Clinical Research

Autoantibodies Targeting a Collecting Duct–Specific Water Channel in Tubulointerstitial Nephritis

Nils Landegren, Mina Pourmousa Lindberg, Jakob Skov, Åsa Hallgren, Daniel Eriksson, Trine Lisberg Toft-Bertelsen, Nanna MacAulay, Eva Hagforsen, Anne Räisänen-Sokolowski, Heikki Saha, Thomas Nilsson, Gunnel Nordmark, Sophie Ohlsson, Jan Gustafsson, Eystein S. Husebye, Erik Larsson, Mark S. Anderson, Jaakko Perheentupa, Fredrik Rorsman, Robert A. Fenton and Olle Kämpe
JASN October 2016, 27 (10) 3220-3228; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2015101126

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Abstract

Tubulointerstitial nephritis is a common cause of kidney failure and may have diverse etiologies. This form of nephritis is sometimes associated with autoimmune disease, but the role of autoimmune mechanisms in disease development is not well understood. Here, we present the cases of three patients with autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 who developed tubulointerstitial nephritis and ESRD in association with autoantibodies against kidney collecting duct cells. One of the patients developed autoantibodies targeting the collecting duct–specific water channel aquaporin 2, whereas autoantibodies of the two other patients reacted against the HOXB7 or NFAT5 transcription factors, which regulate the aquaporin 2 promoter. Our findings suggest that tubulointerstitial nephritis developed in these patients as a result of an autoimmune insult on the kidney collecting duct cells.

Chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis describes a pattern of histologic changes commonly seen in patients with kidney failure that includes atrophy of tubular cells, mononuclear cell infiltrates, and interstitial scarring. It can develop from diverse backgrounds, such as kidney ischemia, adverse drug reactions, arterial hypertension, and diabetes, or it can be idiopathic. Tubulointerstitial nephritis may present in association with autoimmune disease, typically Sjögren syndrome1 or IgG4-related disease,2 but the role of autoimmune mechanisms in disease development is not well understood. Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 (APS1; Mendelian Inheritance in Man no. 240300) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by autoimmune manifestations in multiple organs.3 APS1 serves as a model for tissue–specific autoimmune disease and has aided the understanding of autoimmune disease mechanisms in different complex disorders.4,5 The disease is caused by mutations in the autoimmune regulator (AIRE) gene, which encodes a transcription factor primarily expressed in medullary thymic epithelial cells. AIRE promotes ectopic display of tissue-specific antigens in the thymus—a process that is crucial for negative selection of autoreactive T cells and the establishment of central immune tolerance.6 Tubulointerstitial nephritis is a severe complication of APS1 that affects a subset of the patients.7–11 The underlying cause is not known. Autoantibodies against kidney tubules have been detected in sera from patients with APS1 and CKD,8–10 but tubular antigens have remained unidentified. We here report on three patients with APS1 developing ESRD is association with autoantibodies against the kidney collecting ducts and the identification of aquaporin 2 (AQP2), homolog of human homeobox B7 (HOXB7), and NF of activated T cells 5, tonicity responsive (NFAT5) as collecting duct autoantigens.

Results

Study Subjects

Patient 1 was a girl who presented with hypoparathyroidism during her second year of life and was diagnosed with adrenal failure when she was 5 years old. By the age of 15 years old, she had developed alopecia totalis, oral candidiasis, and premature ovarian failure. Between the ages of 17 and 20 years old, she developed worsening uremia. Kidney biopsies revealed tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis, and focal, dense lymphocytic infiltrates, consistent with a diagnosis of chronic interstitial nephritis. At 23 years of age, she received a kidney transplant, which has functioned for 35 years at present on immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporin, azathioprine, and methylprednisolone). Many years after transplantation, she developed hypertension and hypokalemia.

Patient 2 was a girl who developed the hallmark components of APS1 at a relatively high age, with the diagnoses of hypoparathyroidism at the age of 10 years old and oral candidiasis at age 13 years old. She also displayed mild enamel dysplasia, nail pitting, and premature ovarian failure. At 14 years of age, she developed a clinical picture of apparent mineralocorticoid excess, with high BP, hypokalemia, normonatremia, and plasma renin activity and plasma aldosterone levels below detection limit. Hypertension and hypokalemia were controlled with spironolactone, nifedipine, and potassium chloride substitution. At the age of 18 years old, she displayed reduced kidney function and tubular proteinuria (plasma creatinine at 126 μmol/L and urine β2-microglobulin at 1.05 mg/L). A kidney biopsy disclosed tubulointerstitial nephritis. Tubular atrophy was seen throughout the tubular system and appeared to be the most pronounced in the collecting ducts (Figure 1, Supplemental Figure 1). By the age of 25 years old, she had stage 5 CKD, and maintenance dialysis was started; 2 years later, she received a kidney transplant. The patient has maintained kidney function on immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporin, mycophenolate, and methylprednisolone) for 2 years at present.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Patients with APS1 and kidney disease show marked atrophy of collecting duct cells. A hematoxylin–stained kidney specimen from patient 2 (left panel) is compared with normal kidney medulla (right panel). The patient’s kidney showed severe changes in the medullary region, with prominent atrophy of the tubular system, increased fibrosis, and occasional tubular calcifications (arrow). Inflammatory activity was low. Findings were consistent with severe chronic tubulointerstitial nephritis. cd, collecting ducts; dt, distal tubules.

