Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Article Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Fellowship
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Impact Factor
    • Reprints
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Article Collections
    • Archives
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Fellowship
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Impact Factor
    • Reprints
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Follow JASN on Twitter
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow JASN on RSS
  • Community Forum
Up Front MattersBrief Reviews
You have accessRestricted Access

How Dangerous Is Hyperkalemia?

John R. Montford and Stuart Linas
JASN November 2017, 28 (11) 3155-3165; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2016121344
John R. Montford
*Division of Renal Disease and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado;
†Renal Section, Medicine Service, Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health System, Denver, Colorado; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stuart Linas
*Division of Renal Disease and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado;
‡Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Denver Health and Hospitals, Denver, Colorado
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Abstract

Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening electrolyte disorder appreciated with greater frequency in patients with renal disease, heart failure, and with use of certain medications such as renin angiotensin aldosterone inhibitors. The traditional views that hyperkalemia can be reliably diagnosed by electrocardiogram and that particular levels of hyperkalemia confer cardiotoxic risk have been challenged by several reports of patients with atypic presentations. Epidemiologic data demonstrate strong associations of morbidity and mortality in patients with hyperkalemia but these associations appear disconnected in certain patient populations and in differing clinical presentations. Physiologic adaptation, structural cardiac disease, medication use, and degree of concurrent illness might predispose certain patients presenting with hyperkalemia to a lower or higher threshold for toxicity. These factors are often overlooked; yet data suggest that the clinical context in which hyperkalemia develops is at least as important as the degree of hyperkalemia is in determining patient outcome. This review summarizes the clinical data linking hyperkalemia with poor outcomes and discusses how the efficacy of certain treatments might depend on the clinical presentation.

  • hyperkalemia
  • chronic kidney disease
  • electrolytes

Integrated Discussion

Introduction

Hyperkalemia is an electrolyte disturbance occurring with increased frequency among patients with CKD, diabetes, heart failure, and use of certain medications such as renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.1–4 Extracellular potassium concentration is usually kept within a narrow physiologic range by redundant and highly efficient homeostatic mechanisms that simultaneously control internal potassium redistribution while regulating net potassium excretion. Hyperkalemia occurs when rises in extracellular potassium concentration are accompanied by one, or additive, defects in these two processes. Blunted potassium redistribution typically occurs through insulin deficiency, decreases in aldosterone biosynthesis or action, diminished adrenergic signaling, and osmolar disturbances including hyperglycemia. Renal failure, and/or failure to augment distal tubular potassium secretion, is largely responsible for the maintenance of hyperkalemia. Many studies reproducibly identify common clinical risk factors that are associated with the development of hyperkalemia regardless of the clinical setting (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Risk factors for the development of hyperkalemia

The fatal consequences of rapid increases in extracellular potassium concentration have been demonstrated in the setting of acute intravenous potassium loading in animals.5,6 Early rises in extracellular potassium concentration lower the resting cardiac membrane potential. This decreases the threshold for rapid phase-0 Na+-dependent depolarization resulting in an increase in cardiac conduction velocity.7 By electrocardiogram (ECG), these changes are manifested by “peaked” or “tented” T waves most prominent in the precordial (V2–V4) leads. With larger acute rises in extracellular potassium concentration, conduction delay becomes prominent in the atrioventricular node and His–Purkinje system due to action potential shortening and prolongation of phase-4 diastolic depolarization.7,8 Indeed, prolongation of the PR interval, P-wave amplitude, and increased QRS complex width are ominous findings in patients with advanced hyperkalemia that can precede a classically described “sine-wave” pattern on ECG.9 Thus, hyperkalemia predisposes to both cardiac hyperexcitability (ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation) and depression (bradycardia, atrioventricular block, interventricular conduction delay, and asystole), both of which can be fatal.

Despite a wealth of animal data demonstrating cardiotoxicity from acute hyperkalemia, these presentations are overall uncommon in humans. Reports of acute hyperkalemia precipitating cardiac arrest typically involve intravenous potassium loading, massive cell turnover, or shift of potassium in the setting of surgical anesthesia or critical illness.10–14 In these cases, the measured potassium concentration was usually normal shortly before cardiopulmonary arrest; and only with rapid increases in serum potassium did the findings of tachy- and bradyarrhythmias associated with hyperkalemia become apparent. These extreme situations constitute a small minority of clinical hyperkalemia in humans which is often incidental, asymptomatic, and of unknown duration. Additionally, there are many published reports demonstrating a large disconnect between degree of hyperkalemia and expected ECG findings in humans.

The ECG was observed to be somewhat unreliable in older studies of patients with potassium levels <6.5 meq/L.9,15 Modern studies and case reports also support that extreme hyperkalemia is accompanied by inconsistent findings. For example, a prospective study examining treatment strategies for acute hyperkalemia revealed only 46% of all patients with a serum potassium >6.0 meq/L had ascribable ECG changes.16 In another study of hospitalized patients with serum potassium levels >6.0 meq/L, the ECG was noted to be completely insensitive at diagnosing mild-to-moderate degrees of hyperkalemia and only approached minimal predictive power with potassium levels of 7.2–9.4 meq/L.17 In patients on hemodialysis with hyperkalemia, ECG-diagnosed T wave “tenting” did not predict the serum potassium and substantially lost its sensitivity with increasing patient age and presence of diabetes.18 Specificity for hyperkalemia and sudden death at follow-up was improved with evaluation of the T:R wave amplitude in these patients, but sensitivity was also diminished.

Hyperkalemia has also been associated with a host of nontraditional ECG changes including T wave inversions19 and pseudonormalizations,20 bundle branch,21 bifascicular,22 sinoatrial exit,20 and atypic bundle branch blocks,8 and ST depressions and elevations.15,23,24 There are even reports of profound hyperkalemia with minimal or no discernable ECG changes.21,25,26 Additionally, metabolic acidosis,27 left ventricular hypertrophy,28 early benign repolarization,29 and acute coronary ischemia30 are known to induce T wave “tenting” in patients with normal serum potassium. Because there are currently inconsistent data supporting the utility of the ECG in predicting the degree of, and prognosis with, hyperkalemia, we must turn to published data that examines the relationship between hyperkalemia and cardiovascular outcomes.

Hyperkalemia in the Setting of Critical Illness

Compelling data link hyperkalemia with heightened adverse outcomes in the critically ill population. In a retrospective analysis of 932 hospitalized adults in two Korean medical centers, high rates of arrhythmia (in 35.2%) and cardiac arrest (in 43.3%) occurred in patients with serum potassium levels >6.5 meq/L.31 Nonsurvivors in this cohort had a higher prevalence of comorbidities which independently predicted death including multiorgan failure (odds ratio [OR], 7.64; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.00 to 14.57), malignancy (OR, 2.88; 95% CI, 1.68 to 4.96), AKI (OR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.27 to 3.71), and need for intensive care (OR, 3.62; 95% CI, 1.79 to 7.32). Furthermore, as compared with survivors with hyperkalemia, nonsurvivors had higher increases in serum potassium preceding death (1.1±1.3 versus 2.2±1.5 meq/L change in serum potassium from admission, respectively). Most cases of hyperkalemia developed during hospitalization (in 60% of the cohort) with a mean admission potassium level of 5.7±1.5 meq/L rising to 7.1±0.7 meq/L after an average of 17 days of follow-up.

In another retrospective review of >39,000 patients admitted to the intensive care unit at two teaching hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts between 1997 and 2007, incident hyperkalemia independently predicted mortality at the time of critical care initiation.32 This association was graded, with even minor elevations in serum potassium (to levels 4.5–5.0 meq/L) conferring an increased risk of death (OR for death within 30 days, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.38 to 1.59), and remained significant after adjusting for many potential confounders prevalent in the critical care setting (adjusted OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.27). Furthermore, failure of serum potassium to correct by >1.0 meq/L within 48 hours after initial measurement continued to predict death; whereas, this association was attenuated among patients achieving this degree of correction. Khanagavi et al.33 reported on hospitalized patients with serum potassium >5.1 meq/L, finding that duration of hyperkalemia and mortality increased substantially with concomitant tissue necrosis [hazard ratio (HR) for death, 4.55; 95% CI, 1.74 to 11.90], metabolic acidosis (HR, 4.84; 95% CI, 1.48 to 15.82), and AKI (HR, 3.89; 95% CI, 1.14 to 13.26). Total duration of hyperkalemia was also associated with death, although the association was less robust (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.09).

