Clinical Epidemiology

Analysis of a Urinary Biomarker Panel for Incident Kidney Disease and Clinical Outcomes

Conall M. O’Seaghdha, Shih-Jen Hwang, Martin G. Larson, James B. Meigs, Ramachandran S. Vasan and Caroline S. Fox
JASN November 2013, 24 (11) 1880-1888; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2013010019

Abstract

Whether novel biomarkers improve the assessment of incident kidney disease and related adverse outcomes remains to be tested in longitudinal observational studies. We tested 14 urinary biomarkers for association with incident kidney, cardiovascular, and mortality outcomes in 2948 Framingham Heart Study participants. Baseline examinations were performed between 1995 and 1998; mean follow-up was 10.1 years for renal outcomes and 11.2 years for survival analyses. Primary outcomes were incident CKD, incident albuminuria, incident cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality. Secondary analyses assessed incident congestive heart failure (CHF) and mortality with coexistent kidney disease. Biomarkers were tested for association with renal end points using logistic regression and incident cardiovascular and mortality outcomes in proportional hazards models; α1-microglobulin, Kim-1, and TFF-3 predicted all-cause mortality (hazard ratio per SD increase in log-transformed biomarker [HR] range, 1.15 to 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] range, 1.04 to 1.34; P values=0.007 to <0.001), whereas α1-microglobulin, β2-microglobulin, KIM-1, and TFF-3 associated with death with coexistent kidney disease (HR range, 1.72–2.25; 95% CI, 1.17 to 3.24; P values<0.01). KIM-1 also associated with the risk of incident CHF (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.63; P=0.008). CTGF associated nominally with CKD (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.98; P=0.03), but no other biomarkers associated with incident CKD or albuminuria. Addition of α1-microglobulin and TFF-3 resulted in a nonsignificant net reclassification index (NRI) of 3% for all-cause mortality beyond clinical risk factors. In conclusion, components of a panel of 14 subclinical biomarkers of kidney injury were associated with important clinical outcomes and merit additional investigation.

During the past 50 years, cardiac injury biomarkers, such as creatine-kinase MB isoenzyme and troponin, have transformed the assessment and management of patients with heart disease.1 During this time, clinically validated biomarkers available for the assessment of kidney disease have remained unchanged. The current benchmarks, serum creatinine and albuminuria, lack sensitivity in early disease and provide limited insight into the nature of the underlying renal injury.2,3

There is a need for novel biomarkers that identify at-risk individuals before the development of overt kidney disease. Kidney injury biomarkers can provide mechanistic insights by precisely localizing the affected kidney compartment and permit monitoring and assessment of distinct renal pathophysiological pathways, which may have prognostic implications for patients. Furthermore, they can provide insight into disease biology and help to better classify at-risk individuals in the absence of overt clinical disease.

Several novel renal biomarkers, detectable as proteins in urine, have been proposed for these purposes in experimental and clinical settings, but they require validation in prospective human cohorts.2,4,5 We used a panel of 14 biomarkers identified in animal studies of AKI as well as cross-sectional human studies.2,4,5 The panel includes all five biomarkers recently proposed by the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Evaluation Agency for use as indicators of drug-induced AKI through the Critical Path Initiative: kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), β2-microglobulin, cystatin C, clusterin, and trefoil factor-3 (TFF-3).6 We hypothesized that these biomarkers would be associated with an increased risk of kidney disease and related adverse outcomes. Our specific aim was to determine if the urinary biomarker panel is associated with incident CKD (estimated GFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2), incident albuminuria, cardiovascular disease (CVD), and mortality. To address this question, we performed prospective analyses in unselected participants from the Framingham Heart Study (FHS).

Results

Baseline Characteristics of the Cohort

Baseline characteristics of the cohort and median indexed biomarker levels are presented in Table 1. The mean age was 59 years, 53% were women, and mean follow-up was 10.1 years for renal outcomes and 11.2 years for survival analyses.

View this table:
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the study sample

Correlation Coefficients between Biomarkers

Pearson correlations of log-transformed urinary biomarkers are presented in Supplemental Table 1. In general, biomarkers showed moderate to high correlations with each other, with the majority of r values between 0.25 and 0.75.

Correlations of Urinary Biomarkers with CKD Risk Factors

Pearson correlations between indexed urinary biomarkers and CKD risk factors are presented in Table 2. Moderate to weak positive correlations were observed between the urinary biomarkers and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio. In general, correlations with other CKD covariates were weak.

View this table:
Table 2.

Correlations between biomarkers indexed to urinary creatinine and clinical traits

Primary End Points

Associations of Urinary Biomarkers with Incident CKD, Albuminuria, and CVD

Of 2141 participants free of baseline CKD, 194 (9.1%) participants developed CKD at 10 years. Each 1 SD increase in log-connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) was associated with a decreased risk of CKD (odds ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.71 to 0.98; P=0.03) (Table 3), consistent with a prior report in a subset of these participants.7 Results were similar for CTGF after additional adjustment for serum cystatin C concentration at exam 7 (CTGF odds ratio, 0.80; P=0.01). No other urinary biomarker was associated with risk of incident CKD. Similarly, no biomarker was significantly associated with continuous rapid decline in eGFR, which was defined as the loss of >3 ml/min per 1.73 m2 eGFR per year (Supplemental Table 2).

