View this table:
Table 1.

Clinical characteristics in patients with and without AKI progression

Table 2 describes the postoperative time of creatinine-based AKI and outcomes of patients in which AKI progressed compared with nonprogressors. There was no statistically significant difference in the proportion of those patients with decreased urine output on the first day of AKI. Diuretic use, on the day before or day of AKI, did not differ between progressors and nonprogressors, despite progressors having a higher percent change in serum creatinine from baseline at the time of clinical diagnosis (Table 2). Clinical outcomes were much worse for AKI progressors; they had longer ICU and hospital stays, and they had higher inpatient mortality (Table 2).

View this table:
Table 2.

Postoperative characteristics and outcomes in patients with and without AKI progression

Traditional Biomarkers of Renal Function Patterns and Performance

Mean serum creatinine (mg/dl [SD]) at the time of creatinine-based AKI diagnosis trended to be higher in those patients who progressed (1.9 [0.6]) compared with nonprogressors (1.6 [0.4], P=0.08). The highest quintile of serum creatinine had a significantly higher risk of progression in the unadjusted model; this effect was attenuated in the adjusted model (Table 3). There was no difference between the area under the curve (SE) for serum creatinine in the adjusted model and the clinical model alone (0.75 [0.04]). The clinical model consisted of variables from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk prediction model for AKI along with the postoperative change in serum creatinine.

View this table:
Table 3.

Progression of AKI biomarker quintiles with outcome

There was no statistical difference in the preoperative ACR concentrations between those patients with and without progressive AKI (Table 1). Mean urinary ACR (mg/g [SD]) at the time of creatinine-based diagnosis of AKI was higher in those patients who progressed (314 [831]) compared with those patients who did not (104 [281], P=0.0003). There was a graded response across the quintiles that persisted after adjusting for clinical variables (Table 3). There was no difference in the percentage of progressors (15.6%, n=7) and nonprogressors (17.6%, n=59) who had preoperative ACR values above the cutoff for the fifth quintile of proteinuria (>133 mg/g) at the time of creatinine-based diagnosis of AKI (P=0.70).

Novel Biomarkers of Renal Injury

Median urinary IL-18 (pg/ml [interquartile range]) at the time of creatinine-based diagnosis of AKI was 40.7 (12.6–124.8) in nonprogressors and 104.3 (23.4–269.0) in progressors (P=0.006). There was a dose-response relationship with biomarker categories in adjusted and unadjusted analyses; those patients in the highest quintile (IL-18>185 pg/ml) had threefold odds of progression (adjusted) compared with the lowest quintiles (IL-18=0–29.6 pg/ml) (Table 3).

Median urinary NGAL (ng/ml [interqartile range]) at the time of creatinine-based AKI diagnosis was 28.3 (13.5–82.9) in nonprogressors and 72.1 (11.4–495.6) in progressors (P=0.07). The highest quintile of urinary NGAL had a significantly higher risk of progression in the unadjusted analysis; however, there was a U-shaped relationship across risk groups that was attenuated after adjusting for clinical factors (Table 3).

Plasma NGAL (ng/ml) had the strongest ability to predict the progression of AKI; the fifth quintile detected most progressors (n=24 of 71; 34%). The median plasma NGAL (ng/ml [interquartile range]) in nonprogressors was 176.8 (110.3–259.8) compared with 328.0 (203.6–384.1) among progressors (P<0.0001). Those patients in the fifth quintile (plasma NGAL [ng/ml] >322) had an 11-fold odds of progression in the unadjusted analysis that was slightly attenuated (7.7-fold odds) in an adjusted multivariate analysis.

Supplemental Table 1 provides data with respect to the absolute and relative changes in serum creatinine and novel biomarker values compared with baseline at the time of creatinine-based AKI diagnosis. There were no significant differences between the performance of the raw biomarker values and the absolute and relative changes in biomarkers values presented in Supplemental Table 1.

Given the potential for colinearity between some of the biomarkers, the interbiomarker correlation was assessed (Supplemental Table 2). Briefly, urinary biomarkers tended to correlate better with urinary biomarkers, and serum creatinine correlated with plasma NGAL. Finally, the ability of biomarker combinations, with and without the clinical model, to forecast AKI progression was assessed; the combination of urine and plasma NGAL provided the highest area under the curve for the unadjusted and adjusted analyses (0.79 and 0.83, respectively) (Supplemental Table 3, A and B). Supplemental Table 4 provides data about the performance of biomarkers at the time of creatinine-based diagnosis of AKI for predicting the future receipt of renal replacement therapy.

