Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Article Collections
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Archives
    • Saved Searches
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Subscriptions
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Feedback
    • Reprints
    • Impact Factor
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Article Collections
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Archives
    • Saved Searches
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Subscriptions
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Feedback
    • Reprints
    • Impact Factor
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Follow JASN on Twitter
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow JASN on RSS
  • Community Forum
Perspectives
Open Access

Increasing Peritoneal Dialysis Use in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Will It Go Viral?

Edwina A. Brown and Jeffrey Perl
JASN September 2020, 31 (9) 1928-1930; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020050729
Edwina A. Brown
1Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Perl
2Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading
  • peritoneal dialysis
  • COVID-19
  • home dialysis

As the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic has unfolded, efforts to facilitate social distancing while minimizing person-to-person transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has resulted in unprecedented changes across all facets of society. The COVID-19 pandemic represents an opportunity to reevaluate and refine existing models of health care delivery to enable provision of high-quality, comprehensive care traditionally offered within health care facilities in the home. In the United States and most high-income countries, dialysis is predominantly delivered as in-center hemodialysis, although the minority of patients who undergo dialysis at home, either as home hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (PD), have comparable, if not better, outcomes.1 Frequent, routine trips for dialysis treatments at health care facilities, where individuals with advanced age, a large comorbidity burden, and high rates of hospitalization are cohorted together, foster a high-risk situation for COVID-19 transmission and related morbidity and mortality. COVID-19 outbreaks across hemodialysis facilities have been described, placing patients, their families, and the health care workers who care for these patients at risk.2

The notion that individuals receiving center-based hemodialysis are at higher risk of acquiring communicable diseases is not novel, given that transmission of viral hepatitis and colonization with drug-resistant bacteria remain major concerns across dialysis facilities. Organizing patient transport while maintaining effective infection prevention and control measures has also been a major challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic. With fewer health care facility visits and greater ability to adhere to social distancing measures, individuals receiving home-based dialysis have a clear advantage. This is reflected in the data relating to COVID-19 infection being collected prospectively by the United Kingdom Renal Registry and the Ontario Renal Network. In the United Kingdom, by April 29, 2020, 2.9% of patients on PD were reported to have contracted COVID-19 compared with 9% of patients on hemodialysis.3 Also, as of May 22, preliminary data from the Ontario Renal Network demonstrated that, in Ontario (where the overall prevalence of COVID-19 among the ESKD population was 1%), the rate of increase in COVID-19 positivity among patients on center-based hemodialysis was threefold that experienced among those receiving home dialysis. Data from the United States are still forthcoming.

Two ESKD health care reform initiatives in the United States have increased support for home-based dialysis, which may prove useful in reducing risks presented by the COVID-19 pandemic. The first, the ESKD Prospective Payment System, created a favorable reimbursement structure that has realized increasing use of home-based dialysis in the United States. The second initiative, the recently signed Executive Order on Advancing American Kidney Health, directly set targets aimed at increasing home-based dialysis in an effort to reduce ESKD-related costs while improving care. Given the lower risk of COVID-19 exposure from home-based dialysis compared with in-center dialysis, enabling more patients to undergo dialysis at home will protect individuals from COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality and will help limit spread of infection into the community. We are now only at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, so it is a matter of urgency to consider what resources will be required to facilitate a rapid increase in the use of home-based dialysis and what barriers must be overcome to accomplish this goal.

Studies already show a strong association between appropriate education and the proportion of patients who subsequently choose PD.4 The “stay-at-home” messages related to the pandemic are likely to further increase this choice. Because both COVID-19 mortality and the need for maintenance dialysis increase with age, older patients are particularly going to benefit from dialysis at home. But it is precisely these individuals who have been less likely to receive home dialysis than in-center hemodialysis in the United States. In the United Kingdom and Canada, assistance is available for older people to have PD in their home or nursing homes. Indeed, studies show that patient satisfaction is higher for assisted PD compared with in-center hemodialysis.5 Ensuring patients receive education about PD and exploring models of providing assistance that may also include reimbursement to family care partners seem likely to increase PD eligibility and use.