View this table:
Table 3.

Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression of log-transformed urinary biomarker levels indexed to urinary creatinine and the primary outcomes of incident CKD, incident albuminuria, incident CVD, and all-cause mortality

Among 1812 participants with data available, 175 (9.7%) participants developed albuminuria during follow-up. No biomarker was significantly associated with incident albuminuria in the overall analysis (Table 3). However, when stratified by sex, KIM-1 was associated with an increased risk of albuminuria in women (hazard ratio [HR], 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 2.25; P=0.001). Results were otherwise unchanged from the primary analysis (data not shown).

Of 2795 participants free of CVD at baseline, 225 individuals developed CVD. No biomarker was significantly associated with risk of incident CVD (Table 3).

Associations of Urinary Biomarkers with All-Cause Mortality

There was a total of 404 deaths among 2948 participants during the follow-up period. Three biomarkers were associated with all-cause mortality: α1-microglobulin, KIM-1, and TFF-3. The increased mortality risk ranged from 1.17 (KIM-1) to 1.26 (α1-microglobulin; P range=0.007 to <0.001) (Table 3). Age- and sex-adjusted mortality rates increased by quartile of urinary biomarker, even among participants without CKD (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Mortality rates increase by quartile of α1-microglobulin, KIM-1, and TFF-3 in participants with and without CKD. Bars represent age- and sex-adjusted mortality rates, and error bars represent standard errors quartiles of α1-microglobulin, KIM-1, and TFF-3.

In participants free of baseline CKD, mortality HRs for α1-microglobulin and TFF-3 showed a significant upward trend by quartile (α1-microglobulin: Q4 versus Q1 HR, 1.44 [0.64 to 3.24]; Ptrend=0.02; TFF-3: Q4 versus Q1 HR, 1.51 [1.09 to 2.10]; Ptrend=0.03). Results were similar in participants with baseline CKD (α1-microglobulin: Q4 versus Q1 HR, 1.44 [0.64 to 3.24]; Ptrend=0.02; TFF-3: Q4 versus Q1 HR, 1.75 [0.91 to 3.36]; Ptrend=0.03).

Secondary End Points

Exploration of Association between Urinary Biomarkers and Cause of Death

Of 404 total deaths, 86 deaths were attributed to CVD. We observed no associations between biomarkers and CVD mortality (HR, 0.94 to 1.15) (Table 4). Conversely, six of seven significant biomarkers were associated with non-CVD mortality (α1-microglobulin, β2-microglobulin, calbindin, glutathione S-transferase-α (GST-α), KIM-1, and TFF-3; P value range=0.02 to <0.001) (Table 4). Additional adjustment for C-reactive protein (CRP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) did not materially affect these results (P for non-CVD mortality=0.03 to <0.001; data not shown).

View this table:
Table 4.

Multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard and logistic regression of log-transformed urinary biomarker level, indexed to urinary creatinine and the secondary outcomes of incident CHF, cardiovascular mortality, noncardiovascular mortality, and mortality with kidney disease

Of 318 deaths from noncardiovascular causes, 34 participants died with coexisting kidney disease. Of six markers associated with non-CVD mortality, four biomarkers were associated with death with coexistent kidney disease: α1-microglobulin (HR, 2.20 [1.49 to 3.24]; P<0.001), β2-microglobulin (HR, 1.72 [1.24 to 2.39]; P=0.001), KIM-1 (HR, 1.86 [1.17 to 2.95]; P=0.009), and TFF-3 (HR, 2.25 [1.62 to 3.12]; P<0.001) (Table 4). These four biomarkers remained significant after additional adjustment for CRP and BNP (P=0.02 to <0.001; data not shown). Finally, after excluding cases of baseline CKD (n=67), only TFF-3 remained significant (HR, 1.99 [1.14 to 3.48]; P=0.02).

Associations of Urinary Biomarkers with Incident Cancer

Of the entire cohort of 2948 participants, 175 participants developed cancer during follow-up. Two biomarkers, α1-microglobulin and TFF-3, were associated with this outcome after adjustment for multiple testing (α1-microglobulin: HR, 1.28 [1.09 to 1.51]; P=0.003; TFF-3: HR, 1.32 [1.14 to 1.54]; P<0.001; data not shown).

Associations of Urinary Biomarkers with Incident Congestive Heart Failure

Of 2915 participants free of congestive heart failure (CHF) at baseline, 131 participants developed CHF during follow-up. Overall, 13 of 14 biomarkers tested were not associated with incident CHF, with the exception of KIM-1, which was associated with a 32% increased hazard of CHF per 1 SD (HR, 1.32 [1.07 to 1.63]; P=0.008) (Table 4). The association with KIM-1 and incident CHF was not attenuated after additional adjustment for plasma BNP (HR, 1.48 [1.18 to 1.86]; P<0.001).