Risk Classification—Category-Free Net Reclassification Improvement and the Integrated Discrimination Improvement

To evaluate the improvement of the risk prediction with the addition of biomarkers to the clinical model, we determined the category-free net reclassification improvement (NRI) and the integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) indices. All biomarkers, traditional and novel, improved risk classification over the clinical model, with plasma NGAL displaying the largest category-free NRI of 0.69 (P<0.0001) and IDI of 0.06 (P<0.0001) (Table 4). ACR also significantly improved the risk stratification for AKI progression with a category-free NRI of 0.42 (P=0.008). Figure 2 shows the change in risk stratification, among progressors and nonprogressors, that occurred with the addition of the individual biomarkers to the clinical model.

View this table:
Table 4.

Net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement of including biomarkers in the risk factor model to predict AKI progression

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Improvements in predicted risk with the inclusion of biomarkers in the clinical model. The plots display the changes in risk stratification for (left) progressors and (right) nonprogressors with the addition of individual biomarkers urinary ACR (UACR), urine NGAL, urine IL-18, and plasma NGAL to the clinical model. The x axis for all plots is the predicted risk according to the clinical model alone, and the y axis is the clinical model plus the given biomarker. The diagonal line indicates the line of identity; for the points above this line, the predicted risk is higher in the new model, and for points below this line, the predicted risk is lower. The individual plots display the number of patients who were at increased and decreased risk of progressive AKI after the addition of a biomarker to the model. As an example, inclusion of plasma NGAL in the model led to increased predicted risk in 28 of 45 progressors (62%) and decreased predicted risk in 216 of 335 nonprogressors (66.4%). The clinical model contains age, sex, white race, CPB time>120 minutes, nonelective surgery, preoperative estimated GFR, diabetes, hypertension, intraoperative intra-aortic balloon pump, repeat cardiac surgery during the hospitalization, and percent change in postoperative serum creatinine.

Discussion

In this analysis of a prospective multicenter observational cohort study of adults undergoing cardiac surgery, we found that urine and plasma biomarkers at the time of creatinine-based diagnosis of AKI forecasted the progression to more severe AKI. Among the urinary biomarkers, ACR>133 mg/g at the time of AKI denoted a 3.4-fold odds of AKI progression compared with an ACR<35 mg/g, and urine IL-18 levels>185 showed a threefold risk of progression compared with lower levels in adjusted analysis. Urine NGAL levels were not significant after adjustment of clinical variables. A level of plasma NGAL of >323 ng/ml performed the best, conveying an over sevenfold risk of AKI progression compared with patients in the lowest two quintiles after controlling for clinical factors, including postoperative change in serum creatinine. All four biomarkers and serum creatinine improved the prediction for the diagnosis of AKI progression, as seen by the category-free NRI, when added to the clinical model.

These results augment the findings from our previous publication that showed a role for these same biomarkers in the diagnosis of early AKI.17 Biomarkers measured in the first 6 postoperative hours were found to forecast the future rise in serum creatinine as well as adverse patient outcomes (increased length of ICU and hospital stay and mortality). In that study, the highest quintiles of urine IL-18 and plasma NGAL were strongly associated with a postoperative doubling of serum creatinine or the receipt of acute dialysis (6.8- and 5-fold adjusted odds, respectively). The current analyses show that serial daily monitoring of these same biomarkers as well as ACR may be equally beneficial in that they provide additional information with regards to the risk of AKI progression and other adverse clinical outcomes during the critical first few postoperative days. In our cohort, 95% of all cases of AKI were diagnosed within the first 72 postoperative hours, and the majority of those patients with progressive AKI declared themselves within these same 3 days. Thus, future investigation seeking to use adult cardiac surgery as a model for AKI should focus their efforts/recruitment on these first few critical days. These investigations should systematically pair novel biomarker measures with serum creatinine with sample collection every 24 hours to maximize renal event capture.