Patient 3 was a boy affected by multiple manifestations of APS1. He presented with oral candidiasis during his first year of life, and before the age of 10 years old, he had developed asthma, hypothyroidism, adrenal failure, growth hormone deficiency, chronic active hepatitis, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, dry eye syndrome, and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. At 8 years of age, he developed symptoms consistent with apparent mineralocorticoid excess, with severe arterial hypertension, hypokalemia, low plasma renin activity, and low plasma aldosterone level. He was started on antihypertensive therapy and potassium chloride substitution. At the age of 9 years old, he displayed decreased kidney function and tubular proteinuria (GFR at 48 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and urine β2-microglobulin at 3.8 mg/24 h). Kidney biopsy revealed tubulointerstitial nephritis with tubular atrophy, fibrotic interstitium, and focal lymphocytic infiltrates. He experienced episodes with severe hypertension and was at one time referred to an intensive care unit with heart failure and impending pulmonary edema. At 9 years of age, he reached ESRD, and peritoneal dialysis was started. Three years later, he received a kidney transplant, which functioned well on immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporin, azathioprine, and methylprednisolone). He died of causes not related to kidney disease at 18 years of age (Table 1, Supplemental Table 1).

View this table:
Table 1.

Description of patients with APS1 and tubulointerstitial nephritis

Patients with APS1 and Kidney Disease Harbor Autoantibodies against Kidney Collecting Duct Cells

Tissue–destructive autoimmune disease processes in APS1 are accompanied by circulating autoantibodies targeting the affected tissues. To assess the involvement of autoimmune disease mechanisms in the development of kidney disease in patients 1–3, we screened their sera for autoantibodies against kidney tissue. Sections of fresh frozen rat kidney tissue were incubated with sera from patients with APS1 and healthy subjects, and autoantibodies were detected with a fluorescence–coupled anti–human IgG antibody. In all three patients with APS1 and tubulointerstitial nephritis, we observed distinct staining of tubular cells, with especially strong intensity seen for patients 1 and 2 (Figure 2A). To define the target cells, we costained tissue sections with patient sera and antibodies against markers of different tubular segments. Anti-AQP1 was used to label the proximal tubules, the descending thin limbs of Henle, and the descending vasa recta, whereas anti-AQP2 was used to identify the collecting duct system.12 Patient serum autoantibodies colocalized with the AQP2 antiserum, thereby identifying the collecting duct cells as targets of immunoreactivity (Figure 2B).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Patients with APS1 and kidney disease harbor autoantibodies against kidney collecting duct cells. (A) Sera from patients with APS1 and kidney disease and controls were screened for autoantibodies against rat kidney tissue. Autoantibodies against kidney tubular cells were detected in sera from the patients with APS1 and kidney disease. (B) To define the target cells, tissue sections were costained with patient sera and markers of different tubular segments. Anti-AQP1 was used to label the proximal tubules, the long descending thin limbs of the loop of Henle, and the descending vasa recta, whereas anti-AQP2 was used to identify the collecting duct system principal cells and the cortical and medullary collecting tubules (connecting tubules). Autoantibodies colocalized with AQP2 and not with AQP1, thereby identifying the collecting duct cells as the targets of serum autoantibodies.

Identification of AQP2 as a Collecting Duct Autoantigen

We next sought to identify the molecular immune targets involved in collecting duct autoreactivity. We initially assessed AQP2 as a candidate autoantigen and used a radio–ligand binding assay to screen for AQP2 autoantibodies. Radio–labeled human AQP2 protein was produced in vitro and subjected to immunoprecipitation with sera from patients 1–3 and a broad selection of control sera, including those from patients with APS1 without known kidney disease, patients with interstitial nephritis not related to APS1, patients with IgA nephritis, patients with Sjögren syndrome, and healthy subjects. Serum from patient 1 reacted distinctly with AQP2, whereas AQP2 autoantibodies were absent in sera from the two other patients with APS1 and tubulointerstitial nephritis and all control sera (Figure 3A). To validate AQP2 autoantibodies with an independent method, we performed Western blotting using native antigen present in human kidney tissue homogenate. Serum from patient 1 reacted with distinct protein moieties, with molecular masses of 26 kD corresponding to nonglycoslated AQP2 and also, 30–60 kD corresponding to glycosylated forms of AQP2 (Figure 2B).