Reclassification Analyses

When three significant biomarkers from the all-cause mortality analysis (α1-microglobulin, KIM-1, and TFF-3) were included in a clinical model for all-cause mortality, α1-microglobulin (P=0.002) and TFF-3 (P=0.03) remained significant. In multivariable-adjusted analyses, a multimarker model comprising α1-microglobulin and TFF-3 resulted in a nonsignificant net reclassification improvement beyond clinical predictors of 3.0% [0.0 to 7.8].

Discussion

Principle Findings

We have systematically examined biomarkers of subclinical kidney injury and related them to clinically meaningful longitudinal end points. Overall, five key findings emerge. First and most strikingly, a panel of markers of kidney injury was most strongly associated with mortality rather than incident kidney disease. Second, despite the well established connection between established CKD and CVD, the majority of this association seemed to be driven by deaths from noncardiovascular causes. Third, there was an excess of coexistent kidney disease at death for four specific biomarkers, namely α1-microglobulin, β2-microglobulin, KIM-1, and TFF-3. Fourth, KIM-1 was associated with a range of related adverse outcomes, including incident albuminuria in women, incident CHF, all-cause mortality, and death with coexistent kidney disease. Fifth, the biomarkers failed to meaningfully improve reclassification of all-cause mortality risk beyond the improvement achievable by clinical risk factors alone.

In the Context of the Current Literature

Several population-based studies have evaluated a multiple biomarker approach for the prediction of renal, cardiovascular, and mortality events. In general, the incremental risk described by these markers is modest, and little improvement is seen in traditional measures of discrimination.8,9 We have previously reported a small improvement in reclassification of risk for incident CKD and albuminuria beyond traditional risk factors by homocysteine, aldosterone, and BNP.10 UACR, BNP, CRP, homocysteine, and renin were also shown to predict all-cause mortality in FHS.11 A more recent study in a unique cohort of elderly men showed that cystatin C, troponin I, BNP, and CRP improved risk stratification for death from cardiovascular causes.12

Our findings advance the literature in this area in several ways. We present data on an extensive panel of urinary biomarkers specific for kidney injury and disease, and many of these biomarkers have not previously been examined in a community-based setting. Furthermore, our findings were robust after adjustment for many previously identified mortality biomarkers, including eGFR, UACR, cystatin C, BNP, and CRP. Finally, the inclusion of the end point of death with coexisting kidney disease sheds light on the cause of death in at least some of those participants at increased risk, suggesting that the excess mortality may have been mediated, at least in part, by kidney damage.

Of the biomarkers that we tested, KIM-1 in particular was associated with a range of important clinical outcomes, including all-cause mortality, incident albuminuria in women, death with coexistent kidney, and incident CHF. KIM-1 is a transmembrane tubular protein solely expressed in response to kidney injury,13 which has been proposed as an early marker of AKI as well as a player in the transition from AKI to CKD.14,15 Furthermore, KIM-1 is elevated in symptomatic heart failure and predicts adverse outcomes in that setting.16,17 We extend these findings by showing that KIM-1 also predicts new cases of CHF in members of the general population. Taken together, these findings suggest that KIM-1 predicts adverse outcomes across the clinical spectrum, highlighting its potential as a biomarker of promise.

TFF-3 was strongly associated with all-cause mortality and mortality with kidney disease in this analysis, extending a previously identified association with incident CKD identified in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.18 TFF-3 is a member of the trefoil factor peptide family secreted by mucin-producing epithelial cells of the human urinary tract, and it is the predominant trefoil subclass in the proximal and distal tubules and cortical collecting duct.19 TFF-3 seems to play an important role in mucosal repair through restitution early postinjury20–22 and later by effects on epithelial differentiation.23–25 We speculate that TFF-3 plays a role in repair of tubular epithelial damage, with higher urinary levels indicative of previous or persistent injury. Interestingly, we also observed an increased risk of cancer mortality with higher urinary TFF-3. Pathologic expression of TFF-3 has been observed in several cancers, including endometrial and prostate adenocarcinoma, gastric cancer, and several lung cancer histologic subtypes.26–28

Although there has been considerable focus on the cardiovascular consequences of kidney disease, the importance of non-CVD outcomes as a cause of death in CKD is increasingly recognized. People with CKD experience premature morbidity and death from a wide range of causes compared with age-matched members of the general population. For example, in the elderly, there is a graded and independent increase in all-cause mortality risk as CKD advances,29,30 and kidney function predicts death from a range of causes, including pulmonary disease, infection, and cancer.31 In younger adults, the risk of hospitalization, death from pneumonia,32 and non-CVD mortality all increase as GFR declines.33 Albuminuria similarly predicts non-CVD mortality in the general population.34 Our findings extend the literature in this regard by showing that the excess mortality associated with biomarkers of subclinical kidney injury is linked to non-CVD outcomes.

