Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Subject Collections
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Archives
    • Saved Searches
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Subscriptions
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Editorial Fellowship Program
    • Feedback
    • Reprints
    • Impact Factor
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Subject Collections
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Archives
    • Saved Searches
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Subscriptions
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Editorial Fellowship Program
    • Feedback
    • Reprints
    • Impact Factor
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Follow JASN on Twitter
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow JASN on RSS
  • Community Forum
Brief Communications
You have accessRestricted Access

Batf3-Dependent Dendritic Cells in the Renal Lymph Node Induce Tolerance against Circulating Antigens

Catherine Gottschalk, Vera Damuzzo, Janine Gotot, Richard A. Kroczek, Hideo Yagita, Kenneth M. Murphy, Percy A. Knolle, Isis Ludwig-Portugall and Christian Kurts
JASN April 2013, 24 (4) 543-549; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2012101022
Catherine Gottschalk
*Institutes of Molecular Medicine and Experimental Immunology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vera Damuzzo
*Institutes of Molecular Medicine and Experimental Immunology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janine Gotot
*Institutes of Molecular Medicine and Experimental Immunology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Kroczek
†Robert Koch-Institute, Berlin, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hideo Yagita
‡Department of Immunology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth M. Murphy
§Department of Pathology and Immunology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Percy A. Knolle
*Institutes of Molecular Medicine and Experimental Immunology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Isis Ludwig-Portugall
*Institutes of Molecular Medicine and Experimental Immunology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christian Kurts
*Institutes of Molecular Medicine and Experimental Immunology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Abstract

Although the spleen is a major site where immune tolerance to circulating innocuous antigens occurs, the kidney also contributes. Circulating antigens smaller than albumin are constitutively filtered and concentrated in the kidney and reach the renal lymph node by lymphatic drainage, where resident dendritic cells (DCs) capture them and induce tolerance of specific cytotoxic T cells through unknown mechanisms. Here, we found that the coinhibitory cell surface receptor programmed death 1 (PD-1) on cytotoxic T cells mediates to their tolerance. Renal lymph node DCs of the CD8+ XCR1+ subset, which depend on the transcription factor Batf3, expressed the PD-1 cognate ligand PD-L1. Batf3-dependent DCs in the renal lymph node presented antigen that had been concentrated in the kidney and used PD-L1 to induce apoptosis of cytotoxic T cells. In contrast, T cell tolerance in the spleen was independent of PD-1, PD-L1, and Batf3. In summary, these results clarify how the kidney/renal lymph node system tolerizes the immune system against circulating innocuous antigens.

Cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (CTLs) mediate host defense against tumors and intracellular pathogens like viruses. However, they may cause diseases if they are specific for self-antigens (e.g., in type 1 diabetes mellitus). The first checkpoint for preventing autoimmunity is the thymus that eliminates autoreactive T cells. However, T cells specific for innocuous foreign antigens, like food antigens, or for self-antigens that are not expressed in the thymus escape central tolerance. Such T cells can be silenced by peripheral tolerance mechanisms in secondary lymphatic tissues. The spleen possesses a conduit system for concentrating soluble antigens, which enables splenic dendritic cells (DCs) to endocytose them for inducing T cell tolerance.1–3 Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells can capture antigens from the portal vein and anergize CTLs.4 We recently identified the kidney as the third organ involved in T cell tolerance against innocuous circulating antigens5: Antigens below albumin size constitutively pass the kidney glomerular filter and are concentrated when fluid is reabsorbed in the tubular system. Concentrated low molecular weight (LMW) antigens reach the renal lymph nodes (RLNs) by bulk lymph drainage, where they are endocytosed by resident DCs. The RLN is the only lymph node showing such antigen concentration (Figure 1, A and B), illustrating the unique role of the kidney in handling LMW antigens.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

PD-L1 mediates CTL apoptosis in the renal LN, but not in the spleen. (A) Uptake of OVA-Alexa647 by CD11c+ DCs in various LNs and the spleen 10 minutes after intravenous injection assessed by flow cytometry. Numbers represent the percentage of cells that had captured OVA-Alexa647. (B) Quantitative analysis of OVA uptake in uninjected mice (white) 10 minutes (gray) and 30 minutes (black) after OVA-Alexa647 injection. The absolute numbers of OVA+ DCs was multiplied with their mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) at 647 nm, which correlates with the amount of OVA captured per OVA+ DC. (C–H) MFI of IFN-γ production (C and F) and apoptosis of OT-I cells (D and G) in the RLN (C and D) and the spleen (F and G) 3 days after injecting 8 µg/g body weight endotoxin-free OVA (black), compared with nonimmunized control (white) and immunogenic immunization with OVA/CpG subcutaneously followed by analysis of the draining skin LN (gray). Antibodies blocking PD-L1 and/or PD-L2 are administered intraperitoneally 1 day before and on the day of immunization. (E and H) Proliferation of OT-I cells 3 days after OVA injection in the RLN (E) and the spleen (H) are expressed as proportion of cells per division round, after treatment with blocking antibodies against PD-L1 (triangle), PD-L2 (reverse triangle), or both (square) or left untreated (circle). Data are given as means of three independent experiments. P values refer to nonimmunized controls.

