Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Article Collections
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Archives
    • Saved Searches
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Subscriptions
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Feedback
    • Reprints
    • Impact Factor
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • Article Collections
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Archives
    • Saved Searches
    • ASN Meeting Abstracts
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Subscriptions
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Alerts
    • Advertising
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Feedback
    • Reprints
    • Impact Factor
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Follow JASN on Twitter
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow JASN on RSS
  • Community Forum
Clinical Research
Open Access

In Patients with Membranous Lupus Nephritis, Exostosin-Positivity and Exostosin-Negativity Represent Two Different Phenotypes

Aishwarya Ravindran, Marta Casal Moura, Fernando C. Fervenza, Samih H. Nasr, Mariam P. Alexander, Mary E. Fidler, Loren P. Herrera Hernandez, Pingchuan Zhang, Joseph P. Grande, Lynn D. Cornell, Lou Ann Gross, Vivian Negron, Grace E. Jenson, Benjamin J. Madden, M. Cristine Charlesworth and Sanjeev Sethi
JASN March 2021, 32 (3) 695-706; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2020081181
Aishwarya Ravindran
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marta Casal Moura
2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fernando C. Fervenza
3Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fernando C. Fervenza
Samih H. Nasr
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mariam P. Alexander
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary E. Fidler
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Loren P. Herrera Hernandez
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pingchuan Zhang
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph P. Grande
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lynn D. Cornell
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lou Ann Gross
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vivian Negron
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Grace E. Jenson
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin J. Madden
4Medical Genome Facility, Proteomics Core, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Cristine Charlesworth
4Medical Genome Facility, Proteomics Core, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sanjeev Sethi
1Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Sanjeev Sethi
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Study cohort of membranous lupus nephritis. Membranous lupus nephritis is categorized into EXT1/EXT2-positive and EXT1/EXT-2 negative cohorts, which are further subcategorized with and without proliferative features.

  • Figure 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 2.

    Light microscopy and immunohistochemistry (IHC) of EXT1/EXT2-positive LMN. (A–C) Top panel showing pure class 5 LMN, and (D–F) bottom panel showing class 5 LMN with class 3 proliferative LN. (B and E) IHC for EXT1 (×40 magnification). (C and F) IHC for EXT2 (×40 magnification).

  • Figure 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 3.

    Light microscopy and immunohistochemistry (IHC) of EXT1/EXT2-negative LMN. (A–C) Top panel showing pure class 5 LMN, (D–F) and bottom panel showing class 5 LMN with class 3 proliferative LN. (B and E) IHC for EXT1 (×40 magnification). (C and F) IHC for EXT2 (×40 magnification).

  • Figure 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 4.

    Cumulative incidence of ESKD in patients with LMN. Kaplan-Meier plots of the cumulative incidence of ESKD over 10 years. (A) EXT1/EXT2-positive and EXT1/EXT2-negative LMN (with or without class 3/4 LN): 64 EXT1/EXT2-positive versus 96 EXT1/EXT2-negative LMN; two versus 18 events; P=0.007. (B) EXT1/EXT2-positive and EXT1/EXT2-negative pure class 5 LMN (with no class 3/4 LN): 48 EXT1/EXT2-positive versus 65 EXT1/EXT2-negative LMN; two versus 11 events; P=0.08. (C) EXT1/EXT2-positive and EXT1/EXT2-negative class 5 LMN with class 3/4 LN: 16 EXT1/EXT2-positive versus 31 EXT1/EXT2-negative LMN; zero versus seven events; P=0.03.

  • Figure 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 5.