Supporting growth in PD will require increasing resources for PD catheter placement to make this procedure available in the setting of COVID-19. It is also important to ensure universal availability of both surgical and percutaneous approaches for PD catheter insertion. In many regions, the demand for ventilators, operating room closures, and the risk of aerosol spray associated with laparoscopic procedures for PD catheter placement have curtailed access to surgery. As a result, in many places, PD catheter insertion has been limited to percutaneous procedures. Percutaneous PD access insertion remains underused in the United States compared with other countries because of historically low rates of training across interventional radiology and nephrology training programs in how to perform these procedures. Despite a recommendation by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to prioritize PD catheter insertion during the COVID-19 pandemic, it remains poorly remunerated relative to other procedures. This creates challenges for financially constrained health care facilities already struggling with how to prioritize surgical procedures in the face of relaxing COVID-19-related restrictions.

COVID-19 resilience also includes developing robust telemedicine strategies that minimize in-person interactions with health care. Experience from the COVID-19 pandemic so far has shown that patients using PD can be monitored remotely by telephone, with or without video.6 Those on automated PD can take advantage of the remote monitoring technology that is now available on many automated PD cyclers, enabling PD teams to monitor dialysis performance and change the prescription remotely if needed. Temporary regulatory concessions to enhance greater use of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic should prompt consideration of a long-term shift to telehealth among patients receiving home dialysis, with a critical evaluation of this approach’s effect on patient-reported and clinical outcomes.

Recently updated International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines for prescribing PD have stated that the prescription should focus on the patient’s well-being and enable achievement of the patient’s goals, de-emphasizing small-solute clearance alone as a measure of high-quality dialysis.7 The relaxed requirements for PD adequacy measures and reporting during this period also provide a unique opportunity for reappraisal of these and other quality improvement measures. If routine blood work for a patient receiving PD before the pandemic has been stable, within target, and the person is clinically well, frequency of blood work may also be reconsidered, particularly in the face of recent evidence in the hemodialysis population that did not demonstrate deleterious consequences with regular but less-frequent blood sampling.8

Blake et al.9 have described six steps for patients to access PD: identifying candidates for PD, assessing candidates for eligibility, offering PD, choosing of PD by the patient, inserting the PD catheter, and training to start PD. For use of PD to increase, prejudices regarding which patients are eligible for PD will have to change. The wide variation among kidney care practitioners about PD eligibility may stem from a lack of exposure to home dialysis training and education during nephrology fellowship.10 Virtual instruction about PD therefore needs to be made readily available for all kidney care practitioners. Patients facing making a choice about dialysis modality will also need robust online educational resources, because social distancing will make face-to-face education sessions difficult to organize (Figure 1).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Selected strategies to increase PD use after the COVID-19 pandemic. Image for PD modified from reference 12, with permission.

In the United States and elsewhere, a disproportionate burden of COVID-19 illness and death has occurred among racial and ethnic minority groups. It is no coincidence that home dialysis is underused in the very same groups and that, when it is used in these groups, it is associated with inferior outcomes.11 Both of these sobering observations underscore social determinants of health (which include socioeconomic status, living conditions, access to health care, and other factors) that need to be addressed to facilitate greater use of home dialysis and improved health outcomes.

It has taken the COVID-19 pandemic to highlight the advantage of having dialysis at home. It is now up to the kidney care community to ensure that all people faced with starting dialysis have the opportunity to choose whether to have their dialysis at home, and to receive the assistance to do so when they need it.

Disclosures

E. Brown has received speaking honoraria from Baxter Healthcare UK, and has served as a consultant for AWAK, Baxter Healthcare, and LiberDi. J. Perl has received speaking honoraria from AstraZeneca, Baxter Healthcare, DaVita Healthcare Partners, Dialysis Clinics Incorporated, Fresenius Medical Care, and Satellite Healthcare, and has served as a consultant for Baxter Healthcare, DaVita Healthcare Partners, Fresenius Medical Care, and LiberDi.

Funding

None.

Acknowledgments

The content of this article reflects the personal experience and views of the author and should not be considered medical advice or recommendations. The content does not reflect the views or opinions of the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) or JASN. Responsibility for the information and views expressed herein lies entirely with the author(s).

The author(s) acknowledge that the data used in this publication was obtained through the Ontario Renal Reporting System and the ORN COVID-19 Data Tracker, collected and provided by Ontario Health and Ontario Renal Network.

Dr. Jeffrey Perl thanks the home dialysis subcommitee of the ASN COVID-19 Response Team for their contributions to this article. Dr. Jeffrey Perl has received personal fees from Dialysis Clinics Incorporated and Otsuka, outside the submitted work.

Footnotes

  • Published online ahead of print. Publication date available at www.jasn.org.