We previously showed that CTLs responding to LMW antigen in the RLN or in the spleen lacked effector function and possessed a curtailed lifespan.5 The molecular mechanisms of this CTL deletion are unclear. Ligation of programmed death 1 (PD-1; CD279), a member of the family of CD28-like costimulatory molecules,6 by one of its two ligands, PD-L1 (B7-1H, CD274) and PD-L2 (B7-DC, CD273), can induce apoptosis in T cells.7,8 We recently showed that regulatory T cells use PD-1 ligands to directly tolerize B cells specific for glomerular autoantigen.9 The role of PD-1 in renal disease is unclear.

To study whether PD-1 ligands are involved in CTL cross-tolerance against LMW antigens, we used our adoptive transfer protocol where ovalbumin (OVA)–specific CD8+ T cells (OT-I cells), OVA antigen, and antibodies blocking PD-L1 and/or PD-L2 were intravenously injected into mice. Without antibody blockade, OT-I cells in the RLN produced low levels of IFN-γ compared with an immunogenic challenge (OVA/CpG subcutaneously) (Figure 1C), indicating lack of effector function, and >20% of them were apoptotic (Figure 1D). Blockade of PD-L1, but not of PD-L2, increased IFN-γ production and inhibited apoptosis of OT-I cells in the RLN (Figure 1, C and D and Supplemental Figure 1A). Combined blockade of PD-L1 and PD-L2 improved OT-I cell proliferation in this lymph node (LN) (Figure 1E and Supplemental Figure 1A). In the spleen, PD-L1 blockade had little effect, and PD-L2-blockade had no effect on IFN-γ production and apoptosis of OT-I cells (Figure 1, F and G). Generally, the proportion of apoptotic OT-I cells was lower in the spleen than the RLN (Figure 1, D and G and Supplemental Figure 1B). Interestingly, PD-L2 blockade slightly reduced OT-I cell proliferation in the spleen, albeit not significantly, whereas PD-L1 blockade was ineffectual (Figure 1H). These results suggest that PD-L1 was required for CTL tolerization in the RLN, but not in the spleen.

To determine whether CTL apoptosis in the RLN resulted in their deletion, we first transferred OT-I cells and OVA into recipient mice and after 2 days transferred splenocytes or RLN cells into separate recipient mice, to follow the fate of OT-I cells (experimental protocol in Figure 2A). Again, we used OT-I cell–injected mice immunized with OVA/CpG subcutaneously as a control for immunogenic CTL activation. After 5 days, a substantial number of immunogenically activated OT-I cells were recovered from pooled spleen and LNs of secondary recipients (Figure 2B), and these produced robust amounts of IFN-γ (Figure 2C). OT-I cells from mice that had not been injected with OVA were recovered in lower numbers and produced no IFN-γ, indicating their retained naïve phenotype (Figure 2, B and C). Very few OT-I cells responding to OVA in the RLN or in the spleen were recovered from the secondary recipients and these produced hardly any IFN-γ (Figure 2, B and C), indicating deletion and functional incapacitation, respectively. When we transferred OT-I.PD1−/− cells activated in the RLN, almost 10× more cells were recovered and these produced IFN-γ (Figure 2, B and C). In contrast, OT-I.PD-1−/− cells activated in the spleen were still deleted (Figure 2B), but nevertheless produced IFN-γ (Figure 2C), suggesting that an additional PD-1–independent deletion mechanism operated in the spleen that did not switch off cytokine production. Nonactivated OT-I.PD-1−/− cells survived, but produced no IFN-γ (Figure 2, B and C). These findings indicated that CTLs responding to LMW antigen in the RLN were deleted through PD-1 engagement, whereas CTLs responding in the spleen were deleted by other mechanism.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

PD-1 mediates CTL deletion in the RLN, but not in the spleen. (A) Experimental scheme for OT-I survival analysis. The 5×106 CFSE-labeled OT-I (white) or OT-IxPD1−/− (black) cells are transferred into wild-type recipients, which are then immunized with 8 µg/g body weight endotoxin-free OVA intravenously or OVA/CpG subcutaneously (pos ctrl; gray). One day later, single cell suspensions from RLN, spleen, or draining cutaneous LNs are analyzed for absolute OT-I cell numbers by flow cytometry. Suspensions are transferred into separate secondary recipient mice, and the proportion of transferred OT-I cells that survive (B) and produce IFN-γ (C) are determined in pooled spleen and LNs after 5 days. Data are representative of four independent experiments. CFSE, carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester.

We next aimed to identify the DC subset that tolerized CTLs in the RLN. To this end, we intravenously injected fluorescent OVA and used flow cytometry to search for DCs that captured this filterable 45-kD antigen, expressed PD-L1, and were capable of cross-presentation. This term denotes extracellular antigen uptake, processing, and presentation capabilities necessary for activation of CTLs.10,11 Only some DCs are capable of cross-presentation, and these can be identified by the lack of CD11b and by the expression of CD8,12,13 CD103,14,15 and/or the chemokine receptor XCR1.16,17 Cross-presentation is required both for immunogenic activation of CTLs (cross-priming), such as against viruses or tumors, and for the deletion of CTLs specific for autoantigens, a process known as cross-tolerance.18

Among the RLN DCs that had captured OVA, there were both CD11b+ non-cross-presenting DCs and CD8+ CD103+ XCR1+ cross-presenting DCs (Figure 3A). In the steady state, the development of cross-presenting DCs depends on the basic leucine zipper transcription factor (Batf3; ATF-like 3). Mice deficient for this factor lack cross-presenting DCs and show severely compromised CTL responses.19 When we injected OVA into Batf3−/− mice, the abundance of OVA+ cross-presenting DCs in the RLN was more than 80% lower than in Batf3-competent controls (Figure 3B). Immature DCs can express PD-1 ligands.20,21 We found selective PD-L1 expression on CD8+ DCs, but not on CD11b+ RLN DCs (Figure 3C), supporting a role of the former DC subset in cross-tolerance in this node. Such a role would be consistent with a previous report showing that CD8+ DCs tolerized CTLs against islet autoantigen in the pancreatic LN.22 OVA+ DCs of the CD8+ and the CD11b+ subset were also found in the spleen (Figure 3D). Spleens of Batf3-deficient mice contained far less OVA+ cross-presenting DCs, reminiscent of the RLN (Figure 3, B and E). However, no selective PD-L1 expression on any splenic DC subset was noted (Figure 3F), supporting our conclusion that other tolerance mechanisms operate in this organ (Figures 1 and 2). PD-L2, which was not involved in CTL tolerance (Figures 1 and 2), was not detected on any DC (Figure 3, C and F).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

CD8+ DCs in the RLN capture LMW antigen and express PD-L1. (A and D) OVA uptake by CD11c+ MHCII+ DC subsets expressing either CD11b or CD8, and CD103 and XCR1 expression of these subsets in the RLN (A) or spleen (D) of wild-type mice injected with 8 µg/g endotoxin-free OVA-Alexa647. Numbers represent the percentages of cells inside the gate. (C and F) Surface expression of PD-L1 (left) and PD-L2 (right) by CD8+ DCs (black line) and CD11b+ DCs (dotted line) in the RLN (C) and spleen (F) compared with isotype control staining (gray area). (B and E) OVA uptake by CD11c+ MHCII+ DC subsets expressing either CD11b or CD8 in the RLN (B) or spleen (E) of Batf3−/− mice injected with 8 µg/g body weight endotoxin-free OVA-Alexa647. Numbers represent the percentages of cells inside the gate. Representative plots of three independent experiments are shown.

To address the functional necessity of Batf3-dependent DCs, we injected OT-I cells and OVA into Batf3−/− and control mice and determined CTL apoptosis. Indeed, less apoptotic OT-I cells were seen in the RLN, but not in the spleen of Batf3−/− mice compared with Batf3-competent controls (Figure 4A), indicating that Batf3-dependent DCs are important for cross-tolerance in the RLN, but not in the spleen.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

PD-L1 on Batf3-dependent DCs is required for CTL cross-tolerance in the RLN. (A) Proportion of apoptotic OT-I cells transferred into wild-type (black) or Batf3−/− (white) mice 18 hours after intravenous injection of 8 µg/g body weight OVA. (B) Experimental scheme for mixed bone marrow chimeras. Irradiated wild-type or PD-L1−/− mice are reconstituted at a 1:1 ratio with bone marrow from Batf3−/− mice and wild-type or PD-L1−/− mice. (C) Proportion of apoptotic OT-I cells in the RLN and spleens of Batf3/wt (white) or Batf3/PD-L1 mixed chimeras (black) 18 hours after injecting 8 µg/g body weight OVA intravenously. Controls include OVA-injected (light gray) or noninjected wild-type mice (dark gray). (D) Same as in C except that PD-L1−/− mice are used as bone marrow recipients. Results are representative of two independent experiments using four mice per group. wt, wild type; bm, bone marrow.

Finally, we asked whether PD-L1 expression by Batf3+ DCs was required for CTL cross-tolerance. To this end, we created mixed bone marrow chimeras by combining 50% Batf3-deficient and 50% PD-L1–deficient bone marrow. In these chimeras, Batf3-dependent DCs were PD-L1 deficient, whereas the other DCs expressed PD-L1 (Figure 4B and Supplemental Figure 2A). When we transferred OT-I cells and OVA into these chimeras, apoptosis induction in the RLN was abrogated but remained intact in the spleen (Figure 4C). Apoptosis occurred in the RLN of Batf3/wild-type mixed bone marrow chimeras that served as a positive control for the integrity of the PD-1 pathway (Figure 4C and Supplemental Figure 2B). These findings verified that PD-L1 expression of Batf3-dependent DCs was required for CTL cross-tolerance against LMW antigens in the RLN. We also created such mixed bone marrow chimeras using PD-L1−/− mice as recipients. Again, CTL apoptosis in the RLN, but not in the spleen, was attenuated (Figure 4D), excluding a role for PD-L1 on radioresistant host cells for cross-tolerance.

In summary, we showed that Batf3+ DCs in the RLN capture LMW antigen filtrated and concentrated in the kidney and present it together with PD-L1 to CTLs, resulting in cross-tolerance. This is consistent with a previous study showing that immature DCs can tolerize autoreactive CTLs through PD-1.23 This mechanism is unique to the kidney, because the spleen, the only other organ in which antigen concentration occurs, uses other immune tolerance mechanisms that remain to be identified. The scenario that kidney DCs, which are tolerogenic under homeostatic conditions as well,24–28 capture LMW antigens and carry them to the RLN for tolerance induction is unlikely to be relevant because few DCs migrate to draining LNs in the steady state, whereas bulk drainage transports large antigen amounts very rapidly toward RLN-resident DCs.5

Batf3-dependent DCs are necessary for CTL cross-priming against various pathogens and tumors.19 To our knowledge, this report is the first to imply these DCs in peripheral cross-tolerance. It is also the first report linking Batf3-dependent DCs with functional PD-L1 expression. PD-1 signaling has been shown to induce the proapoptotic molecule Bim in vitro,29 which might have caused CTL apoptosis in our system. Blockade of PD-1 or PD-L1 is currently under clinical investigation for improving inefficient CTL responses against tumors30,31 or in chronic hepatitis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00703469). Our results imply that such blockade will not compromise cross-tolerance against LMW antigens, provided that the spleen remains operational.

The tolerance mechanism described here may help prevent unwanted immunity against LMW antigens that lack molecular patterns indicative of danger or infections, and that are too small to represent pathogens (e.g., food antigens or hormones that are not expressed in the thymus).32 Thus, PD-L1+ Batf3-dependent DCs of the kidney/RLN system purge the T cell repertoire of reactivity against innocuous LMW antigens. Future studies may clarify whether this mechanism induces tolerance against tumor antigens and whether tolerance against autoantigens fails in inflammatory kidney disease.

Concise Methods

Reagents and Mice

All reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, if not specified otherwise. OVA-Alexa647 was prepared using EndoGrade OVA (Hyglos) and the succinimidyl ester of AlexaFluor647 carboxylic acid (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers’ guidelines. All mice were bred under specific pathogen-free conditions at the central animal facility of the University Clinic of Bonn (House for Experimental Therapy) and were used in accordance with local animal experimentation guidelines at 8–12 weeks of age. All animal studies were approved by an external review board (Bezirksregierung Köln, Cologne). For immunization of mice with soluble protein, OVA (grade VII) was dissolved in PBS and run over Sephadex G-25 (PD10 column; Amersham) to remove peptide contaminations. Eight micrograms of soluble OVA per gram body weight in a total volume of 300 µl was injected intravenously. For immunogenic immunization, 50 µg of OVA and 10 µg of CpG ODN1668 in a total volume of 200 µl were injected subcutaneously into the flank. PD-L1 and PD-L2 were blocked as recently described, by intraperitoneally injecting 250 µg of MIH5 or TY25,9,33 respectively, on the day before and on the day of immunization.

Isolation of Lymphocytes/Purification of CD8 Cells

OVA-specific CTLs from OT-I, OT-I.Thy1.1, OT-I.CD45.1, or OT-I.PD1−/− mice were isolated as previously described.34 Purity was typically 90%–98% of viable lymphocytes. Labeling with carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (Invitrogen Life Technologies) for cell division analysis was performed as previously described.18 DCs were isolated from spleen, and LN by digestion with collagenase (Roche Diagnostics) and DNase I as described.5

Flow Cytometry

Cells were stained on ice with the following fluorochrome-labeled Abs: anti-CD8, CD11b, CD11c, CD45.1, CD90.1 (Thy1.1), CD90.2 (Thy1.2), CD103, F4/80, MHC-II, PD-L2 (CD273), PD-L1 (CD274), Vα2-TCR, Vβ-5 TCR (eBioscience), and XCR1.17 OT-I cells were identified as CD8+ Vα2+ Vβ5+ cells or by the congenic markers Thy1.1 or CD45.1. Fc receptors were blocked with 2.4G2 hybridoma supernatant; dead cells were excluded by Hoechst-33342 dye or Violet Dead Cell Stain (LIVE/DEAD Fixable Dead Cell Stains; Invitrogen). Apoptosis was determined using the FLICA caspase 3/7 activity detection kit (Immunochemistry Industries) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Intracellular IFN-γ staining was performed as described.5 Cytometry was performed on a FACS Canto II using FACS Diva software (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software (TriStar Software). Proliferation analysis was performed by cell cycle analysis using FlowJo software. Absolute cell numbers were determined using 1×105 CaliBRITE APC beads.

Statistical Analyses

Statistics are given as the mean ± SEM. Comparisons were made using ANOVA with the Bonferroni post test using Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software).

Disclosures

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Sonny Leopold and Melanie Eichler for technical assistance, Linda Diehl for PD-1 and PD-L1 knockout mice, and Natalio Garbi for helpful discussions. The PD-L1 blocking antibody (MIH5) was kindly provided by Miyuki Azuma and the RIKEN BRC Cell Bank.

We acknowledge support from the Central Animal Facilities of the Medical Faculty Bonn and the Flow Cytometry Core Facility at the Institutes of Molecular Medicine and Experimental Immunology. This work was financed by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grants Ku1038/7-2 within KFO228, Lu1387/2-1, SFB704, and SFBTR57), NRW International Graduate Research School LIMES-Chemical Biology, and the Immunosensation Excellence Cluster.

Footnotes

  • I.L.-P. and C.K. contributed equally to this work.

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.jasn.org.

  • See related editorial, “The Renal Lymph Node and Immune Tolerance to Filtered Antigens,” on pages 519–521.

  • This article contains supplemental material online at http://jasn.asnjournals.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1681/ASN.2012101022/-/DCSupplemental.

  • Copyright © 2013 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    1. Li M,
    2. Davey GM,
    3. Sutherland RM,
    4. Kurts C,
    5. Lew AM,
    6. Hirst C,
    7. Carbone FR,
    8. Heath WR
    : Cell-associated ovalbumin is cross-presented much more efficiently than soluble ovalbumin in vivo. J Immunol 166: 6099–6103, 2001pmid:11342628
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gütgemann I,
    2. Darling JM,
    3. Greenberg HB,
    4. Davis MM,
    5. Chien YH
    : A blood-borne antigen induces rapid T-B cell contact: A potential mechanism for tolerance induction. Immunology 107: 420–425, 2002pmid:12460186
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Nolte MA,
    2. Beliën JA,
    3. Schadee-Eestermans I,
    4. Jansen W,
    5. Unger WW,
    6. van Rooijen N,
    7. Kraal G,
    8. Mebius RE
    : A conduit system distributes chemokines and small blood-borne molecules through the splenic white pulp. J Exp Med 198: 505–512, 2003pmid:12900524
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Limmer A,
    2. Ohl J,
    3. Kurts C,
    4. Ljunggren HG,
    5. Reiss Y,
    6. Groettrup M,
    7. Momburg F,
    8. Arnold B,
    9. Knolle PA
    : Efficient presentation of exogenous antigen by liver endothelial cells to CD8+ T cells results in antigen-specific T-cell tolerance. Nat Med 6: 1348–1354, 2000pmid:11100119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Lukacs-Kornek V,
    2. Burgdorf S,
    3. Diehl L,
    4. Specht S,
    5. Kornek M,
    6. Kurts C
    : The kidney-renal lymph node-system contributes to cross-tolerance against innocuous circulating antigen. J Immunol 180: 706–715, 2008pmid:18178808
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Keir ME,
    2. Butte MJ,
    3. Freeman GJ,
    4. Sharpe AH
    : PD-1 and its ligands in tolerance and immunity. Annu Rev Immunol 26: 677–704, 2008pmid:18173375
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Freeman GJ,
    2. Long AJ,
    3. Iwai Y,
    4. Bourque K,
    5. Chernova T,
    6. Nishimura H,
    7. Fitz LJ,
    8. Malenkovich N,
    9. Okazaki T,
    10. Byrne MC,
    11. Horton HF,
    12. Fouser L,
    13. Carter L,
    14. Ling V,
    15. Bowman MR,
    16. Carreno BM,
    17. Collins M,
    18. Wood CR,
    19. Honjo T
    : Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J Exp Med 192: 1027–1034, 2000pmid:11015443
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Latchman Y,
    2. Wood CR,
    3. Chernova T,
    4. Chaudhary D,
    5. Borde M,
    6. Chernova I,
    7. Iwai Y,
    8. Long AJ,
    9. Brown JA,
    10. Nunes R,
    11. Greenfield EA,
    12. Bourque K,
    13. Boussiotis VA,
    14. Carter LL,
    15. Carreno BM,
    16. Malenkovich N,
    17. Nishimura H,
    18. Okazaki T,
    19. Honjo T,
    20. Sharpe AH,
    21. Freeman GJ
    : PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD-1 and inhibits T cell activation. Nat Immunol 2: 261–268, 2001pmid:11224527
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Gotot J,
    2. Gottschalk C,
    3. Leopold S,
    4. Knolle PA,
    5. Yagita H,
    6. Kurts C,
    7. Ludwig-Portugall I
    : Regulatory T cells use programmed death 1 ligands to directly suppress autoreactive B cells in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 10468–10473, 2012pmid:22689978
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Kurts C,
    2. Heath WR,
    3. Carbone FR,
    4. Allison J,
    5. Miller JF,
    6. Kosaka H
    : Constitutive class I-restricted exogenous presentation of self antigens in vivo. J Exp Med 184: 923–930, 1996pmid:9064352
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Kurts C,
    2. Robinson BW,
    3. Knolle PA
    : Cross-priming in health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 10: 403–414, 2010pmid:20498667
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Bonifaz L,
    2. Bonnyay D,
    3. Mahnke K,
    4. Rivera M,
    5. Nussenzweig MC,
    6. Steinman RM
    : Efficient targeting of protein antigen to the dendritic cell receptor DEC-205 in the steady state leads to antigen presentation on major histocompatibility complex class I products and peripheral CD8+ T cell tolerance. J Exp Med 196: 1627–1638, 2002pmid:12486105
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. den Haan JM,
    2. Lehar SM,
    3. Bevan MJ
    : CD8(+) but not CD8(-) dendritic cells cross-prime cytotoxic T cells in vivo. J Exp Med 192: 1685–1696, 2000pmid:11120766
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Bedoui S,
    2. Whitney PG,
    3. Waithman J,
    4. Eidsmo L,
    5. Wakim L,
    6. Caminschi I,
    7. Allan RS,
    8. Wojtasiak M,
    9. Shortman K,
    10. Carbone FR,
    11. Brooks AG,
    12. Heath WR
    : Cross-presentation of viral and self antigens by skin-derived CD103+ dendritic cells. Nat Immunol 10: 488–495, 2009pmid:19349986
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. del Rio ML,
    2. Rodriguez-Barbosa JI,
    3. Kremmer E,
    4. Förster R
    : CD103- and CD103+ bronchial lymph node dendritic cells are specialized in presenting and cross-presenting innocuous antigen to CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. J Immunol 178: 6861–6866, 2007pmid:17513734
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Dorner BG,
    2. Dorner MB,
    3. Zhou X,
    4. Opitz C,
    5. Mora A,
    6. Güttler S,
    7. Hutloff A,
    8. Mages HW,
    9. Ranke K,
    10. Schaefer M,
    11. Jack RS,
    12. Henn V,
    13. Kroczek RA
    : Selective expression of the chemokine receptor XCR1 on cross-presenting dendritic cells determines cooperation with CD8+ T cells. Immunity 31: 823–833, 2009pmid:19913446
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Bachem A,
    2. Hartung E,
    3. Güttler S,
    4. Mora A,
    5. Zhou X,
    6. Hegemann A,
    7. Plantinga M,
    8. Mazzini E,
    9. Stoitzner P,
    10. Gurka S,
    11. Henn V,
    12. Mages HW,
    13. Kroczek RA
    : Expression of XCR1 characterizes the Batf3-dependent lineage of dendritic cells capable of antigen cross-presentation. Front Immunol 3: 214, 2012pmid:22826713
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Kurts C,
    2. Kosaka H,
    3. Carbone FR,
    4. Miller JF,
    5. Heath WR
    : Class I-restricted cross-presentation of exogenous self-antigens leads to deletion of autoreactive CD8(+) T cells. J Exp Med 186: 239–245, 1997pmid:9221753
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Hildner K,
    2. Edelson BT,
    3. Purtha WE,
    4. Diamond M,
    5. Matsushita H,
    6. Kohyama M,
    7. Calderon B,
    8. Schraml BU,
    9. Unanue ER,
    10. Diamond MS,
    11. Schreiber RD,
    12. Murphy TL,
    13. Murphy KM
    : Batf3 deficiency reveals a critical role for CD8alpha+ dendritic cells in cytotoxic T cell immunity. Science 322: 1097–1100, 2008pmid:19008445
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Selenko-Gebauer N,
    2. Majdic O,
    3. Szekeres A,
    4. Höfler G,
    5. Guthann E,
    6. Korthäuer U,
    7. Zlabinger G,
    8. Steinberger P,
    9. Pickl WF,
    10. Stockinger H,
    11. Knapp W,
    12. Stöckl J
    : B7-H1 (programmed death-1 ligand) on dendritic cells is involved in the induction and maintenance of T cell anergy. J Immunol 170: 3637–3644, 2003pmid:12646628
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Yamazaki T,
    2. Akiba H,
    3. Iwai H,
    4. Matsuda H,
    5. Aoki M,
    6. Tanno Y,
    7. Shin T,
    8. Tsuchiya H,
    9. Pardoll DM,
    10. Okumura K,
    11. Azuma M,
    12. Yagita H
    : Expression of programmed death 1 ligands by murine T cells and APC. J Immunol 169: 5538–5545, 2002pmid:12421930
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Belz GT,
    2. Behrens GM,
    3. Smith CM,
    4. Miller JF,
    5. Jones C,
    6. Lejon K,
    7. Fathman CG,
    8. Mueller SN,
    9. Shortman K,
    10. Carbone FR,
    11. Heath WR
    : The CD8alpha(+) dendritic cell is responsible for inducing peripheral self-tolerance to tissue-associated antigens. J Exp Med 196: 1099–1104, 2002pmid:12391021
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Probst HC,
    2. McCoy K,
    3. Okazaki T,
    4. Honjo T,
    5. van den Broek M
    : Resting dendritic cells induce peripheral CD8+ T cell tolerance through PD-1 and CTLA-4. Nat Immunol 6: 280–286, 2005pmid:15685176
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Tadagavadi RK,
    2. Reeves WB
    : Renal dendritic cells ameliorate nephrotoxic acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 21: 53–63, 2010pmid:19875815
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Macconi D,
    2. Chiabrando C,
    3. Schiarea S,
    4. Aiello S,
    5. Cassis L,
    6. Gagliardini E,
    7. Noris M,
    8. Buelli S,
    9. Zoja C,
    10. Corna D,
    11. Mele C,
    12. Fanelli R,
    13. Remuzzi G,
    14. Benigni A
    : Proteasomal processing of albumin by renal dendritic cells generates antigenic peptides. J Am Soc Nephrol 20: 123–130, 2009pmid:19092126
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hochheiser K,
    2. Engel DR,
    3. Hammerich L,
    4. Heymann F,
    5. Knolle PA,
    6. Panzer U,
    7. Kurts C
    : Kidney dendritic cells become pathogenic during crescentic glomerulonephritis with proteinuria. J Am Soc Nephrol 22: 306–316, 2011pmid:21164025
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Nelson PJ,
    2. Rees AJ,
    3. Griffin MD,
    4. Hughes J,
    5. Kurts C,
    6. Duffield J
    : The renal mononuclear phagocytic system. J Am Soc Nephrol 23: 194–203, 2012pmid:22135312
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Teteris SA,
    2. Engel DR,
    3. Kurts C
    : Homeostatic and pathogenic role of renal dendritic cells. Kidney Int 80: 139–145, 2011pmid:21613986
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Larrubia JR,
    2. Benito-Martínez S,
    3. Miquel J,
    4. Calvino M,
    5. Sanz-de-Villalobos E,
    6. González-Praetorius A,
    7. Albertos S,
    8. García-Garzón S,
    9. Lokhande M,
    10. Parra-Cid T
    : Bim-mediated apoptosis and PD-1/PD-L1 pathway impair reactivity of PD1(+)/CD127(-) HCV-specific CD8(+) cells targeting the virus in chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Cell Immunol 269: 104–114, 2011pmid:21481848
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Topalian SL,
    2. Hodi FS,
    3. Brahmer JR,
    4. Gettinger SN,
    5. Smith DC,
    6. McDermott DF,
    7. Powderly JD,
    8. Carvajal RD,
    9. Sosman JA,
    10. Atkins MB,
    11. Leming PD,
    12. Spigel DR,
    13. Antonia SJ,
    14. Horn L,
    15. Drake CG,
    16. Pardoll DM,
    17. Chen L,
    18. Sharfman WH,
    19. Anders RA,
    20. Taube JM,
    21. McMiller TL,
    22. Xu H,
    23. Korman AJ,
    24. Jure-Kunkel M,
    25. Agrawal S,
    26. McDonald D,
    27. Kollia GD,
    28. Gupta A,
    29. Wigginton JM,
    30. Sznol M
    : Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N Engl J Med 366: 2443–2454, 2012pmid:22658127
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Brahmer JR,
    2. Tykodi SS,
    3. Chow LQ,
    4. Hwu WJ,
    5. Topalian SL,
    6. Hwu P,
    7. Drake CG,
    8. Camacho LH,
    9. Kauh J,
    10. Odunsi K,
    11. Pitot HC,
    12. Hamid O,
    13. Bhatia S,
    14. Martins R,
    15. Eaton K,
    16. Chen S,
    17. Salay TM,
    18. Alaparthy S,
    19. Grosso JF,
    20. Korman AJ,
    21. Parker SM,
    22. Agrawal S,
    23. Goldberg SM,
    24. Pardoll DM,
    25. Gupta A,
    26. Wigginton JM
    : Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N Engl J Med 366: 2455–2465, 2012pmid:22658128
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Rees A
    : Cross dendritic cells anger T cells after kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 20: 3–5, 2009pmid:19118144
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Tsushima F,
    2. Iwai H,
    3. Otsuki N,
    4. Abe M,
    5. Hirose S,
    6. Yamazaki T,
    7. Akiba H,
    8. Yagita H,
    9. Takahashi Y,
    10. Omura K,
    11. Okumura K,
    12. Azuma M
    : Preferential contribution of B7-H1 to programmed death-1-mediated regulation of hapten-specific allergic inflammatory responses. Eur J Immunol 33: 2773–2782, 2003pmid:14515261
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Heymann F,
    2. Meyer-Schwesinger C,
    3. Hamilton-Williams EE,
    4. Hammerich L,
    5. Panzer U,
    6. Kaden S,
    7. Floege J,
    8. Gröne HJ,
    9. Kurts C
    : Kidney dendritic cell activation is required for progression of renal disease in a mouse model of glomerular injury. J Clin Invest 119: 1286–1297, 2009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 24 (4)
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 24, Issue 4
April 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in JASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Batf3-Dependent Dendritic Cells in the Renal Lymph Node Induce Tolerance against Circulating Antigens
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Batf3-Dependent Dendritic Cells in the Renal Lymph Node Induce Tolerance against Circulating Antigens
Catherine Gottschalk, Vera Damuzzo, Janine Gotot, Richard A. Kroczek, Hideo Yagita, Kenneth M. Murphy, Percy A. Knolle, Isis Ludwig-Portugall, Christian Kurts
JASN Apr 2013, 24 (4) 543-549; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2012101022

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Batf3-Dependent Dendritic Cells in the Renal Lymph Node Induce Tolerance against Circulating Antigens
Catherine Gottschalk, Vera Damuzzo, Janine Gotot, Richard A. Kroczek, Hideo Yagita, Kenneth M. Murphy, Percy A. Knolle, Isis Ludwig-Portugall, Christian Kurts
JASN Apr 2013, 24 (4) 543-549; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2012101022
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Concise Methods
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Serum Response Factor Is Essential for Maintenance of Podocyte Structure and Function
  • Phospholipase A2 Receptor 1 Epitope Spreading at Baseline Predicts Reduced Likelihood of Remission of Membranous Nephropathy
  • TRPC5 Does Not Cause or Aggravate Glomerular Disease
Show more Brief Communications

Cited By...

  • CD103+ Kidney Dendritic Cells Protect against Crescentic GN by Maintaining IL-10-Producing Regulatory T Cells
  • CD103+ Dendritic Cells Elicit CD8+ T Cell Responses to Accelerate Kidney Injury in Adriamycin Nephropathy
  • Cutting Edge: The RIG-I Ligand 3pRNA Potently Improves CTL Cross-Priming and Facilitates Antiviral Vaccination
  • Dendritic Cells and Macrophages: Sentinels in the Kidney
  • The Renal Lymph Node and Immune Tolerance to Filtered Antigens
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • The Renal Lymph Node and Immune Tolerance to Filtered Antigens
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Annual Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Resources
  • Editorial Fellowship Program
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • JASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About JASN
  • JASN Email Alerts
  • JASN Key Impact Information
  • JASN Podcasts
  • JASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1046-6673 Online ISSN - 1533-3450

Powered by HighWire