We showed that the ACR has use as a tool in determining AKI progression. Albuminuria, which was not different preoperatively between progressors and nonprogressors, is increasingly being recognized as an important risk factor for the development of AKI in a variety of clinical settings.20–22 Recently, the work by Huang et al.20 showed that, before coronary artery bypass grafting, the presence of mild and heavy proteinuria (defined by urinary dipstick) was associated with an increased odds of both developing postoperative AKI and requiring postoperative renal replacement therapy. Their study did not attempt to quantify the urinary proteinuria beyond dipstick or comment on the role of postoperative proteinuria in forecasting adverse patient outcomes. Several other studies have delineated that the presence of baseline proteinuria is associated with increased risk for the future development of AKI21,23–25; however, to our knowledge, our work represents the first documentation of a quantified postoperative protein concentration predicting the severity of AKI. This information elevates the use of ACR in the setting of AKI and also supports the role of proteinuria as a biomarker of AKI after cardiac surgery.20,22

Much of the previously published novel biomarker literature has focused on the ability of these new tests to predict the development of AKI earlier than serum creatinine.7–10 However, in a recent pooled analysis of several prospective observational cohort studies, elevations of urine and plasma NGAL were shown to predispose patients for the need for renal replacement therapy, longer hospital stays, and increased mortality, even in the absence of a significant elevation in serum creatinine.26 This ability to augment the diagnosis of AKI, beyond the constraints of serum creatinine, and forecast adverse patient outcomes represents an important paradigm shift. NGAL and other biomarkers of structural kidney injury may be viewed as tests that add value to sole assessment of kidney function by serum creatinine in the setting of AKI rather than replace it. Our data show and validate another example of this changing application of biomarkers; we found that, even after correction for clinical factors and change in serum creatinine, plasma NGAL, urine IL-18, and ACR at the time of creatinine-based diagnosis of AKI can help predict the progression of AKI. This ability to distinguish those patients at highest risk for the worst patient outcomes will be crucial as nephrologists and intensivists conduct more clinical trials for the treatment of AKI and its most severe form of acute tubular necrosis.27 The incidence of AKI after cardiac surgery is high (>30%)10,28; however, as in our study, the vast majority of those patients with AKI do not progress, and they improve within 48–72 hours. Thus, the number of patients needed to show a positive result in a randomized controlled trial for AKI would be very large, because the majority of patients in the placebo and treatment group will spontaneously resolve. However, plasma and urine biomarkers will allow future clinical trials of AKI interventions to be targeted to those patients at highest risk of progression, which would be far more efficient in terms of costs and resources. Focusing future trials and interventions on those patients with the most severe forms of AKI should not undermine the increased risk of post-AKI CKD, morbidity, and mortality experienced by those patients with AKIN stage 1-limited AKI compared with those patients without AKI.

We evaluated the ability of several biomarkers to improve risk stratification for worsening of AKI. The category-free NRI values for all four biomarkers and serum creatinine show that each assay has the ability to improve on the risk assessment provided by the clinical model alone. This effect is also shown by the statistically significant increase in the adjusted area under the curve for all four biomarkers compared with the clinical model alone (area under the curve=0.75) (Table 3). The NRI and IDI represent modern, more sensitive statistical methods to quantify model improvement of the addition of a biomarker (or new variable) to an existing clinical model. The popular method of examining the increase in the area under the curve is problematic, because it is difficult to interpret the clinical significance of a small change in area under the curve (i.e., 0.05 in plasma NGAL), and the biomarker (or new variable) must have exceptional discriminatory ability to increase the area under the curve after it reaches a certain level.29 The NRI does not directly depend on the performance of the baseline model, and by definition, it considers an improvement in reclassification as any increase in model-based predicted probabilities after the addition of the biomarker for events (AKI progression) and a decrease in probabilities for nonevents. Similarly, a worsening in reclassification is defined by a decrease in probabilities for events and an increase in probabilities for nonevents. According to the work by Pencina et al.,29 medium effect sizes have an NRI of 0.4–0.6 (urine NGAL, IL-18, and ACR), and large effect sizes have an NRI greater than 0.6 (plasma NGAL). The IDI can be defined as the difference in discrimination slopes between the biomarker-adjusted and -unadjusted models, with large effect sizes having an IDI roughly greater than or equal to 0.10 (none of our biomarkers) and medium effect sizes having values around 0.05 (plasma NGAL).29 Our data suggest that ACR improves the NRI of progressors, whereas IL-18 predominantly improves stratification for the nonprogressors. Plasma NGAL showed the unique ability to improve the NRI for both progressors and nonprogressors; thus, if validated in future studies, plasma NGAL may serve as an ideal biomarker to help select subjects for future AKI trials. All of these biomarkers show promise in that they have both an elevated NRI (>0.40) as well as a statistically increased area under the curve compared with the clinical model alone.