Data from these studies suggest that not only the absolute level, but the velocity and duration of hyperkalemia are associated with poor outcomes with critical illness. Although compelling, these studies are limited by their retrospective design and weighed down by the severity of illness in the subjects. Mortality was high (30.7%) in the cohort by An et al.31 and many patients needed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (32%), the majority for reasons unrelated to hyperkalemia. Although initial and sustained hyperkalemia predicted mortality in the study by McMahon et al.,32 there are no data regarding the disease-specific clinical improvement or lack of improvement in the patients who suffered in-hospital mortality. Furthermore, these studies were unable to adequately control for the severity of patient illness due to a lack of physiologic data.

Hyperkalemia during Acute Myocardial Infarction

Hyperkalemia was not originally identified as a potential risk factor for poor outcomes during evolution of acute myocardial infarction (AMI),34 despite the existence of strong biologic plausibility in animal models.35,36 However, modern approaches, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and more widespread adoption of RAAS inhibitors, β-adrenergic blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), have drastically improved patient survival while also predisposing the post-AMI population to more frequent hyperkalemia. One widely cited retrospective trial of 38,689 hospitalized patients with AMI treated in the modern era demonstrated an independent increase in mortality among patients with potassium levels >5.1 meq/L (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.52 to 4.24) which persisted in patients with serum potassium levels of 4.5–5.0 meq/L (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.68 to 2.36).37 A subsequent analysis of this same cohort showed elevated in-hospital mortality with exposure to a higher number of hyperkalemic episodes (13.4%, 16.2%, and 19.8% increase in mortality with one, two, and three or more potassium measurements >5.0 meq/L, respectively) and maximum achieved serum potassium level (4.2%, 11.1%, 16.6%, 26.6%, and 31.7% increase in mortality with potassium levels <5.0, 5.0–5.5, 5.5–6.0, 6.0–6.5, and >6.5 meq/L, respectively).38 Another retrospective trial analyzing 90-day mortality in 2596 Danish patients with heart failure post-AMI also supports that a serum potassium >5.1 meq/L is associated with higher risk of death (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.6).39

The studies by Goyal et al.37 and Grodzinsky et al.38 are strengthened by use of robust adjustment models that control for baseline risk, medications, PCI use, and other pertinent factors. Nevertheless, residual confounding in very ill patients is common in retrospective analyses, and outcomes in patients with serum potassium >4.5 meq/L in the study by Goyal et al.37 were ultimately driven by a small number of individuals (11%, 2%, and 0.6% of the entire cohort had potassium levels 4.5–5.0, 5.1–5.5, and >5.5 meq/L, respectively). These patients also had substantially higher comorbidities, and lower rates of PCI, aspirin, RAAS inhibitor, β-blocker, and statin usage. The analysis by Krogager et al.39 suffers a similar limitation, including very few patients with serum potassium levels >5.1 meq/L. In the study by Goyal et al.37 there was also a paradoxic dissociation between rates of malignant arrhythmias and rates of overall mortality in higher versus lower ranges of hyperkalemia and normokalaemia, in which both associations were more congruent. The authors hypothesized that poor coding of arrhythmias associated with extremes of hyperkalemia, such as sinus arrest and asystole, led to this discrepancy.

Hyperkalemia with CKD

One of the first studies to demonstrate an independent association of hyperkalemia and risk of subsequent death involved a large retrospective study of Japanese patients with advanced CKD presenting for dialysis initiation.40 An initial serum potassium level >5.5 meq/L at dialysis vintage was the strongest single independent predictor of mortality after an average of 15 years of follow-up. In patients on hemodialysis, potassium levels >5.641 and >5.742 meq/L have been associated with higher mortality. This is also reflected in patients on peritoneal dialysis, with one study suggesting hyperkalemia >5.5 meq/L is associated with a heightened risk of death.43 Potassium increases during longer intradialytic intervals, and many have attempted to link these fluctuations to the higher incidence of sudden cardiac death in patients with ESRD. In a 3-year study of community dwelling patients on hemodialysis, the presence of hyperkalemia (defined as three or more averaged serum potassium levels >6.0 meq/L over a 6-month period) was one of the strongest single predictors of sudden death (HR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.3 to 5.9).44

A recently published retrospective observational trial of 52,734 patients on a Monday/Wednesday/Friday hemodialysis schedule revealed that serum potassium levels 5.5–6.0 meq/L were associated with higher risk for subsequent hospitalization, emergency department visits, and mortality within 4 days of measurement.45 Of note, the association between hyperkalemia and hospitalization was magnified among patients entering a longer intradialytic interval (adjusted OR for hospitalization, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.24; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.16; and OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.30 for patients with potassium measurements performed on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, respectively).

The association of mortality with hyperkalemia also appears to extend to patients with earlier stage CKD. Einhorn et al.2 conducted a retrospective analysis of 245,808 United States adult veterans with and without CKD, showing potassium levels of >5.5 meq/L predicted death just 1 day after measurement. In another study of 36,000 patients in the Cleveland Clinic system with an eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2, sustained hyperkalemia (defined as an average serum potassium level >5.5 meq/L over 2.3 years) was also associated with increased all-cause mortality.46

However, an interesting paradox is documented in these later studies regarding the relationship between CKD stage, hyperkalemia, and mortality. In the study by Einhorn et al.2 the strongest association between hyperkalemia and 1-day mortality involved patients with normal renal function (OR, 10.32 and 31.64 for serum potassium ranges ≥5.5 and <6.0 and ≥6.0 meq/L, respectively), and declined as CKD stage progressed; with stage 5 CKD associated with a much lower relative risk (OR, 2.31 and 8.02 for serum potassium ≥5.5 and <6.0 and ≥6.0 meq/L, respectively). Patients with ESRD in the study by Nakhoul et al.46 also seemed to be protected with hyperkalemia relative to the entire cohort (adjusted HR for death, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.58 versus 1.65; 95% CI, 1.48 to 1.84, respectively). Furthermore, An et al.31 showed a graded decrease in risk of death among patients with extreme levels of hyperkalemia (>6.5 meq/L) as CKD stage increased (OR for death with stage 2, 3, 4, and 5 CKD, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.78, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.46, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.26, and 0.17; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.27). Similar results were observed among dialysis versus non-CKD patients with hyperkalemia and AMI in the studies performed by Goyal et al.37 and Grodzinsky et al.38 One prospective observational analysis of sustained hyperkalemia and outcomes in patients with creatinine clearance <50 ml/min demonstrated that hyperkalemia in the ranges of 5.0–6.0 meq/L (using an average of six measurements per patient) appeared to be well tolerated.47

Adaptive increases in circulating catecholamines, aldosterone, and augmentation of renal and gastrointestinal (GI) potassium elimination are thought to blunt hyperkalemia development in CKD and could partially explain this apparent disconnect in mortality relative to non-CKD patients.48–53 However, physiologic adaptation incompletely explains why mortality risk could be diminished once hyperkalemia has already been established. Furthermore, patients with CKD might be uniquely predisposed to more not less toxicity with hyperkalemia due to a higher prevalence of metabolic derangements (e.g., hypocalcemia, acidosis, and elevated uremic solutes) and structural heart disease. Left ventricular hypertrophy,54,55 atrial fibrillation,56,57 heart rate variability,58 heart failure,59 silent myocardial infarction,60 QT abnormalities,61 and pulmonary hypertension62,63 are all highly prevalent in the CKD population and could lower arrhythmogenic potential with concurrent hyperkalemia. All of these factors could be further compounded by changes in individual solutes, rapid osmolar shifts, high ultrafiltration rates, and myocardial stunning during dialysis treatments. Thus, persons with CKD might be uniquely predisposed or uniquely protected from cardiotoxicity with hyperkalemia relative to other populations, and further studies should be performed with these apparent inconsistencies in mind.