Although results for the incident kidney disease analyses were generally negative, it is notable that reduced levels of CTGF were associated with incident CKD, which is in a direction consistent with a prior small case-control study in FHS.7 This counterintuitive finding may perhaps be explained by the homeostatic challenge model described for the closely related cytokine TGF-β.35 This hypothesis proposes a physiologic custodial function for these cytokines under basal conditions, such that a deficiency in signaling results in tubular cell injury, impaired repair, and fibrosis.

Implications

There are several important implications to this work. First, elevated urinary α1-microglobulin, KIM-1, and TFF-3 levels are associated with a range of important clinical outcomes. Indeed, because one half of the 14 biomarkers tested were at least nominally associated with an increased risk of death, urinary biomarker leak may be a novel presentation of kidney disease in the general population. Second, the panel captures different prognostic information to creatinine, because there was no association between any biomarker and baseline eGFR; also, the findings were independent of adjustment for baseline eGFR, albuminuria, and cystatin C. Future research should focus on validation of our findings in independent studies as well as examination of whether it is possible to intervene to improve outcomes of individuals identified as being at risk. Examining whether these biomarkers predict propensity of disease progression in a sample enriched for CKD would also be of interest.

Strengths and Limitations

Our results may potentially have been attenuated by urinary biomarker degradation during prolonged frozen storage. However, although long-term stability measurements for these biomarkers are not available, medium-term measures for those biomarkers that have been tested seem acceptable. For example, storage for 2 years at −80°C, including several freeze–thaw cycles, did not have a significant effect on the stability of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) or KIM-1.36 Equally, serum β2-microglobulin measurements were robust to a single freeze–thaw cycle in long-term stored samples from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.37 More importantly, biomarker degradation would not explain our findings, because degradation would not be expected to occur differentially with regard to outcomes. If significant degradation did occur, it would be expected to bias our results to the null and potentially explain attenuated results for individual biomarkers. This result may have been a particular issue for GST-α, for which the addition of a buffer solution to fresh urine samples is recommended to prevent degradation until assay. No buffer was added at the time of urine collection in FHS, and samples were instead frozen and stored for later use. However, although long-term stability measures for GST-α are not available, it remained detectable at the time of assay in our sample. If partial degradation of GST-α occurred, it may partly explain the negative findings for that biomarker. Lastly, suboptimal (i.e., >10%) individual intra-assay coefficient of variations (CVs) for clusterin, GST-α, NGAL, and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 may have blunted their predictive performance and biased the results for these biomarkers to the null.

Loss of participants to follow-up is a limitation in longstanding cohort studies such as FHS. Nonreturning participants in our study tended to be in poorer health, which was evidenced by a higher prevalence of chronic disease, including kidney disease (data not shown). This finding may have attenuated the observed associations by excluding sicker participants. Although confirmatory testing of serum creatinine or UACR to confirm the presence of CKD would be desirable, it is not feasible in a large epidemiologic study such as FHS, where participants only return every 4–8 years. Again, any imprecision introduced would be expected to yield attenuated associations. Lastly, because our sample was composed of white individuals of European ancestry, the generalizability of our findings is uncertain.

Strengths of our study include the prospective design and large, well defined cohort as well as the inclusion of biomarkers that are both biologically plausible and supported by the literature. The ability to assess performance of the biomarker panel across a broad range of adjudicated outcomes is also a strength.

Components of a panel of 14 subclinical biomarkers of kidney injury are associated with important outcomes among members of the general population, and KIM-1 in particular was associated with several cardiovascular and mortality outcomes. Elevations in α1-microglobulin and TFF-3 were associated with an excess mortality risk that may be missed by traditional markers of kidney disease. Future studies are needed to establish the role of these biomarkers in reducing risks for these outcomes.

Concise Methods

Study Participants

Participants were from the Framingham Offspring cohort, and they have been examined approximately every 4 years since its inception in 1971.38 Participants who attended the sixth examination cycle (1995–1998) were included, with follow-up at the eighth exam cycle (2005–2008) for longitudinal analyses and December 31, 2009 for survival analyses. Of 3532 participants who attended the baseline examination, 2948 participants had urine samples taken and stored, permitting biomarkers to be assayed, and they were included in the mortality analyses. Participants had to attend follow-up to be assessed for the development of CKD and albuminuria. Of 2948 participants, 261 participants had baseline CKD, 2 participants were missing exposures or covariates, and 544 participants did not return for follow-up, leaving 2141 participants in the incident CKD analysis. For the incident albuminuria analysis, 373 participants had baseline albuminuria, 1 participant was missing covariates, 186 participants did not have follow-up albuminuria measured, and 576 participants did not return for follow-up, leaving 1812 participants. Participants provided written informed consent, and the institutional review board of the Boston Medical Center (Boston, Ma) approved the study.