After adjustment for clinical variables, urinary IL-18 showed promise in its ability to predict the worsening of AKI at the time of creatinine-based diagnosis of AKI. IL-18 is specific to the renal tubules and is known to be up-regulated in response to ischemia reperfusion injury.30 However, initial creatinine elevations after ischemic injury often do not occur until 24–48 hours after an insult (68.4% of our cohort developed AKI on or after day 2).31 Thus, creatinine kinetics supply ample time for urinary IL-18 concentrations to dissipate, and this time lag may explain why other markers displayed more robust results. Despite this limitation, the area under the curve for predicting progression of AKI using urinary IL-18 (0.79) was statistically greater compared with the clinical model alone (0.75) and was associated with a threefold increase in risk of worsening AKI. These data, along with its ability to predict a sixfold increased risk for a postoperative doubling of serum creatinine or receipt of acute dialysis in the early postoperative period,17 support urine IL-18’s potential role in a biomarker panel to predict severity of AKI at a variety of time points after adult cardiac surgery. Despite prior reports showing that urine NGAL concentrations may predict progression through the RIFLE or AKIN criteria,10,32,33 our investigation did not find benefit to urine NGAL measurement after adjusting for variables known to impact AKI risk. It is important to note that these prior publications were not specific to cardiac surgery32,33 and were limited by small sample sizes10; additionally, the aforementioned creatinine kinetics may play a role in our negative urine NGAL findings.

Creatinine kinetics, in part, allow plasma NGAL to outperform the urinary biomarkers. Plasma NGAL is generated outside of the kidney, and owing to the drop in GFR in AKI, it accumulates in the blood over the first several postoperative hours to days. These high concentrations at the delayed clinical time point interrogated in our investigation create the ideal pairing of plasma NGAL and the progression of AKI. Additionally, plasma NGAL did not correlate highly with the urinary biomarkers, making it an ideal partner for biomarker pairings to improve the prediction of progressive AKI (Supplemental Table 3A). This finding is in sharp contrast to several of the urinary biomarkers, which were highly covariant (Supplemental Table 2). The correlation between IL-18 and ACR reached nearly 0.7. Thus, given the similar statistical performance and widespread availability of ACR, as well as the decreased assay cost, the routine measurement of ACR at the time of AKI after cardiac surgery seems clinically appropriate.

Our study has a number of strengths; our data, samples, and measurement were all performed as part of a large prospective, multicenter international investigation. Additionally, we relied on standardized modern AKI staging criteria (AKIN) that are currently employed by the international community and are readily duplicated in follow-up investigations. However, we did not measure traditional urine indices to which biomarker results could be compared, such as fractional excretion of sodium and urea, or microscopy data. However, these clinical tools have been shown to be nondiagnostic in the postcardiac surgery setting, where volume status, fluid responsiveness, and diuretic use confound the relationship between tubular function and injury.10,12–16

In summary, urinary IL-18, ACR, and plasma NGAL measurement at the time of clinical creatinine increase (AKI diagnosis) forecasted the progression of AKI in adults after cardiac surgery. Given the strong correlation between urinary biomarkers, routine measurement of ACR and plasma NGAL may identify a subpopulation that is at the highest risk for the most adverse of patient outcomes. Improving risk prediction may improve monitoring and care of postoperative patients, guide patient counseling and decision-making, and facilitate participation in interventional trials of AKI.

Concise Methods

Study Sample

As previously described, we prospectively enrolled 1219 adults undergoing cardiac surgery (coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery) who were at high risk for AKI at six academic medical centers in North America between July of 2007 and December of 2009.17,28 All participants provided written informed consent, and the study was approved by each institution’s research ethics board. Only patients who developed at least AKIN stage 1 were included in this analysis; however, those patients whose initial AKI diagnosis was stage 3 (n=3, 0.7% of those patients with AKI) were excluded from the analysis, because they could not progress further.4 Patients were also excluded if they did not have blood and urine samples collected on the day of initial AKI diagnosis. This clinical study was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00774137.