Hyperkalemia with Selected Medication Exposure

Hyperkalemia that develops while exposed to certain medications could alter the threshold of cardiac toxicity. Cases of digoxin poisoning have illustrated quite dramatic rises in serum potassium with associated arrhythmias.64 In the studies performed by Khanagavi et al.33 and McMahon et al.32, but not An et al.,31 potassium supplementation with hyperkalemia was linked to heightened mortality. With regard to the risks of hyperkalemia while exposed to RAAS inhibitors and β-adrenergic blockers, patients in the study by An et al.31 had lower observed mortality. Conversely, critically ill patients in the study by McMahon et al.32 were not afforded similar protection with either agent. Unfortunately, there is no data on patient mortality stratified by exposure versus nonexposure to RAAS inhibitors and β blockers in the studies performed by Goyal et al.,37 Grodzinsky et al.,38 and Krogager et al.39 Patients with higher mortality in these studies were less likely to be exposed to either agent. Other data indicate that RAAS inhibitor use is linked with more profound hyperkalemia and death in the elderly65 and in patients with diabetic versus nondiabetic CKD.66 In the randomized controlled Hypertension in Hemodialysis Patients Treated with Atenolol or Lisinopril trial,67 lisinopril predisposed patients on dialysis to more hyperkalemia and higher cardiovascular morbidity than atenolol; although, the lack of a control group is a limitation to further generalizations that can be made from this study.

There is conflicting data regarding the outcome of patients with hyperkalemia exposed to MRAs. Post hoc data68 from the Eplerenone Post–Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS) trial indicates that eplerenone maintains a mortality benefit in patients with CKD and eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 while simultaneously predisposing these patients to higher rates of hyperkalemia. Unfortunately, patients with more advanced CKD (serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dl) were excluded from both the original EPHESUS trial69 and the earlier Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study.70 It is important to note that no hyperkalemia-associated deaths were reported in either of these trials. However, in an analysis of the Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure, patients with serum potassium levels >5.5 meq/L had a higher risk of all-cause mortality.71 MRA exposure was also associated with more hyperkalemia (>5.0 meq/L) and higher mortality in a study of 15,803 United States veterans with established cardiovascular disease (OR for death, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.40 to 5.64).72 Patients with eGFR<60 ml/min per 1.73 m2 in this study had even worse outcomes while on MRAs (OR for death, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.71). Another recent study examining spironolactone use in 27,213 predialysis patients in Taiwan demonstrated that exposure was independently associated with increases in hospitalizations for heart failure (adjusted HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.67), infection-related deaths (adjusted HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.73), and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.24 to 1.46).73

Implications of Data Supporting an Association between Hyperkalemia and Mortality

To date, the published studies demonstrating an association of mortality with hyperkalemia are largely limited to retrospective analyses that do not provide evidence of causation. Much of the published data are also cross-sectional in nature, potentially raising more questions than answers. Furthermore, there are sparse data to suggest that treatment of hyperkalemia modifies risk. In the study of critically ill patients by McMahon et al.,32 the risk of mortality with hyperkalemia was attenuated in patients achieving a >1.0 meq/L decrease in serum potassium within 48 hours; although, it is unclear if this represented an actual treatment effect. Other studies suggesting that longer durations and failure to reverse hyperkalemia are associated with mortality suffer from similar limitations. Of note, An et al.31 attempted to control for the effect of treatment by giving individual therapies a weighted score which was plotted against patient survival. Although increasing number of targeted interventions for hyperkalemia was associated with improved patient survival, there was no control for other treatments that were directed at reversing the underlying illness. It is interesting to note that when hemodialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy were included as treatments for hyperkalemia in this study, the improvement in patient mortality was eliminated. Extracorporeal elimination of potassium is the most efficient and definitive therapy for life-threatening hyperkalemia. Therefore, it is surprising that these therapies were not associated with improvement in mortality whereas others (withdraw of offending medicines, intravenous calcium, insulin/dextrose, etc.) were, especially if hyperkalemia is presumed to be the proximate cause of mortality.

Abrupt incidence and more rapid velocity of hyperkalemia are salient features in studies such as those performed by An et al.,31 Goyal et al.,37 and Grodzinsky et al.38 More rapid development of hyperkalemia is potentially more cardiotoxic, and directed treatment might have more protective effects in this population compared with others. Nevertheless, we can find only one published attempt at protocolizing treatment of patients who develop hyperkalemia while hospitalized.16 This study demonstrated no significant changes in patient outcome with prescribed protocols, although clinician adherence was low. We conclude that prospectively designed randomized trials of treatment for hyperkalemia should be performed with valid endpoints (e.g., target potassium levels) and outcome measures (e.g., mortality, arrhythmia, and health care utilization) in mind. A well designed trial using accepted therapies to lower serum potassium in noncritically ill monitored hospitalized patients with hyperkalemia would be the safest initial study to perform. Presently, we will review the common treatments for hyperkalemia and the potential pitfalls in using these agents.

Treatment of Hyperkalemia

Many reviews have been published on this topic and we will only briefly highlight these strategies. Acute treatment of life-threatening hyperkalemia necessitates infusion of intravenous calcium to protect against malignant cardiac hyperexcitability followed by agents which have been proven in humans to rapidly and effectively shift potassium into the intracellular space. Insulin appears the most well studied treatment in this regard and its rapid action to shift potassium is not dependent on receptor-ligand signaling and downstream protein synthesis. Unlike β-adrenergic agonist and bicarbonate therapy, insulin does not lose its efficacy, and might be enhanced, in the presence of renal failure.49 Intravenous dextrose is usually given to prevent hypoglycemia and further stimulates endogenous insulin production. Studies suggest that oral glucose loading may also be an effective strategy to increase insulin and reduce serum potassium in patients on hemodialysis.74 There is conflicting data regarding the efficacy of β-adrenergic agonists and sodium bicarbonate to reliably shift potassium; however, we observe that these agents are often used in the acute management of hyperkalemia. Ultimately, acute hemodialysis may be necessary for the extracorporeal elimination of potassium in life-threatening situations.

Diuretics are often underappreciated as an effective treatment of hyperkalemia owing to misconceptions regarding the efficacy of these drugs in patients with lower renal function. Indeed, absence of diuretic usage is associated with the development of hyperkalemia in at-risk patients.47 Patients with CKD and patients who experience diuretic braking, in which response to a diuretic becomes blunted over time, are known to need higher diuretic doses, diuretic rotation, or combination diuretics to maintain a therapeutic effect.75 Therapies directed at augmenting GI potassium excretion have been in use for many years, principally with sodium polystyrene sulfate (SPS). Generally, SPS has been shown to be unreliable in the acute setting although data on chronic management might support its use.76 Newer agents, such as sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (ZS-9; AstraZeneca) and the recently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved patiromer (Veltassa; Relypsa), have been demonstrated to effectively lower serum potassium when administered in patients with chronic hyperkalemia at levels <6.5 meq/L.77–80 Furthermore, serum potassium may be rapidly lowered within hours by both ZS-979 and patiromer,81 suggesting a previously unrecognized role of the upper GI tract in potassium regulation.

Correction of hypoaldosteronism by mineralocorticoid administration may be an effective therapy to reverse hyperkalemia. Data indicate that urinary losses of potassium only partially explain the treatment effect, suggesting a role for enhanced intracellular redistribution or augmented GI excretion.82,83 This therapy has enjoyed some recent resurgence, with several reports demonstrating successful treatment of hyperkalemia due to a range of causes.84–86 However, small randomized placebo-controlled trials using oral fludrocortisone in patients on hemodialysis with hyperkalemia have demonstrated poor efficacy87 or modest efficacy88 at lowering serum potassium. It is important to note that the doses used in these trials were relatively low (0.1 mg fludrocortisone daily), and older data indicate that patients with renal disease require much higher doses (up to 1.0 mg daily) to effectively reverse hyperkalemia.82

Perhaps the most underused of all therapies to combat hyperkalemia involves reduction of dietary potassium intake. Careful screening of the diet for potassium-rich foods is not often performed due to time-crunched clinician visits and poor dietary education given to health care providers. A careful review of potassium intake and directed counseling might prevent incident hyperkalemia and serve as an important adjunct with other therapies in the treatment of hyperkalemia. However, we can find no human data that dietary counseling is an effective strategy in the prevention or treatment of hyperkalemia. Data on the effectiveness of dietary potassium reduction in hyperkalemic individuals with advanced CKD (who often have relatively fixed levels of urinary and GI potassium excretion) is particularly needed.