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Identification of AQP2 as a collecting duct autoantigen. (A) A radio–ligand binding assay was used to screen the patients with APS1 and kidney disease and various controls for the presence of AQP2 autoantibodies. AQP2 autoantibodies were detected in the serum from patient 1, whereas patients 2 and 3, patients with APS1 and without known kidney disease (n=90), patients with interstitial nephritis not related to APS1 (n=37), patients with IgA nephritis (n=40), patients with Sjögren syndrome (n=108), patients with various tissue–specific autoimmune diseases (n=60), and healthy subjects (n=155) were all negative for AQP2 autoantibodies. (B) The presence of AQP2 autoantibodies in the serum from patient 1 was confirmed by Western blotting using native antigen present in human kidney tissue homogenate. Serum from patient 1 reacted with distinct protein moieties with molecular masses of 26 kD corresponding to nonglycosylated (NG) AQP2 and also, 30–60 kD corresponding to glycosylated (G) forms of AQP2. (C) To better understand the relation between AQP2 autoantibodies and the development of kidney disease in patient 1, a time series of serum samples was investigated. AQP2 autoantibodies were detected in the earliest collected serum sample taken 3 years before uremia was noted, and they persisted throughout the development of kidney disease and to the most recently collected sample 2 years after kidney transplantation. (D) AQP2 autoantibody titers were compared between samples collected before and after kidney transplantation (collected at ages 20 and 25 years old, respectively), which revealed a decrease in AQP2 autoantibody signal after kidney transplantation. (E) To determine whether AQP2 autoantibodies reacted with an external epitope of AQP2, immunocytochemistry and confocal laser–scanning microscopy were performed on mouse collecting duct principal cells that natively express AQP2 under permeabilized and nonpermeabilized conditions. Serum from patient 1 labeled both permeabilized and nonpermeabilized cells, indicating that AQP2 autoantibodies reacted with an external epitope of AQP2. Scale bar, 20 μm in upper right panel; 25 μm in upper left, lower left, and lower right panels.

To better understand the relation between AQP2 autoantibodies and the development of kidney disease in patient 1, we investigated a time series of serum samples. AQP2 autoantibodies were detected in the earliest serum sample collected 3 years before uremia was noted, and they persisted throughout the development of kidney disease to the most recently collected sample 2 years after kidney transplantation (Figure 3C). It is a typical finding in autoimmune disorders that autoantibodies precede clinical disease debut by many years.13 Interestingly, we also noted a decrease in AQP2 autoantibody signal after kidney transplantation and the start of immunosuppressive therapy, which could be further substantiated in a dilution series of serum samples collected before and after transplantation (Figure 3D). Similar decrease in autoantibody titer after kidney transplantation has been shown previously in a patient with interstitial nephritis and autoantibodies against the proximal tubule brush border.14

AQP2 is a pore–shaped, transmembrane protein with polypeptide regions facing the internal and external sides of the cell. To determine whether AQP2 autoantibodies targeted an external epitope, we performed staining with permeabilized and nonpermeabilized cells. Mouse collecting duct principal cells were grown on permeable support in the presence of vasopressin to stimulate polarization and native AQP2 expression, and they were incubated with patient and control sera. Serum from patient 1 labeled both permeabilized and nonpermeabilized cells, indicating that AQP2 autoantibodies reacted with an external epitope on AQP2 (Figure 3E, Supplemental Figure 2). Because autoantibody binding may block functional activity of target antigens, we examined whether AQP2 autoantibody binding affected AQP2–mediated water transport in Xenopus laevis oocytes transfected with AQP2. Serum from patient 1 reacted specifically with AQP2-expressing oocytes but did not affect water permeability, suggesting that AQP2 autoantibody binding did not interfere with AQP2 function (Supplemental Figure 3). This observation of noninhibitory binding was in line with the patient’s clinical presentation, which did not involve symptoms of disturbed water balance at any stage of disease development.

Identification of HOXB7 and NFAT5 as AQP2-Related Autoantigens

Because AQP2 proved to be a relevant target for only one patient and not the two other patients with tubulointerstitial nephritis and collecting duct autoantibodies, we then adopted a systematic approach to identify additional collecting duct autoantigens. We constructed a cDNA library representing the collecting duct cell transcriptome and screened the library with serum IgG antibodies from patients 2 and 3. Twelve clones were isolated by immunoscreening with serum from patient 2, of which 10 were identified as the rat HOXB7. Screening with serum from patient 3 generated three positive clones, of which two independent clones contained the rat homolog of human NFAT5 (Supplemental Table 2). The presence of serum autoantibodies against HOXB7 in patient 2 was further confirmed using a radio–ligand binding assay (Figure 4A). We were, however, unable to establish a radio–ligand binding assay for validation of NFAT5. Interestingly, the AQP2 promoter has previously been reported to contain transcription factor binding sites for NFAT5 and HOXB7.15–17 To confirm and locate these binding sites, we analyzed the 1000-bp 5′ flanking region of human AQP2 exon 1. Conserved response elements for the NFAT and the HOX family were identified at 490 and 207 bp upstream of the AQP2 transcription start site (Figure 4B, Supplemental Figures 4 and 5).

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Identification of HOXB7 and NFAT5 as AQP2-related autoantigens. To define the molecular targets of kidney autoantibodies in patients 2 and 3, a cDNA library was constructed using mRNA isolated from rat inner medullary collecting duct cells and screened with patient sera. Autoantibodies in serum from patient 2 reacted with HOXB7, whereas serum autoantibodies in patient 3 recognized NFAT5. (A) The presence of autoantibodies against HOXB7 in serum from patient 2 was confirmed using a radio–ligand binding assay in a clinical control material. (B) The 1000-bp 5′ flanking region of AQP2 exon 1 was analyzed for conserved transcription factor binding sites. Response elements for the NFAT (V$NFAT) and the HOX (V$HOXF) families were identified at 490 and 207 bp upstream of AQP2 transcription start site, respectively.