Urinary Biomarker Determination

Morning urine samples were collected at baseline and initially stored in a large aliquot at −20°C before transfer to −80°C. In January of 2010, each large aliquot was thawed and stored in smaller aliquots until assaying in May of 2010. Urinary biomarker concentrations were measured using a multiplex immunoassay (Human KidneyMAP v1.0 panel; Rules Based Medicine, Austin, TX). There was good stability of biomarker measurements and no freezer decay. Intra-assay coefficients of variation were α1-microglobulin (8.8%), β2-microglobulin (11.8%), calbindin (7.5%), clusterin (20.7%), CTGF (28.1%), cystatin-C (6.3%), GST-α (19.9%), KIM-1 (7.4%), NGAL (12.5%), osteopontin (5.7%), TFF-3 (9.0%), Tamm–Horsfall Protein (7.6%), tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (18.3%), and vascular endothelial growth factor (7.4%). Undetectable values were set at the limit of detection.

Outcome Definitions

CKD

The National Kidney Foundation practice guidelines definition of CKD was used (eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation).39 Continuous rapid decline in eGFR was defined as the loss of >3 ml/min per year during follow-up. Serum creatinine (Jaffé method) was calibrated as follows: a correction factor of 0.23 mg/dl was applied to NHANES III creatinine values to align them with the Cleveland Clinic Laboratory values, and FHS serum creatinine values were then calibrated to the age- and sex-specific mean values from NHANES III.40

Albuminuria

Albuminuria was assessed by UACR. For baseline UACR assessment, spot urine samples were kept at −20°C until quantification in October of 1998. Urinary albumin was measured using immunoturbidimetry (Tina-quant albumin assay; Roche; http://www.roche-diagnostics.us/). Urinary creatinine was assessed using a modified Jaffé method. Albuminuria was defined as UACR≥17 (men) or ≥25 mg/g (women).41

Incident CVD, CHF, Cancer, and Mortality Definitions

CVD was defined as one or more of fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or transient ischemic attack. Incident CVD, CHF, and mortality events were confirmed by a panel of three physicians after review of outpatient, hospital, and death records using established protocols and criteria.42

Death adjudication forms were abstracted for evidence of kidney disease at the time of death by a trained nephrologist. Death with coexisting kidney disease was adjudicated if renal failure or CKD were recorded as an immediate or contributing cause of death or if they coexisted at the time of death.

Covariate Assessment

The average of two BP measurements, recorded using a mercury sphygmomanometer after 5 minutes seated rest, was used. Hypertension was defined as systolic BP≥140mmHg, diastolic BP≥90mmHg, or use of antihypertensive medication. BMI was defined as weight (kg) divided by the square of height (m). Persons that smoked cigarettes during the previous year were classified as current smokers. Fasting levels of HDL cholesterol and plasma glucose were measured using standardized assays. Diabetes mellitus was defined as a fasting plasma glucose level ≥126 mg/dl or medication. Plasma BNP was measured with high-sensitivity immunoradiometric assays (intra-assay CV=12.2%; Shionogi, Japan). CRP was quantified using a high-sensitivity assay (intra-assay CV=3.2%; Dade Behring BN100 nephelometer; Dade Behring Diagnostic, Marburg, Germany). Serum cystatin C was measured using particle-enhanced immunonephelometry (intra-assay CV=2.4%; Dade Behring BN 100).

Statistical Analyses

Urinary biomarkers were log-transformed for all analyses. Urinary biomarkers were indexed to urinary creatinine for all analyses to adjust for variability in urine concentration, with the exception of assessment of the interbiomarker Pearson correlations to avoid detecting spurious urinary creatinine-to-creatinine correlation. Correlations of biomarkers with CKD risk factors as well as interbiomarker correlations were assessed using multivariable-adjusted Pearson partial correlation coefficients.

We tested four primary outcomes: incident CKD, incident microalbuminuria, incident CVD, and all-cause mortality. Associations of individual biomarkers with incident CKD and albuminuria were determined using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for standard risk factors: age, sex, baseline eGFR, hypertension, diabetes, and dipstick proteinuria (in lieu of UACR to avoid collinearity with urinary creatinine).43 Associations of individual biomarkers with incident albuminuria were also assessed separately in men and women. Multivariable proportional hazards regression models were constructed to test the association of individual urinary biomarkers with incident cardiovascular and mortality events.44 Mortality models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, total HDL-to-cholesterol ratio, eGFR, UACR, and baseline CVD. Incident CVD analyses excluded baseline CVD and were adjusted for the same covariates (except baseline CVD). Proportional hazards assumptions were met for these models.

We also tested four secondary outcomes: incident CHF, cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality, and death with coexistent kidney disease. Incident CHF analyses excluded prevalent CHF and were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking, systolic BP, hypertension treatment, diabetes, total to HDL cholesterol ratio, baseline CVD, and valvular heart disease. Cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality models were adjusted for the same covariates as all-cause mortality.

We performed four sensitivity analyses. First, all mortality analyses were additionally adjusted for baseline BNP and CRP, because these biomarkers are associated with mortality beyond standard risk factors.11 Second, analyses for death with coexistent kidney disease were also assessed after exclusion of baseline CKD. Third, we determined age- and sex-adjusted mortality rates in participants stratified by CKD status. Finally, incident CKD and albuminuria analyses were additionally adjusted for serum cystatin C.