Adverse Events Linked to Potassium-Lowering Therapies

Clinicians employ these therapies to patients with hyperkalemia, but to what target level? And at what cost to the patient and the health care system? It is important to highlight that many of the treatments used in management of hyperkalemia may have untoward or even unrecognized side effects. Acute infusions of elemental calcium can induce heart block in patients with digoxin-induced hyperkalemia89 and precipitate acute dermal calcifications.90,91 Given the higher prevalence of hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD, intravenous calcium infusion carries the theoretic risk of creating or worsening existing metastatic vascular calcifications.

Hypoglycemia and tachycardia can accompany insulin and albuterol administration, respectively. Large intravenous infusions of sodium bicarbonate may precipitate acute hyperosmolarity,92 including case reports of central pontine myelinolysis.93 Sodium bicarbonate infusions also risk development of acute pulmonary edema,94 ionized hypocalcemia,94,95 and worsening of AKI and mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.96

Diuretics can induce volume contraction, dysnatremias, hypomagnesemia, nephrolithiasis, and gout flares. SPS has been linked with numerous cases of intestinal necrosis,97–99 which has given this drug a warning label by the FDA and limited its modern appeal. Newer potassium exchange resins are not without potential side effects and have been shown to induce hypomagnesemia,78 hypercalciuria,100 and even edema80 at high doses. Long-term effects from these drugs are unknown and neither of these newer agents have been shown to be efficacious in patients on dialysis. Exogenous mineralocorticoids are not commonly used for hyperkalemia given concerns for precipitating volume overload and significant cardiopulmonary complications.82

Central line insertion for acute dialysis access can predispose to a host of periprocedural complications and trauma to the central veins that vitally feed future dialysis access creation. Very low potassium–containing dialysate solutions (<2.0 meq/L) are sometimes employed for severe cases of hyperkalemia but the consequences of achieving a rapid (within minutes) reduction in extracellular potassium concentration are unknown. Data suggest that lower potassium–containing dialysates are associated with significant morbidity and mortality101–103; which has largely led to abandoning this practice. Finally, unnecessary hospitalizations and clinician hypervigilance may predispose an already frail patient population to a cascade of unpredictable iatrogenic effects.

Who Is Most Likely to Benefit from the Correction of Hyperkalemia and How to Achieve It? An Opinion-Based Set of Recommendations

Despite decades of knowledge regarding the potential risks of hyperkalemia, the high incidence and prevalence of hyperkalemia in patients with certain comorbidities and medication exposures, and the availability of effective potassium-lowering therapies, there are no guidelines to advise who should be treated. Neither the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes nor the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative have published guidelines in the treatment of hyperkalemia. The Investigator Network Initiative Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists recently published guidelines104 on workup of hyperkalemia and treatment strategies in patients with serum potassium >5.1 meq/L, but doesn’t stipulate exactly who should be treated.

On the basis of the published data demonstrating disparate risks of hyperkalemia in different patient populations, the safety profile and reliability of agents to reduce serum potassium, and our own experience, we propose a step-wise strategy for the prevention and treatment of hyperkalemia in the following sections which is applicable in a range of clinical settings. We propose treatment on the basis of clinical presentation of the patient rather than degree of hyperkalemia, which poorly predicts cardiotoxicity in humans. Although we support a threshold for initiating therapy in certain patients, we do not support that any upper limit of hyperkalemia constitutes an “emergency” on the basis of the serum potassium concentration alone. Furthermore, we do not recommend guiding therapies on the basis of ECG findings given their inherent variability. We have found that relying on the ECG without extensive knowledge of the patient’s prior cardiac history, velocity of hyperkalemia development, and baseline ECG (all are almost never present) can distract from addressing the underlying cause and interfere with appropriate targeted therapy.

Prevention and Supportive Treatment of Hyperkalemia

To reduce the incidence of hyperkalemia, at risk patients, as defined in Table 1, should be identified and managed in an anticipatory fashion, with dietary modifications, avoidance of medications which might worsen risk for hyperkalemia, and surveillance for common clinical scenarios that create additive risk. We advise all patients with existing hyperkalemia (>5.0 meq/L) to reduce potassium intake to <40 meq/d. Similar dietary reductions are advised in patients with eGFR<30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 and in patients with eGFR>30 ml/min per 1.73 m2 but prone to hyperkalemia. In at-risk patients with high-to-normal levels of serum potassium (4.5–5.0 meq/L), proactive dietary screening is advised to identify and mitigate large potassium loads. We readily admit these dietary recommendations are not based on evidence supporting efficacy, and they could have the adverse effect of steering patients with CKD away from more nutrient-rich foods.

Providers should seek to limit or abstain from exposing higher-risk patients to medications listed in Table 1. In cases where avoidance of these agents is not possible, close monitoring and frequent laboratory checks are advised. The data on avoidance of β-adrenergic blockers in patients prone to hyperkalemia is controversial, because β blocker usage is one of the few established therapies in CKD and non-CKD patients which is associated with lower risk of cardiovascular events. Our own practice, depending on the degree of hyperkalemia and clinical presentation, is to maintain these drugs unless other supportive measures fail to correct the hyperkalemia.

We advise cautious administration of higher RAAS inhibitor doses and MRAs in patients with diabetic CKD, advanced CKD, and those with a prior history of hyperkalemia. Combination RAAS inhibitor regimens should be avoided because these therapies place patients at special risk for hyperkalemia without proven benefit. Hyperkalemia which develops on a diuretic should prompt an investigation for factors which might cause diuretic braking and limit distal nephron sodium delivery, and thus potassium secretion.

Hyperkalemia out of proportion to changes in eGFR should prompt a rigorous investigation for urinary obstruction, insulinopenia, acidosis, and disorders which predispose to hypoladosteronism, such as adrenal insufficiency. Patients with advanced CKD, including those on dialysis, who newly develop hyperkalemia should be evaluated for new constipation or bowel obstruction. In hospitalized patients, the clinician should be attentive to the risk of incident hyperkalemia with blood product administration, sepsis, multiorgan failure, myonecrosis, and rewarming of a cooled patient. Patients on dialysis should have access interventions and other operations scheduled away from long dialytic intervals to minimize the periprocedural risk of hyperkalemia. Furthermore, monitoring postprocedural serum potassium in patients on dialysis with higher prevalent hyperkalemia is advised.

Emergency Treatment of Hyperkalemia

A “Hyperkalemia Emergency,” which we define as a serum potassium >6.0 meq/L or a sudden increase in serum potassium 1.0 meq/L above 4.5 meq/L within 24 hours associated with cardiopulmonary arrest, evolving critical illness, AMI, or signs and symptoms of neuromuscular weakness, should be treated with agents that rapidly and reliably shift serum potassium into the intracellular space while preparations are made for elimination of total body potassium (TBK+). Infusion of intravenous calcium, insulin, and dextrose, and lastly inhaled or intravenous β-adrenergic agonist therapy should be administered only in these extreme circumstances. Consideration for sodium bicarbonate administration should be given in cases of hyperkalemia accompanying severe metabolic acidosis. Arrangements for emergent hemodialysis should be made early and proactively unless a rapidly reversible cause is identified and therapy is expedited. Our practice might require instituting hemodialysis in patients who might otherwise recover from hyperkalemia with directed treatment, yet in this demographic the failure to rapidly stabilize or reverse hyperkalemia might have fatal consequences.