    Schematic of EXT1/EXT2-positive and EXT1/EXT2-negative LMN. (A) EXT1/EXT2-negative LMN. There is no increased secretion of EXT1/EXT2 into the glomerular basement membrane (GBM). (B and C) EXT1/EXT2-positive LMN. (B) In EXT1/EXT2-positive LMN, there is increased secretion of the catalytic domain of exostosin into the GBM that is part of the immune complexes. (C) EXT1/EXT2 generate more heparan sulfates in the GBM and those coating the immune complexes. Red circle indicates exostosin, blue lines indicate increased expression of heparan sulfates in the GBM and around the deposits, green indicates immune complexes, and dashed lines indicate GBMs. C, catalytic domain of exostosin; P, podocyte; S, stalk.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Clinicopathologic features of EXT1/EXT2-positive and EXT1/EXT2-negative LMN

    VariableEXT1/EXT2-Positive, n=122EXT1/EXT2-Negative, n=252P Valuea
    Age, yrMedian: 32Median: 350.01
    IQR: 25–41IQR: 27–45
    SexMale: 16 (13.1%)Male: 47 (18.7%)0.18
    Female: 106 (86.9%)Female: 205 (81.3%)
    SCr at presentation, mg/dlMedian: 0.8Median: 0.90.02
    IQR: 0.6–1.2; n=112IQR: 0.7–1.4; n=227
    Proteinuria at presentation, g/24 hMedian: 3.5Median: 30.08
    IQR: 2–6.6; n=95IQR: 1.8–4.8; n=199
    Proteinuria ≥3.5 g/d at presentation57 (60%); n=9587 (43.7%); n=1990.009
    Hematuria41 (33.6%)87 (34.5%)0.86
    Other autoimmune disease32 (26.2%)47 (18.7%)0.09
    Sclerosed glomeruli, %Median: 3.8Median: 9.10.001
    IQR: 0–12.1IQR: 0–24.8
    IFTA, %Median: 0Median: 10<0.001
    IQR: 0–10IQR: 5–20
    Proliferative features on light microscopy30 (24. 6%)81 (32.1%)0.13
    Immunofluorescence (glomerular staining)Total cases with immunofluorescence (n=118)Total cases with immunofluorescence (n=244)—
    IgG: 2–3+ (n=118, 100%)IgG (n=244, 100%):
    IgA (n=89, 75.4%);trace (n=3);
    trace (n=17);1+ (n=8);
    1+ (n=22);2–3+ (233)
    2–3+ (50)IgA (n=186, 76.2%):
    IgM (n=103, 87.3%):trace (n=35);
    trace (n=23);1+ (n=53);
    1+ (n=32);2–3+ (98)
    2–3+ (48)IgM (n=220, 90.2%):
    C1q (n=107, 90.7%):trace (n=27);
    trace (n=18);1+ (n=75);
    1+ (n=20);2–3+ (118)
    2–3+ (69)C1q (n=216, 88.5%):
    C3 (n=117, 99.2%):trace (n=38);
    trace (n=2);1+ (n=39);
    1+ (n=6);2–3+ (139)
    2–3+ (109)C3 (n=238, 97.5%):
    κ light chain (n=118, 100%):trace (n=11);
    trace (n=3);1+ (n=29);
    1+ (n=8);2–3+ (198)
    2–3+ (107)κ light chain (n=241, 98.8%):
    λ light chain (n=118, 100%):trace (n=12);
    trace (n=1);1+ (n=31);
    1+ (n=1);2–3+ (198)
    2–3+ (116)λ light chain (n=241, 98.8%):
    trace (n=10);
    1+ (n=22);
    2–3+ (209)
    Electron microscopySubepithelial deposits: 122 (100%), of which 62 (50.8%) also had intramembranous depositsSubepithelial deposits: 250 (99.2%), of which 153 (61.2%) also had intramembranous deposits—
    Mesangial/paramesangial deposits: 116 (95.1%)Intramembranous deposits only: 2 (0.8%)
    Subendothelial deposits: 71 (58.2%)Mesangial/paramesangial deposits: 239 (94.8%)
    Tubuloreticular inclusions: 107 (87.7%)Subendothelial deposits: 146 (57.9%)
    Tubuloreticular inclusions: 199 (79.0%)
    • ↵a P<0.05 is considered significant.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Electron microscopy class on the basis of the Ehrenreich and Churg classification

    Ehrenreich and Churg ClassificationEXT1/EXT2-Negative, n=252 (67.4%)EXT1/EXT2-Positive, n=122 (32.6%)P Valuea
    19 (3.6%)8 (6.6%)0.19
    272 (28.6%)58 (47.5%)<0.001
    3167 (66.3%)56 (45.9%)<0.001
    43 (1.2%)0 (0.0%)0.23
    • ↵a P<0.05 is considered significant.