Discussion

We report on three patients with APS1 and kidney failure with marked atrophy of the kidney collecting ducts and collecting duct autoantibodies present in their sera. Tubulointerstitial nephritis and kidney failure seem to have developed in these patients from an autoimmune attack on the kidney collecting duct cells.

APS1 features a variety of tissue–specific disease components that, despite of its name, involve both endocrine and nonendocrine organ systems. The endocrine components were early recognized as autoimmune.18 Successively, several nonendocrine components have also been linked with an autoimmune genesis, including intestinal dysfunction,19 lung disease,5,20 and prostatitis.21 We are here able to suggest a disease mechanism for tubulointerstitial nephritis in APS1 that involves autoimmune targeting and destruction of the kidney collecting ducts.

Autoantibodies in tissue–specific autoimmune disorders typically target molecules that are key to the physiologic function of the affected tissue. In some autoimmune disorders, multiple molecules in a common tissue–specific pathway may be involved. This is well exemplified by autoimmune adrenal failure, where multiple enzymes in the steroid hormone synthesis have been implicated as autoantigens, namely 21-hydroxylase, 17-hydroxylase, and side–chain cleavage enzyme. The targets of collecting duct autoantibodies in the three patients with APS1 and tubulointerstitial nephritis proved to be separate but all related to collecting duct–specific AQP2. AQP2 is the primary regulator of water permeability in the collecting ducts, and it is crucial for the urine concentration mechanism.12 Short-term changes in water permeability along the collecting ducts are achieved by shuttling AQP2 between intracellular vesicles and the apical cell membrane, whereas long-term regulation occurs at the level of AQP2 gene expression control.12 Interestingly, NFAT5 is an important driver of AQP2 gene expression, with an influence comparable with that of vasopressin.17 NFAT5 knockout mice develop a profound atrophy of the kidney medulla with markedly inhibited expression of AQP2.22 HOXB7 belongs to an evolutionary conserved family of transcription factors called homeotic or Hox. Hox genes are expressed during embryonic development and decisive for the early organization of the body plan and subsequent development of segment structures. HOXB7 is expressed in the ureteric bud during formation of the embryonic kidney and continuously in its derivatives throughout kidney development.23,24 In contrast with most Hox genes, the expression of HOXB7 persists in the adult and becomes confined to the kidney collecting duct cells.23,24 The physiologic function of HOXB7 in the adult collecting ducts is not understood. It is, therefore, notable that the AQP2 promoter contains a conserved binding site for HOXB7,15,16 revealing a potential role of HOXB7 in AQP2 gene regulation.

Interestingly, patients 2 and 3 presented with hypokalemia and severe arterial hypertension. Apparent mineralocorticoid excess is an established but poorly understood complication of APS1 that is seen in association with kidney disease.7 Given the important role of the collecting ducts in potassium handling25 and BP regulation,26 it is attractive to speculate that pseudohyperaldosteronism was caused by collecting duct cell injury. Probably, damage to the collecting ducts was not caused by the autoantibodies directly but was mediated through a cellular immune response with the cognate specificity, which has seen for other tissue–destructive autoimmune manifestations in APS1 and its animal model.5,27,28

Tubulointerstitial nephritis represents a common end stage for a variety of disease processes that can affect the kidney tubules. Despite links with autoimmune disorders,1,2 the role of autoimmune disease mechanisms in tubulointerstitial nephritis is not well defined. Importantly, it remains unknown whether tubulointerstitial nephritis can develop from an autoimmune response specifically targeting the tubular cells. Autoantibodies against tubular basement membrane14,29,30 and tubular cells8–10,31 have previously been shown in patients with tubulointerstitial nephritis, but the molecular targets of these autoantibodies have not been characterized. Carbonic anhydrase II has been reported as an immune target in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis and tubulointerstitial nephritis.32 However, this enzyme shows widespread expression and cannot explain tissue specificity in kidney disease. To our knowledge, this is the first report identifying tubular-specific autoantigens in patients with tubulointerstitial nephritis. Many autoimmune manifestations of APS1 also occur sporadically in isolated forms in the general population, and characterization of APS1 components has helped in the understanding of autoimmune disease mechanisms in other and more complex disorders. For example, findings of tissue-specific autoimmunity in patients with APS1 and lung disease could be extended to patients with idiopathic interstitial lung disease without APS1.5 Future studies are needed to better understand the role of tissue–specific autoimmune mechanisms in tubulointerstitial nephritis in the general population.

Concise Methods

Study Subjects

Three patients with APS1 and ESRD were investigated. The studied serum samples were collected from the patients after debut of kidney disease and before kidney transplantation (patient 1: at 20 years of age; patient 2: at 13 years of age; and patient 3: at 8 years of age). Patients with APS1 without known kidney disease (n=90), patients with Sjögren syndrome (n=108), patients with interstitial nephritis not related to APS1 (n=37), patients with IgA nephritis (n=40), patients with different organ–specific autoimmune disorders and without kidney disease (n=60), and healthy blood donors (n=155) were included as controls. All patients with APS1 fulfilled the clinical diagnosis of APS1, which required the presence of two or three of the hallmark components: chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis, hypoparathyroidism, and adrenal failure. Most patients had also undergone genetic analyses and been found with mutations in the AIRE gene. All patients and blood donors had given their informed consent for participation. The study was approved by ethical boards in Helsinki, Bergen, and Uppsala and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Histochemistry and Immunohistochemistry

Kidney tissue specimens from patients with APS1 were stained with hematoxylin and eosin and immunostained with anti-AQP1 (1:1500; HPA019206; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and anti-AQP2 (1:200; HPA046834; Sigma-Aldrich).