Urgent Treatment for Hyperkalemia

We propose a more guarded strategy to treat hyperkalemia in less dire circumstances, which constitutes the majority of hyperkalemia cases in practice. In patients with hyperkalemia, but outside extremis, we propose adopting a four-step system aimed at maximizing elimination of TBK+ in a prompt but safe manner: (1) Increase urinary potassium clearance, (2) augment potassium excretion through the GI tract, (3) administer exogenous mineralocorticoids in selected patients, and (4) initiate dialysis or optimize dialysis delivery (Table 2). We propose executing this strategy in patients with normal renal function with serum potassium >5.0 meq/L, patients with non-ESRD CKD and serum potassium >5.5 meq/L, and patients with ESRD on maintenance dialysis and serum potassium >6.0 meq/L who have failed supportive measures to reverse the hyperkalemia (or are deemed more at risk to fail with supportive measures alone). Utilizing one of these strategies along with supportive measures should be sufficient to reverse most cases of hyperkalemia; although, several strategies in combination can be used to maximize efficacy in patients with suspicion of multifactorial hyperkalemia.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Strategies to urgently treat hyperkalemia

The goals of this treatment strategy are to stabilize and gradually reduce serum potassium in low-risk patients, and more rapidly reduce serum potassium in higher-risk patients without the need to employ intravenous calcium, insulin, dextrose, β-adrenergic agonists, and bicarbonate that have little use outside emergencies and are wholly ineffective at removing TBK+. The inclusion of mineralocorticoid administration is likely a controversial position. In our own practice, we have observed that this strategy is safe and very effective in a time-limited fashion in appropriately selected patients. Although we include dialysis initiation in cases of refractory hyperkalemia, outside patients with oligoanuric renal failure and critical illness we have found there are very few circumstances that will require the initiation of dialysis for hyperkalemia alone. We propose that a close follow-up plan should be implemented for every patient with hyperkalemia, particularly in the outpatient setting. Adopting this strategy might potentially spare patients from unnecessary emergency department visits and hospitalizations. Furthermore, employing a strategy such as this might better integrate knowledge of potassium homeostasis by the treating clinician and steer both low- and higher-risk patients with hyperkalemia into appropriate, effective, and safe treatment plans.

Disclosures

S.L. reports serving on an advisory board for ZS Pharma. No financial support was received in the preparation of this manuscript.

Acknowledgments

None.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.jasn.org.

  • Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sarafidis PA,
    2. Blacklock R,
    3. Wood E,
    4. Rumjon A,
    5. Simmonds S,
    6. Fletcher-Rogers J,
    7. Ariyanayagam R,
    8. Al-Yassin A,
    9. Sharpe C,
    10. Vinen K
    : Prevalence and factors associated with hyperkalemia in predialysis patients followed in a low-clearance clinic. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 1234–1241, 2012pmid:22595825
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Einhorn LM,
    2. Zhan M,
    3. Hsu VD,
    4. Walker LD,
    5. Moen MF,
    6. Seliger SL,
    7. Weir MR,
    8. Fink JC
    : The frequency of hyperkalemia and its significance in chronic kidney disease. Arch Intern Med 169: 1156–1162, 2009pmid:19546417
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Weir MR,
    2. Rolfe M
    : Potassium homeostasis and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 531–548, 2010pmid:20150448
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Lafrance JP,
    2. Miller DR
    : Dispensed selective and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the risk of moderate to severe hyperkalemia: A nested case-control study. Am J Kidney Dis 60: 82–89, 2012pmid:22503390
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Hiatt N,
    2. Katayanagi T,
    3. Miller A
    : Cardiac sensitivity to hyperkalemia in adrenalectomized dogs. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 149: 168–171, 1975pmid:1144421
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Coulter DB,
    2. Swenson MJ
    : Effects of potassium intoxication on porcine electrocardiograms. Am J Vet Res 31: 2001–2011, 1970pmid:5490631
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Fisch C
    : Relation of electrolyte disturbances to cardiac arrhythmias. Circulation 47: 408–419, 1973pmid:4567871
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. El-Sherif N,
    2. Turitto G
    : Electrolyte disorders and arrhythmogenesis. Cardiol J 18: 233–245, 2011pmid:21660912
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Surawicz B
    : Relationship between electrocardiogram and electrolytes. Am Heart J 73: 814–834, 1967pmid:5338052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Lee SH,
    2. Kim KJ,
    3. Chang CH,
    4. Heo SB
    : Cardiac arrest from acute hyperkalemia during liver surgery -A case report-. Korean J Anesthesiol 59[Suppl]: S124–S127, 2010pmid:21286420
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Mercer CW,
    2. Logic JR
    : Cardiac arrest due to hyperkalemia following intravenous penicillin administration. Chest 64: 358–359, 1973pmid:4749385
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wiltrout C
    : Hyperkalemia, bradycardia, and cardiac arrest during percutaneous declotting of an arteriovenous graft. Semin Intervent Radiol 27: 241–244, 2010pmid:21629412
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Huggins RM,
    2. Kennedy WK,
    3. Melroy MJ,
    4. Tollerton DG
    : Cardiac arrest from succinylcholine-induced hyperkalemia. Am J Health Syst Pharm 60: 694–697, 2003pmid:12701553
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Wilson D,
    2. Stewart A,
    3. Szwed J,
    4. Einhorn LH
    : Cardiac arrest due to hyperkalemia following therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Cancer 39: 2290–2293, 1977pmid:265752
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Tarail R
    : Relation of abnormalities in concentration of serum potassium to electrocardiographic disturbances. Am J Med 5: 828–837, 1948pmid:18100392
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Acker CG,
    2. Johnson JP,
    3. Palevsky PM,
    4. Greenberg A
    : Hyperkalemia in hospitalized patients: Causes, adequacy of treatment, and results of an attempt to improve physician compliance with published therapy guidelines. Arch Intern Med 158: 917–924, 1998pmid:9570179
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Montague BT,
    2. Ouellette JR,
    3. Buller GK
    : Retrospective review of the frequency of ECG changes in hyperkalemia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3: 324–330, 2008pmid:18235147
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Green D,
    2. Green HD,
    3. New DI,
    4. Kalra PA
    : The clinical significance of hyperkalaemia-associated repolarization abnormalities in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 28: 99–105, 2013pmid:22610985
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Khattak HK,
    2. Khalid S,
    3. Manzoor K,
    4. Stein PK
    : Recurrent life-threatening hyperkalemia without typical electrocardiographic changes. J Electrocardiol 47: 95–97, 2014pmid:23973093
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Yu AS
    : Atypical electrocardiographic changes in severe hyperkalemia. Am J Cardiol 77: 906–908, 1996pmid:8623755
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Martinez-Vea A,
    2. Bardají A,
    3. Garcia C,
    4. Oliver JA
    : Severe hyperkalemia with minimal electrocardiographic manifestations: A report of seven cases. J Electrocardiol 32: 45–49, 1999pmid:10037088
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. O’Neil JP,
    2. Chung EK
    : Unusual electrocardiographic finding--bifascicular block due to hyperkalemia. Am J Med 61: 537–540, 1976pmid:973647
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Simon BC
    : Pseudomyocardial infarction and hyperkalemia: A case report and subject review. J Emerg Med 6: 511–515, 1988pmid:3146597
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Pothiawala SE
    : Hyperkalemia induced pseudo-myocardial infarction in septic shock. J Postgrad Med 60: 338–340, 2014pmid:25121383
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Szerlip HM,
    2. Weiss J,
    3. Singer I
    : Profound hyperkalemia without electrocardiographic manifestations. Am J Kidney Dis 7: 461–465, 1986pmid:3717152
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Fordjour KN,
    2. Walton T,
    3. Doran JJ
    : Management of hyperkalemia in hospitalized patients. Am J Med Sci 347: 93–100, 2014pmid:23255245
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Dreyfuss D,
    2. Jondeau G,
    3. Couturier R,
    4. Rahmani J,
    5. Assayag P,
    6. Coste F
    : Tall T waves during metabolic acidosis without hyperkalemia: A prospective study. Crit Care Med 17: 404–408, 1989pmid:2707009
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Huwez FU,
    2. Pringle SD,
    3. Macfarlane PW
    : Variable patterns of ST-T abnormalities in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy and normal coronary arteries. Br Heart J 67: 304–307, 1992pmid:1389704
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Brady WJ,
    2. Chan TC
    : Electrocardiographic manifestations: Benign early repolarization. J Emerg Med 17: 473–478, 1999pmid:10338242
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Somers MP,
    2. Brady WJ,
    3. Perron AD,
    4. Mattu A
    : The prominent T wave: Electrocardiographic differential diagnosis. Am J Emerg Med 20: 243–251, 2002pmid:11992348
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. An JN,
    2. Lee JP,
    3. Jeon HJ,
    4. Kim DH,
    5. Oh YK,
    6. Kim YS,
    7. Lim CS
    : Severe hyperkalemia requiring hospitalization: Predictors of mortality. Crit Care 16: R225, 2012pmid:23171442
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. McMahon GM,
    2. Mendu ML,
    3. Gibbons FK,
    4. Christopher KB
    : Association between hyperkalemia at critical care initiation and mortality. Intensive Care Med 38: 1834–1842, 2012pmid:22806439
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Khanagavi J,
    2. Gupta T,
    3. Aronow WS,
    4. Shah T,
    5. Garg J,
    6. Ahn C,
    7. Sule S,
    8. Peterson S
    : Hyperkalemia among hospitalized patients and association between duration of hyperkalemia and outcomes. Arch Med Sci 10: 251–257, 2014pmid:24904657
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Friedensohn A,
    2. Faibel HE,
    3. Bairey O,
    4. Goldbourt U,
    5. Schlesinger Z
    : Malignant arrhythmias in relation to values of serum potassium in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 32: 331–338, 1991pmid:1686433
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Hill JL,
    2. Gettes LS
    : Effect of acute coronary artery occlusion on local myocardial extracellular K+ activity in swine. Circulation 61: 768–778, 1980pmid:7357719
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Coronel R,
    2. Fiolet JW,
    3. Wilms-Schopman FJ,
    4. Schaapherder AF,
    5. Johnson TA,
    6. Gettes LS,
    7. Janse MJ
    : Distribution of extracellular potassium and its relation to electrophysiologic changes during acute myocardial ischemia in the isolated perfused porcine heart. Circulation 77: 1125–1138, 1988pmid:3359590
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Goyal A,
    2. Spertus JA,
    3. Gosch K,
    4. Venkitachalam L,
    5. Jones PG,
    6. Van den Berghe G,
    7. Kosiborod M
    : Serum potassium levels and mortality in acute myocardial infarction. JAMA 307: 157–164, 2012pmid:22235086
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Grodzinsky A,
    2. Goyal A,
    3. Gosch K,
    4. McCullough PA,
    5. Fonarow GC,
    6. Mebazaa A,
    7. Masoudi FA,
    8. Spertus JA,
    9. Palmer BF,
    10. Kosiborod M
    : Prevalence and prognosis of hyperkalemia in patients with acute myocardial Infarction. Am J Med 129: 858–865, 2016pmid:27060233
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Krogager ML,
    2. Eggers-Kaas L,
    3. Aasbjerg K,
    4. Mortensen RN,
    5. Køber L,
    6. Gislason G,
    7. Torp-Pedersen C,
    8. Søgaard P
    : Short-term mortality risk of serum potassium levels in acute heart failure following myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother 1: 245–251, 2015pmid:27418967
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Iseki K,
    2. Uehara H,
    3. Nishime K,
    4. Tokuyama K,
    5. Yoshihara K,
    6. Kinjo K,
    7. Shiohira Y,
    8. Fukiyama K
    : Impact of the initial levels of laboratory variables on survival in chronic dialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 28: 541–548, 1996pmid:8840944
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Kovesdy CP,
    2. Regidor DL,
    3. Mehrotra R,
    4. Jing J,
    5. McAllister CJ,
    6. Greenland S,
    7. Kopple JD,
    8. Kalantar-Zadeh K
    : Serum and dialysate potassium concentrations and survival in hemodialysis patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2: 999–1007, 2007pmid:17702709
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Yusuf AA,
    2. Hu Y,
    3. Singh B,
    4. Menoyo JA,
    5. Wetmore JB
    : Serum potassium levels and mortality in hemodialysis patients: A Retrospective Cohort study. Am J Nephrol 44: 179–186, 2016pmid:27592170
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Torlén K,
    2. Kalantar-Zadeh K,
    3. Molnar MZ,
    4. Vashistha T,
    5. Mehrotra R
    : Serum potassium and cause-specific mortality in a large peritoneal dialysis cohort. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 1272–1284, 2012pmid:22626960
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Genovesi S,
    2. Valsecchi MG,
    3. Rossi E,
    4. Pogliani D,
    5. Acquistapace I,
    6. De Cristofaro V,
    7. Stella A,
    8. Vincenti A
    : Sudden death and associated factors in a historical cohort of chronic haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24: 2529–2536, 2009pmid:19293137
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Brunelli SM,
    2. Du Mond C,
    3. Oestreicher N,
    4. Rakov V,
    5. Spiegel DM
    : Serum potassium and short-term clinical outcomes among hemodialysis patients: Impact of the long interdialytic interval. Am J Kidney Dis 70: 21–29, 2017pmid:28111027
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Nakhoul GN,
    2. Huang H,
    3. Arrigain S,
    4. Jolly SE,
    5. Schold JD,
    6. Nally JV Jr.,
    7. Navaneethan SD
    : Serum potassium, end-stage renal disease and mortality in chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol 41: 456–463, 2015pmid:26228532
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Korgaonkar S,
    2. Tilea A,
    3. Gillespie BW,
    4. Kiser M,
    5. Eisele G,
    6. Finkelstein F,
    7. Kotanko P,
    8. Pitt B,
    9. Saran R
    : Serum potassium and outcomes in CKD: Insights from the RRI-CKD cohort study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 762–769, 2010pmid:20203167
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Gennari FJ,
    2. Segal AS
    : Hyperkalemia: An adaptive response in chronic renal insufficiency. Kidney Int 62: 1–9, 2002pmid:12081558
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Salem MM,
    2. Rosa RM,
    3. Batlle DC
    : Extrarenal potassium tolerance in chronic renal failure: Implications for the treatment of acute hyperkalemia. Am J Kidney Dis 18: 421–440, 1991pmid:1928061
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sandle GI,
    2. Gaiger E,
    3. Tapster S,
    4. Goodship TH
    : Evidence for large intestinal control of potassium homoeostasis in uraemic patients undergoing long-term dialysis. Clin Sci (Lond) 73: 247–252, 1987pmid:3652631
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Grimm PR,
    2. Sansom SC
    : BK channels in the kidney. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 16: 430–436, 2007pmid:17693758
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Foster ES,
    2. Jones WJ,
    3. Hayslett JP,
    4. Binder HJ
    : Role of aldosterone and dietary potassium in potassium adaptation in the distal colon of the rat. Gastroenterology 88: 41–46, 1985pmid:3964771
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Butterfield I,
    2. Warhurst G,
    3. Jones MN,
    4. Sandle GI
    : Characterization of apical potassium channels induced in rat distal colon during potassium adaptation. J Physiol 501: 537–547, 1997pmid:9218214
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Foley RN,
    2. Curtis BM,
    3. Randell EW,
    4. Parfrey PS
    : Left ventricular hypertrophy in new hemodialysis patients without symptomatic cardiac disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 5: 805–813, 2010pmid:20378644
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Bansal N,
    2. Keane M,
    3. Delafontaine P,
    4. Dries D,
    5. Foster E,
    6. Gadegbeku CA,
    7. Go AS,
    8. Hamm LL,
    9. Kusek JW,
    10. Ojo AO,
    11. Rahman M,
    12. Tao K,
    13. Wright JT,
    14. Xie D,
    15. Hsu CY; CRIC Study Investigators
    : A longitudinal study of left ventricular function and structure from CKD to ESRD: The CRIC study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 8: 355–362, 2013pmid:23411431
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Bansal N,
    2. Fan D,
    3. Hsu CY,
    4. Ordonez JD,
    5. Go AS
    : Incident atrial fibrillation and risk of death in adults with chronic kidney disease. J Am Heart Assoc 3: e001303, 2014pmid:25332181
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Soliman EZ,
    2. Prineas RJ,
    3. Go AS,
    4. Xie D,
    5. Lash JP,
    6. Rahman M,
    7. Ojo A,
    8. Teal VL,
    9. Jensvold NG,
    10. Robinson NL,
    11. Dries DL,
    12. Bazzano L,
    13. Mohler ER,
    14. Wright JT,
    15. Feldman HI; Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) Study Group
    : Chronic kidney disease and prevalent atrial fibrillation: The Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC). Am Heart J 159: 1102–1107, 2010pmid:20569726
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Drawz PE,
    2. Babineau DC,
    3. Brecklin C,
    4. He J,
    5. Kallem RR,