  • Copyright © 2020 by the American Society of Nephrology

References

  1. ↵
    1. Trinh E,
    2. Chan CT,
    3. Perl J
    : Dialysis modality and survival: Done to death. Semin Dial 31: 315–324, 2018 pmid:29539161
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Corbett RW,
    2. Blakey S,
    3. Nitsch D,
    4. Loucaidou M,
    5. McLean A,
    6. Duncan N, et al
    .; West London Renal and Transplant Centre: Epidemiology of COVID-19 in an urban dialysis center [published online ahead of print June 19, 2020]. J Am Soc Nephrol doi:10.1681/ASN.2020040534pmid:32561681
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. UK Renal Registry
    : Weekly COVID-19 Surveillance Report for Renal Centres in the UK, Bristol, United Kingdom, UK Renal Registry, 2020
  4. ↵
    1. Devoe DJ,
    2. Wong B,
    3. James MT,
    4. Ravani P,
    5. Oliver MJ,
    6. Barnieh L, et al
    : Patient education and peritoneal dialysis modality selection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis 68: 422–433, 2016 pmid:27125246
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Iyasere OU,
    2. Brown EA,
    3. Johansson L,
    4. Huson L,
    5. Smee J,
    6. Maxwell AP, et al
    : Quality of life and physical function in older patients on dialysis: A comparison of assisted peritoneal dialysis with hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 11: 423–430, 2016 pmid:26712808
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Srivitana V,
    2. Liu F,
    3. Levine DM,
    4. Kalloo SD
    : Early use of telehealth in home dialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York city. Kidney360 1: 524–526, 2020
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Brown EA,
    2. Blake PG,
    3. Boudville N,
    4. Davies S,
    5. de Arteaga J,
    6. Dong J, et al
    : International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis practice recommendations: Prescribing high-quality goal-directed peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 40: 244–253, 2020 pmid:32063219
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Thomas A,
    2. Silver SA,
    3. Perl J,
    4. Freeman M,
    5. Slater JJ,
    6. Nash DM, et al
    : The frequency of routine blood sampling and patient outcomes among maintenance hemodialysis recipients. Am J Kidney Dis 75: 471–479, 2020 pmid:31732233
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Blake PG,
    2. Quinn RR,
    3. Oliver MJ
    : Peritoneal dialysis and the process of modality selection. Perit Dial Int 33: 233–241, 2013 pmid:23660605
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Rope RW,
    2. Pivert KA,
    3. Parker MG,
    4. Sozio SM,
    5. Merell SB
    : Education in nephrology fellowship: A survey-based needs assessment. J Am Soc Nephrol 28: 1983–1990, 2017 pmid:28428332
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Mehrotra R,
    2. Soohoo M,
    3. Rivara MB,
    4. Himmelfarb J,
    5. Cheung AK,
    6. Arah OA, et al
    : Racial and ethnic disparities in use of and outcomes with home dialysis in the United States. J Am Soc Nephrol 27: 2123–2134, 2016 pmid:26657565
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Manera KE,
    2. Johnson DW,
    3. Craig JC,
    4. Shen JI,
    5. Ruiz L,
    6. Wang AYM, et al
    : Patient and caregiver priorities for outcomes in peritoneal dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 74–83, 2019 pmid:26657565
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 31 (9)
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 31, Issue 9
September 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in JASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Increasing Peritoneal Dialysis Use in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Will It Go Viral?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Increasing Peritoneal Dialysis Use in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Will It Go Viral?
Edwina A. Brown, Jeffrey Perl
JASN Sep 2020, 31 (9) 1928-1930; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2020050729

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Increasing Peritoneal Dialysis Use in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Will It Go Viral?
Edwina A. Brown, Jeffrey Perl
JASN Sep 2020, 31 (9) 1928-1930; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2020050729
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosures
    • Funding
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Passage of the Comprehensive Immunosuppressive Drug Coverage for Kidney Transplant Patients Act—a Chance to Celebrate and Reflect
  • Separate and Unequal: Race-Based Algorithms and Implications for Nephrology
  • COVID-19 and Dialysis Patients: Unsolved Problems in Early 2021
Show more Perspectives

Cited By...

  • Mass Disasters and Burnout in Nephrology Personnel: From Earthquakes and Hurricanes to COVID-19 Pandemic
  • Management of COVID-19 in special populations with kidney disease
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • peritoneal dialysis
  • COVID-19
  • home dialysis

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Annual Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Resources
  • Editorial Fellowship Program
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • JASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About JASN
  • JASN Email Alerts
  • JASN Key Impact Information
  • JASN Podcasts
  • JASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1046-6673 Online ISSN - 1533-3450

Powered by HighWire