Immunofluorescence Labeling of Kidneys and Laser–Scanning Confocal Microscopy

Serum samples were screened for autoantibodies against kidney tissue using an indirect immunofluorescence technique. The target cell specificity of patient autoantibodies was defined by costaining with established markers of different tubular segments. Cryosections (6-μm thick) of rat kidney were air dried and blocked with Background Sniper (Biocare Medical) for 30 minutes, and then, they were incubated with serum samples at 1:500 dilution overnight at 4°C. The sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated goat anti–human IgG (1:500; A-11013; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 30 minutes at room temperature (RT). Thereafter, the sections were incubated with a mouse monoclonal anti–AQP1 (1:200; ab9566; Abcam, Inc., Cambridge, MA) and a rabbit polyclonal anti–AQP2 (1:4000; ab62628; Abcam, Inc.) for 1 hour at RT. The sections were then incubated with secondary binders: 30 minutes with Alexa Fluor 568–conjugated goat anti–rabbit IgG (1:500; A-11011; Invitrogen) or Alexa Fluor 633–conjugated goat anti–mouse IgG (1:500; A-21052; Invitrogen). The slides were mounted with Vectashield Mounting Medium (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Images were taken using a Zeiss Laser Scan Microscope 700 (Carl Zeiss GmbH, Jena, Germany) with the 20× objective (numerical aperture [NA] =0.8). All settings were identical for imaging with the different sera.

Radio–Ligand Binding Autoantibody Assays

Radio–ligand binding assays were used to screen patient sera for autoantibodies against AQP2 and HOXB7. cDNA clones of human AQP2 (SC300078; OriGene Technologies, Rockville, MD) and HOXB7 (SC122274; OriGene Technologies) were transcribed and translated in vitro in the presence of 35S-labeled methionine according to the supplier’s protocol (Promega TNT Systems; Promega, Madison, WI). Radio-labeled protein (30,000 cpm) was immunoprecipitated with serum samples (2.5 μl) in 96–well filtration plates (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA). Sera were analyzed in duplicate. Positive and negative standards (a reactive serum and 4% BSA, respectively) were included on each plate. Autoantibody-antigen complexes were immobilized to Protein A Sepharose (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI), and radioactivity was measured using a liquid scintillation counter (Wallac 1450 MicroBeta; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA). Autoantibody index values were calculated for each sample according to (sample − negative standard)/(positive standard − negative standard) ×100.

AQP2 autoantibody titers were determined in serum samples collected from patient 1 3 years before and 2 years after kidney transplantation (ages 20 and 25 years old, respectively). The serum samples were diluted according to 1:1, 1:2, 1:4, etc. to 1:1024, and AQP2 autoantibodies were detected in analyses of 2.5 μl diluted serum sample.

Immunocytochemistry of Polarized Kidney Epithelial Cells

In a polarized cell model of the collecting duct principal cell,16 mpkCCD#11 cells were seeded onto permeable supports (Costar Transwell Permeable Supports, 0.4-μm Polyester Membranes; Costar, Cambridge, MA) and grown until confluent in DMEM/F12 media containing 5 μg/ml insulin, 5×10−8 M dexamethasone, 60 nM selenium, 5 μg/ml transferrin, 10−9 M tri-iodthyronine, 10 ng/ml EGF, 20 mM Hepes, and 2% donor bovine serum. When transepithelial resistance was >5 kΩ/cm2, 1 nM desmopressin (dDAVP) was added to the basolateral compartment for 4 days to induce AQP2 expression. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 20 minutes at RT, and immunocytochemistry was performed as previously described.33 Permeabilization steps were removed for some conditions. Patient sera were diluted 1:3000 for all experiments, and an Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated goat anti–human IgG (1:1000; A-11013; Invitrogen) used for detection. A Leica TCS SL Confocal Microscope (Leica Microsystems, Buffalo Grove, IL) with an HCX PL APO 63× oil objective lens (NA=1.40) was used for obtaining image stacks with a z distance of 0.1 μm between images. Microscope settings (PMT offset and gain, sampling period, and averaging) were identical for imaging of cells treated with different sera.

Western Blotting

Standard procedures were used on human kidney protein homogenates, and blots were developed using enhanced chemiluminescence detection. Sera were diluted 1:2000.