    • View popup
    Table 3.

    Chronicity findings in LMN on rebiopsy

    CaseGlomeruli/SclerosedIFTA, %Follow-Up, yrRebiopsy: Glomeruli/SclerosedRebiopsy: IFTA, %
    117/1 (5.9%)0217/2 (11.8%)0
    210/0 (0%)0226/0 (0%)0
    33/0 (0%)01042/2 (4.8%)0
    47/0 (0%)0742/19 (45.2%)25
    • Cases 1–3 are EXT1/EXT2-positive LMN and case 4 is EXT1/EXT2-negative LMN.

    • View popup
    Table 4.

    Clinical characteristics, follow-up, and outcomes of EXT1/EXT2-positive and EXT1/EXT2-negative LMN, with and without LN (combined class 5 LMN with or without class 3/4 LN)

    VariableEXT1/EXT2-Positive LMN, n=64/122 (52.5%)EXT1/EXT2-Negative LMN, n=96/252 (38.1%)P Valuea
    Age at presentation, median (IQR), yr33 (25–42)38 (28–47)0.10
    Female, n (%)57 (89.1)75 (78.1)0.07
    SCr at presentation, median (IQR), mg/dl0.80 (0.60–1.00), n=610.90 (0.70–1.40), n=890.004
    Proteinuria at presentation, median (IQR), g/24 h3.9 (1.6–6.7) n=533.0 (1.5–4.9), n=760.3
    Proteinuria at presentation ≥3.5/d, n (%)32 (60.4), n=5333 (43.4), n=760.06
    Hematuria, n (%)19 (29.7)35 (36.5)0.38
    Proliferative features, n (%)16 (25.0)31 (32.3)0.32
    Other autoimmune diseases, n (%)19 (29.7)22 (22.9)0.34
    Sclerosed glomeruli, median (IQR), %0.0 (0.0–10.2)13.2 (1.82–25.0)<0.001
    IFTA, median (IQR), %0.0 (0.0–0.0)10.0 (5.0–20.0)<0.001
    SCr at end of follow-up, median (IQR), mg/dl0.90 (0.70–1.20), n=511.10 (0.70–1.60), n=710.05
    Proteinuria at end of follow-up, median (IQR), g/24 h0.85 (0.20–2.00), n=360.90 (0.25–2.35), n=570.89
    Proteinuria at end of follow-up ≥3.5/d, n (%)3 (8.3), n=369 (15.8), n=570.3
    ESKD, n (%)2 (3.1)18 (18.8)0.003
    Death, n (%)2 (3.1)8 (8.3)0.18
    Time of follow-up, median (IQR), mo48.6 (33.1–76.5)50.6 (32.7–86.8)0.85
    • ↵a P<0.05 is considered significant.

    • View popup
    Table 5.

    Clinical characteristics, follow-up, and outcomes of EXT1/EXT2-positive and EXT1/EXT2-negative LMN without proliferative features (pure class 5)