    6. Soliman EZ,
    7. Xie D,
    8. Appleby D,
    9. Anderson AH,
    10. Rahman M; CRIC Study Investigators
    : Heart rate variability is a predictor of mortality in chronic kidney disease: A report from the CRIC Study. Am J Nephrol 38: 517–528, 2013pmid:24356377
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Harnett JD,
    2. Foley RN,
    3. Kent GM,
    4. Barre PE,
    5. Murray D,
    6. Parfrey PS
    : Congestive heart failure in dialysis patients: Prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors. Kidney Int 47: 884–890, 1995pmid:7752588
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Rizk DV,
    2. Gutierrez O,
    3. Levitan EB,
    4. McClellan WM,
    5. Safford M,
    6. Soliman EZ,
    7. Warnock DG,
    8. Muntner P
    : Prevalence and prognosis of unrecognized myocardial infarctions in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27: 3482–3488, 2012pmid:22167594
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Lorincz I,
    2. Mátyus J,
    3. Zilahi Z,
    4. Kun C,
    5. Karányi Z,
    6. Kakuk G
    : QT dispersion in patients with end-stage renal failure and during hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 1297–1302, 1999pmid:10361868
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Sise ME,
    2. Courtwright AM,
    3. Channick RN
    : Pulmonary hypertension in patients with chronic and end-stage kidney disease. Kidney Int 84: 682–692, 2013pmid:23739239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Kim SC,
    2. Chang HJ,
    3. Kim MG,
    4. Jo SK,
    5. Cho WY,
    6. Kim HK
    : Relationship between pulmonary hypertension, peripheral vascular calcification, and major cardiovascular events in dialysis patients. Kidney Res Clin Pract 34: 28–34, 2015pmid:26484016
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Fenton F,
    2. Smally AJ,
    3. Laut J
    : Hyperkalemia and digoxin toxicity in a patient with kidney failure. Ann Emerg Med 28: 440–441, 1996pmid:8839532
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Turgutalp K,
    2. Bardak S,
    3. Helvacı I,
    4. İşgüzar G,
    5. Payas E,
    6. Demir S,
    7. Kıykım A
    : Community-acquired hyperkalemia in elderly patients: Risk factors and clinical outcomes. Ren Fail 38: 1405–1412, 2016pmid:27494301
    OpenUrlPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Loutradis C,
    2. Tolika P,
    3. Skodra A,
    4. Avdelidou A,
    5. Sarafidis PA
    : Prevalence of hyperkalemia in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease: A Nested Case-Control study. Am J Nephrol 42: 351–360, 2015pmid:26599956
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Agarwal R,
    2. Sinha AD,
    3. Pappas MK,
    4. Abraham TN,
    5. Tegegne GG
    : Hypertension in hemodialysis patients treated with atenolol or lisinopril: A randomized controlled trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 29: 672–681, 2014pmid:24398888
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Pitt B,
    2. Bakris G,
    3. Ruilope LM,
    4. DiCarlo L,
    5. Mukherjee R; EPHESUS Investigators
    : Serum potassium and clinical outcomes in the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS). Circulation 118: 1643–1650, 2008pmid:18824643
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Pitt B,
    2. Remme W,
    3. Zannad F,
    4. Neaton J,
    5. Martinez F,
    6. Roniker B,
    7. Bittman R,
    8. Hurley S,
    9. Kleiman J,
    10. Gatlin M; Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study Investigators
    : Eplerenone, a selective aldosterone blocker, in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 348: 1309–1321, 2003pmid:12668699
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Pitt B,
    2. Zannad F,
    3. Remme WJ,
    4. Cody R,
    5. Castaigne A,
    6. Perez A,
    7. Palensky J,
    8. Wittes J; Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators
    : The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. N Engl J Med 341: 709–717, 1999pmid:10471456
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Rossignol P,
    2. Dobre D,
    3. McMurray JJ,
    4. Swedberg K,
    5. Krum H,
    6. van Veldhuisen DJ,
    7. Shi H,
    8. Messig M,
    9. Vincent J,
    10. Girerd N,
    11. Bakris G,
    12. Pitt B,
    13. Zannad F
    : Incidence, determinants, and prognostic significance of hyperkalemia and worsening renal function in patients with heart failure receiving the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist eplerenone or placebo in addition to optimal medical therapy: Results from the Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure (EMPHASIS-HF). Circ Heart Fail 7: 51–58, 2014pmid:24297687
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Jain N,
    2. Kotla S,
    3. Little BB,
    4. Weideman RA,
    5. Brilakis ES,
    6. Reilly RF,
    7. Banerjee S
    : Predictors of hyperkalemia and death in patients with cardiac and renal disease. Am J Cardiol 109: 1510–1513, 2012pmid:22342847
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Tseng WC,
    2. Liu JS,
    3. Hung SC,
    4. Kuo KL,
    5. Chen YH,
    6. Tarng DC,
    7. Hsu CC
    : Effect of spironolactone on the risks of mortality and hospitalization for heart failure in pre-dialysis advanced chronic kidney disease: A nationwide population-based study. Int J Cardiol 238: 72–78, 2017pmid:28363684
    OpenUrlPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Muto S,
    2. Sebata K,
    3. Watanabe H,
    4. Shoji F,
    5. Yamamoto Y,
    6. Ohashi M,
    7. Yamada T,
    8. Matsumoto H,
    9. Mukouyama T,
    10. Yonekura T,
    11. Namiki S,
    12. Kusano E
    : Effect of oral glucose administration on serum potassium concentration in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 46: 697–705, 2005pmid:16183425
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Sica DA
    : Diuretic use in renal disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 8: 100–109, 2011pmid:22183505
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Lepage L,
    2. Dufour AC,
    3. Doiron J,
    4. Handfield K,
    5. Desforges K,
    6. Bell R,
    7. Vallée M,
    8. Savoie M,
    9. Perreault S,
    10. Laurin LP,
    11. Pichette V,
    12. Lafrance JP
    : Randomized clinical trial of sodium polystyrene sulfonate for the treatment of mild hyperkalemia in CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 10: 2136–2142, 2015pmid:26576619
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Weir MR,
    2. Bakris GL,
    3. Bushinsky DA,
    4. Mayo MR,
    5. Garza D,
    6. Stasiv Y,
    7. Wittes J,
    8. Christ-Schmidt H,
    9. Berman L,
    10. Pitt B; OPAL-HK Investigators
    : Patiromer in patients with kidney disease and hyperkalemia receiving RAAS inhibitors. N Engl J Med 372: 211–221, 2015pmid:25415805
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Bakris GL,
    2. Pitt B,
    3. Weir MR,
    4. Freeman MW,
    5. Mayo MR,
    6. Garza D,
    7. Stasiv Y,
    8. Zawadzki R,
    9. Berman L,
    10. Bushinsky DA; AMETHYST-DN Investigators
    : Effect of patiromer on serum potassium level in patients with hyperkalemia and diabetic kidney disease: The AMETHYST-DN randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314: 151–161, 2015pmid:26172895
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Packham DK,
    2. Rasmussen HS,
    3. Lavin PT,
    4. El-Shahawy MA,
    5. Roger SD,
    6. Block G,
    7. Qunibi W,
    8. Pergola P,
    9. Singh B
    : Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in hyperkalemia. N Engl J Med 372: 222–231, 2015pmid:25415807
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Kosiborod M,
    2. Rasmussen HS,
    3. Lavin P,
    4. Qunibi WY,
    5. Spinowitz B,
    6. Packham D,
    7. Roger SD,
    8. Yang A,
    9. Lerma E,
    10. Singh B
    : Effect of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate on potassium lowering for 28 days among outpatients with hyperkalemia: The HARMONIZE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 312: 2223–2233, 2014pmid:25402495
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Bushinsky DA,
    2. Williams GH,
    3. Pitt B,
    4. Weir MR,
    5. Freeman MW,
    6. Garza D,
    7. Stasiv Y,
    8. Li E,
    9. Berman L,
    10. Bakris GL
    : Patiromer induces rapid and sustained potassium lowering in patients with chronic kidney disease and hyperkalemia. Kidney Int 88: 1427–1433, 2015pmid:26376130
    OpenUrlPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. DeFronzo RA
    : Hyperkalemia and hyporeninemic hypoaldosteronism. Kidney Int 17: 118–134, 1980pmid:6990088
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Kamel KS,
    2. Ethier JH,
    3. Quaggin S,
    4. Levin A,
    5. Albert S,
    6. Carlisle EJ,
    7. Halperin ML
    : Studies to determine the basis for hyperkalemia in recipients of a renal transplant who are treated with cyclosporine. J Am Soc Nephrol 2: 1279–1284, 1992pmid:1627752
    OpenUrlAbstract
  77. ↵
    1. Dobbin SJH,
    2. Petrie JR,
    3. Lean MEJ,
    4. McKay GA
    : Fludrocortisone therapy for persistent hyperkalaemia. Diabet Med 34: 1005–1008, 2017pmid:28375568
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Sivakumar V,
    2. Sriramnaveen P,
    3. Krishna C,
    4. Manjusha Y,
    5. Reddy YS,
    6. Sridhar N,
    7. Subramanian S
    : Role of fludrocortisone in the management of tacrolimus-induced hyperkalemia in a renal transplant recipient. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 25: 149–151, 2014pmid:24434399
    OpenUrlPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Brown G
    : Fludrocortisone for heparin-induced hyperkalemia. Can J Hosp Pharm 64: 463–464, 2011pmid:22479104
    OpenUrlPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Kaisar MO,
    2. Wiggins KJ,
    3. Sturtevant JM,
    4. Hawley CM,
    5. Campbell SB,
    6. Isbel NM,
    7. Mudge DW,
    8. Bofinger A,
    9. Petrie JJ,
    10. Johnson DW
    : A randomized controlled trial of fludrocortisone for the treatment of hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis 47: 809–814, 2006pmid:16632019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Kim DM,
    2. Chung JH,
    3. Yoon SH,
    4. Kim HL
    : Effect of fludrocortisone acetate on reducing serum potassium levels in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22: 3273–3276, 2007pmid:17616536
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Jabbar AA,
    2. Wase A
    : Worsening wenckebach after calcium gluconate injection: Not uncommon but frequently missed diagnosis. Am J Emerg Med 31(5): 893.e5–893.e6, 2013
    OpenUrl
  82. ↵
    1. Watanabe S,
    2. Shioda T,
    3. Kobayashi K,
    4. Ishizaki S,
    5. Ito F,
    6. Fujibayashi M,
    7. Tanaka M
    : Calcinosis cutis confined to the dermis after intravenous administration of a calcium preparation: A case report and review of the Japanese literature. Case Rep Dermatol 6: 85–90, 2014pmid:24761140
    OpenUrlPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Moss J,
    2. Syrengelas A,
    3. Antaya R,
    4. Lazova R
    : Calcinosis cutis: A complication of intravenous administration of calcium glucanate. J Cutan Pathol 33[Suppl 2]: 60–62, 2006pmid:16972958
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Conte G,
    2. Dal Canton A,
    3. Imperatore P,
    4. De Nicola L,
    5. Gigliotti G,
    6. Pisanti N,
    7. Memoli B,
    8. Fuiano G,
    9. Esposito C,
    10. Andreucci VE
    : Acute increase in plasma osmolality as a cause of hyperkalemia in patients with renal failure. Kidney Int 38: 301–307, 1990pmid:2402122
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Chang KY,
    2. Lee IH,
    3. Kim GJ,
    4. Cho K,
    5. Park HS,
    6. Kim HW
    : Plasma exchange successfully treats central pontine myelinolysis after acute hypernatremia from intravenous sodium bicarbonate therapy. BMC Nephrol 15: 56, 2014pmid:24708786
    OpenUrlPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Cooper DJ,
    2. Walley KR,
    3. Wiggs BR,
    4. Russell JA
    : Bicarbonate does not improve hemodynamics in critically ill patients who have lactic acidosis. A prospective, controlled clinical study. Ann Intern Med 112: 492–498, 1990pmid:2156475
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Fox GN
    : Hypocalcemia complicating bicarbonate therapy for salicylate poisoning. West J Med 141: 108–109, 1984pmid:6089440
    OpenUrlPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Schiffl H
    : Sodium bicarbonate infusion for prevention of acute kidney injury: No evidence for superior benefit, but risk for harm? Int Urol Nephrol 47: 321–326, 2015pmid:25164590
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Chou YH,
    2. Wang HY,
    3. Hsieh MS
    : Colonic necrosis in a young patient receiving oral kayexalate in sorbitol: Case report and literature review. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 27: 155–158, 2011pmid:21463839
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. McGowan CE,
    2. Saha S,
    3. Chu G,
    4. Resnick MB,
    5. Moss SF
    : Intestinal necrosis due to sodium polystyrene sulfonate (Kayexalate) in sorbitol. South Med J 102: 493–497, 2009pmid:19373153
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Saginur M,
    2. Thiesen A,
    3. Lacson A,
    4. Bigam D,
    5. Yap J
    : Small intestinal transplant mucosal necrosis associated with enteral sodium polystyrene sulfonate administration. Am J Transplant 12: 3152–3154, 2012pmid:22900907
    OpenUrlPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Bushinsky DA,
    2. Spiegel DM,
    3. Gross C,
    4. Benton WW,
    5. Fogli J,
    6. Hill Gallant KM,
    7. Du Mond C,
    8. Block GA,
    9. Weir MR,
    10. Pitt B
    : Effect of patiromer on urinary ion excretion in healthy adults. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 11: 1769–1776, 2016pmid:27679518
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  92. ↵
    1. Wiegand CF,
    2. Davin TD,
    3. Raij L,
    4. Kjellstrand CM
    : Severe hypokalemia induced by hemodialysis. Arch Intern Med 141: 167–170, 1981pmid:7458512
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jadoul M,
    2. Thumma J,
    3. Fuller DS,
    4. Tentori F,
    5. Li Y,
    6. Morgenstern H,
    7. Mendelssohn D,
    8. Tomo T,
    9. Ethier J,
    10. Port F,
    11. Robinson BM
    : Modifiable practices associated with sudden death among hemodialysis patients in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7: 765–774, 2012pmid:22403271
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  93. ↵
    1. Morrison G,
    2. Michelson EL,
    3. Brown S,
    4. Morganroth J
    : Mechanism and prevention of cardiac arrhythmias in chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 17: 811–819, 1980pmid:6447822
    OpenUrlPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Rossignol P,
    2. Legrand M,
    3. Kosiborod M,
    4. Hollenberg SM,
    5. Peacock WF,
    6. Emmett M,
    7. Epstein M,
    8. Kovesdy CP,
    9. Yilmaz MB,
    10. Stough WG,
    11. Gayat E,
    12. Pitt B,
    13. Zannad F,
    14. Mebazaa A
    : Emergency management of severe hyperkalemia: Guideline for best practice and opportunities for the future. Pharmacol Res 113[Pt A]: 585–591, 2016pmid:27693804
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 28 (11)
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 28, Issue 11
November 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in JASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How Dangerous Is Hyperkalemia?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
How Dangerous Is Hyperkalemia?
John R. Montford, Stuart Linas
JASN Nov 2017, 28 (11) 3155-3165; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2016121344