Functional Analyses of Osmotic Water Permeability

The osmotic water permeability of AQP2-expressing oocytes was measured using an experimental setup that was described in detail previously.34 Oocytes were incubated with various sera for 18 hours in kulori media at 19°C before measurements were performed. After functional analysis, oocytes were prepared for immunocytochemistry as previously described,34 with the exception that primary antiserums were omitted from the protocol and an Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated goat anti–human IgG (1:1000; A-11013; Invitrogen) was used for detection. A Leica TCS SL Confocal Microscope (Leica Microsystems) with an HCX PL APO 63× oil objective lens (NA=1.40) was used for obtaining images. Microscope settings (photomultiplier tube offset and gain, sampling period, and averaging) were identical for imaging of cells treated with different sera. Standard immunohistochemical labeling of AQP2 was used as a positive control.34

Construction and Screening of a Collecting Duct cDNA Library

Inner medullary collecting duct cells were isolated as previously described35 and are explained in brief. Rats were euthanized, and kidney inner medullas were isolated immediately. Collected tissue was minced with a razor blade to 1-mm cubes and loaded into tubes prefilled with a digestion solution of collagenase B (2 mg/ml; 11–088–823–103; Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and hyaluronidase (1250 U/mg; final: 800 U/ml; 2592; Worthington). Samples were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with shaking. Inner medullary collecting duct cells were pelleted by centrifugation, washed twice in 0.1% BSA, and then, resuspended in 0.1% BSA. Total RNA was isolated using Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen). A Poly A Sepharose Purist (Ambion Inc., Austin, TX) was used to extract the mRNA fraction. Isolated mRNA was converted to cDNA and cloned into a Zap Express Vector (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) according to the instructions from the supplier. The cDNA library was screened with patient sera as described previously.36 Isolated clones were amplified with PCR, Sanger sequenced, and identified using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool.

Transcription Factor Binding Site Analyses of the AQP2 Promoter

The Gene2Promoter and FrameWorker 5.6 programs from the Genomatix software suite (version 3.2) were used to confirm and locate response elements for the NFAT and the HOX family transcription factor binding sites in the AQP2 promoter region of seven vertebrate species (Homo sapiens, Macaca mulatta, Pan troglodytes, Mus musculus, Rattus norvegicus, Bos taurus, and Sus scrofa). The flanking region 1000 bp upstream of the AQP2 exon 1 transcription start was selected from the built-in database (Matrix Family Library, version 9.1) and searched for models containing the response elements for the NFAT and the HOX matrix families.

Disclosures

None.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Biological Visualization Facility at SciLife laboratory for technical assistance and Cindy Wong for critical review of the manuscript.

We also thank the Swedish Research Council, the Formas Research Council, the Torsten and Ragnar Söderbergs Foundation, the Swedish Rheumatism Association, the Novonordisk Foundation, the National Organization for Rare Disorders, the Danish Medical Research Council, and the Lundbeck Foundation for financial support.