    VariableEXT1/EXT2-Positive LMN, n=48/64 (75.0%)EXT1/EXT2-Negative LMN, n=65/96 (67.7%)P Valuea
    Age at presentation, median (IQR), yr33 (25–42)40 (28–47)0.12
    Female, n (%)42 (87.5)53 (81.5)0.39
    SCr at presentation, median (IQR), mg/dl0.70 (0.60–0.90), n=460.80 (0.60–1.30), n=580.01
    Proteinuria at presentation, median (IQR), g/24 h3.5 (1.5–5.9), n=402.8 (1.40–4.3), n=510.23
    Proteinuria at presentation ≥3.5/d, n (%)23 (57.5), n=4018 (35.3), n=510.04
    Hematuria, n (%)15 (31.3)22 (33.8)0.77
    Other autoimmune diseases, n (%)14 (29.2)15 (23.1)0.46
    Sclerosed glomeruli, median (IQR), %0.0 (0.0–8.5)9.5 (0.0–24.4)<0.001
    IFTA, median (IQR), %0.0 (0.0–0.0)10.0 (5.0–25.0)<0.001
    SCr at end of follow-up, median (IQR), mg/dl0.85 (0.70–1.13), n=381.00 (0.70–1.57), n=510.09
    Proteinuria at end of follow-up, median (IQR), g/24 h0.95 (0.20–2.55), n=260.90 (0.20–1.93), n=420.46
    Proteinuria at end of follow-up ≥3.5/d, n (%)3 (11.5), n=266 (14.3), n=420.75
    ESKD, n (%)2 (4.2)11 (16.9)0.04
    Death, n (%)2 (4.2)2 (3.1)0.76
    Time of follow-up, median (IQR), mo52.5 (31.6–81.2)53.6 (34.2–97.1)0.61
    • ↵a P<0.05 is considered significant.

    • View popup
    Table 6.

    Clinical characteristics, follow-up, and outcomes of all EXT1/EXT2-positive and EXT1/EXT2-negative LMN with proliferative features (class 5 with class 3/4 LN)

    VariableEXT1/EXT2-Positive LMN, n=16/64 (25.0%)EXT1/EXT2-Negative LMN, n=31/96 (32.3%)P Valuea
    Age at presentation, median (IQR), yr32 (25–43)33 (28–47)0.39
    Female, n (%)15 (93.8)22 (71.0)0.07
    SCr at presentation, median (IQR), mg/dl1.0 (0.8–2.0), n=151.20 (0.8–2.3), n=310.35
    Proteinuria at presentation, median (IQR), g/24 h6.6 (1.5–7.9), n=133.7 (1.7–6.5), n=250.48
    Proteinuria at presentation ≥3.5/d, n (%)9 (69.2), n=1315 (60), n=250.58
    Hematuria, n (%)4 (25.0)13 (41.9)0.25
    Other autoimmune diseases, n (%)5 (31.3)7 (22.6)0.52
    Sclerosed glomeruli, median (IQR), %4.6 (0.0–12.5)20.0 (3.22–27.8)0.01
    IFTA, median (IQR), %0.0 (0.0–8.75)10.0 (5.0–20.0)0.003
    SCr at end of follow-up, median (IQR), mg/dl0.90 (0.8–1.5), n=131.30 (0.70–1.9), n=200.32
    Proteinuria at end of follow-up, median (IQR), g/24 h0.60 (0.20–1.25), n=101.5 (0.30–3.40), n=150.12
    Proteinuria at end of follow-up ≥3.5/d, n (%)0 (0.0), n=103 (20.0), n=150.13
    ESKD, n (%)0 (0.0)7 (22.6)0.04
    Death, n (%)0 (0.0)6 (19.4)0.06
    Time of follow-up, median (IQR), mo48.6 (43.0–76.3)43.4 (27.1–77.9)0.27
    • ↵a P<0.05 is considered significant.

    • View popup
    Table 7.

