Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Article Collections
    • Archives
    • Kidney Week Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Fellowship
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Impact Factor
    • Reprints
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Other
    • ASN Publications
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
American Society of Nephrology
  • Other
    • ASN Publications
    • CJASN
    • Kidney360
    • Kidney News Online
    • American Society of Nephrology
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Advertisement
American Society of Nephrology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Published Ahead of Print
    • Current Issue
    • JASN Podcasts
    • Article Collections
    • Archives
    • Kidney Week Abstracts
    • Saved Searches
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Resources
  • Editorial Team
  • Editorial Fellowship
    • Editorial Fellowship Team
    • Editorial Fellowship Application Process
  • More
    • About JASN
    • Advertising
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Impact Factor
    • Reprints
    • Subscriptions
  • ASN Kidney News
  • Follow JASN on Twitter
  • Visit ASN on Facebook
  • Follow JASN on RSS
  • Community Forum
Clinical Research
You have accessRestricted Access

The Trifecta Study: Comparing Plasma Levels of Donor-derived Cell-Free DNA with the Molecular Phenotype of Kidney Transplant Biopsies

Philip F. Halloran, Jeff Reeve, Katelynn S. Madill-Thomsen, Zachary Demko, Adam Prewett, Paul Billings and the Trifecta Investigators
JASN February 2022, 33 (2) 387-400; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2021091191
Philip F. Halloran
1Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Center, Edmonton, Canada
2Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
3Transcriptome Sciences Inc., Edmonton, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Philip F. Halloran
Jeff Reeve
1Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Center, Edmonton, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katelynn S. Madill-Thomsen
1Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Center, Edmonton, Canada
3Transcriptome Sciences Inc., Edmonton, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zachary Demko
4Natera, San Carlos, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Adam Prewett
4Natera, San Carlos, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Billings
4Natera, San Carlos, California
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Paul Billings
  • Article
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Significance Statement

Plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) measured as a percent of total cfDNA (dd-cfDNA[%]) has been proposed as a screening test for kidney transplant rejection. The prospective Trifecta study examined relationships between dd-cfDNA(%) measured at the time of indication biopsy and the genome-wide molecular findings in 300 biopsies from kidney transplant recipients assessed by microarrays. The dd-cfDNA(%) correlated with active rejection in the biopsy, and molecular scores predicted dd-cfDNA(%) ≥1.0% better than histologic scores. The top transcripts in the biopsy correlating with dd-cfDNA(%) were related to IFN-γ effects and natural killer cells. AKI and atrophy fibrosis were associated with mildly elevated dd-cfDNA(%), although some biopsies with high dd-cfDNA(%) revealed no rejection. These findings indicate that plasma dd-cfDNA levels are strongly related to the active molecular rejection processes in indication biopsies.

Abstract

Background The relationship between the donor-derived cell-free DNA fraction (dd-cfDNA[%]) in plasma in kidney transplant recipients at time of indication biopsy and gene expression in the biopsied allograft has not been defined.

Methods In the prospective, multicenter Trifecta study, we collected tissue from 300 biopsies from 289 kidney transplant recipients to compare genome-wide gene expression in biopsies with dd-cfDNA(%) in corresponding plasma samples drawn just before biopsy. Rejection was assessed with the microarray-based Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System using automatically assigned rejection archetypes and molecular report sign-outs, and histology assessments that followed Banff guidelines.

Results The median time of biopsy post-transplantation was 455 days (5 days to 32 years), with a case mix similar to that of previous studies: 180 (60%) no rejection, 89 (30%) antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), and 31 (10%) T cell–mediated rejection (TCMR) and mixed. In genome-wide mRNA measurements, all 20 top probe sets correlating with dd-cfDNA(%) were previously annotated for association with ABMR and all types of rejection, either natural killer (NK) cell–expressed (e.g., GNLY, CCL4, TRDC, and S1PR5) or IFN-γ–inducible (e.g., PLA1A, IDO1, CXCL11, and WARS). Among gene set and classifier scores, dd-cfDNA(%) correlated very strongly with ABMR and all types of rejection, reasonably strongly with active TCMR, and weakly with inactive TCMR, kidney injury, and atrophy fibrosis. Active ABMR, mixed, and active TCMR had the highest dd-cfDNA(%), whereas dd-cfDNA(%) was lower in late-stage ABMR and less-active TCMR. By multivariate random forests and logistic regression, molecular rejection variables predicted dd-cfDNA(%) better than histologic variables.

Conclusions The dd-cfDNA(%) at time of indication biopsy strongly correlates with active molecular rejection and has the potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies.