We estimated the net reclassification improvement for the significant biomarkers from the all-cause mortality analysis in a multimarker model containing established risk factors.45,46 Categories for the reclassification analysis were derived from tertiles of the number of deaths.

We adjusted for multiple testing in analyses of the exploratory biomarkers to reduce the likelihood of false positives. KIM-1, NGAL, and CTGF were not considered exploratory based on the extensive literature on these biomarkers and our own prior work. Because biomarkers were highly intercorrelated, we constructed a correlation matrix to determine the number of independent markers. There were four eigenvalues>1, indicating four independent sets of markers, which explained 50.9%, 9.1%, 7.3%, and 7.2% of the total variance, respectively. The P value for declaring significance for the primary end points was, thus, corrected by a factor of 16 (four independent tests × four independent outcomes), yielding a threshold P value=0.003 (0.05/16). A P value<0.05 was considered statistically significant for the secondary end points. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.2.

Disclosures

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the staff and participants of the Framingham Heart Study for their important contributions.

The Framingham Heart Study is supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Grant N01-HC-25195.

Footnotes

References

  1. ↵
    1. Alpert JS,
    2. Thygesen K,
    3. Jaffe A,
    4. White HD
    : The universal definition of myocardial infarction: A consensus document: Ischaemic heart disease. Heart 94: 1335–1341, 2008pmid:18801791
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Bonventre JV,
    2. Vaidya VS,
    3. Schmouder R,
    4. Feig P,
    5. Dieterle F
    : Next-generation biomarkers for detecting kidney toxicity. Nat Biotechnol 28: 436–440, 2010pmid:20458311
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Wu I,
    2. Parikh CR
    : Screening for kidney diseases: Older measures versus novel biomarkers. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3: 1895–1901, 2008pmid:18922990
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Parikh CR,
    2. Devarajan P
    : New biomarkers of acute kidney injury. Crit Care Med 36[Suppl]: S159–S165, 2008pmid:18382188
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Endre ZH,
    2. Westhuyzen J
    : Early detection of acute kidney injury: Emerging new biomarkers. Nephrology (Carlton) 13: 91–98, 2008pmid:18275495
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Coons SJ
    : The FDA’s critical path initiative: A brief introduction. Clin Ther 31: 2572–2573, 2009pmid:20110002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. O’Seaghdha CM,
    2. Hwang SJ,
    3. Bhavsar NA,
    4. Köttgen A,
    5. Coresh J,
    6. Astor BC,
    7. Fox CS
    : Lower urinary connective tissue growth factor levels and incident CKD stage 3 in the general population. Am J Kidney Dis 57: 841–849, 2011pmid:21292366
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Olsen MH,
    2. Hansen TW,
    3. Christensen MK,
    4. Gustafsson F,
    5. Rasmussen S,
    6. Wachtell K,
    7. Ibsen H,
    8. Torp-Pedersen C,
    9. Hildebrandt PR
    : N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, but not high sensitivity C-reactive protein, improves cardiovascular risk prediction in the general population. Eur Heart J 28: 1374–1381, 2007pmid:17242007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Ridker PM,
    2. Buring JE,
    3. Rifai N,
    4. Cook NR
    : Development and validation of improved algorithms for the assessment of global cardiovascular risk in women: The Reynolds Risk Score. JAMA 297: 611–619, 2007pmid:17299196
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Fox CS,
    2. Gona P,
    3. Larson MG,
    4. Selhub J,
    5. Tofler G,
    6. Hwang SJ,
    7. Meigs JB,
    8. Levy D,
    9. Wang TJ,
    10. Jacques PF,
    11. Benjamin EJ,
    12. Vasan RS
    : A multi-marker approach to predict incident CKD and microalbuminuria. J Am Soc Nephrol 21: 2143–2149, 2010pmid:20966127
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Wang TJ,
    2. Gona P,
    3. Larson MG,
    4. Tofler GH,
    5. Levy D,
    6. Newton-Cheh C,
    7. Jacques PF,
    8. Rifai N,
    9. Selhub J,
    10. Robins SJ,
    11. Benjamin EJ,
    12. D’Agostino RB,
    13. Vasan RS
    : Multiple biomarkers for the prediction of first major cardiovascular events and death. N Engl J Med 355: 2631–2639, 2006pmid:17182988
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Zethelius B,
    2. Berglund L,
    3. Sundström J,
    4. Ingelsson E,
    5. Basu S,
    6. Larsson A,
    7. Venge P,
    8. Arnlöv J
    : Use of multiple biomarkers to improve the prediction of death from cardiovascular causes. N Engl J Med 358: 2107–2116, 2008pmid:18480203
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. van Timmeren MM,
    2. van den Heuvel MC,
    3. Bailly V,
    4. Bakker SJ,
    5. van Goor H,
    6. Stegeman CA
    : Tubular kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) in human renal disease. J Pathol 212: 209–217, 2007pmid:17471468