    Multivariable analysis of predictive factors for ESKD at 10 years

    FactorsUnivariable Cox RegressionMultivariable Cox Regression
    HR (95% CI)P ValueaHR (95% CI)P Valuea
    Combined class 5 LMN with or without class 3/4 LN
     Age0.97 (0.94 to 1.01)0.21
     Male2.82 (1.12 to 7.08)0.032.92 (1.16 to 7.34)0.02
     EXT1/EXT2-negative5.85 (1.36 to 25.24)0.02
     SCr at presentation1.36 (1.10 to 1.69)0.004
     Proteinuria at presentation0.96 (0.83 to 1.11)0.58
     Hematuria1.15 (0.66 to 1.98)0.63
     Other autoimmune diseases1.08 (0.39 to 2.97)0.88
     ≥25% glomerulosclerosis3.93 (1.63 to 9.47)0.0024.03 (1.67 to 19.71)0.002
     ≥25% IFTA4.23 (1.74 to 10.28)0.001
    Only class 5 LMN (without class 3/4 LN)
     Age0.99 (0.95 to 1.04)0.67
     Male2.35 (0.72 to 7.70)0.16
     EXT1/EXT2-negative3.56 (0.79 to 16.08)0.1
     SCr at presentation1.27 (0.9 to 1.81)0.18
     Proteinuria at presentation1.02 (0.91 to 1.15)0.77
     Hematuria1.40 (0.66 to 2.99)0.38
     Other autoimmune diseases1.29 (0.4 to 4.18)0.68
     ≥25% glomerulosclerosis4.31 (1.44 to 12.88)0.009
     ≥25% IFTA3.91 (1.31 to 11.73)0.02
    Class 5 LMN with class 3/4 LN
     Age0.93 (0.84 to 1.04)0.20
     Male6.33 (1.03 to 38.8)0.058.35 (1.11 to 62.60)0.04
     EXT1/EXT2-negative————
     SCr at presentation1.40 (1.02 to 1.92)0.041.53 (1.04 to 2.25)0.03
     Proteinuria at presentation0.21 (0.02 to 3.04)0.25
     Hematuria0.73 (0.30 to 1.75)0.48
     Other autoimmune diseases0.85 (0.1 to 7.50)0.88
     ≥25% glomerulosclerosis2.52 (0.55 to 11.50)2.52
     ≥25% IFTA6.36 (1.27 to 31.80)0.02
    • ↵a P<0.05 is considered significant.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 32 (3)
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 32, Issue 3
March 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in JASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Patients with Membranous Lupus Nephritis, Exostosin-Positivity and Exostosin-Negativity Represent Two Different Phenotypes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In Patients with Membranous Lupus Nephritis, Exostosin-Positivity and Exostosin-Negativity Represent Two Different Phenotypes
Aishwarya Ravindran, Marta Casal Moura, Fernando C. Fervenza, Samih H. Nasr, Mariam P. Alexander, Mary E. Fidler, Loren P. Herrera Hernandez, Pingchuan Zhang, Joseph P. Grande, Lynn D. Cornell, Lou Ann Gross, Vivian Negron, Grace E. Jenson, Benjamin J. Madden, M. Cristine Charlesworth, Sanjeev Sethi
JASN Mar 2021, 32 (3) 695-706; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2020081181

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
In Patients with Membranous Lupus Nephritis, Exostosin-Positivity and Exostosin-Negativity Represent Two Different Phenotypes
Aishwarya Ravindran, Marta Casal Moura, Fernando C. Fervenza, Samih H. Nasr, Mariam P. Alexander, Mary E. Fidler, Loren P. Herrera Hernandez, Pingchuan Zhang, Joseph P. Grande, Lynn D. Cornell, Lou Ann Gross, Vivian Negron, Grace E. Jenson, Benjamin J. Madden, M. Cristine Charlesworth, Sanjeev Sethi
JASN Mar 2021, 32 (3) 695-706; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2020081181
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Funding
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Nephrology Fellow Training and Well-Being in the United States: A National Survey
  • Discovery and Validation of a Urinary Exosome mRNA Signature for the Diagnosis of Human Kidney Transplant Rejection
  • Kidney Function after Treatment for Childhood Cancer: A Report from the St. Jude Lifetime Cohort Study
Show more Clinical Research

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • Glomerular Exostosin Deposits in Membranous Lupus Nephritis—a Dialogue
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • membranous nephropathy
  • renal biopsy
  • lupus nephritis

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Annual Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Resources
  • Editorial Fellowship Program
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • JASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About JASN
  • JASN Email Alerts
  • JASN Key Impact Information
  • JASN Podcasts
  • JASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe

© 2021 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1046-6673 Online ISSN - 1533-3450

Powered by HighWire