Clinical Trial registration number: NCT04239703

  • cell-free DNA
  • rejection
  • transplantation
  • microarrays
  • genomics
  • biopsy
  • blood donors
  • phenotype
  • Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology
View Full Text

If you are:

  • an ASN member, select the "ASN Member" login button. 
  • an individual subscriber, login with you User Name and Password.
  • an Institutional user, select the Institution option where you will be presented with a list of Shibboleth federations. If you do not see your federation, contact publications@asn-online.org. 

ASN MEMBER LOGIN

ASN MEMBER LOGIN

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.

Purchase access

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 1 day for US$34.00

In order to get access to the article, you must have an account.  If you have an account, enter your user name and password into the boxes above. If you do not have an account, follow the instructions below to create one.  Once you have purchased the article, you will have access to it for 24 hours.  

Steps for Creating an Account:

Click the "Purchase Access" button.  The page will redisplay with the following message at the top of the screen. In the message, click to create an account. 

When you create the account, you will be asked to register a user name, email address and you will need to create a password that is at least eight characters in length.  You do not need an ASN Member number to complete the form. As you move through the registration page, you will have to verify you are a person by completing a Captcha request.   Lastly, your first and last name will be required. 

Once your information is successfully saved, the system will redisplay the home page of the journal.  From there, navigate back to the article to purchase.  Select the article and at the bottom of the page, use the credentials you just created to login. The article will be added to your shopping cart.  You can continue to navigate across JASN and CJASN adding to your cart from both journals. When you are ready to complete your purchse, select the Shopping Cart from the upper right hand corner of the page and follow the onscreen instructions. 

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: 33 (2)
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Vol. 33, Issue 2
February 2022
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Index by author
View Selected Citations (0)
Print
Download PDF
Sign up for Alerts
Email Article
Thank you for your help in sharing the high-quality science in JASN.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Trifecta Study: Comparing Plasma Levels of Donor-derived Cell-Free DNA with the Molecular Phenotype of Kidney Transplant Biopsies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Society of Nephrology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Society of Nephrology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Trifecta Study: Comparing Plasma Levels of Donor-derived Cell-Free DNA with the Molecular Phenotype of Kidney Transplant Biopsies
Philip F. Halloran, Jeff Reeve, Katelynn S. Madill-Thomsen, Zachary Demko, Adam Prewett, Paul Billings, the Trifecta Investigators
JASN Feb 2022, 33 (2) 387-400; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2021091191

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The Trifecta Study: Comparing Plasma Levels of Donor-derived Cell-Free DNA with the Molecular Phenotype of Kidney Transplant Biopsies
Philip F. Halloran, Jeff Reeve, Katelynn S. Madill-Thomsen, Zachary Demko, Adam Prewett, Paul Billings, the Trifecta Investigators
JASN Feb 2022, 33 (2) 387-400; DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2021091191
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Funding
    • Acknowledgments
    • Data Sharing Statement
    • Supplemental Material
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data Supps
  • Info & Metrics
  • View PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Albuminuria-Lowering Effect of Dapagliflozin, Eplerenone, and their Combination in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized Cross-Over Clinical Trial
  • Kidney Biopsy Features Most Predictive of Clinical Outcomes in the Spectrum of Minimal Change Disease and Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis
  • Molecular Characterization of Membranous Nephropathy
Show more Clinical Research

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Related Articles

  • Comparing Plasma Donor-Derived Cell-free DNA to Indication Kidney Biopsy Tissue Gene Expression: Toward Understanding the Molecular Equivalents of Non-Invasive Tests
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Keywords

  • cell-free DNA
  • rejection
  • transplantation
  • microarrays
  • genomics
  • biopsy
  • blood donors
  • phenotype

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Early Access
  • Subject Collections
  • Article Archive
  • ASN Annual Meeting Abstracts

Information for Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Author Resources
  • Editorial Fellowship Program
  • ASN Journal Policies
  • Reuse/Reprint Policy

About

  • JASN
  • ASN
  • ASN Journals
  • ASN Kidney News

Journal Information

  • About JASN
  • JASN Email Alerts
  • JASN Key Impact Information
  • JASN Podcasts
  • JASN RSS Feeds
  • Editorial Board

More Information

  • Advertise
  • ASN Podcasts
  • ASN Publications
  • Become an ASN Member
  • Feedback
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Password/Email Address Changes
  • Subscribe to ASN Journals

© 2022 American Society of Nephrology

Print ISSN - 1046-6673 Online ISSN - 1533-3450

Powered by HighWire