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
How Dangerous Is Hyperkalemia?
John R. Montford, Stuart Linas
JASN Nov 2017, 28 (11) 3155-3165; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2016121344
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Integrated Discussion
    • Who Is Most Likely to Benefit from the Correction of Hyperkalemia and How to Achieve It? An Opinion-Based Set of Recommendations
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

Up Front Matters

  • QALYs, DALYs and Now PALYs: Strengthening the Argument for Prevention of CKD
  • Management of Obesity in Adults with CKD
  • Me Or Your Own Eyes: RNA-Seq and the Kidney
Show more Up Front Matters

Brief Reviews

  • Differentiating Primary, Genetic, and Secondary FSGS in Adults: A Clinicopathologic Approach
  • Salt-Losing Tubulopathies in Children: What’s New, What’s Controversial?
  • Targeting B Cells and Plasma Cells in Glomerular Diseases: Translational Perspectives
Show more Brief Reviews

Cited By...

  • Medication Safety Principles and Practice in CKD
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • hyperkalemia
  • chronic kidney disease
  • electrolytes

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Annual Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Resources
  • Editorial Fellowship Program
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • JASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About JASN
  • JASN Email Alerts
  • JASN Key Impact Information
  • JASN Podcasts
  • JASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe to ASN Journals

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1046-6673 Online ISSN - 1533-3450

Powered by HighWire