Study Protocol

We collected urine and plasma specimens preoperatively and daily for up to 5 postoperative days. The first postoperative samples were collected soon after admission to the ICU. For the first 24 hours postoperatively, urine samples were collected every 6 hours. The remaining daily blood and urine samples were obtained at the time of routine morning blood collection conducted for clinical care. Specimen collection was stopped on postoperative day 3 in patients who had no evidence of an increase in serum creatinine. Sample collection and processing have been previously described.17,28

AKI Biomarker Measurements

For the purposes of this study, postoperative biomarkers were measured on the initial day that the serum creatinine first crossed the AKIN stage 1 threshold (rise of ≥50% or 0.3 mg/dl from baseline value). Urine albumin was reported as the ratio to urinary creatinine (ACR) and was measured by immunoturbidimetry on a Siemens Dimension Plus with HM clinical analyzer per the manufacturer’s instructions. Urine creatinine was measured by the modified Jaffe reaction. Urine IL-18 and NGAL were measured with the ARCHITECT assay (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL). The coefficient of variation for the urine creatinine assay was 5%, whereas the coefficient of variation for the NGAL and IL-18 assays were 5% and 8%, respectively. Plasma NGAL was measured through the Triage NGAL immunoassay in conjunction with the Triage Meter (Biosite Inc., San Diego, CA). The Triage assay has a detection range of 60–1300 ng/ml with a coefficient of variation of 10–15%. Personnel performing the biomarker measurements were blinded to each patient’s clinical information. All biomarkers were measured from frozen aliquots that did not undergo any additional freeze–thaw cycles.34,35 Additional details on repeat biomarker measurements and assay performance and stability have been previously described.17

Outcome Definitions

The primary outcome was the progression of AKI, defined by worsening of AKIN stage (from stage 1 to either stage 2 or 3 or from stage 2 to 3). Patients treated with acute dialysis at any point during hospitalization were classified as stage 3. All preoperative creatinine values were measured within 2 months before surgery (median=4 days, mean=8 days). Pre- and postoperative serum creatinine levels were measured in the same clinical laboratory for each patient at all sites. Serum creatinine values were recorded for every patient throughout the hospital stay. Additional clinical outcomes were need for acute dialysis, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay in hospital and ICU.

Variable Definitions

We collected preoperative characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications using definitions of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (http://www.ctsnet.org/file/rptDataSpecifications252_1_ForVendorsPGS.pdf). We recorded whether the patient had received cardiac catheterization within 72 hours before surgery. We estimated preoperative GFR using the CKD epidemiology collaboration equation equation.36

Statistical Analyses

We categorized into quintiles the values of urine IL-18, NGAL, and ACR and plasma NGAL at the time of AKI clinical diagnosis. Because of the small number of progressors, we combined quintiles 1 and 2 (low risk) and quintiles 3 and 4 (intermediate risk), and we defined quintile 5 as high risk.37 We assessed unadjusted linear trends by the Cochran–Armitage test for dichotomous outcomes and the Jonckheere–Terpstra test for continuous outcomes. Continuous variables were compared between progressors and nonprogressors with a two-sample t test or Wilcoxon rank sum test, and dichotomous variables were compared with the chi-squared or Fisher exact test. We determined the adjusted odds ratios of AKI progression with mixed logistic regression with random intercepts for each center. We adjusted for important covariates described in the STS model to predict AKI in the cardiac surgery setting: patient demographics (age, sex, and white race), clinical risk factors (baseline estimated GFR, hypertension, and diabetes), and operative characteristics (elective or urgent procedure and cardiopulmonary bypass time>120) as well as the postoperative percent change in serum creatinine from baseline to the time of AKI diagnosis.18 We used area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to determine the ability of the biomarkers to discriminate between patients with AKI that did and did not progress. We compared areas under the curve using the test developed by DeLong et al.38 Areas under the curve for biomarker pairings were calculated by logistic regression with and without the clinical model as noted. We quantified the improvement of biomarkers on progressive AKI risk prediction with the category-free NRI and IDI indices.39 For the primary analyses, urinary biomarkers were not corrected for urine creatinine, with the exception of the ACR in the analyses. We performed the analyses in SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and R 2.10.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

Disclosures

S.G.C. and Dr. Devarajan are consultants to Abbott Diagnostics. Dr. Charles Edelstein and C.R.P. are named coinventors on the IL-18 patent. Dr. Devarajan is the coinventor on the NGAL patents. Dr. Devarajan is a consultant to Biosite, Inc. There are no conflicts for the other authors.

Acknowledgments

The research reported in this article was supported by the American Heart Association Clinical Development Award and National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant R01HL-085757 (to C.R.P.). The study was also supported by Clinical and Translational Science Award Grant UL1 RR024139 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR). J.L.K. was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant K23 DK081616. A.X.G. was supported by a Clinician Scientist Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. The urine biomarker assays were donated by Abbott Diagnostics, and plasma NGAL was donated by Biosite, Inc. The granting agencies, Abbott Diagnostics and Biosite, Inc., did not participate in the protocol development, analysis, and interpretation of the results. Clinical Trial Registration is at Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00774137.

Members of the AKI-TRIBE consortium (www.yale.edu/tribeaki/): McGill University Health Center, Michael Zappitelli; Yale University, Simon Li; Duke University, Madhav Swaminathan; Cincinnati Children’s Hospital, Prasad Devarajan and Catherine D. Krawczeski; University of Colorado, Charles L. Edelstein; Danbury Hospital, Cary Passik.

This data were presented at the American Society of Nephrology’s Renal Week on November 10, 2011, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Footnotes

References

  1. ↵
    1. Wijeysundera DN,
    2. Karkouti K,
    3. Dupuis JY,
    4. Rao V,
    5. Chan CT,
    6. Granton JT,
    7. Beattie WS
    : Derivation and validation of a simplified predictive index for renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery. JAMA 297: 1801–1809, 2007pmid:17456822
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Chertow GM,
    2. Levy EM,
    3. Hammermeister KE,
    4. Grover F,
    5. Daley J
    : Independent association between acute renal failure and mortality following cardiac surgery. Am J Med 104: 343–348, 1998pmid:9576407
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bellomo R,
    2. Ronco C,
    3. Kellum JA,
    4. Mehta RL,
    5. Palevsky P,
    6. Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative workgroup
    : Acute renal failure—definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: The Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 8: R204–R212, 2004pmid:15312219
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Mehta RL,
    2. Kellum JA,
    3. Shah SV,
    4. Molitoris BA,
    5. Ronco C,
    6. Warnock DG,
    7. Levin A,
    8. Acute Kidney Injury Network
    : Acute Kidney Injury Network: Report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care 11: R31, 2007pmid:17331245
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Brown JR,
    2. Kramer RS,
    3. Coca SG,
    4. Parikh CR
    : Duration of acute kidney injury impacts long-term survival after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 90: 1142–1148, 2010pmid:20868804
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Dasta JF,
    2. Kane-Gill SL,
    3. Durtschi AJ,
    4. Pathak DS,
    5. Kellum JA
    : Costs and outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) following cardiac surgery. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23: 1970–1974, 2008pmid:18178605
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Vaidya VS,
    2. Waikar SS,
    3. Ferguson MA,
    4. Collings FB,
    5. Sunderland K,
    6. Gioules C,
    7. Bradwin G,
    8. Matsouaka R,
    9. Betensky RA,
    10. Curhan GC,
    11. Bonventre JV
    : Urinary biomarkers for sensitive and specific detection of acute kidney injury in humans. Clin Transl Sci 1: 200–208, 2008pmid:19212447
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Parikh CR,
    2. Devarajan P
    : New biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Crit Care Med 36[Suppl]: S159–S165, 2008pmid:18382188
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Han WK,
    2. Bonventre JV
    : Biologic markers for the early detection of acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Crit Care 10: 476–482, 2004pmid:15616389
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Koyner JL,
    2. Vaidya VS,
    3. Bennett MR,
    4. Ma Q,
    5. Worcester E,
    6. Akhter SA,
    7. Raman J,
    8. Jeevanandam V,
    9. O’Connor MF,
    10. Devarajan P,
    11. Bonventre JV,
    12. Murray PT
    : Urinary biomarkers in the clinical prognosis and early detection of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 2154–2165, 2010pmid:20798258
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Zappitelli M,
    2. Krawczeski CD,
    3. Devarajan P,
    4. Wang Z,
    5. Sint K,
    6. Thiessen-Philbrook H,
    7. Li S,
    8. Bennett MR,
    9. Ma Q,
    10. Shlipak MG,
    11. Garg AX,
    12. Parikh CR,
    13. TRIBE-AKI consortium
    : Early postoperative serum cystatin C predicts severe acute kidney injury following pediatric cardiac surgery. Kidney Int 80: 655–662, 2011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Hilberman M,
    2. Myers BD,
    3. Carrie BJ,
    4. Derby G,
    5. Jamison RL,
    6. Stinson EB
    : Acute renal failure following cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 77: 880–888, 1979pmid:439924
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Steiner RW
    : Interpreting the fractional excretion of sodium. Am J Med 77: 699–702, 1984pmid:6486145
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pépin MN,
    2. Bouchard J,
    3. Legault L,
    4. Ethier J
    : Diagnostic performance of fractional excretion of urea and fractional excretion of sodium in the evaluations of patients with acute kidney injury with or without diuretic treatment. Am J Kidney Dis 50: 566–573, 2007pmid:17900456
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Yavuz I,
    2. Asgun FH,
    3. Bolcal C,
    4. Bingol H,
    5. Yokusoglu M,
    6. Baysan O,
    7. Ozgurtas T,
    8. Demirkilic U,
    9. Tatar H
    : Importance of urinary measurement of glutathione S-transferase in renal dysfunction patients after on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 57: 125–129, 2009pmid:19330747
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. da Silva Magro MC,
    2. de Fatima Fernandes Vattimo M
    : Does urinalysis predict acute renal failure after heart surgery? Ren Fail 26: 385–392, 2004pmid:15462106
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Parikh CR,
    2. Devarajan P,
    3. Zappitelli M,
    4. Sint K,
    5. Thiessen-Philbrook H,
    6. Li S,
    7. Kim RW,
    8. Koyner JL,
    9. Coca SG,
    10. Edelstein CL,
    11. Shlipak MG,
    12. Garg AX,
    13. Krawczeski CD,
    14. Garg AX,
    15. TRIBE-AKI Consortium
    : Postoperative biomarkers predict acute kidney injury and poor outcomes after adult cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol 22: 1748–1757, 2011pmid:21836143
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Mehta RH,
    2. Grab JD,
    3. O’Brien SM,
    4. Bridges CR,
    5. Gammie JS,
    6. Haan CK,
    7. Ferguson TB,
    8. Peterson ED,
    9. Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database Investigators
    : Bedside tool for predicting the risk of postoperative dialysis in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Circulation 114: 2208–2216, quiz 2208, 2006pmid:17088458
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Thakar CV,
    2. Arrigain S,
    3. Worley S,
    4. Yared JP,
    5. Paganini EP
    : A clinical score to predict acute renal failure after cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 162–168, 2005pmid:15563569
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Huang TM,
    2. Wu VC,
    3. Young GH,
    4. Lin YF,
    5. Shiao CC,
    6. Wu PC,
    7. Li WY,
    8. Yu HY,
    9. Hu FC,
    10. Lin JW,
    11. Chen YS,
    12. Lin YH,
    13. Wang SS,
    14. Hsu RB,
    15. Chang FC,
    16. Chou NK,
    17. Chu TS,
    18. Yeh YC,
    19. Tsai PR,
    20. Huang JW,
    21. Lin SL,
    22. Chen YM,
    23. Ko WJ,
    24. Wu KD,
    25. National Taiwan University Hospital Study Group of Acute Renal Failure
    : Preoperative proteinuria predicts adverse renal outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Soc Nephrol 22: 156–163, 2011pmid:21115618
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Hsu RK,
    2. Hsu CY
    : Proteinuria and reduced glomerular filtration rate as risk factors for acute kidney injury. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 20: 211–217, 2011pmid:21455065
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Portilla D,
    2. Dent C,
    3. Sugaya T,
    4. Nagothu KK,
    5. Kundi I,
    6. Moore P,
    7. Noiri E,
    8. Devarajan P
    : Liver fatty acid-binding protein as a biomarker of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Kidney Int 73: 465–472, 2008pmid:18094680
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Grams ME,
    2. Astor BC,
    3. Bash LD,
    4. Matsushita K,
    5. Wang Y,
    6. Coresh J
    : Albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate independently associate with acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 21: 1757–1764, 2010pmid:20671214
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hsu CY,
    2. Ordoñez JD,
    3. Chertow GM,
    4. Fan D,
    5. McCulloch CE,
    6. Go AS
    : The risk of acute renal failure in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 74: 101–107, 2008pmid:18385668
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. James MT,
    2. Hemmelgarn BR,
    3. Wiebe N,
    4. Pannu N,
    5. Manns BJ,
    6. Klarenbach SW,
    7. Tonelli M,
    8. Alberta Kidney Disease Network
    : Glomerular filtration rate, proteinuria, and the incidence and consequences of acute kidney injury: A cohort study. Lancet 376: 2096–2103, 2010pmid:21094997
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Haase M,
    2. Devarajan P,
    3. Haase-Fielitz A,
    4. Bellomo R,
    5. Cruz DN,
    6. Wagener G,
    7. Krawczeski CD,
    8. Koyner JL,
    9. Murray P,
    10. Zappitelli M,
    11. Goldstein SL,
    12. Makris K,
    13. Ronco C,
    14. Martensson J,
    15. Martling CR,
    16. Venge P,
    17. Siew E,
    18. Ware LB,
    19. Ikizler TA,
    20. Mertens PR