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Koyner JL,
    2. Vaidya VS,
    3. Bennett MR,
    4. Ma Q,
    5. Worcester E,
    6. Akhter SA,
    7. Raman J,
    8. Jeevanandam V,
    9. O’Connor MF,
    10. Devarajan P,
    11. Bonventre JV,
    12. Murray PT
    : Urinary biomarkers in the clinical prognosis and early detection of acute kidney injury. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 2154–2165, 2010pmid:20798258
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Ko GJ,
    2. Grigoryev DN,
    3. Linfert D,
    4. Jang HR,
    5. Watkins T,
    6. Cheadle C,
    7. Racusen L,
    8. Rabb H
    : Transcriptional analysis of kidneys during repair from AKI reveals possible roles for NGAL and KIM-1 as biomarkers of AKI-to-CKD transition. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 298: F1472–F1483, 2010pmid:20181666
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Damman K,
    2. Van Veldhuisen DJ,
    3. Navis G,
    4. Vaidya VS,
    5. Smilde TD,
    6. Westenbrink BD,
    7. Bonventre JV,
    8. Voors AA,
    9. Hillege HL
    : Tubular damage in chronic systolic heart failure is associated with reduced survival independent of glomerular filtration rate. Heart 96: 1297–1302, 2010pmid:20659949
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Jungbauer CG,
    2. Birner C,
    3. Jung B,
    4. Buchner S,
    5. Lubnow M,
    6. von Bary C,
    7. Endemann D,
    8. Banas B,
    9. Mack M,
    10. Böger CA,
    11. Riegger G,
    12. Luchner A
    : Kidney injury molecule-1 and N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase in chronic heart failure: Possible biomarkers of cardiorenal syndrome. Eur J Heart Fail 13: 1104–1110, 2011pmid:21846754
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Astor BC,
    2. Köttgen A,
    3. Hwang SJ,
    4. Bhavsar N,
    5. Fox CS,
    6. Coresh J
    : Trefoil factor 3 predicts incident chronic kidney disease: A case-control study nested within the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Am J Nephrol 34: 291–297, 2011pmid:21829008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Rinnert M,
    2. Hinz M,
    3. Buhtz P,
    4. Reiher F,
    5. Lessel W,
    6. Hoffmann W
    : Synthesis and localization of trefoil factor family (TFF) peptides in the human urinary tract and TFF2 excretion into the urine. Cell Tissue Res 339: 639–647, 2010pmid:20063012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Hoffmann W
    : Trefoil factors TFF (trefoil factor family) peptide-triggered signals promoting mucosal restitution. Cell Mol Life Sci 62: 2932–2938, 2005pmid:16374581
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pawar S,
    2. Kartha S,
    3. Toback FG
    : Differential gene expression in migrating renal epithelial cells after wounding. J Cell Physiol 165: 556–565, 1995pmid:7593235
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Bonventre JV
    : Dedifferentiation and proliferation of surviving epithelial cells in acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 14[Suppl 1]: S55–S61, 2003pmid:12761240
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Romih R,
    2. Koprivec D,
    3. Martincic DS,
    4. Jezernik K
    : Restoration of the rat urothelium after cyclophosphamide treatment. Cell Biol Int 25: 531–537, 2001pmid:11407858
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Veranic P,
    2. Romih R,
    3. Jezernik K
    : What determines differentiation of urothelial umbrella cells? Eur J Cell Biol 83: 27–34, 2004pmid:15085953
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Hoffmann W
    : Regeneration of the gastric mucosa and its glands from stem cells. Curr Med Chem 15: 3133–3144, 2008pmid:19075658
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Mhawech-Fauceglia P,
    2. Wang D,
    3. Samrao D,
    4. Liu S,
    5. Dupont NC,
    6. Pejovic T
    : Trefoil factor family 3 (TFF3) expression and its interaction with estrogen receptor (ER) in endometrial adenocarcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 130: 174–180, 2013pmid:23578537
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Im S,
    2. Yoo C,
    3. Jung JH,
    4. Choi HJ,
    5. Yoo J,
    6. Kang CS
    : Reduced expression of TFF1 and increased expression of TFF3 in gastric cancer: Correlation with clinicopathological parameters and prognosis. Int J Med Sci 10: 133–140, 2013pmid:23329884
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Qu Y,
    2. Yang Y,
    3. Ma D,
    4. Xiao W
    : Increased trefoil factor 3 levels in the serum of patients with three major histological subtypes of lung cancer. Oncol Rep 27: 1277–1283, 2012pmid:22246423
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Roderick PJ,
    2. Atkins RJ,
    3. Smeeth L,
    4. Mylne A,
    5. Nitsch DD,
    6. Hubbard RB,
    7. Bulpitt CJ,
    8. Fletcher AE
    : CKD and mortality risk in older people: A community-based population study in the United Kingdom. Am J Kidney Dis 53: 950–960, 2009pmid:19394727
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Emberson JR,
    2. Haynes R,
    3. Dasgupta T,
    4. Mafham M,
    5. Landray MJ,
    6. Baigent C,
    7. Clarke R
    : Cystatin C and risk of vascular and nonvascular mortality: A prospective cohort study of older men. J Intern Med 268: 145–154, 2010pmid:20337853
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Fried LF,
    2. Katz R,
    3. Sarnak MJ,
    4. Shlipak MG,
    5. Chaves PH,
    6. Jenny NS,
    7. Stehman-Breen C,
    8. Gillen D,
    9. Bleyer AJ,
    10. Hirsch C,
    11. Siscovick D,
    12. Newman AB
    : Kidney function as a predictor of noncardiovascular mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol 16: 3728–3735, 2005pmid:16251239
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. James MT,
    2. Quan H,
    3. Tonelli M,
    4. Manns BJ,
    5. Faris P,
    6. Laupland KB,
    7. Hemmelgarn BR,
    8. Alberta Kidney Disease Network
    : CKD and risk of hospitalization and death with pneumonia. Am J Kidney Dis 54: 24–32, 2009pmid:19447535
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Di Angelantonio E,
    2. Chowdhury R,
    3. Sarwar N,
    4. Aspelund T,
    5. Danesh J,
    6. Gudnason V
    : Chronic kidney disease and risk of major cardiovascular disease and non-vascular mortality: Prospective population based cohort study. BMJ 341: c4986, 2010pmid:20884698
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Hillege HL,
    2. Fidler V,
    3. Diercks GF,
    4. van Gilst WH,
    5. de Zeeuw D,
    6. van Veldhuisen DJ,
    7. Gans RO,
    8. Janssen WM,
    9. Grobbee DE,
    10. de Jong PE,
    11. Prevention of Renal and Vascular End Stage Disease (PREVEND) Study Group
    : Urinary albumin excretion predicts cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality in general population. Circulation 106: 1777–1782, 2002pmid:12356629
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Wakefield LM,
    2. Stuelten C
    : Keeping order in the neighborhood: New roles for TGFbeta in maintaining epithelial homeostasis. Cancer Cell 12: 293–295, 2007pmid:17936552
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Han WK,
    2. Wagener G,
    3. Zhu Y,
    4. Wang S,
    5. Lee HT
    : Urinary biomarkers in the early detection of acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 873–882, 2009pmid:19406962
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Juraschek SP,
    2. Coresh J,
    3. Inker LA,
    4. Rynders GP,
    5. Eckfeldt JH,
    6. Selvin E
    : The effects of freeze-thaw on β-trace protein and β2-microglobulin assays after long-term sample storage. Clin Biochem 45: 694–696, 2012pmid:22425605
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Kannel WB,
    2. Feinleib M,
    3. McNamara PM,
    4. Garrison RJ,
    5. Castelli WP
    : An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study. Am J Epidemiol 110: 281–290, 1979pmid:474565
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. National Kidney Foundation
    : K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 39[Suppl 1]: S1–S266, 2002pmid:11904577
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Fox CS,
    2. Larson MG,
    3. Leip EP,
    4. Culleton B,
    5. Wilson PW,
    6. Levy D
    : Predictors of new-onset kidney disease in a community-based population. JAMA 291: 844–850, 2004pmid:14970063
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Mattix HJ,
    2. Hsu CY,
    3. Shaykevich S,
    4. Curhan G
    : Use of the albumin/creatinine ratio to detect microalbuminuria: Implications of sex and race. J Am Soc Nephrol 13: 1034–1039, 2002pmid:11912263
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. McKee PA,
    2. Castelli WP,
    3. McNamara PM,
    4. Kannel WB
    : The natural history of congestive heart failure: The Framingham study. N Engl J Med 285: 1441–1446, 1971pmid:5122894
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. O’Seaghdha CM,
    2. Lyass A,
    3. Massaro JM,
    4. Meigs JB,
    5. Coresh J,
    6. D’Agostino RB Sr,
    7. Astor BC,
    8. Fox CS
    : A risk score for chronic kidney disease in the general population. Am J Med 125: 270–277, 2012pmid:22340925
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Cox DR
    : Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser A 34: 187–220, 1972
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Pencina MJ,
    2. D'Agostino RB Sr,
    3. D'Agostino RB Jr,
    4. Vasan RS
    : Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: From area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Stat Med 27: 157–172, 2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Pencina MJ,
    2. D’Agostino RB Sr,
    3. Steyerberg EW
    : Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers. Stat Med 30: 11–21, 2011pmid:21204120
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Email Article
Citation Tools
Request Permissions
Analysis of a Urinary Biomarker Panel for Incident Kidney Disease and Clinical Outcomes
Conall M. O’Seaghdha, Shih-Jen Hwang, Martin G. Larson, James B. Meigs, Ramachandran S. Vasan, Caroline S. Fox
JASN Nov 2013, 24 (11) 1880-1888; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2013010019
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

More in this TOC Section

Cited By...

Similar Articles

Related Articles