Footnotes

References

  1. ↵
    1. Maripuri S,
    2. Grande JP,
    3. Osborn TG,
    4. Fervenza FC,
    5. Matteson EL,
    6. Donadio JV,
    7. Hogan MC
    : Renal involvement in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: A clinicopathologic study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 1423–1431, 2009pmid:19679669
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Stone JH,
    2. Zen Y,
    3. Deshpande V
    : IgG4-related disease. N Engl J Med 366: 539–551, 2012pmid:22316447
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Ahonen P,
    2. Myllärniemi S,
    3. Sipilä I,
    4. Perheentupa J
    : Clinical variation of autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy (APECED) in a series of 68 patients. N Engl J Med 322: 1829–1836, 1990pmid:2348835
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Winqvist O,
    2. Gustafsson J,
    3. Rorsman F,
    4. Karlsson FA,
    5. Kämpe O
    : Two different cytochrome P450 enzymes are the adrenal antigens in autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type I and Addison’s disease. J Clin Invest 92: 2377–2385, 1993pmid:8227354
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Shum AK,
    2. Alimohammadi M,
    3. Tan CL,
    4. Cheng MH,
    5. Metzger TC,
    6. Law CS,
    7. Lwin W,
    8. Perheentupa J,
    9. Bour-Jordan H,
    10. Carel JC,
    11. Husebye ES,
    12. De Luca F,
    13. Janson C,
    14. Sargur R,
    15. Dubois N,
    16. Kajosaari M,
    17. Wolters PJ,
    18. Chapman HA,
    19. Kämpe O,
    20. Anderson MS
    : BPIFB1 is a lung-specific autoantigen associated with interstitial lung disease. Sci Transl Med 5: 206ra139, 2013pmid:24107778
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Anderson MS,
    2. Venanzi ES,
    3. Klein L,
    4. Chen Z,
    5. Berzins SP,
    6. Turley SJ,
    7. von Boehmer H,
    8. Bronson R,
    9. Dierich A,
    10. Benoist C,
    11. Mathis D
    : Projection of an immunological self shadow within the thymus by the aire protein. Science 298: 1395–1401, 2002pmid:12376594
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Perheentupa J
    : Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91: 2843–2850, 2006pmid:16684821
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Kluger N,
    2. Kataja J,
    3. Aho H,
    4. Rönn A-M,
    5. Krohn K,
    6. Ranki A
    : Kidney involvement in autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy in a Finnish cohort. Nephrol Dial Transplant 29: 1750–1757, 2014pmid:24711434
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hannigan NR,
    2. Jabs K,
    3. Perez-Atayde AR,
    4. Rosen S
    : Autoimmune interstitial nephritis and hepatitis in polyglandular autoimmune syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 10: 511–514, 1996pmid:8865257
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Ulinski T,
    2. Perrin L,
    3. Morris M,
    4. Houang M,
    5. Cabrol S,
    6. Grapin C,
    7. Chabbert-Buffet N,
    8. Bensman A,
    9. Deschênes G,
    10. Giurgea I
    : Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy syndrome with renal failure: Impact of posttransplant immunosuppression on disease activity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91: 192–195, 2006pmid:16263818
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Al-Owain M,
    2. Kaya N,
    3. Al-Zaidan H,
    4. Bin Hussain I,
    5. Al-Manea H,
    6. Al-Hindi H,
    7. Kennedy S,
    8. Iqbal MA,
    9. Al-Mojalli H,
    10. Al-Bakheet A,
    11. Puel A,
    12. Casanova J-L,
    13. Al-Muhsen S
    : Renal failure associated with APECED and terminal 4q deletion: Evidence of autoimmune nephropathy. Clin Dev Immunol 2010: 586342, 2010pmid:21197407
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kortenoeven MLA,
    2. Fenton RA
    : Renal aquaporins and water balance disorders. Biochim Biophys Acta 1840: 1533–1549, 2014pmid:24342488
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Notkins AL
    : New predictors of disease. Molecules called predictive autoantibodies appear in the blood years before people show symptoms of various disorders. Tests that detected these molecules could warn of the need to take preventive action. Sci Am 296: 72–79, 2007pmid:17348162
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Rosales IA,
    2. Collins AB,
    3. do Carmo PA,
    4. Tolkoff-Rubin N,
    5. Smith RN,
    6. Colvin RB
    : Immune complex tubulointerstitial nephritis due to autoantibodies to the proximal tubule brush border. J Am Soc Nephrol 27: 380–384, 2016pmid:26334028
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Tchapyjnikov D,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Pisitkun T,
    4. Hoffert JD,
    5. Yu M-J,
    6. Knepper MA
    : Proteomic profiling of nuclei from native renal inner medullary collecting duct cells using LC-MS/MS. Physiol Genomics 40: 167–183, 2010pmid:19996160
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Yu M-J,
    2. Miller RL,
    3. Uawithya P,
    4. Rinschen MM,
    5. Khositseth S,
    6. Braucht DWW,
    7. Chou C-L,
    8. Pisitkun T,
    9. Nelson RD,
    10. Knepper MA
    : Systems-level analysis of cell-specific AQP2 gene expression in renal collecting duct. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 2441–2446, 2009pmid:19190182
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Hasler U,
    2. Jeon US,
    3. Kim JA,
    4. Mordasini D,
    5. Kwon HM,
    6. Féraille E,
    7. Martin P-Y
    : Tonicity-responsive enhancer binding protein is an essential regulator of aquaporin-2 expression in renal collecting duct principal cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 1521–1531, 2006pmid:16641150
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Neufeld M,
    2. Maclaren N,
    3. Blizzard R
    : Autoimmune polyglandular syndromes. Pediatr Ann 9: 154–162, 1980pmid:6990358
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Ekwall O,
    2. Hedstrand H,
    3. Grimelius L,
    4. Haavik J,
    5. Perheentupa J,
    6. Gustafsson J,
    7. Husebye E,
    8. Kämpe O,
    9. Rorsman F
    : Identification of tryptophan hydroxylase as an intestinal autoantigen. Lancet 352: 279–283, 1998pmid:9690408
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Alimohammadi M,
    2. Dubois N,
    3. Sköldberg F,
    4. Hallgren A,
    5. Tardivel I,
    6. Hedstrand H,
    7. Haavik J,
    8. Husebye ES,
    9. Gustafsson J,
    10. Rorsman F,
    11. Meloni A,
    12. Janson C,