    : The outcome of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin-positive subclinical acute kidney injury: A multicenter pooled analysis of prospective studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 57: 1752–1761, 2011pmid:21511111
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Endre ZH,
    2. Walker RJ,
    3. Pickering JW,
    4. Shaw GM,
    5. Frampton CM,
    6. Henderson SJ,
    7. Hutchison R,
    8. Mehrtens JE,
    9. Robinson JM,
    10. Schollum JB,
    11. Westhuyzen J,
    12. Celi LA,
    13. McGinley RJ,
    14. Campbell IJ,
    15. George PM
    : Early intervention with erythropoietin does not affect the outcome of acute kidney injury (the EARLYARF trial). Kidney Int 77: 1020–1030, 2010pmid:20164823
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Shlipak MG,
    2. Coca SG,
    3. Wang Z,
    4. Devarajan P,
    5. Koyner JL,
    6. Patel UD,
    7. Thiessen-Philbrook H,
    8. Garg AX,
    9. Parikh CR,
    10. TRIBE-AKI Consortium
    : Presurgical serum cystatin C and risk of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Am J Kidney Dis 58: 366–373, 2011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Pencina MJ,
    2. D'Agostino RB Sr,
    3. Demler OV
    : Novel metrics for evaluating improvement in discrimination: Net reclassification and integrated discrimination improvement for normal variables and nested models. Stat Med 31: 101–113, 2012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Faubel S,
    2. Edelstein CL
    : Caspases as drug targets in ischemic organ injury. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord 5: 269–287, 2005pmid:16178788
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Moran SM,
    2. Myers BD
    : Course of acute renal failure studied by a model of creatinine kinetics. Kidney Int 27: 928–937, 1985pmid:4021321
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Bagshaw SM,
    2. Haase M,
    3. Haase-Fielitz A,
    4. Bennett M,
    5. Devarajan P,
    6. Bellomo R
    : A prospective evaluation of urine microscopy in septic and non-septic acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27: 582–588, 2012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Singer E,
    2. Elger A,
    3. Elitok S,
    4. Kettritz R,
    5. Nickolas TL,
    6. Barasch J,
    7. Luft FC,
    8. Schmidt-Ott KM
    : Urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin distinguishes pre-renal from intrinsic renal failure and predicts outcomes. Kidney Int 80: 405–414, 2011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Grenier FC,
    2. Ali S,
    3. Syed H,
    4. Workman R,
    5. Martens F,
    6. Liao M,
    7. Wang Y,
    8. Wong PY
    : Evaluation of the ARCHITECT urine NGAL assay: Assay performance, specimen handling requirements and biological variability. Clin Biochem 43: 615–620, 2010pmid:20026020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Han WK,
    2. Wagener G,
    3. Zhu Y,
    4. Wang S,
    5. Lee HT
    : Urinary biomarkers in the early detection of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 873–882, 2009pmid:19406962
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Levey AS,
    2. Stevens LA,
    3. Schmid CH,
    4. Zhang YL,
    5. Castro AF 3rd,
    6. Feldman HI,
    7. Kusek JW,
    8. Eggers P,
    9. Van Lente F,
    10. Greene T,
    11. Coresh J,
    12. CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration)
    : A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 150: 604–612, 2009pmid:19414839
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Shlipak MG,
    2. Sarnak MJ,
    3. Katz R,
    4. Fried LF,
    5. Seliger SL,
    6. Newman AB,
    7. Siscovick DS,
    8. Stehman-Breen C
    : Cystatin C and the risk of death and cardiovascular events among elderly persons. N Engl J Med 352: 2049–2060, 2005pmid:15901858
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. DeLong ER,
    2. DeLong DM,
    3. Clarke-Pearson DL
    : Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: A nonparametric approach. Biometrics 44: 837–845, 1988pmid:3203132
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Pencina MJ,
    2. D’Agostino RB Sr,
    3. Steyerberg EW
    : Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med 30: 11–21, 2011pmid:21204120
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Request Permissions
Biomarkers Predict Progression of Acute Kidney Injury after Cardiac Surgery
Jay L. Koyner, Amit X. Garg, Steven G. Coca, Kyaw Sint, Heather Thiessen-Philbrook, Uptal D. Patel, Michael G. Shlipak, Chirag R. Parikh, for the TRIBE-AKI Consortium
JASN May 2012, 23 (5) 905-914; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2011090907
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

More in this TOC Section

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Related Articles