    13. Vialettes B,
    14. Kajosaari M,
    15. Egner W,
    16. Sargur R,
    17. Pontén F,
    18. Amoura Z,
    19. Grimfeld A,
    20. De Luca F,
    21. Betterle C,
    22. Perheentupa J,
    23. Kämpe O,
    24. Carel J-C
    : Pulmonary autoimmunity as a feature of autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 and identification of KCNRG as a bronchial autoantigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 4396–4401, 2009pmid:19251657
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Landegren N,
    2. Sharon D,
    3. Shum AK,
    4. Khan IS,
    5. Fasano KJ,
    6. Hallgren Å,
    7. Kampf C,
    8. Freyhult E,
    9. Ardesjö-Lundgren B,
    10. Alimohammadi M,
    11. Rathsman S,
    12. Ludvigsson JF,
    13. Lundh D,
    14. Motrich R,
    15. Rivero V,
    16. Fong L,
    17. Giwercman A,
    18. Gustafsson J,
    19. Perheentupa J,
    20. Husebye ES,
    21. Anderson MS,
    22. Snyder M,
    23. Kämpe O
    : Transglutaminase 4 as a prostate autoantigen in male subfertility. Sci Transl Med 7: 292ra101, 2015pmid:26084804
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. López-Rodríguez C,
    2. Antos CL,
    3. Shelton JM,
    4. Richardson JA,
    5. Lin F,
    6. Novobrantseva TI,
    7. Bronson RT,
    8. Igarashi P,
    9. Rao A,
    10. Olson EN
    : Loss of NFAT5 results in renal atrophy and lack of tonicity-responsive gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 2392–2397, 2004pmid:14983020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Kress C,
    2. Vogels R,
    3. De Graaff W,
    4. Bonnerot C,
    5. Meijlink F,
    6. Nicolas JF,
    7. Deschamps J
    : Hox-2.3 upstream sequences mediate lacZ expression in intermediate mesoderm derivatives of transgenic mice. Development 109: 775–786, 1990pmid:1977573
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Srinivas S,
    2. Goldberg MR,
    3. Watanabe T,
    4. D’Agati V,
    5. al-Awqati Q,
    6. Costantini F
    : Expression of green fluorescent protein in the ureteric bud of transgenic mice: A new tool for the analysis of ureteric bud morphogenesis. Dev Genet 24: 241–251, 1999pmid:10322632
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Wang WH,
    2. Giebisch G
    : Regulation of potassium (K) handling in the renal collecting duct. Pflugers Arch 458: 157–168, 2009pmid:18839206
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Ahn D,
    2. Ge Y,
    3. Stricklett PK,
    4. Gill P,
    5. Taylor D,
    6. Hughes AK,
    7. Yanagisawa M,
    8. Miller L,
    9. Nelson RD,
    10. Kohan DE
    : Collecting duct-specific knockout of endothelin-1 causes hypertension and sodium retention. J Clin Invest 114: 504–511, 2004pmid:15314687
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Devoss JJ,
    2. Shum AK,
    3. Johannes KP,
    4. Lu W,
    5. Krawisz AK,
    6. Wang P,
    7. Yang T,
    8. Leclair NP,
    9. Austin C,
    10. Strauss EC,
    11. Anderson MS
    : Effector mechanisms of the autoimmune syndrome in the murine model of autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1. J Immunol 181: 4072–4079, 2008pmid:18768863
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Gavanescu I,
    2. Benoist C,
    3. Mathis D
    : B cells are required for Aire-deficient mice to develop multi-organ autoinflammation: A therapeutic approach for APECED patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 13009–13014, 2008pmid:18755889
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Border WA,
    2. Lehman DH,
    3. Egan JD,
    4. Sass HJ,
    5. Glode JE,
    6. Wilson CB
    : Antitubular basement-membrane antibodies in methicillin-associated interstitial nephritis. N Engl J Med 291: 381–384, 1974pmid:4211170
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Bergstein J,
    2. Litman N
    : Interstitial nephritis with anti-tubular-basement-membrane antibody. N Engl J Med 292: 875–878, 1975pmid:804130
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Wakaki H,
    2. Sakamoto H,
    3. Awazu M
    : Tubulointerstitial nephritis and uveitis syndrome with autoantibody directed to renal tubular cells. Pediatrics 107: 1443–1446, 2001pmid:11389273
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Nishi H,
    2. Tojo A,
    3. Onozato ML,
    4. Jimbo R,
    5. Nangaku M,
    6. Uozaki H,
    7. Hirano K,
    8. Isayama H,
    9. Omata M,
    10. Kaname S,
    11. Fujita T
    : Anti-carbonic anhydrase II antibody in autoimmune pancreatitis and tubulointerstitial nephritis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22: 1273–1275, 2007pmid:17138573
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Moeller HB,
    2. Aroankins TS,
    3. Slengerik-Hansen J,
    4. Pisitkun T,
    5. Fenton RA
    : Phosphorylation and ubiquitylation are opposing processes that regulate endocytosis of the water channel aquaporin-2. J Cell Sci 127: 3174–3183, 2014pmid:24876223
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Moeller HB,
    2. MacAulay N,
    3. Knepper MA,
    4. Fenton RA
    : Role of multiple phosphorylation sites in the COOH-terminal tail of aquaporin-2 for water transport: Evidence against channel gating. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 296: F649–F657, 2009pmid:19144687
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Stokes JB,
    2. Grupp C,
    3. Kinne RK
    : Purification of rat papillary collecting duct cells: Functional and metabolic assessment. Am J Physiol 253: F251–F262, 1987pmid:3303974
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Rorsman F,
    2. Husebye ES,
    3. Winqvist O,
    4. Björk E,
    5. Karlsson FA,
    6. Kämpe O
    : Aromatic-L-amino-acid decarboxylase, a pyridoxal phosphate-dependent enzyme, is a beta-cell autoantigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92: 8626–8629, 1995pmid:7567987
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Request Permissions
Autoantibodies Targeting a Collecting Duct–Specific Water Channel in Tubulointerstitial Nephritis
Nils Landegren, Mina Pourmousa Lindberg, Jakob Skov, Åsa Hallgren, Daniel Eriksson, Trine Lisberg Toft-Bertelsen, Nanna MacAulay, Eva Hagforsen, Anne Räisänen-Sokolowski, Heikki Saha, Thomas Nilsson, Gunnel Nordmark, Sophie Ohlsson, Jan Gustafsson, Eystein S. Husebye, Erik Larsson, Mark S. Anderson, Jaakko Perheentupa, Fredrik Rorsman, Robert A. Fenton, Olle Kämpe
JASN Oct 2016, 27 (10) 3220-3228; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2015101126
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords